View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 18815
Back to top |
|
cthskzfn
Joined: 21 Nov 2004 Posts: 12851 Location: In a world where a PSYCHOpath like Trump isn't potus.
Back to top |
Posted: 10/27/05 12:19 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
ah, my yearly cue...
nothing SILLIER than PREseason awards!
|
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 18815
Back to top |
Posted: 10/27/05 12:21 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
cthskzfn wrote: |
ah, my yearly cue...
nothing SILLIER than PREseason awards! |
you're late; I already has a "fight" with Vandy about the uselessness of pre-season polls except for fun.
|
|
VandyWhit
Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 897
Back to top |
Posted: 10/27/05 12:29 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Quote: |
you're late; I already has a "fight" with Vandy about the uselessness of pre-season polls except for fun. |
Just a wee bit of revisionist history there.
|
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 18815
Back to top |
Posted: 10/27/05 12:31 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
VandyWhit wrote: |
Quote: |
you're late; I already has a "fight" with Vandy about the uselessness of pre-season polls except for fun. |
Just a wee bit of revisionist history there. |
unintentional if there was; what didn't I say correctly? I believe my words at the time were "I don't know why you get worked up about preseason polls. You gotta prove it on the court."
Am I wrong?
EDIT:
Ah yes, here it is....
http://boards.rebkell.net/viewtopic.php?t=7643
Last edited by dtsnms on 10/27/05 12:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
bballfan2005
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 25315 Location: Somewhere here and there
Back to top |
|
VandyWhit
Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 897
Back to top |
Posted: 10/27/05 12:41 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
DTS's recent statement:
Quote: |
I already has a "fight" with Vandy about the uselessness of pre-season polls except for fun |
Here's the thread with the referred to "fight".
http://boards.rebkell.net/viewtopic.php?t=7643&highlight=
I'll leave it to people to come to their own conclusions as to whether "revisionist history" has taken place.
|
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 18815
Back to top |
Posted: 10/27/05 12:44 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I revised my post to include the link already. And as I re-read it, I still nowhere said that someone who likes the polls is "inferior" as you said, and you still owe me an apology for it.
|
|
VandyWhit
Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 897
Back to top |
Posted: 10/27/05 12:54 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Quote: |
I revised my post to include the link already. And as I re-read it, I still nowhere said that someone who likes the polls is "inferior" as you said, and you still owe me an apology for it. |
I didn't say that you said that someone who likes the polls is 'inferior' as you said I said. I don't think I owe you an apology, so none will be forthcoming, so it's pointless for you to keep asking. I'm sure that you will find a way to go on with your life anyway, however.
Again, if anybody is interested, they can draw their own conclusions.
|
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 18815
Back to top |
Posted: 10/27/05 1:01 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I'll leave it after this, but you did say in response to my statement:
Sure, they don't count in the standings, and no matter where you're ranked or not-ranked, you have to prove it all on the court. But a lot of people find them interesting. If you don't, it's fine, but that doesn't mean that other people are somehow inferior if they do.
|
|
VandyWhit
Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 897
Back to top |
|
|
|