RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Soon to be Women's Rules?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ex-Ref



Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 5577



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/19 4:12 pm    ::: Soon to be Women's Rules? Reply Reply with quote

Some men's changes this year that I'd guess are going to be in the women's game soon.

Three point line moved back and shot clock changed to 20 seconds on an offensive rebound. This one will be hard to get used to.

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/26905011/ncaa-moving-3-point-line-back-next-season



_________________
"Our democracy is designed to speak truth to power." — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

"If this guy can be Senator, you can do anything." — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 58892
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/19 4:55 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Very soon

https://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-women/article/2019-06-05/shot-clock-rule-altered-womens-basketball



_________________
On Christmas Day, the Gingerbread Man said, ‘Ladyfingers, be my wife.’
ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 9626



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/19 5:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The shot clock reset I am all for ...

Not as convinced about the three-point line. Strength is a significant component of long-distance shooting (leg strength) and women are not as strong as men. My fear is that three-point shooting percentages would decline if the line is moved back, thus clogging the middle, creating more contact, etc.

But I do like the idea of standardizing the rules. It would be great if there were one basketball rule book world-wide, with adjustments for age and strength of players for the three-point line.



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
BallState1984



Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 1882
Location: Halfway between Muncie and West Lafayette


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/12/19 6:52 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Quit screwing with the rules
. In fact, eliminate the shot clock and bring back the jump ball.



_________________
Terminally afffected with Our Girl Syndrome and proud of it!
ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 9626



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/12/19 11:29 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

BallState1984 wrote:
Quit screwing with the rules
. In fact, eliminate the shot clock and bring back the jump ball.


Glenn would be thrilled ...



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
bballgrl



Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 3486



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/12/19 4:32 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The powers that be want the rules to be the same for the men and the women but don't want the women to make more money. Don't expect them to do more without paying more.


GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 5489
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/13/19 4:03 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ClayK wrote:
BallState1984 wrote:
Quit screwing with the rules
. In fact, eliminate the shot clock and bring back the jump ball.


Glenn would be thrilled ...


Darn right. And while we're at it, bring back Doris Day, Emily Post and Bishop Fulton J. Sheen.

I'd also favor eliminating the three-point line altogether, so that basketball would be more forced to re-learn the elegant teamwork required to get the shooter as close to the basket as possible for the highest percentage shot possible. However, since eliminating the arc of evil is fantasy, I don't think I favor moving the three-point line further away for women, who don't have the excitement factor of the above-the-rim aerobatics of men's basketball.

The three-point line should be at a distance where the average probability of points produced by a three-point shot significantly exceeds the average probability of points produced by two-point shots. I'm not sure exactly what distance that is or what those percentages are, but if three-point shots begin to average less than about 33%, I'm not sure they're "worth it" from either a statistical or an excitement factor point of view. The line should be set at 20 feet.
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 58892
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/13/19 5:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

BallState1984 wrote:
Quit screwing with the rules
. In fact, eliminate the shot clock and bring back the jump ball.


The jump ball might happen someday. The shot clock is here to stay.



_________________
On Christmas Day, the Gingerbread Man said, ‘Ladyfingers, be my wife.’
willtalk



Joined: 13 Apr 2012
Posts: 689
Location: NorCal


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/13/19 9:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Let's bring back chicken wire backboards and the jump ball after each made basket.



_________________
No one one is ever as good as their best game, nor as bad as their worst.
TechDawgMc



Joined: 12 Aug 2010
Posts: 255
Location: Temple, TX


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/14/19 12:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

BallState1984 wrote:
Quit screwing with the rules
. In fact, eliminate the shot clock and bring back the jump ball.


Yeah, and get off my lawn.


BallState1984



Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 1882
Location: Halfway between Muncie and West Lafayette


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/19 8:45 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

TechDawgMc wrote:
BallState1984 wrote:
Quit screwing with the rules
. In fact, eliminate the shot clock and bring back the jump ball.


Yeah, and get off my lawn.


Obviously, you never seen basketball before it was ruined with stupid ass rules.



_________________
Terminally afffected with Our Girl Syndrome and proud of it!
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 58892
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/19 9:02 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

BallState1984 wrote:
TechDawgMc wrote:
BallState1984 wrote:
Quit screwing with the rules
. In fact, eliminate the shot clock and bring back the jump ball.


Yeah, and get off my lawn.


Obviously, you never seen basketball before it was ruined with stupid ass rules.


You mean ACC tournament games that end 12-10?



_________________
On Christmas Day, the Gingerbread Man said, ‘Ladyfingers, be my wife.’
ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 9626



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/19 10:48 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Or how about that 16-9 state championship high school game in Oregon?



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
summertime blues



Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 5370
Location: Shenandoah Valley


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/19 12:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GlennMacGrady wrote:
ClayK wrote:
BallState1984 wrote:
Quit screwing with the rules
. In fact, eliminate the shot clock and bring back the jump ball.


Glenn would be thrilled ...


Darn right. And while we're at it, bring back Doris Day, Emily Post and Bishop Fulton J. Sheen.

I'd also favor eliminating the three-point line altogether, so that basketball would be more forced to re-learn the elegant teamwork required to get the shooter as close to the basket as possible for the highest percentage shot possible. However, since eliminating the arc of evil is fantasy, I don't think I favor moving the three-point line further away for women, who don't have the excitement factor of the above-the-rim aerobatics of men's basketball.

The three-point line should be at a distance where the average probability of points produced by a three-point shot significantly exceeds the average probability of points produced by two-point shots. I'm not sure exactly what distance that is or what those percentages are, but if three-point shots begin to average less than about 33%, I'm not sure they're "worth it" from either a statistical or an excitement factor point of view. The line should be set at 20 feet.


Oh please, Glenn. Do you also want to go back to the old half court, two-dribble rule? Rolling Eyes Leave it alone!



_________________
Don't take life so serious. It ain't nohows permanent.
It takes 3 years to build a team and 7 to build a program.--Conventional Wisdom
Howee



Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Posts: 11919
Location: OREGON (in my heart)


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/19 3:17 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

My Biggest Fantasy is that the men (collegiate and pro) play with an 11' rim. I sincerely doubt Naismith ever envisioned people jumping higher than the goal itself, and CERTAINLY not with such ease and regularity, to so utterly alter the game from what he intended.

Just my 2 cents. Razz



_________________
Oregon: Go Ducks!
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin