RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Mystics @ Liberty - 9/17/21
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who will win this game?
Mystics
60%
 60%  [ 9 ]
Liberty
40%
 40%  [ 6 ]
Total Votes : 15

Author Message
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/17/21 8:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I give Sabrina Ionescu the game ball. She played wonderfully when it really mattered. Although her WNBA career so far has been a struggle due to injuries, I remain VERY excited about her future on my team.



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
jmvcity



Joined: 21 Jun 2013
Posts: 339
Location: Big Apple


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/17/21 8:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

That was scary. I wouldn’t have been surprised if NY choked but glad they pulled through. Where was this defense and sense of urgency in the last 10 games?


NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 14097



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/17/21 10:40 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I give Hopkins a C+ for the season. I’ll elaborate on positives later but I have like 1,000 thoughts and needed the processing time.

First. The turnovers. Laney 2021 career high turnovers per minute. Howard 2021 overwhelming career high turnovers per minute. Clarendon 2020 obliterated her career high in turnovers per minute, though she nearly matched it this year albeit with way more assists.

Even in an offense that likes to push pace where possible, some of these turnovers are fixable. I don’t feel like taking care of the ball is emphasized consistently enough to be valued. That has to change in 2022.

Also, tonight’s defensive scheme was an aggressive switching and double teaming scheme designed to take Tina out of the game and it worked. It also meant the Liberty dictated something. Not surprisingly, they withstood some punches tonight. That’s what happens when you dictate.

What analytics don’t account for is those nights where you give up easy twos. Like when Stewie is owning Laney in the post with no help. If the Liberty schemed more aggressively to cover for their size issues they’d be a better defensive team. And yes I think it’s that simple.

Anyway I’m exhausted. More tomorrow.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/17/21 11:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Bob Lamm wrote:
I give Sabrina Ionescu the game ball. She played wonderfully when it really mattered. Although her WNBA career so far has been a struggle due to injuries, I remain VERY excited about her future on my team.


In the P12 we learned to never underestimate Io. She looks deceptively slow and sometimes unorthodox, but she delivers time after time. I have every confidence she will turn out to be a good'un for y'all.


Stormeo



Joined: 14 Jul 2019
Posts: 4701



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/17/21 11:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

myrtle wrote:
Bob Lamm wrote:
I give Sabrina Ionescu the game ball. She played wonderfully when it really mattered. Although her WNBA career so far has been a struggle due to injuries, I remain VERY excited about her future on my team.


In the P12 we learned to never underestimate Io. She looks deceptively slow and sometimes unorthodox, but she delivers time after time. I have every confidence she will turn out to be a good'un for y'all.


+1. And injuries weren't the only reason why she struggled this year – it has definitely also been her learning on the job how to really be a full-time PG in the WNBA. It's already hard enough to make the transition from college to the W for PGs, and she wasn't even a full-time PG in college. It could take time, but like myrtle basically said, she'll get there.

I wonder if she'll play overseas this year, assuming she's healthy. It'd be cool to see her play in her other home country of sorts (Romania), but the pay probably is completely uncompetitive compared to the likes of the Russia League, amongst others.


Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18030
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/17/21 11:37 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I'm pleasantly surprised and relieved that the game didn't fall apart completely and that epic failure of a marriage proposal in the fourth quarter (where the young lady looked like someone had handed her a live tarantula and fled the scene with great haste) did not turn into an omen.

(Seriously, do not do a Jumbotron proposal unless you know they're going to say yes. And even then, hesitate. I made it perfectly clear to Happycappie that if he pulled a stunt like that, it was the best way for him to suddenly get a no.)

I thought we were going to blow it when Ariel Atkins reminded everyone that she is in fact an Olympic gold medalist and started sniping threes. But when we started applying even token defense, that was enough to cool her down.

Washington missed Mike Thibault tonight, IMO. Eric's good, but he's not tested, and he doesn't have the experience to have the knack for matchups that Mike does. Maybe a couple of different substitutions change the flow of the game. Or maybe Mike gets that technical instead of Walker-Kimbrough. (I still don't know what she did, but honestly, I don't blame her for being mad at the refs in the first half. There were a lot of bad calls in the Liberty's favor, and she was in the middle of at least two of them.)

Dear Australians for both teams: y'all are not playing rugby, please stop with the tackling.

Natasha Howard looked like the high-end free agent we cranked open the bank vault for, and I would like more of this next season, please and thank you.

I did not think we were going to keep up the intensity. I'm pleasantly surprised.

So was it "wear your random WNBA gear" day at this game and no one told me? Bear in mind, this was Mystics at Liberty. Gear spotted in the crowd: a Seattle Storm shirt, a "Sparks Nation" LA shirt, an A'ja Wilson Aces jersey, and a spectacular throwback flex of a Tamera Young Chicago Sky third jersey (the yellow one with the blue yoke).

Also spotted in the crowd: a Rebecca Allen Opals jersey and a homebrew Becky Hammon jersey (couldn't tell if it was old from before the real ones came out, or kludged together from the Pondexter giveaway). Someone may have had a T-Spoon jersey in the new style. I don't know how I feel about throwforwards.

A very satisfying way to not fuck up Fan Appreciation Night. We finished off the experience with a walk down Flatbush Avenue to Junior's. (Fam, if you need a link to that...) I did not expect the cheesesteak to be that good! I also did not expect my slice of cheesecake to still be slightly frozen in the middle! But it was still tasty.



_________________
Ardent believer in the separation of church and stadium.
gpark33



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 5116



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/18/21 3:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

That was a fun game to be a Lib fan. My group went to McMahon's after and I heard Sabrina was there a bit later in the night with what looked to be her family. I had to hop the train home so missed the sighting. Glad she isn't shying away from places where fans would obviously be after the game.

One of my favorite parts of being a Lib fan back in the day was running into Sue at Cubby or Tari and Tamika at ESPN Zone.



_________________
The teacher and the student.
Lib Fan



Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 4593
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/18/21 3:32 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

gpark33 wrote:
That was a fun game to be a Lib fan. My group went to McMahon's after and I heard Sabrina was there a bit later in the night with what looked to be her family. I had to hop the train home so missed the sighting. Glad she isn't shying away from places where fans would obviously be after the game.

One of my favorite parts of being a Lib fan back in the day was running into Sue at Cubby or Tari and Tamika at ESPN Zone.


or players at Cafe 31



_________________
Lets Go Liberty
Brooklyn 2021
Bring Back Maddie!
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 14097



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/18/21 3:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

So…more thoughts. On the overall defensive concept first off. We’ve seen NY be on the slow side of incorporating double teams, fronting, trapping or doing things that smaller teams normally do defensively. The switching defensive scheme has just been incorporated more recently. It could be that they’ve opted for a less aggressive defensive approach until Howard became more acclimated and maybe their plan was to incorporate some of this sooner. We’ll never know that answer. But a few things are apparent. First in spite of the Libs’ relative lack of size, they don’t force many turnovers. They also commit an alarming amount, which when coupled with their 11th-ranked rebound percentage, probably is the reason for their just about all of their negative differential in fast break points. A small defensive team in my estimation has to have a positive turnover differential so that they have a means of dictating some form of aggressiveness that makes up for their size. I’ll give something of a pass for this being they didn’t have Howard at near 100% till late in the season.

But next year I’m not giving a pass. Even if they let Bec go they’re going to have Laney, Onyenwere, Richards and Willoughby who all fit a similar size profile. They’re going to have enough pieces to make moves that will enable them to be more balanced even if someone like Howard gets hurt.

So while I like this in-theory offense oriented system. And while I think Hopkins is smart and can potentially implement something special, next year is it. By 2015 Laimbeer had turned the Liberty around. The Liberty can draft no lower than 5. This regime will have had two first overall picks (one traded) plus another high one this year. Losing Durr was a bad break but that’s what has likely helped to enable another high pick. Next year has to be your year. Barring major injuries you have to get the job done and that’s the end of the discussion. If Sabrina is healthy next year 17 team turnovers per game cannot and will not be excused. Defensively, they have to force a good deal more than 12 per game as well.

I think this can work and I don’t think a major overhaul in philosophy is needed to make it work. But I think you can and need to schematically better suit your personnel.

It’s a make or break year next year. If it turns out to be “break” I’m going to be vocal in my displeasure.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 7365
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/18/21 5:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I don't think the Liberty care if they have fans much less what we think. How else to explain the Sales Department going incommunicado and forcing us to chase them around in an attempt to renew our tickets? We've tried three out of four options and we're still empty-handed. The fourth option was signing a blank contract. That's like signing a blank check -- not doing it. Evil or Very Mad



_________________
You can always do something else.
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/18/21 6:59 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

NYL_WNBA_FAN wrote:
I give Hopkins a C+ for the season.


This is a response to your grade and your two posts.

Many crucial things that hurt the Liberty this season were in no way Walt's fault. Durr's illness. Johannes and Han not coming. Willoughby's injury. Losing Howard for a long while. Sabrina playing at less than 100% for a long while. All very unfortunate. And that was a lot for one team for any one season.

But, for me, these three things ARE Walt Hopkins' fault, either entirely or in an important way:

1. I don't believe that a WNBA team playing Rebecca Allen, Jocelyn Willoughby, or anyone that size and weight at power forward can be a top team in the league. I grant the appeal offensively, especially if (with Howard) you can have five starters who can all hit three-pointers. But defense? Rebounding? Forget it. I say: if the Liberty don't have a legitimate post player on the court WITH Natasha Howard next season then it will be another disappointing year.

2. Given all the unfortunate problems stated above, the Liberty did quite respectably in the first half of the season. Then they got WORSE. Even with Howard back and getting more comfortable with her new teammates. Even with Sabrina getting healthier and looking better. That reflects on the players, but in an important way it also reflects on Walt Hopkins. Teams should get better over time, not seriously worse.

3. Walt's postgame press conference opening on Wednesday night--"We gave up!"--was sickening and profoundly dishonest. What he really said was: "THEY gave up." He took NO responsibility. That says to me that there is something fundamentally lacking in his character.

My provisional grade: D. If New York can back into the playoffs tomorrow, win a first-round game, and advance, then I'll have to go to C minus or higher. But if Washington or Los Angeles wins tomorrow, then I'll stick with a grade of D for Walt Hopkins.



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
lynxmania



Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Posts: 10697
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/18/21 8:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Y’all really hung up on that post game comment. Reeve makes those comments all the time. Laughing


Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/18/21 8:49 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

lynxmania wrote:
Y’all really hung up on that post game comment. Reeve makes those comments all the time. Laughing


Does Reeve act like it has NOTHING to do with her and her coaching? Does she say "we" when she obviously means "they"? Let's not forget that Reeve has won multiple championships and SO much respect from so many. What has Walt Hopkins won as a head coach? In my view, this is a terrible comparison.

P.S. If Hopkins and Reeve are really the same, can we trade head coaches immediately? Smile



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18030
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/18/21 9:37 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

root_thing wrote:
I don't think the Liberty care if they have fans much less what we think. How else to explain the Sales Department going incommunicado and forcing us to chase them around in an attempt to renew our tickets? We've tried three out of four options and we're still empty-handed. The fourth option was signing a blank contract. That's like signing a blank check -- not doing it. Evil or Very Mad


I think they might be turning over sales staff. My STH rep is no longer with the organization. Check with Justin.



_________________
Ardent believer in the separation of church and stadium.
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 7365
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/18/21 11:47 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Queenie wrote:
root_thing wrote:
I don't think the Liberty care if they have fans much less what we think. How else to explain the Sales Department going incommunicado and forcing us to chase them around in an attempt to renew our tickets? We've tried three out of four options and we're still empty-handed. The fourth option was signing a blank contract. That's like signing a blank check -- not doing it. Evil or Very Mad


I think they might be turning over sales staff. My STH rep is no longer with the organization. Check with Justin.


Justin is the one who was ignoring our calls and emails. We spoke to him for a few seconds at halftime right before play was about to start. He says he will help us on Monday. We had never met him previously, and we didn't give him our names. However, I did mention that we had called and written. Justin acted like he knew who we were. Is it possible no one else called or wrote to him during the last week of the early bird special? And why not write back even briefly? Say you're busy and you'll get to us later. Instead, we had to chase him down. Confused



_________________
You can always do something else.
jmvcity



Joined: 21 Jun 2013
Posts: 339
Location: Big Apple


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/19/21 12:09 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The reps sitting at the subscription table at barclays are clueless. Each time I stopped by with questions about renewal, they’re always looking for Justin, who seems to be always on the move.

I had emailed Justin in the past and have yet to get a response.


NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 14097



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/19/21 9:00 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Bob Lamm wrote:
NYL_WNBA_FAN wrote:
I give Hopkins a C+ for the season.


This is a response to your grade and your two posts.

Many crucial things that hurt the Liberty this season were in no way Walt's fault. Durr's illness. Johannes and Han not coming. Willoughby's injury. Losing Howard for a long while. Sabrina playing at less than 100% for a long while. All very unfortunate. And that was a lot for one team for any one season.

But, for me, these three things ARE Walt Hopkins' fault, either entirely or in an important way:

1. I don't believe that a WNBA team playing Rebecca Allen, Jocelyn Willoughby, or anyone that size and weight at power forward can be a top team in the league. I grant the appeal offensively, especially if (with Howard) you can have five starters who can all hit three-pointers. But defense? Rebounding? Forget it. I say: if the Liberty don't have a legitimate post player on the court WITH Natasha Howard next season then it will be another disappointing year.

2. Given all the unfortunate problems stated above, the Liberty did quite respectably in the first half of the season. Then they got WORSE. Even with Howard back and getting more comfortable with her new teammates. Even with Sabrina getting healthier and looking better. That reflects on the players, but in an important way it also reflects on Walt Hopkins. Teams should get better over time, not seriously worse.

3. Walt's postgame press conference opening on Wednesday night--"We gave up!"--was sickening and profoundly dishonest. What he really said was: "THEY gave up." He took NO responsibility. That says to me that there is something fundamentally lacking in his character.

My provisional grade: D. If New York can back into the playoffs tomorrow, win a first-round game, and advance, then I'll have to go to C minus or higher. But if Washington or Los Angeles wins tomorrow, then I'll stick with a grade of D for Walt Hopkins.


I agree with a lot of this. The team especially should have gotten better with Howard and a progressively healthy Sabrina and not worse.

The one area I think could have helped defensively and rebounding would have been Willoughby. She’s 180 pounds and a much physically stronger player than either Allen or Onyenwere, who I actually expected too much of defensively.

But, that said, it’s not ideal to have those be your 4 spot options regardless, in terms of depth. Maybe it’s possible they planned to play Howard and Shook together more but didn’t feel they had the practice time to implement that approach, I don’t know.

But regardless of all that, if we take a step back and look at this as more of a developmental year, then it’s probably imperative to balance out the team better rather than risk this for philosophy not working next season.

Possibilities abound for improving the team via the draft, free agency and trade.

Here’s one Root and I have discussed. How about Onyenwere for Hebard? Chicago is deep in the post and reuniting Hebard and Sabrina would be an obvious incentive.

If the Liberty win the lottery, I think I’d also work to try to pry Sabally from Dallas if possible (same principle). Or else they’d draft Howard. Who, while not an ideal PF, would be 6’2” 180 and give you someone who’d improve the rebounding and defense. Nalyssa Smith is a 6’2” PF with serious offensive skill. Austin is an athletic 6’5” post. All of these players would represent major upgrades to a form of team need while adding to the talent base.

Myesha Hines-Allen is an attainable free agent as well.

There’s lots of avenues toward improvement. I don’t want to continuously hear the words “development” or “process” next season. The team has preached development for two years. By next year they should have commodities that improve the team either by their own presence or trade.

We’ve also seen how an undersized team gets officiated. For example Howard was switched onto Zellous, posting up on one play. Zellous has her arm wrapped around Howard. Textbook foul no call.

The very next possession Sabrina is switched on Tina, bodies her cleanly with no arm usage and gets whistled.

So, if being undersized means calls automatically go against you, then you have to have more size I guess. It is what it is. But you can’t be 11th in rebound percentage, -100 in free throw attempts and -4 or -5 in turnovers and still win.

If the team still remains this imbalanced and disparate in the above statistical categories next season, well…😡



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/19/21 10:52 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

NYL_WNBA_FAN wrote:
But, that said, it’s not ideal to have those be your 4 spot options regardless, in terms of depth. Maybe it’s possible they planned to play Howard and Shook together more but didn’t feel they had the practice time to implement that approach, I don’t know.

But regardless of all that, if we take a step back and look at this as more of a developmental year, then it’s probably imperative to balance out the team better rather than risk this for philosophy not working next season.

So, if being undersized means calls automatically go against you, then you have to have more size I guess. It is what it is. But you can’t be 11th in rebound percentage, -100 in free throw attempts and -4 or -5 in turnovers and still win.

If the team still remains this imbalanced and disparate in the above statistical categories next season, well…😡


Yes to all this and the rest of what you wrote, including your ideas for roster moves.



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin