RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Dear WNBA: say NO to Amazon
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
johnjohnW



Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1846



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/26/21 5:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Bob Lamm wrote:
norwester wrote:
It doesn’t matter if you boycott Amazon. They don’t make the majority of their money through their retail. Most of their profit is through providing web services (cloud, etc) and they do so for a substantial portion of the internet.


Even if this is true--no specifics offered, not a single source cited, coming from a person not using a real name--it is a dubious argument. Suppose only 30 to 40% of Amazon's business comes from retail. An effective boycott could still be costly for the company. Even more important, in many mass boycotts the crucial point isn't necessarily to hurt the corporation financially--though that's surely one of the goals. It's to totally challenge their public image and make them look shameful.

I don't know how successful the cultural and sports boycott of apartheid South Africa was financially. But it surely brought much greater attention to that racist regime and contributed to the end of apartheid.


You get really hung up on people not using their full government name on a message board.


TigerVol



Joined: 16 Jul 2008
Posts: 2209
Location: ATL


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/26/21 5:43 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Bob Lamm wrote:
norwester wrote:
It doesn’t matter if you boycott Amazon. They don’t make the majority of their money through their retail. Most of their profit is through providing web services (cloud, etc) and they do so for a substantial portion of the internet.


Even if this is true--no specifics offered, not a single source cited, coming from a person not using a real name--it is a dubious argument. Suppose only 30 to 40% of Amazon's business comes from retail. An effective boycott could still be costly for the company. Even more important, in many mass boycotts the crucial point isn't necessarily to hurt the corporation financially--though that's surely one of the goals. It's to totally challenge their public image and make them look shameful.

I don't know how successful the cultural and sports boycott of apartheid South Africa was financially. But it surely brought much greater attention to that racist regime and contributed to the end of apartheid.



Are you really trying to compare South African apartheid to Amazon?



_________________
"Never put an age limit on your dreams" - Dara Torres 2008
Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18031
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/26/21 7:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

johnjohnW wrote:
Bob Lamm wrote:
norwester wrote:
It doesn’t matter if you boycott Amazon. They don’t make the majority of their money through their retail. Most of their profit is through providing web services (cloud, etc) and they do so for a substantial portion of the internet.


Even if this is true--no specifics offered, not a single source cited, coming from a person not using a real name--it is a dubious argument. Suppose only 30 to 40% of Amazon's business comes from retail. An effective boycott could still be costly for the company. Even more important, in many mass boycotts the crucial point isn't necessarily to hurt the corporation financially--though that's surely one of the goals. It's to totally challenge their public image and make them look shameful.

I don't know how successful the cultural and sports boycott of apartheid South Africa was financially. But it surely brought much greater attention to that racist regime and contributed to the end of apartheid.


You get really hung up on people not using their full government name on a message board.


Seriously! My generation was taught never to give away that level of personal identifying information. Just because the pendulum is swinging so far the other way now doesn't mean some of us are inclined to change our ways.

(And yes, I know, I personally have linked my real-life identity to my internet identity through the whole Jeopardy! thing, so I'm not the best person to demonstrate the theory.)

By the way, to return to the topic: Amazon Web Services, the cloud computing giant led by the now-future Amazon CEO, closed out 2020 with more than $13.5 billion in annual operating profits, responsible for more than 63% of the entire company’s operating profits for the year, on annual AWS revenue of $45.3 billion, up nearly 30% year-over-year.



_________________
Ardent believer in the separation of church and stadium.
FrozenLVFan



Joined: 08 Jul 2014
Posts: 3516



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/26/21 10:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Bob Lamm wrote:
norwester wrote:
It doesn’t matter if you boycott Amazon. They don’t make the majority of their money through their retail. Most of their profit is through providing web services (cloud, etc) and they do so for a substantial portion of the internet. Also, as an aside, there is a not insignificant population of folks who are unable to physically shop/run errands on their own who rely on places that will deliver like Amazon. It’s not all for rich people. Not defending their business practices. Just pointing out why boycotts probably won’t affect them much. Probably more useful to write your reps and advocate for laws that help solve the problem.


Even if this is true--no specifics offered, not a single source cited, coming from a person not using a real name--it is a dubious argument. Suppose only 30 to 40% of Amazon's business comes from retail. An effective boycott could still be costly for the company. Even more important, in many mass boycotts the crucial point isn't necessarily to hurt the corporation financially--though that's surely one of the goals. It's to totally challenge their public image and make them look shameful.

I don't know how successful the cultural and sports boycott of apartheid South Africa was financially. But it surely brought much greater attention to that racist regime and contributed to the end of apartheid.


