RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Extra year of Eligibility

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NoDakSt



Joined: 26 Oct 2005
Posts: 4929



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/27/21 7:47 pm    ::: Extra year of Eligibility Reply Reply with quote

Was going to start a tracking thread for players taking an extra year of availability but Raoul is already all over that.

https://wbbblog.com/womens-basketball-extra-eligibility-players-returning-to-current-school-in-2021-22

Regarding SoDakSt, Irwin is the only senior on the team (they do have a transfer grad student on the team) and is the second leading scorer and leading 3pt ace for the Jacks.

For NoDakSt, Dietz is the second leading scorer and leading rebounder for the Bison.





Regarding SoDakSt, Irwin is the only senior on the team


SDHoops



Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 1183



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/27/21 9:52 pm    ::: Re: Extra year of Eligibility Reply Reply with quote

NoDakSt wrote:
Was going to start a tracking thread for players taking an extra year of availability but Raoul is already all over that.

https://wbbblog.com/womens-basketball-extra-eligibility-players-returning-to-current-school-in-2021-22

Regarding SoDakSt, Irwin is the only senior on the team (they do have a transfer grad student on the team) and is the second leading scorer and leading 3pt ace for the Jacks.

For NoDakSt, Dietz is the second leading scorer and leading rebounder for the Bison.





Regarding SoDakSt, Irwin is the only senior on the team

HM mentioned that Hannah Sjerven's final year will be next year at USD. I think this is good because she essentially lost a year as a true freshman in the cesspool that was (still is?) New Mexico.


myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/28/21 12:00 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

So do underclassmen also get the extra year?

I think so since for instance Van Oelhoefen started playing for OrSU mid season instead of staying in HS. But will she be considered a Freshman next year? It's going to make for confusion for a few years to come.


SDHoops



Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 1183



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/28/21 3:24 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

myrtle wrote:
So do underclassmen also get the extra year?

I think so since for instance Van Oelhoefen started playing for OrSU mid season instead of staying in HS. But will she be considered a Freshman next year? It's going to make for confusion for a few years to come.

If I read it correctly, this year will not count against anyone.


mzonefan



Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 4878
Location: Ann Arbor, MI


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/28/21 11:25 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

SDHoops wrote:
myrtle wrote:
So do underclassmen also get the extra year?

I think so since for instance Van Oelhoefen started playing for OrSU mid season instead of staying in HS. But will she be considered a Freshman next year? It's going to make for confusion for a few years to come.

If I read it correctly, this year will not count against anyone.


Correct, which can have recruiting/scholarship implications for many years as the numbers get worked out.


summertime blues



Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 7845
Location: Shenandoah Valley


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/28/21 12:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

So anyone who transfers will also get another year? JMU's Eleanore Marciszewski is in the transfer portal. She is a junior this year and if I'm reading this would grant her two years of eligibility. She'll likely go somewhere nearer her home in Ste-Julie, Quebec...OTOH, she may just go back to Canada.



_________________
Don't take life so serious. It ain't nohows permanent.
It takes 3 years to build a team and 7 to build a program.--Conventional Wisdom
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/28/21 10:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Stanford had senior night, and it didn't sound like any of those three - Williams, Wilson, Jerome - would be back.



_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
bucks4now



Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 723



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/01/21 10:06 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Braxtin Miller for Ohio State has said that she is coming back.


undersized_post



Joined: 01 Mar 2021
Posts: 2864



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/01/21 10:32 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

bucks4now wrote:
Braxtin Miller for Ohio State has said that she is coming back.


Makes sense for her since OSU has so much talent rn but unfortunately are banned from post season.


summertime blues



Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 7845
Location: Shenandoah Valley


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/01/21 12:47 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I see per Raoul that Keyen Green, who grad-transferred from Liberty to Tennessee and then had a season-ending ACL early, is planning on coming back for another year. She was not honored on Senior Day so I guess that must be true.



_________________
Don't take life so serious. It ain't nohows permanent.
It takes 3 years to build a team and 7 to build a program.--Conventional Wisdom
Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18031
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/02/21 12:04 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Apparently it was stated on previous broadcasts, but it was confirmed tonight that Qadashah Hoppie is returning next year to St. John's.



_________________
Ardent believer in the separation of church and stadium.
huskiemaniac



Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 1049
Location: NE CT


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/04/21 6:32 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

It was a bad ruling, imo, and looks especially bad given that the season has played out.

they should revoke it immediately, imo.


Hoopsmom



Joined: 05 Apr 2017
Posts: 680



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/04/21 11:08 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

huskiemaniac wrote:
It was a bad ruling, imo, and looks especially bad given that the season has played out.

they should revoke it immediately, imo.


Although the season did “play out”, as you put it, in no way was it optimal or even close to normal for the players. Players had to work out last summer without the benefit of coaches, trainers, or even facilities in some cases. They were playing at outdoor courts in the neighborhood park. Because of the lack of strength training, there were injuries incurred that may not have happened in a normal year. Many teams had to go without practice players, making it much harder to prepare for games. Practice was especially hard to run if they had athletes in contact quarantine. Several teams did not play at all, and others stopped partway through the season. Several teams did not get any home games. Quite a few teams never got any fans. Teams had far fewer than normal the amount of games, and had to do them under weird schedules. Sometimes, games were canceled due to testing results. Often there were false positives that canceled games.

Players that are choosing to stay have been given the opportunity to get or finish another degree, which will help them with their future. Remember, very, very few women players make it to the pros. This extra year of free schooling can only be seen as a good thing.


Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18031
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/04/21 11:32 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

huskiemaniac wrote:
It was a bad ruling, imo, and looks especially bad given that the season has played out.

they should revoke it immediately, imo.


Let's not discourage the NCAA from making decisions that benefit student-athletes.



_________________
Ardent believer in the separation of church and stadium.
PickledGinger



Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 1365



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/05/21 4:48 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Queenie wrote:
huskiemaniac wrote:
It was a bad ruling, imo, and looks especially bad given that the season has played out.

they should revoke it immediately, imo.


Let's not discourage the NCAA from making decisions that benefit student-athletes.


Yeah... that take comes of as a bit callous. I think we all deserve as much of a do-over on this last year as we can get. Maybe elaborate on why you are against it?



_________________
Unspoken expectations are just premeditated resentments.
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/05/21 1:23 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PickledGinger wrote:
Queenie wrote:
huskiemaniac wrote:
It was a bad ruling, imo, and looks especially bad given that the season has played out.

they should revoke it immediately, imo.


Let's not discourage the NCAA from making decisions that benefit student-athletes.


Yeah... that take comes of as a bit callous. I think we all deserve as much of a do-over on this last year as we can get. Maybe elaborate on why you are against it?


It would be really bad to change it at this late date. Like selling someone a box of chocolates and after you take their money yank the box out of their hands. Actually worse than that... Lots of kids already made important life decisions based on that ruling including a bunch who joined their teams midseason because they know they will get that extra year.



_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
huskiemaniac



Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 1049
Location: NE CT


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/05/21 2:48 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

A kneejerk ruling, made too soon, with no flexibility.

The "student-athletes" who were actually robbed- the class of 2020- are the ones who deserve the extra year of eligibility, not those who play a regular season as well as conference and national tournaments.

Sheesh.


linkster



Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 5423



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/05/21 11:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

huskiemaniac wrote:
A kneejerk ruling, made too soon, with no flexibility.

The "student-athletes" who were actually robbed- the class of 2020- are the ones who deserve the extra year of eligibility, not those who play a regular season as well as conference and national tournaments.

Sheesh.


At the time there was a real possibility that the season could end early, like the previous year. The NCAA, worried that 50% or more of D1 players would opt out given the risks and the state of the pandemic late in the summer and decided to give players who opted to play a free year as an incentive to play in what ended up as basketball in confinement.
I agree that it will cause confusion in some programs but I understand that teams will be able to carry over 15 scholarships next year for that reason
And it should create some interesting transfers. Doesn't Arkansas need an entire new starting lineup?


PickledGinger



Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 1365



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/21 4:28 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

There are a lot of technical remifications of this decision but I don't really see how any of them are particularly negative for any party. Students are still playing to be educated. Even though some teams got a relatively full season, it was by no means accross the board and shouldin some ways be a wash.

And for the point of the 2020 season, yes, that ending was absolutely tragic and those seniors can never get those opportunities back. But they did get to play 30-ish games in front of actual fans, so I don't buy the notion that they experienced such a greater degree of hardship than this season's players to make the decision somehow unfair of irrational.



_________________
Unspoken expectations are just premeditated resentments.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin