View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
toad455
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 22478 Location: NJ
Back to top |
|
stever
Joined: 16 Nov 2004 Posts: 6918 Location: https://womensbasketballdaily.net
Back to top |
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 11:57 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Both sites project Indiana to take Lauren Cox with the #1 pick. Cox would be a perfect fit next to McCowan and could be the PF replacement for Candice Dupree (should she retire or move on).
Is Cox the best player available, however? Is Ionescu the best player in the draft? Both fair questions. The positional fit, however, is great, as High Post Hoops noted.
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 12:00 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
CamrnCrz1974 wrote: |
Duke's Leaonna Odom was a top ten player coming out of high school who has not developed or reached her potential under Joanne P. McCallie.
I expect her to be a steal for the 2020 draft, as she will become a much better pro with the right coaching. |
And I still believe this to be true.
|
|
PUmatty
Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 16385 Location: Chicago
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 12:15 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
CamrnCrz1974 wrote: |
Both sites project Indiana to take Lauren Cox with the #1 pick. Cox would be a perfect fit next to McCowan and could be the PF replacement for Candice Dupree (should she retire or move on).
Is Cox the best player available, however? Is Ionescu the best player in the draft? Both fair questions. The positional fit, however, is great, as High Post Hoops noted. |
If Ionescu gets the No. 1 pick and wants Cox, they have to trade it to whoever has the No. 2. You can't just pass on a consensus No. 1 pick because of positional needs. NY, for example, would need to give something up to get Ionescu, not just be able to take the best player in the draft at No. 2 for free.
The unfortunate thing for by NY and Indiana in this scenario is that it is difficult to find a player on NY's roster outside of Nurse and Charles worth trading for.
That said, I am far from sold on the idea that Indiana should take Cox over Ionescu. If Ionescu truly is a generational player, you take her and figure it out. She could play alongside Mitchell or Wheeler, to give you a nice three-guard rotation, for example. Or jettison some players and build around the Ionescu/McCowan combo.
You wouldn't pass on Diana Taurasi just because you already have some guards on your roster.
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 12:17 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
PUmatty wrote: |
That said, I am far from sold on the idea that Indiana should take Cox over Ionescu. If Ionescu truly is a generational player, you take her and figure it out. She could play alongside Mitchell or Wheeler, to give you a nice three-guard rotation, for example. Or jettison some players and build around the Ionescu/McCowan combo.
You wouldn't pass on Diana Taurasi just because you already have some guards on your roster. |
But that is the question, isn't it?
Is Ionescu a generational player? Or is she a better version of Kelsey Plum?
|
|
PUmatty
Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 16385 Location: Chicago
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 12:52 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
CamrnCrz1974 wrote: |
PUmatty wrote: |
That said, I am far from sold on the idea that Indiana should take Cox over Ionescu. If Ionescu truly is a generational player, you take her and figure it out. She could play alongside Mitchell or Wheeler, to give you a nice three-guard rotation, for example. Or jettison some players and build around the Ionescu/McCowan combo.
You wouldn't pass on Diana Taurasi just because you already have some guards on your roster. |
But that is the question, isn't it?
Is Ionescu a generational player? Or is she a better version of Kelsey Plum? |
It is. And I don't know. Ever since Angie Welle, I try not to make predictions.
If Indiana does get the No. 1 pick, I don't trust Pokey to make the decision.
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 67125 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 1:03 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
PUmatty wrote: |
CamrnCrz1974 wrote: |
PUmatty wrote: |
That said, I am far from sold on the idea that Indiana should take Cox over Ionescu. If Ionescu truly is a generational player, you take her and figure it out. She could play alongside Mitchell or Wheeler, to give you a nice three-guard rotation, for example. Or jettison some players and build around the Ionescu/McCowan combo.
You wouldn't pass on Diana Taurasi just because you already have some guards on your roster. |
But that is the question, isn't it?
Is Ionescu a generational player? Or is she a better version of Kelsey Plum? |
It is. And I don't know. Ever since Angie Welle, I try not to make predictions.
If Indiana does get the No. 1 pick, I don't trust Pokey to make the decision. |
Pokey's draft history is pretty good.
_________________ I'm sick and tired of the stories that you always tell
Shakespeare couldn't tell a story that well
See, you're the largest liar that was ever created
You and Pinocchio are probably related
Full of criss-crossed fits, you lie all the time
Your tongue should be embarrassed, you're a threat to mankind
|
|
Stormeo
Joined: 14 Jul 2019 Posts: 4701
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 1:03 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Personally I'm hoping for 1. New York 2. Dallas 3. Indiana 4. Atlanta
New York would finally get a #1 pick and select the highly-marketable "triple-double queen" Ionescu, even if she never gets one in the W, in a year where they start fresh at a new building and likely a new coach
Dallas would get hometown star Cox
Indiana could choose two-way SF Kaila Charles since that is where it needs an upgrade the most (still wondering how Vivians will recover for next year) or go with a backup post in Hebard/Mompremier
At #4, it wouldn't be the biggest reach to go with Dangerfield for Atlanta, or hope Chennedy Carter declares and is still available; this team needs better guards
|
|
Randy
Joined: 08 Oct 2011 Posts: 10911
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 1:15 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
If history is any guide, Dream will probably trade the pick. Badly. I don't think they want to spend money on scouting.
|
|
toad455
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 22478 Location: NJ
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 1:28 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Dream trade the #4 pick in the 2020 draft to Seattle for the rights to Romu Tokashiki & their the third round pick?
_________________ LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!
Twitter: @TBRBWAY
|
|
Stormeo
Joined: 14 Jul 2019 Posts: 4701
Back to top |
|
Shades
Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 63938
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 2:28 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
toad455 wrote: |
Dream trade the #4 pick in the 2020 draft to Seattle for the rights to Romu Tokashiki & their the third round pick? |
Yes, the rights to Tokashiki are so highly coveted that somebody will trade a lottery pick for her. That’s similar to the Lynx trading the rights to Cruz (who hasn’t played for them in awhile) for a lottery pick. If Reeve can pull that off, SpaceJunkie would probably lay rose pedals for her.
_________________ Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
|
|
ClayK
Joined: 11 Oct 2005 Posts: 11222
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 2:32 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I think Cox has a higher floor and lower ceiling than Ionescu -- though Cox's ceiling could be awfully high. She's a made-to-order professional power forward ...
Sabrina has weaknesses that may be exploitable at the next level. But she may also have strengths that more than offset those weaknesses.
Of course, both need to stay healthy, and that's far from a given.
_________________ Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
|
|
toad455
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 22478 Location: NJ
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 3:03 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I do find it odd that Megdal posted his new mock less than an hour after Draftsite posted theirs. Megdal's mock are usually off anyways.
_________________ LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!
Twitter: @TBRBWAY
|
|
PUmatty
Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 16385 Location: Chicago
Back to top |
Posted: 08/05/19 3:50 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Stormeo wrote: |
Personally I'm hoping for 1. New York 2. Dallas 3. Indiana 4. Atlanta
New York would finally get a #1 pick and select the highly-marketable "triple-double queen" Ionescu, even if she never gets one in the W, in a year where they start fresh at a new building and likely a new coach
Dallas would get hometown star Cox
Indiana could choose two-way SF Kaila Charles since that is where it needs an upgrade the most (still wondering how Vivians will recover for next year) or go with a backup post in Hebard/Mompremier
At #4, it wouldn't be the biggest reach to go with Dangerfield for Atlanta, or hope Chennedy Carter declares and is still available; this team needs better guards |
The Fever get screwed like that in the draft again, I might never watch the league again.
|
|
Shades
Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 63938
Back to top |
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 08/06/19 1:20 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
^^ I am guessing that is Tiana Mangakahia (Syracuse), who recently began treatment for breast cancer.
|
|
Shades
Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 63938
Back to top |
Posted: 08/06/19 8:49 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Two-year record tallies as of 8/06/19
SEA 38-19
CON 37-19
WAS 37-19
LAS 32-23
PHX 31-25
MIN 29-27
LVA 29-28
ATL 28-29|11 games remaining. Current 10.4% chance at #1; 14.5% chance at #2
CHI 25-30
DAL 21-35|12 games remaining. Current 17.8% chance at #1; 23.0% chance at #2
NYL 15-40|13 games remaining. Current 27.6% chance at #1; 31.0% chance at #2
IND 14-43|11 games remaining. Current 44.2% chance at #1; 31.5% chance at #2
Current lottery team
_________________ Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
|
|
Shades
Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 63938
Back to top |
Posted: 08/13/19 3:23 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Two-year record tallies as of 8/12/19
SEA 40-19
WAS 39-19
CON 37-21
LAS 34-23
PHX 31-26
MIN 30-28
LVA 30-29
ATL 28-30 | 10 games remaining. Current 10.4% chance at #1; 14.5% chance at #2
CHI 27-31
DAL 22-36 | 10 games remaining. Current 17.8% chance at #1; 23.0% chance at #2
NYL 15-42| 11 games remaining. Current 27.6% chance at #1; 31.0% chance at #2
IND 15-44 | 9 games remaining. Current 44.2% chance at #1; 31.5% chance at #2
Current lottery team
_________________ Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
|
|
5thmantheme
Joined: 11 Apr 2016 Posts: 540
Back to top |
Posted: 08/13/19 3:52 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
The Libs and the Fever could both super tank, and end up with the same record. Who holds the tie-breaker?
And at the other end the Libs could win 10 straight to get into the playoffs, and the Merc could super-tank (cough) down into the lottery.
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 67125 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 08/13/19 3:55 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
5thmantheme wrote: |
And at the other end the Libs could win 10 straight to get into the playoffs, and the Merc could super-tank (cough) down into the lottery. |
Nobody is mathematically eliminated yet and probably won't be until next week. We should have some teams clinching spots soon.
_________________ I'm sick and tired of the stories that you always tell
Shakespeare couldn't tell a story that well
See, you're the largest liar that was ever created
You and Pinocchio are probably related
Full of criss-crossed fits, you lie all the time
Your tongue should be embarrassed, you're a threat to mankind
|
|
Richyyy
Joined: 17 Nov 2005 Posts: 24408 Location: London
Back to top |
Posted: 08/13/19 4:17 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
5thmantheme wrote: |
The Libs and the Fever could both super tank, and end up with the same record. Who holds the tie-breaker? |
Indiana are 2-0 'up' with two still to play. Silly Fever, beating New York twice right at the start of the season and then winning three of their last four to start 'catching' New York in the standings. All those Candice Dupree minutes and they still might not hold on to the #1 seed. |
|
5thmantheme
Joined: 11 Apr 2016 Posts: 540
Back to top |
Posted: 08/13/19 6:19 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Thanks both.
Still plenty of drama to be had this year.
|
|
PUmatty
Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 16385 Location: Chicago
Back to top |
Posted: 08/13/19 6:22 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Richyyy wrote: |
5thmantheme wrote: |
The Libs and the Fever could both super tank, and end up with the same record. Who holds the tie-breaker? |
Indiana are 2-0 'up' with two still to play. Silly Fever, beating New York twice right at the start of the season and then winning three of their last four to start 'catching' New York in the standings. All those Candice Dupree minutes and they still might not hold on to the #1 seed. |
Last year, the Fever were a game below NY, so if they tie this year, Fever have the most balls due to the two-year record.
|
|
|
|