Amazon's ultimate goal may be to get themselves out of retail. 55% of the products they "sell" now are actually sold by third parties, aka their "Marketplace vendors." I could see Bezos just wanting to handle data management, logistics, and shipping, and getting out of hands-on sales, warehousing, and customer support.

https://www.digitalcommerce360.com/2021/04/29/what-percentage-of-products-on-amazon-are-sold-by-marketplace-sellers/

When Amazon came along, I thought it was great to be able to order books online and their customer service was pretty good. As they've grown, it's become positively painful to deal with them. No timely customer service. No more 2-day shipping or choice of shipping company. Fake reviews. Blah, blah. But I still use them because I can't spend 5 hrs driving somewhere whenever I need to buy socks or a new shower curtain, partly because E-tail has driven so many B&M stores out of business. Amazon has a damn good chokehold on the market from a lot of angles now.


Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/26/21 10:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

johnjohnW wrote:
You get really hung up on people not using their full government name on a message board.


I plead guilty, johnjohn. If someone is offering an opinion here, then it doesn't make the slightest difference whether they are using their real name or not. But if someone is offering alleged facts--with no specifics, with no source, and without using a real name--then I say that is completely untrustworthy.



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/26/21 10:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

TigerVol wrote:
Are you really trying to compare South African apartheid to Amazon?


I was discussing past boycotts and a possible boycott of Amazon. Of course I wasn't saying that the horrors of Amazon are the same as the horrors of apartheid in South Africa. I believe it's reasonable to discuss any boycotts on which anyone has information. If you have examples of other important boycotts that you believe are relevant to this discussion, by all means post again and discuss them. The more such discussion, the better.



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
TigerVol



Joined: 16 Jul 2008
Posts: 2209
Location: ATL


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/27/21 2:03 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Bob Lamm wrote:
TigerVol wrote:
Are you really trying to compare South African apartheid to Amazon?


I was discussing past boycotts and a possible boycott of Amazon. Of course I wasn't saying that the horrors of Amazon are the same as the horrors of apartheid in South Africa. I believe it's reasonable to discuss any boycotts on which anyone has information. If you have examples of other important boycotts that you believe are relevant to this discussion, by all means post again and discuss them. The more such discussion, the better.


I didn't bring up the successful boycotts - I have no info.

I don't think it is analogous to tout the shame and reputational success of the anti apartheid boycotts as an example that could apply to Amazon. Apples and giraffes.

I get people boycotting on principle regardless of impact.

I don't think it would have a bottom line impact if every wnba fan quit using Amazon. Not even a blip.

If there are other more relevant reputational/shame boycotts successful on this scale I'm glad to hear about them.



_________________
"Never put an age limit on your dreams" - Dara Torres 2008
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/27/21 3:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

TigerVol wrote:
I didn't bring up the successful boycotts - I have no info.

I don't think it is analogous to tout the shame and reputational success of the anti apartheid boycotts as an example that could apply to Amazon. Apples and giraffes.

I get people boycotting on principle regardless of impact.

I don't think it would have a bottom line impact if every wnba fan quit using Amazon. Not even a blip.

If there are other more relevant reputational/shame boycotts successful on this scale I'm glad to hear about them.


I appreciate what you've posted. Including "I get people boycotting on principle regardless of impact." This thread was begun by readyAIMfire53 who said he/she/they are having nothing to do with Amazon and made a strong statement as to why. I'm not boycotting, but I respect readyAIMfire53 and anyone boycotting for similar reasons.



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 8407
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/27/21 5:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

One of the episodes of Hasan Minhaj's "Patriot Act" on Netflix did a really good job of explaining Amazon's whole racket and how everything centers around AWS.

Highly recommend watching it.



_________________
↑↑↓↓←→←→BA
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66920
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/27/21 9:44 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Bob Lamm wrote:
TigerVol wrote:
I didn't bring up the successful boycotts - I have no info.

I don't think it is analogous to tout the shame and reputational success of the anti apartheid boycotts as an example that could apply to Amazon. Apples and giraffes.

I get people boycotting on principle regardless of impact.

I don't think it would have a bottom line impact if every wnba fan quit using Amazon. Not even a blip.

If there are other more relevant reputational/shame boycotts successful on this scale I'm glad to hear about them.


I appreciate what you've posted. Including "I get people boycotting on principle regardless of impact." This thread was begun by readyAIMfire53 who said he/she/they are having nothing to do with Amazon and made a strong statement as to why. I'm not boycotting, but I respect readyAIMfire53 and anyone boycotting for similar reasons.


Anybody who uses the internet does business with Amazon. It's unavoidable.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/28/21 1:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The closest stores of any kind to me are more than a 30 minute one-way drive away. I try to support these 'local' businesses as much as possible. But there is one grocery store, one gas station, one hardware store, one bank, and one drugstore. I have to drive another 45 minutes to a town of about 20,000 to get anything more than the basics and even there options are very limited. The closest 'city' is a six hour roundtrip. So online stores have been a godsend for me.


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin