Click_ here to Help Support the Junkie Boards

RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums NEW
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

What's up with the Sting?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ChiChi



Joined: 11 Dec 2005
Posts: 665
Location: Raleigh, NC


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/11/05 5:58 pm    ::: What's up with the Sting? Reply Reply with quote

Anyone have any info on the Charlotte Sting's status for next season? I understand Muggsy will still be the coach. Will Trudi Lacey still be the GM?

Is Mr. Johnson committed to the team, and if not, can some Mystics fans get Ms. Johnson to talk a little trash to get him interested?

I'm excited about the new Bobcats arena, but not real hopeful about where the team is going as far as ownership/management.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 27767
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/11/05 6:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Basketball/NBA/Toronto/2005/12/11/1348357-sun.html

They just had a meet-and-greet with STHs. Looks like Trudi Lacy will stay as GM.



_________________
If you want a revolution, the only solution's evolve

My WNBA Fan Site
ChiChi



Joined: 11 Dec 2005
Posts: 665
Location: Raleigh, NC


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/11/05 6:19 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Basketball/NBA/Toronto/2005/12/11/1348357-sun.html

They just had a meet-and-greet with STHs. Looks like Trudi Lacy will stay as GM.


Thanks!

Quote:
tiny ex-Raptors point guard


Ha ha. It's worth the price of admission to watch him strut around with Earl Cureton.

But, of course, the sideshow would be unnecessary if we didn't suck Confused .


styxfan22



Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 842



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/11/05 11:57 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The Sting are my sleeper pick for next year:

PG: Darling
SG: Currie
SF: Sam
PF: Smith
C: TSB

Bench: Miller, Feaster, McCarville, Whoever they take with the Comets' pick (Zolman, Kim Smith?)


jimmyk



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 3949
Location: Bristol. TN


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 12:11 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

If the Sting get Shanna Zolman, I will seriously consider season tickets.
Four



Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 165



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 12:39 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

styxfan22 wrote:
The Sting are my sleeper pick for next year:

PG: Darling
SG: Currie
SF: Sam
PF: Smith
C: TSB

Bench: Miller, Feaster, McCarville, Whoever they take with the Comets' pick (Zolman, Kim Smith?)



I don't like Currie.
I don't like Augustus either...
There are players out there that I do like and enjoy watching play...But I feel that Currie and Augustus are very similar in that they are very, very good most of the time, but not great. I think a player is great when they can step up in big games and in times of adversity. The times I have seen both play, probably around 5 times each, neither of them blow me away (especially tourney time). I just think there are much better players out there who get no where near the attention those two get.


MNfan22



Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 2064



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 12:44 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

styxfan22 wrote:
The Sting are my sleeper pick for next year:

PG: Darling
SG: Currie
SF: Sam
PF: Smith
C: TSB

Bench: Miller, Feaster, McCarville, Whoever they take with the Comets' pick (Zolman, Kim Smith?)


Sleeper to do what ?


Signed, Just Curious




Last edited by MNfan22 on 12/12/05 12:45 am; edited 1 time in total
Keegan



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 12:44 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Four wrote:
I just think there are much better players out there who get no where near the attention those two get.


... like?
Four



Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 165



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 1:35 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Keegan wrote:
Four wrote:
I just think there are much better players out there who get no where near the attention those two get.


... like?


I didn't have anyone in particular in mind when I wrote it but I would have to say:
Sophia Young, get alot of attention but less or on the same wave length as SA and MC and I think Sophia is better.
Cappie Pondexter, same reasons as above.
Crystal Smith, very solid but has never gotten the oppurtunity to go late in post season.
Kim Smith, Liz Shimek, Jamie Broback, Khara Smith, Shay Doron

Pretty much everyone reading these boards know who these players are but if you asked a casual viewer or a less devoted fan...They could probably only name a few players off the cuff, and those players would be Augustus, Currie, Parker, and maybe Davenport. I have the opinion that other players should be advertised and talked up just as much. If the same teams and players are getting all the air time and recognition, that does not do much for the spread in popularity of the game.
The only reason I am here is because I happened to catch a nationally televised Minnesota game last year, of course it was against Augustus and LSU...But it was the first game in which I could actually say that watching womens basketball was enjoyable, and it wasn't because of Augustus.


Keegan



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 3:55 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Four wrote:
Crystal Smith, very solid but has never gotten the oppurtunity to go late in post season.
Kim Smith, Liz Shimek, Jamie Broback, Khara Smith, Shay Doron


These players are "much better" than Augustus and Currie?

Augustus' and Currie's games are made for the pros. Most of the above players are good college players but will struggle to find their niche in the WNBA, though I think Doron and maybe Kim Smith may make an impact.

Sometimes hype isn't justified and it's usually overblown but these players are talked about for a reason. I think the most "overhyped" player at the moment could be Jessica Davenport, who's 6'4" and big but slow and immobile and has limited moves.
styxfan22



Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 842



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 6:49 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

MNfan22 wrote:
styxfan22 wrote:
The Sting are my sleeper pick for next year:

PG: Darling
SG: Currie
SF: Sam
PF: Smith
C: TSB

Bench: Miller, Feaster, McCarville, Whoever they take with the Comets' pick (Zolman, Kim Smith?)


Sleeper to do what ?




Signed, Just Curious



To be one of the best teams in the Eastern Conference, maybe finish 2nd or 3rd. They seemed to play with a lot more energy and enthusiasm after Mugs took over, and they should be adding a great player with the 3rd pick in the draft. They have too much talent to be as bad as last season.


suemar



Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Posts: 2932
Location: Norfolk Va


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 8:48 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I plan on a trip to Charlotte again this year. The areana being in downtown area now will be great. The city is small but neat. i love Reeds gourmet store with wine bar. The Sting however, well, I just hope they play more competive ball this year. It was too sad last year. I do like watching TSB. Ahy Canada!



_________________
2009
3 old nags
Santa Anita
Breeders Cup
gopherfan



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 2434
Location: Central Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 9:27 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

styxfan22 wrote:
The Sting are my sleeper pick for next year:

PG: Darling
SG: Currie
SF: Sam
PF: Smith
C: TSB

Bench: Miller, Feaster, McCarville, Whoever they take with the Comets' pick (Zolman, Kim Smith?)




I think Muggsy should put Janel in the starting line up like he did last year with the 4 games they had left, they did win a few game with her in the starting line up and some close games. She didn't get to do any of the scoring but she the little things and got the rebounds.



_________________
Rah-rah-ah-ah-ah!
Roma-Roma-ma-ah!
Ga-ga-ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

http://www.elyricsworld.com/bad_romance_lyrics_lady_gaga.html
Four



Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 165



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 2:17 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

gopherfan wrote:
styxfan22 wrote:
The Sting are my sleeper pick for next year:

PG: Darling
SG: Currie
SF: Sam
PF: Smith
C: TSB

Bench: Miller, Feaster, McCarville, Whoever they take with the Comets' pick (Zolman, Kim Smith?)




I think Muggsy should put Janel in the starting line up like he did last year with the 4 games they had left, they did win a few game with her in the starting line up and some close games. She didn't get to do any of the scoring but she the little things and got the rebounds.



I agree.
Hopefully she has stepped up her game in the off season, while healing up. But Janel makes other people better, the team starts scoring more and she opens up the lane.


MysticsFan05



Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Posts: 70



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 2:18 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Quote:

Sometimes hype isn't justified and it's usually overblown but these players are talked about for a reason. I think the most "overhyped" player at the moment could be Jessica Davenport, who's 6'4" and big but slow and immobile and has limited moves.


I disagree. Have you seen her play yet this year? She dominates the low post. I know Ohio St. hasn't faced any real competition yet, but she can definitely rebound and is excellent with the outlet pass. She is defintiely not immobile. I don't think scoring moves are what is going to make her effective in the WNBA - it's rebounding.


gopher5



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 2640
Location: Minneapolis, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 2:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Four wrote:
gopherfan wrote:
styxfan22 wrote:
The Sting are my sleeper pick for next year:

PG: Darling
SG: Currie
SF: Sam
PF: Smith
C: TSB

Bench: Miller, Feaster, McCarville, Whoever they take with the Comets' pick (Zolman, Kim Smith?)




I think Muggsy should put Janel in the starting line up like he did last year with the 4 games they had left, they did win a few game with her in the starting line up and some close games. She didn't get to do any of the scoring but she the little things and got the rebounds.



I agree.
Hopefully she has stepped up her game in the off season, while healing up. But Janel makes other people better, the team starts scoring more and she opens up the lane.


I think the reason Janel started was because Tangela was hurt. I don't see Janel starting over TSB or Tangela if both are still with the team. If Janel does remain there next season (I wish she would request a trade ala Powell), I hope she is healthy and is able to earn playing time and is utilized.


Keegan



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 3:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I haven't seen Davenport play this season yet but LSU/Ohio State is being broadcast down here.

It's not that I don't think she'll make it; I just don't think she'll end up being a top tier post. I wouldn't complain if she ended up on the Mercury!
gopherfan



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 2434
Location: Central Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 6:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Quote:
I think the reason Janel started was because Tangela was hurt. I don't see Janel starting over TSB or Tangela if both are still with the team. If Janel does remain there next season (I wish she would request a trade ala Powell), I hope she is healthy and is able to earn playing time and is utilized.




Their are plenty of other Forward/Center players he could of put in to replace Tangela but he didn’t so their has to be some other reason why he started Janel and not anyone else. He has some good options in Janel and he needs to use them, I would like to see Janel continue getting the 10-17 mins that she needs so they can see that she belongs in the starting line up. I want her to be traded to, but where would she go?



_________________
Rah-rah-ah-ah-ah!
Roma-Roma-ma-ah!
Ga-ga-ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

http://www.elyricsworld.com/bad_romance_lyrics_lady_gaga.html
Marjie



Joined: 13 Jun 2005
Posts: 1042



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/05 9:08 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

gopher5 wrote:
Four wrote:
gopherfan wrote:
styxfan22 wrote:
The Sting are my sleeper pick for next year:

PG: Darling
SG: Currie
SF: Sam
PF: Smith
C: TSB

Bench: Miller, Feaster, McCarville, Whoever they take with the Comets' pick (Zolman, Kim Smith?)




I think Muggsy should put Janel in the starting line up like he did last year with the 4 games they had left, they did win a few game with her in the starting line up and some close games. She didn't get to do any of the scoring but she the little things and got the rebounds.



I agree.
Hopefully she has stepped up her game in the off season, while healing up. But Janel makes other people better, the team starts scoring more and she opens up the lane.


I think the reason Janel started was because Tangela was hurt. I don't see Janel starting over TSB or Tangela if both are still with the team. If Janel does remain there next season (I wish she would request a trade ala Powell), I hope she is healthy and is able to earn playing time and is utilized.


Did Janel have surgery on her back? I have seen nothing since she was sent back from Europe. How's her Mom doing?


Ballwinner



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 656
Location: Indianapolis


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 12:48 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ChiChi wrote:
Ha ha. It's worth the price of admission to watch him strut around with Earl Cureton.


The matching maroon suits were money.

The Sting may indeed be a good "sleeper" pick. In 2007, they may wake up in KC and wonder if the Queen City was but a dream.



_________________
There are good ships, and there are wood ships, the ships that sail the sea. But the most important ships for a viable WNBA future are ownerships, and that will always be.
Admiral_Needa



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 5145
Location: Tiburon, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 2:20 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

MysticsFan05 wrote:
Quote:

Sometimes hype isn't justified and it's usually overblown but these players are talked about for a reason. I think the most "overhyped" player at the moment could be Jessica Davenport, who's 6'4" and big but slow and immobile and has limited moves.


I disagree. Have you seen her play yet this year? She dominates the low post. I know Ohio St. hasn't faced any real competition yet, but she can definitely rebound and is excellent with the outlet pass. She is defintiely not immobile. I don't think scoring moves are what is going to make her effective in the WNBA - it's rebounding.



I agree. She's defintiely not immobile. Idea Cheryl Ford didn't come into the league with a lot of scoring moves either... it was all about rebounding.



_________________
2002 WNBA Virtual GM Overall Winner
2006 WNBA Triple Threat Overall Winner
2007 NBA ESPN Fast Break Overall Winner
gopher5



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 2640
Location: Minneapolis, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 10:04 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Marjie wrote:

Did Janel have surgery on her back? I have seen nothing since she was sent back from Europe. How's her Mom doing?


I have not heard or seen anything on either her back or how her Mom is doing. She has been to most of the Gopher games this year.


daspoon



Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 120



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 6:48 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I wonder what Sheri Sam is doing now that she got kicked off her overseas team?
Think that she will re-group and lead the Sting this upcoming season?


ChiChi



Joined: 11 Dec 2005
Posts: 665
Location: Raleigh, NC


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 6:57 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

styxfan22 wrote:
The Sting are my sleeper pick for next year

From your keyboard... Very Happy

Ballwinner wrote:
The Sting may indeed be a good "sleeper" pick. In 2007, they may wake up in KC and wonder if the Queen City was but a dream.
Noooooooooooooooooo. Evil or Very Mad

Four wrote:
I feel that Currie and Augustus are very similar in that they are very, very good most of the time, but not great.

So, would you say they are "virtually bursting with adequatulance" (I love newsradio too)? Personally, I would be thrilled to death if the Sting somehow got Currie. I don't exactly bend over backwards to catch Duke games, but I thought she was very focused in some big games.

gopherfan wrote:
I think Muggsy should put Janel in the starting line up like he did last year with the 4 games they had left

I hope they send her back to Minnesota, if Muggsy is not impressed. It was too bad last year, she really seemed like a positive, "team" player. I don't know if it was more that her back injury was serious, or Trudi Lacey was the problem. But why hang on to her, why not make her and Minnesota fans and happy if you can't find a use for her?


bullsky



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 17713



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 7:01 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I dont know if Janel is fitting with the Sting like a lot of you have said. A trade would be a bad idea. Personally, I think Minnesota would make a trade but who would they give up? A draft pick? One of their wing people? Not sure. Thats the real question. Although, if I were SMS, i'd get rid of Svet ASAP.



_________________
JENNASMITH13.com

2009 WNBA Draft Net - Contributor
Fine In '09 Blog - Contributor


"We will play defense for 94 feet of the court.
We are going to have an up-tempo style and
We are going to make people fear the Fighting Illini."

-Illinois Head Coach Jolette Law
gopherfan



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 2434
Location: Central Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 7:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Quote:
I hope they send her back to Minnesota, if Muggsy is not impressed. It was too bad last year, she really seemed like a positive, "team" player. I don't know if it was more that her back injury was serious, or Trudi Lacey was the problem. But why hang on to her, why not make her and Minnesota fans and happy if you can't find a use for her?


I would love for Janel come back to Minnesota, but their no room for Janel unless they get rid of Ohlde or Hayden, Janel wouldn’t see any time on the court. I would suggest getting rid of one of them but I might get a swift kick in the ass if I did. Janel rookie season wouldn't of suck as merely as bad as it did if they wouldn't of miss diagnosed her back problems.



_________________
Rah-rah-ah-ah-ah!
Roma-Roma-ma-ah!
Ga-ga-ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

http://www.elyricsworld.com/bad_romance_lyrics_lady_gaga.html
styxfan22



Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 842



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 7:58 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

How about McCarve for Tamika Williams?


CamrnCrz1974



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 15403
Location: Phoenix


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 8:29 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Why would Minnesota make that trade? Tamika Williams can start or come off the bench. At 6-3, she uses her body to defend bigger players and to force rebounds.

I didn't think McCarville's game would translate to the WNBA. Yes, she didn't get many minutes, but I always thought Powell would be a very good WNBA player...didn't get the same vibe about Janel.


gopherfan



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 2434
Location: Central Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 8:29 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

styxfan22 wrote:
How about McCarve for Tamika Williams?


Williams and the frist pick.



_________________
Rah-rah-ah-ah-ah!
Roma-Roma-ma-ah!
Ga-ga-ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

http://www.elyricsworld.com/bad_romance_lyrics_lady_gaga.html
CamrnCrz1974



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 15403
Location: Phoenix


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 8:30 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ROFL! No way is McCarville worth Tamika Williams straight up, much less for the #1 pick!


styxfan22



Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 842



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 8:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

TW would be a reasonable price for Minnesota to pay for the attendance boost they'd get with Janel.


PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 7842
Location: Lafayette, Ind.


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 8:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

styxfan22 wrote:
TW would be a reasonable price for Minnesota to pay for the attendance boost they'd get with Janel.


How long is that attendance boost when people realize they are coming to watch McCarville sit on the bench. It would be suicide for the Lynx.


gopherfan



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 2434
Location: Central Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 8:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

CamrnCrz1974 wrote:
ROFL! No way is McCarville worth Tamika Williams straight up, much less for the #1 pick!



Right, because Tamika Williams must of had one of those break out years last year. Wink Rolling Eyes She hasn't proven to be much over the past 2 years.



_________________
Rah-rah-ah-ah-ah!
Roma-Roma-ma-ah!
Ga-ga-ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

http://www.elyricsworld.com/bad_romance_lyrics_lady_gaga.html
styxfan22



Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 842



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 9:08 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:
styxfan22 wrote:
TW would be a reasonable price for Minnesota to pay for the attendance boost they'd get with Janel.


How long is that attendance boost when people realize they are coming to watch McCarville sit on the bench. It would be suicide for the Lynx.


I'm assuming Janel would play better once she got away from Trudi and be the first post off the bench.


gopherfan



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 2434
Location: Central Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 9:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:
styxfan22 wrote:
TW would be a reasonable price for Minnesota to pay for the attendance boost they'd get with Janel.


How long is that attendance boost when people realize they are coming to watch McCarville sit on the bench. It would be suicide for the Lynx.



She would be coming off the bench, but at least not behind T.W or S.L.T. and depending on foul trouble from Ohlde and Hayden which doesn’t take them very long to get into, she could have a good amount of minutes.



_________________
Rah-rah-ah-ah-ah!
Roma-Roma-ma-ah!
Ga-ga-ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

http://www.elyricsworld.com/bad_romance_lyrics_lady_gaga.html
bullsky



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 17713



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 10:19 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

CamrnCrz1974 wrote:
ROFL! No way is McCarville worth Tamika Williams straight up, much less for the #1 pick!


I agree 100%! You send a post player who is proven, but hasnt had decent minutes in the last season to another team for a player than has yet to prove herself even in the little minutes she has gotten. Tamika Williams is worth about three Sting players haha



_________________
JENNASMITH13.com

2009 WNBA Draft Net - Contributor
Fine In '09 Blog - Contributor


"We will play defense for 94 feet of the court.
We are going to have an up-tempo style and
We are going to make people fear the Fighting Illini."

-Illinois Head Coach Jolette Law
Four



Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 165



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 10:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I could find about 3 other threads with the same discussion. There are a few places people would like to see McCarville play including Minnesota and Chicago. But who knows, maybe Charlotte will end up being a great place. I just think we should wait and see.



[quote="ChiChi"]So, would you say they are "virtually bursting with adequatulance" (I love newsradio too)? Personally, I would be thrilled to death if the Sting somehow got Currie. I don't exactly bend over backwards to catch Duke games, but I thought she was very focused in some big games.[quote]

If you like NewsRadio (and who doesn't) go out and get the DVD of seasons 1&2. The next seasons becoming available is based on how well the first set sells. Great Christmas Gift, or Chanukah...


CamrnCrz1974



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 15403
Location: Phoenix


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 11:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Streaks wrote:
CamrnCrz1974 wrote:
ROFL! No way is McCarville worth Tamika Williams straight up, much less for the #1 pick!


I agree 100%! You send a post player who is proven, but hasnt had decent minutes in the last season to another team for a player than has yet to prove herself even in the little minutes she has gotten. Tamika Williams is worth about three Sting players haha


I would love to have Tamika on the Mercury, as the banger to complement Vodi.


Keegan



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/05 11:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

gopherfan wrote:
Right, because Tamika Williams must of had one of those break out years last year. Wink Rolling Eyes She hasn't proven to be much over the past 2 years.


Williams has proven to be a solid role player who could start on the right teams. McCarville has shown what in the WNBA? Even Nicole Powell showed more in her rookie season.
daspoon



Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 120



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/05 12:34 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Uh, I guess that no one but me is interested in Sheri Sad


CamrnCrz1974



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 15403
Location: Phoenix


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/05 12:36 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

daspoon wrote:
Uh, I guess that no one but me is interested in Sheri Sad


Well someone else was, but that was before Sheri left for Charlotte. Shocked


O.G.



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 807



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/05 12:40 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

daspoon wrote:
Uh, I guess that no one but me is interested in Sheri Sad

Somebody's got to lead the Sting and I can't think of anybody better! It seemed like she came on pretty strong as they improved at the end of the year under Muggsy.

Just tryna show ya some love, 'spoon! Wink


O.G.



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 807



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/05 12:43 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

CamrnCrz1974 wrote:
daspoon wrote:
Uh, I guess that no one but me is interested in Sheri Sad


Well someone else was, but that was before Sheri left for Charlotte. Shocked

Such a tease!!!


gopherfan



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 2434
Location: Central Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/05 8:14 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Quote:
McCarville has shown what in the WNBA? Even Nicole Powell showed more in her rookie season.



It's a little different when someone has Unidentified back problems.



_________________
Rah-rah-ah-ah-ah!
Roma-Roma-ma-ah!
Ga-ga-ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

http://www.elyricsworld.com/bad_romance_lyrics_lady_gaga.html
PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 7842
Location: Lafayette, Ind.


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/05 11:41 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

gopherfan wrote:
Quote:
McCarville has shown what in the WNBA? Even Nicole Powell showed more in her rookie season.



It's a little different when someone has Unidentified back problems.


Not if the possibility exists that back problems will persist. What team wants to take that on?


gopherfan



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 2434
Location: Central Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/05 5:06 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:
gopherfan wrote:
Quote:
McCarville has shown what in the WNBA? Even Nicole Powell showed more in her rookie season.



It's a little different when someone has Unidentified back problems.


Not if the possibility exists that back problems will persist. What team wants to take that on?


What difference would that make, if she got the surgery or if it was some what healed.



_________________
Rah-rah-ah-ah-ah!
Roma-Roma-ma-ah!
Ga-ga-ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

http://www.elyricsworld.com/bad_romance_lyrics_lady_gaga.html
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 2997



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/05 5:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Tamika Williams is starter material and, as a RFA, will likely be signed by someone else. - Washington?? Indiana?? Chicago??

The only fair trade would be McCarville, Feaster & their 1st round pick(likely Pondexter) to Minnesota for Nicole Ohlde & Amber Jacobs.


gopher5



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 2640
Location: Minneapolis, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/05 5:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

toad455 wrote:
Tamika Williams is starter material and, as a RFA, will likely be signed by someone else. - Washington?? Indiana?? Chicago??

The only fair trade would be McCarville, Feaster & their 1st round pick(likely Pondexter) to Minnesota for Nicole Ohlde & Amber Jacobs.


I don't see the Lynx letting Tamika go. I think they will match any offer to keep her on the team. She is one of the more experienced players and a vocal team leader plus they have salary cap room.


Alepp03



Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1385



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/05 6:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Unless someone plans to throw a max deal (or something similar) at Tamika (which sounds unreasonable, unless it's a one year deal, and it's someone like Indi or the Merc who need the post help) she won't want to go anywhere IMO. She's captain of the Lynx. She may not start, but she is the type of player you get on the floor somehow. She commands minutes. She does small things, has a good team attitude, and hustles.

I will never forget a couple years back when the Lynx played the Sparks in the first round, nearly upsetting them, almost on Tamika's back.

I don't know exactly how she'd fit in, but I'd take her on the Comets in a split second.



_________________
In a world full of people only some want to fly, isn't that crazy?
MNfan22



Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 2064



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/05 7:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

toad455 wrote:
The only fair trade would be McCarville, Feaster & their 1st round pick(likely Pondexter) to Minnesota for Nicole Ohlde & Amber Jacobs.


Shocked

Lets see ...
bad back J-Mac, fresh off maternity leave Feaster & the #3 pick
=
Ohlde & Jacobs

Shocked

Wow & the Lynx would still keep the #1 pick out of this deal Shocked

well thats a deal that leaves me speechless Shocked Laughing Shocked
maybe after a few more glasses of wine I'll see the light Embarassed


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin