RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

2020 WNBA Mock Draft
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 57, 58, 59  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 24344
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/17/20 12:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

TotalCardinalMove wrote:
Before this season, Carter shot 38 and 35 percent from 3pt range respectively.

That's the part I was gonna point out. Why cherry-pick the 18 game sample from this season when we also have 65 games from the previous two? I don't pretend to have seen much of Carter, but she sure looked pro-ready in that game against Team USA. In the same way as a Cappie Pondexter she doesn't necessarily have to be either kind of guard if she's put in the right situation and system. Hell, New York's only free agent signing to help Ionescu out was a veteran point guard, so they're not exactly just handing things over to her either.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Ice



Joined: 20 Jul 2017
Posts: 32



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/17/20 12:17 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I don't think Hebard gets enough credit. She plays hard on the defensive end, rebounds well, and is an outstanding finisher. I think people overlook her skills because of how Oregon runs its offense. The way Ionescu can find her in the pick and roll makes Ruthy's job look easy. But she knows how to find her spots and make shots at an extremely high rate. In my mind, she is a sure lottery pick.


Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 5375
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/17/20 12:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Ice wrote:
I don't think Hebard gets enough credit. She plays hard on the defensive end, rebounds well, and is an outstanding finisher. I think people overlook her skills because of how Oregon runs its offense. The way Ionescu can find her in the pick and roll makes Ruthy's job look easy. But she knows how to find her spots and make shots at an extremely high rate. In my mind, she is a sure lottery pick.

I hope that she is a lottery pick too.



_________________
You can win, as long as you keep your head to the SKY! Be OPTIMISTIC!
mavcarter
#NATC


Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 5935
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/17/20 12:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ClayK wrote:
OK. so I decided to check out Chennedy Carter's stats, expecting to be impressed, especially given that she is not known to be a player folks like to play with.


Oh Lord. Laughing

While raw stats shouldn’t be ignored, it isn’t necessarily the greatest indicator of a player’s potential at the next level. Intangibles, skill set, and attributes are more important, IMO.

Hell, Jackie Young was supposed to be more prepared for the W than Ogunbowale..



_________________
wrote:
Or maybe said poster should quit being a nuisance when people don’t agree?
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/17/20 1:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Rock Hard wrote:
Ice wrote:
I don't think Hebard gets enough credit. She plays hard on the defensive end, rebounds well, and is an outstanding finisher. I think people overlook her skills because of how Oregon runs its offense. The way Ionescu can find her in the pick and roll makes Ruthy's job look easy. But she knows how to find her spots and make shots at an extremely high rate. In my mind, she is a sure lottery pick.

I hope that she is a lottery pick too.


Her defense is suspect IMO, but I think has improved a lot over her 4 years. That said she has great hands, really nice moves and countermoves around the basket, and can finish even when off balance. I toyed with the idea, but don't think it will happen, of Oregon going one, two, three in the draft.



_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 11135



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/17/20 1:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
TotalCardinalMove wrote:
Before this season, Carter shot 38 and 35 percent from 3pt range respectively.

That's the part I was gonna point out. Why cherry-pick the 18 game sample from this season when we also have 65 games from the previous two? I don't pretend to have seen much of Carter, but she sure looked pro-ready in that game against Team USA. In the same way as a Cappie Pondexter she doesn't necessarily have to be either kind of guard if she's put in the right situation and system. Hell, New York's only free agent signing to help Ionescu out was a veteran point guard, so they're not exactly just handing things over to her either.


Excellent point ... I didn't look past this year.

But I think the comparisons to Cynthia Cooper might be pushing it some, and she doesn't look to be a point guard (unless her A/TO was also a lot better her first two years). A small two guard could be a dominant WNBA player, and I've certainly been wrong before ...



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 24344
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/17/20 1:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

My relflexive comparison with Hebard was Brianna Turner, who also played next to ball-dominant scoring guards in college but always looked like she could have a useful pro career, and showed some good signs last season. Hebard's at least as good, isn't she? Or was Turner that much better defensively in college to create a gap at that end of the floor?

'Sure lottery pick' seems excessive for Hebard, but I agree that she could be a useful pro and may fall further than she should.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/17/20 6:06 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
My relflexive comparison with Hebard was Brianna Turner, who also played next to ball-dominant scoring guards in college but always looked like she could have a useful pro career, and showed some good signs last season. Hebard's at least as good, isn't she? Or was Turner that much better defensively in college to create a gap at that end of the floor?

'Sure lottery pick' seems excessive for Hebard, but I agree that she could be a useful pro and may fall further than she should.


I think she's quite a bit better than Turner offensively, but definitely not as good defensively. I think she can learn since she is pretty athletic and agile. In a way, in college it's more important for her to stay out of foul trouble and in that regard she's doing what her team needs her to do. She will also have to adjust to the physicality so I think it's best if she goes someplace where she will have time to adjust... but that's true of most posts.



_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
PRballer



Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 2544



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 12:32 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Where do you all put Maryland's Stephanie Jones in this draft? I haven't seen her as a first round pick in any mocks, but she's definitely been a consistent, high-energy player in college career.

She's certainly a different prospect than her big sis - maybe more of a poor-woman's Candice Dupree? Yes, I said that. I just think her athletic build at 6'2 draw that comparison for me.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/stephanie-jones-is-miss-consistency-for-maryland-which-relies-on-her-steadiness/2020/02/16/3a899f2c-50f7-11ea-b119-4faabac6674f_story.html

What do you think of her in the pros?


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63758



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 1:19 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I was close to mentioning Stephanie Jones as a way under the radar prospect. She should be worth a shot in somebody’s training camp. First rounder? Naw, not even close unless she amazes in the NCAAT.

She’s not even a consistent starter since they play Charles at the PF. Maybe she’ll start based on matchups or injuries, but it’s mostly Charles and Austin in the post.

Lynetta Kizer was another one who didn’t start at Maryland but carved out a little bit of a career in the WNBA.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Wiseone1



Joined: 13 Oct 2011
Posts: 266



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 1:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
I was close to mentioning Stephanie Jones as a way under the radar prospect. She should be worth a shot in somebody’s training camp. First rounder? Naw, not even close unless she amazes in the NCAAT.

She’s not even a consistent starter since they play Charles at the PF. Maybe she’ll start based on matchups or injuries, but it’s mostly Charles and Austin in the post.

Lynetta Kizer was another one who didn’t start at Maryland but carved out a little bit of a career in the WNBA.



Kizer was a starter her Freshman - Junior Year


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63758



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 1:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Wiseone1 wrote:
Shades wrote:
I was close to mentioning Stephanie Jones as a way under the radar prospect. She should be worth a shot in somebody’s training camp. First rounder? Naw, not even close unless she amazes in the NCAAT.

She’s not even a consistent starter since they play Charles at the PF. Maybe she’ll start based on matchups or injuries, but it’s mostly Charles and Austin in the post.

Lynetta Kizer was another one who didn’t start at Maryland but carved out a little bit of a career in the WNBA.



Kizer was a starter her Freshman - Junior Year


So that’s pretty similar. It would be weird if they had the exact same career trajectory.

SJones starts
F - 0/34
So - 34/34
Jr - 34/34
Sr - 16/26



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66882
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 1:55 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Kizer went in the third round of a not especially strong draft (the same one in which Connecticut threw away their first rounder taking Astan Dabo)



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
mavcarter
#NATC


Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 5935
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 2:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
Kizer went in the third round of a not especially strong draft (the same one in which Connecticut threw away their first rounder taking Astan Dabo)


That 2012 draft had a lot of weird picks.



_________________
wrote:
Or maybe said poster should quit being a nuisance when people don’t agree?
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 10911



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 2:32 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Yet Kizer outlasted most of the players selected ahead or her, and might still be in the WNBA were it not for the injury problems she had.


WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 12526
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 9:17 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I’d like to add Brittany Brewer to this thread from Texas Tech. She’s a finesse big at least 6”6 who can fit in with a team needing a scorer at the 5 . She rebounds just as well. If Bella Arie gets the hype she deserves someone needs to give BB a look possibly late 1st or early 2nd Rd she’s a baller



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 12526
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 9:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

mavcarter wrote:
pilight wrote:
Kizer went in the third round of a not especially strong draft (the same one in which Connecticut threw away their first rounder taking Astan Dabo)


That 2012 draft had a lot of weird picks.


2012 Had below ... definitely a lot of strange picks 8 yrs later. 4 out of 12 still have a career in this league not counting Shenise due to injuries only. Imagine Minnesota choosing Glory instead of Devereaux Withiut Brunson at the moment.


Pick Player Nationality WNBA Team School/Club Team/Country
1 Nneka Ogwumike Los Angeles Sparks Stanford
2 Shekinna Stricklen Seattle Storm (from Chi.)
3 Devereaux Peters Minnesota Lynx (from Was.
4 Glory Johnson Tulsa Shock Tennessee
5 Shenise Johnson San Antonio Silver Stars Miami
6 Samantha Prahalis Phoenix Mercury Ohio State
7 Kelley Cain New York Liberty Tennessee
8 Natalie Novosel Washington Mystics (from Atl.) ND
9 Astan Dabo Connecticut Sun Mali
10 LaSondra Barrett Washington Mystics (from Sea.)
11 Sasha Goodlett Indiana Fever Georgia Tech
12 Damiris Dantas do. Minnesota Lynx



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
SpaceJunkie



Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 4241
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 9:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

WNBA 09 wrote:
Imagine Minnesota choosing Glory instead of Devereaux Withiut Brunson at the moment.


The Lynx traded Peters for Natasha Howard, who is way better than Glory Johnson.


bluedevilaztecfan5



Joined: 16 Mar 2010
Posts: 796
Location: San Diego, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 9:58 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

WNBA 09 wrote:
I’d like to add Brittany Brewer to this thread from Texas Tech. She’s a finesse big at least 6”6 who can fit in with a team needing a scorer at the 5 . She rebounds just as well. If Bella Arie gets the hype she deserves someone needs to give BB a look possibly late 1st or early 2nd Rd she’s a baller


*disclaimer: I really have only seen most college players in brief highlights.

But I liked Brewer and wanted her to slip to the Libs 3rd round pick, with Harris falling to our 2nd rounder (to start the college season). I think both go higher now.

I think Brewer would be a good pickup. She’s got good size, looked to have good hands and footwork, and 3pt range. She’s pretty fluid, especially for her size. But that’s what Alarie has that I personally like- more agility and more of a handle, which makes for good potential imo.


mavcarter
#NATC


Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 5935
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 10:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

WNBA 09 wrote:
mavcarter wrote:
pilight wrote:
Kizer went in the third round of a not especially strong draft (the same one in which Connecticut threw away their first rounder taking Astan Dabo)


That 2012 draft had a lot of weird picks.


2012 Had below ... definitely a lot of strange picks 8 yrs later. 4 out of 12 still have a career in this league not counting Shenise due to injuries only. Imagine Minnesota choosing Glory instead of Devereaux Withiut Brunson at the moment.


Pick Player Nationality WNBA Team School/Club Team/Country
1 Nneka Ogwumike Los Angeles Sparks Stanford
2 Shekinna Stricklen Seattle Storm (from Chi.)
3 Devereaux Peters Minnesota Lynx (from Was.
4 Glory Johnson Tulsa Shock Tennessee
5 Shenise Johnson San Antonio Silver Stars Miami
6 Samantha Prahalis Phoenix Mercury Ohio State
7 Kelley Cain New York Liberty Tennessee
8 Natalie Novosel Washington Mystics (from Atl.) ND
9 Astan Dabo Connecticut Sun Mali
10 LaSondra Barrett Washington Mystics (from Sea.)
11 Sasha Goodlett Indiana Fever Georgia Tech
12 Damiris Dantas do. Minnesota Lynx


Yeah, the first six picks didn’t necessarily throw me off. It’s when it got to #7 that had me like “WTF are these teams doing”. Laughing



_________________
wrote:
Or maybe said poster should quit being a nuisance when people don’t agree?
Luuuc
#NATC


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 21925



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 10:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

So you're saying that #6 seemed ok at the time, and only looks trash in hindsight.
Meanwhile kudos to the Lynx for #12. Dodging bullets like Neo in the matrix to end up with Dantas.



_________________
Thanks for calling. I wait all night for calls like these.
mavcarter
#NATC


Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 5935
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 10:36 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Luuuc wrote:
So you're saying that #6 seemed ok at the time, and only looks trash in hindsight.


Absolutely. At the time, it looked like a PG of the future pick to me.



_________________
wrote:
Or maybe said poster should quit being a nuisance when people don’t agree?
lynxmania



Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Posts: 10697
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 10:43 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

mavcarter wrote:
Luuuc wrote:
So you're saying that #6 seemed ok at the time, and only looks trash in hindsight.


Absolutely. At the time, it looked like a PG of the future pick to me.


Are you two trying to summon He Who Must Not Be Named Back to the Boards? Laughing Razz


PRballer



Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 2544



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 11:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

bluedevilaztecfan5 wrote:
WNBA 09 wrote:
I’d like to add Brittany Brewer to this thread from Texas Tech. She’s a finesse big at least 6”6 who can fit in with a team needing a scorer at the 5 . She rebounds just as well. If Bella Arie gets the hype she deserves someone needs to give BB a look possibly late 1st or early 2nd Rd she’s a baller


*disclaimer: I really have only seen most college players in brief highlights.

But I liked Brewer and wanted her to slip to the Libs 3rd round pick, with Harris falling to our 2nd rounder (to start the college season). I think both go higher now.

I think Brewer would be a good pickup. She’s got good size, looked to have good hands and footwork, and 3pt range. She’s pretty fluid, especially for her size. But that’s what Alarie has that I personally like- more agility and more of a handle, which makes for good potential imo.


I'm on the Brewer train, too. She has a ton of upside and is worth a relatively high pick. She put up great numbers (19 points, 14 rebounds) tonight against that notorious Baylor front line. Impressive.

(I've seen her play twice on TV, including the previous Baylor game, and agree on the comments on her movement and fluidity and length - it's a rare gift for someone at her size).

If Texas Tech makes a run to the Big 12 title game and gets in the NCAAs that could help, too.


Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 5375
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/18/20 11:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

lynxmania wrote:
mavcarter wrote:
Luuuc wrote:
So you're saying that #6 seemed ok at the time, and only looks trash in hindsight.


Absolutely. At the time, it looked like a PG of the future pick to me.


Are you two trying to summon He Who Must Not Be Named Back to the Boards? Laughing Razz

Let's resurrect IMHOTEP!



_________________
You can win, as long as you keep your head to the SKY! Be OPTIMISTIC!
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 57, 58, 59  Next
Page 25 of 59

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin