RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Chicago Sky 2019
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sigur3



Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 6180
Location: Chicago-ish


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 8:30 am    ::: Chicago Sky 2019 Reply Reply with quote

Well, here we are again. Never too early to start dreaming of more lottery picks and new head coaches.


Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 20694
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 8:41 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Two priorities: a) Find an actual starting power forward. Don't care if it's in the draft, free agency, trade, whatever. A genuine starting-calibre 4 would fill a glaring hole.
b) Sort the coaching out. I'd be sorely tempted to dump Stocks and see what else can be pulled out of the pool, personally. I'm still not convinced that she knows what she's doing. The defense this season was a disaster, and while there are some tricky building blocks - Sloot/Quigley on the perimeter is never going to be great at the point of attack, and Dolson doesn't exactly clean up everything behind them - I think a decent coach could get them up to average.

The positive is that there's quite a bit of talent here. One of the best point guards in the league, a potential star in DeShields, pure scorer with Quigley, solid enough 5 with Dolson, some young talent on the bench. This team shouldn't be as bad as they were this season.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 49319



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 9:48 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Having two less-than-franchise rookies as starters is never a winning formula. Just ask Indiana.

It’s tough finding a WNBA PF in the draft because most college PF are too small to do the job in the WNBA. Powers, Maya, Coffey, Hooper, etc, were all college PF’s. Gabby and Clark were centers. The Parkers, Stewarts, Ogwumike, and Wilsons (all #1 picks) don’t come around too often, so ideally you find a nice center conversion project, like Charles (also a #1 pick). Chicago probably needs a well-timed #1 pick, but for a prominent PF, this isn’t that year. Last year was that year.

Last year with Wilson gone, CHI had the same problem of needing a PF but there wasn’t an ideal choice at #4. So the question became, do you stretch all the way down to Billings at #4? In hindsight, maybe. But that would have thoroughly violated the best player available rule.

Anyway, who are the potential PF’s in this draft? Maybe Turner, Magbegor, or Shepard if she keeps trimming down. Collier and Howard are on the short side. CHI already has a short PF, so they should probably avoid them. There’s a senior year to be played, but Howard as a lottery pick would most likely be similar to Billings as a lottery pick last year.

As far as free agency, I could see MIN & CHI fighting over Langhorne. She’ll probably end up being overpaid again.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 3118
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 10:06 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The structure of the team must change in order for the team to improve on the defensive side. I will not say that Chicago needs a new power forward. Chicago has a player by the name of Parker that was underutilized this current season. I will say that Dolson has not been a great rim protector for her entire basketball career.
Quigley is an excellent shooter, maybe one of the best pure shooters in WNBA history. She is horrible at playing defense. I'm not suggesting that Chicago get rid of any of these ladies. I'm just suggesting they would be better at being role players.
When it comes to coaching I will not say that Stocks needs to go now but if she continues to play Williams as the starting power forward then I will vote yes, she has to go. Williams got destroyed every game because she is too undersized to play the position in the WNBA.



_________________
Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you to pieces.
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7169



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 1:02 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I'm very disappointed Stocks didn't give Ndour an opportunity to play the 4.The combination of Sloot,Quigly,DeShields,Ndour and Dolson played a combined 12.8 minutes out of a possible 1380 minutes...Ndour had her best scoring games playing alongside J.Appel at PF.One of the jobs of a HC is to exhaust all possibilities.Stocks stubbornly stuck with Gabby and cost Chicago a playoff spot….Stocks defensive approach also played a huge role in the Sky not making the playoffs...When you have liabilities on defense,switching everything makes no sense.You’re basically doing what the opposition wants...Diamond starts the possession guarding the teams best wing player,but after one or two switches, Sloot or Parker is left on an island guarding Diamond's defensive assignment.

That being said,I would keep Stocks on a HC for another season.Chicago had a decent offense despite the hole at PF and Dolson having a down season.Stocks is well respected by her players.She holds all of her players equally accountable.Stocks isn’t afraid to cut a players minutes or give them a stern talking tongue lashing.


Top 5 priorities for Chicago this offseason:

1.The Power Forward position...Chicago has many options

a)Sign-G.Johnson

b)Trade-Harrison,Meesseman,Charles,Stokes(Any trade package would include Copper)

c)Draft-Collier

d)From within-Ndour or Parker(must improve defense and get in better shape)

2.Move Gabby to the bench[/b].Make her the 6th/7th Woman.

3.Dolson and Parker must improve their conditioning.

4.Defense,defense,defense.

5.Coach Stocks must mature as a HC...Recognize the mistakes she made this season,and correct them.Recognize her players weaknesses,and get them to improve by putting in the work during the offseason.Recognize the teams weaknesses,and make the necessary adjustments.


Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 3118
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 1:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I don't know if Parker and Dolson were terribly out of shape. I just believe they do not have great foot speed.



_________________
Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you to pieces.
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7169



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 1:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Comparing rookie seasons:

Loyd-10.7/3.5r/1.9a/0.5s/0.2b/41%/21%/90% in 25.6 mpg

McBride-13.0p/2.3r/1.7r/0.9s/0.1b/40%/39%/84% in 26.0 mpg

Nolan-7.1p/2.0r/1.1a/0.6s/0.2b/33%/29%/81% in 20.2 mpg

K.Smith-11.7p/2.9r/2.0a/0.6s/0.3b/38%/38%/76% in 30.4 mpg

McCoughtry-12.8p/3.1r/2.1a/2.1s/0.3b/47%/29%/74% in 21.6 mpg

Hayes-8.6p/3.1r/2.1a/0.8s/0.3s/39%/27%/78% in 23.1 mpg

Beard-13.1p/4.2r/2.7a/2.0s/1.0b/42%/37%/72% in 30.1 mpg

Augustus-21.9p/3.8r/1.5a/0.6s/0.5b/45%/35%/89% in 33.1 mpg

Taurasi-17.0p/4.4r/3.9a/1.2s/0.7b/41%/33%/76% in 33.2 mpg

Douglas-7.0p/2.3r/1.8a/1.7s/0.3b/36%/31%/72% in 20.0 mpg

DeShields-14.4p/4.9r/2.2a/1.1s/0.2b/42%/33%/83% in 28.5 mpg


Great Job Diamond.


zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7169



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 1:59 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Rock Hard wrote:
I don't know if Parker and Dolson were terribly out of shape. I just believe they do not have great foot speed.


Dolson was definitely out of shape.The Chicago broadcasters made mention of it during one of the game telecast....Parker looked much more thicker Wink than she has in previous seasons....But I agree with you,both players aren't the fastest.......Ndour should be given a shot at PF.


Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 20694
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 2:00 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Parker had the best season of her career by a country mile, so if that's out of shape she should come in out of shape every year.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7169



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 2:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
Parker had the best season of her career by a country mile, so if that's out of shape she should come in out of shape every year.


Or maybe she can continue to improve her conditioning,foot speed and defense.....Parker had a good season offensively but her defense sucked....Based on offense,Parker should easily be the starting PF right now.Unfortunately,when Parker got the opportunity to start,she choked...on offense and defense.


sigur3



Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 6180
Location: Chicago-ish


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 2:30 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The Sky had a chance to draft a "real PF" a few months ago but went with two SFs instead. Another sharp move.

Parker was in fine shape.

Dolson....maybe not. But she's always been slow afoot and will always be a liability defensively as a result. IMO you're not going to be able to build an acceptable defense with her playing so many minutes.

I could roll with Izzy or Collier. I doubt Meesseman is going anywhere and if Charles leaves it sure as hell won't be for here. Don't want Glory or Stokes unless the price is very low. I do agree that Copper might be on her way out though.


Michelle89



Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 15406
Location: Holland


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 2:34 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
Parker had the best season of her career by a country mile, so if that's out of shape she should come in out of shape every year.


She looked a lot stronger this season



_________________
"Sue Bird and Lauren Jackson were and are the dynamic duo. They're the one-two punch. They're all the clich�s possible to describe people that perfectly complement each other, who make each other better and also bring out the best in the team." �Karen Bryant
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4722



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 2:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Not to exciting but might help

Copper for Coffey

Copper and 2nd round pick #15 for Lavender


GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 5082
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 3:40 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

nm
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 20694
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 4:18 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

sigur3 wrote:
Dolson....maybe not. But she's always been slow afoot and will always be a liability defensively as a result. IMO you're not going to be able to build an acceptable defense with her playing so many minutes.

Thibault did it a couple of times in Washington, with noted defensive stalwarts like Ivory Latta and Kara Lawson playing in front of her (and a young and raw Meesseman next to her).



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 3118
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 5:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I will wait until I find out the Sky's draft position and what free agents are available in 2019 to make a decision on which direction the team should go towards adding players to improve the team.
The Chicago ownership must establish clear goals for HC Stocks to achieve in 2019 for her to keep her job. Winning at least 17 games and making the playoffs should be the goals for the Sky for 2019.



_________________
Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you to pieces.
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 17633



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 6:06 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Dolson needs to come into camp next season in shape. If they land the #3 pick, I'd take Collier. #1 or #2 makes you question if they'd trade the pick or trade Dolson.

PG: Vandersloot/Faulkner/Harper or #15 pick
SG: Quigley/Copper
SF: DeShields/Williams
PF: Parker/Collier/Ndour
C: Dolson/Coates



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 7565
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 6:08 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

toad455 wrote:
Dolson needs to come into camp next season in shape. If they land the #3 pick, I'd take Collier. #1 or #2 makes you question if they'd trade the pick or trade Dolson.

PG: Vandersloot/Faulkner/Harper or #15 pick
SG: Quigley/Copper
SF: DeShields/Williams
PF: Parker/Collier/Ndour
C: Dolson/Coates


If they trade the pick in favor of dolson , Stocks needs to have her ass sent to her via Fedex package behind the rest of her body .



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 3118
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 6:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

WNBA 09 wrote:
toad455 wrote:
Dolson needs to come into camp next season in shape. If they land the #3 pick, I'd take Collier. #1 or #2 makes you question if they'd trade the pick or trade Dolson.

PG: Vandersloot/Faulkner/Harper or #15 pick
SG: Quigley/Copper
SF: DeShields/Williams
PF: Parker/Collier/Ndour
C: Dolson/Coates


If they trade the pick in favor of dolson , Stocks needs to have her ass sent to her via Fedex package behind the rest of her body .

Stocks enjoys her buttocks attached to her body so this scenario will NOT take place. Laughing



_________________
Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you to pieces.
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 8608



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 6:13 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Sky had the worst defensive rating in the WNBA but were mid-pack in Offensive Rating. Maybe they need to improve their defense. BTW - the bottom 5 teams had the worst 5 DR numbers. Perhaps there is something to this.


Nixtreefan



Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 2107



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 8:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

toad455 wrote:
Dolson needs to come into camp next season in shape. If they land the #3 pick, I'd take Collier. #1 or #2 makes you question if they'd trade the pick or trade Dolson.

PG: Vandersloot/Faulkner/Harper or #15 pick
SG: Quigley/Copper
SF: DeShields/Williams
PF: Parker/Collier/Ndour
C: Dolson/Coates


So you want them to take another undersized paint player who is less athletic than Williams and doesn't pass or see the floor as well. That makes sense Rolling Eyes


zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7169



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 9:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

If Chicago ends up with the 3rd pick,I would:

Offer the 3rd pick to Washington for Emma Meesseman

G-Sloot
G-Quigley
C-Dolson
F-Meesseman
F-DeShields
6-Gabby
7-Parker
8-Ndour
9-Copper
10-Coates

This team would definitely make some noise in the playoffs.




Last edited by zune69 on 08/20/18 9:53 pm; edited 1 time in total
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 23110



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 9:28 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Why do we think Meeseman will choose to come over to play anywhere except for Mike? I dunno but am guessing it would make her less likely to come.



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
SO ...I lost a bet with Rock about how many wins Chicago would get this year. My punishment - T. Young as my avatar. Well it could be worse!
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7169



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 9:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

myrtle wrote:
Why do we think Meeseman will choose to come over to play anywhere except for Mike? I dunno but am guessing it would make her less likely to come.


Meesseman and Dolson are close friends.

http://www.espn.com/wnba/story/_/id/13140600/how-stefanie-dolson-brought-best-emma-meesseman

Quote:
"She taught her how to yell," Mystics guard Kara Lawson recalled recently. "Stef would scream and then she wanted Emma to match her volume, have her say words, our coverages and yell them. Her point was just, 'Emma, I know you can scream. You just proved you can scream. You gotta have that volume on the court.'"


Quote:
Meesseman, who has only 50 percent of her hearing in both ears, couldn't have had a better teacher than Dolson, who personifies volume, from her purple-dyed hair to her gregarious personality.


Quote:
The two have become close friends over the past year, helping each other mature and becoming one of the best young frontcourts in the league. Though she is still working on it, Meesseman has become more vocal and more of a team leader


Quote:
"Stef has brought it out for her," Mystics coach Mike Thibault said. "They've developed a really good bond between them. You can see it when they play together on the court."


Nixtreefan



Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 2107



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 9:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

oooh this is new, any extra stuff on Emma not wanting to play for Mike and maybe she wants to be the main 4 on the floor?


J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4722



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/20/18 10:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

If were doing more out there trades how about

Lottery pick, Ch. Parker and Copper for N. Ogwumike?

(Assuming LA flames out in the playoffs and wants to get younger and mix things up)


Aladyyn



Joined: 23 Jul 2017
Posts: 1173
Location: Czech Republic


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 2:24 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
If Chicago ends up with the 3rd pick,I would:

Offer the 3rd pick to Washington for Emma Meesseman

G-Sloot
G-Quigley
C-Dolson
F-Meesseman
F-DeShields
6-Gabby
7-Parker
8-Ndour
9-Copper
10-Coates

This team would definitely make some noise in the playoffs.

I mean sure, you can offer it. That's about as far as you'll get though.


Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 3118
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 8:18 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aladyyn wrote:
zune69 wrote:
If Chicago ends up with the 3rd pick,I would:

Offer the 3rd pick to Washington for Emma Meesseman

G-Sloot
G-Quigley
C-Dolson
F-Meesseman
F-DeShields
6-Gabby
7-Parker
8-Ndour
9-Copper
10-Coates

This team would definitely make some noise in the playoffs.

I mean sure, you can offer it. That's about as far as you'll get though.

Chicago will be better off going for a trade for a RFA.
WNBA GMs do not trade high quality players under contract unless there is a personality conflict with someone on the team.



_________________
Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you to pieces.
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7169



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 8:31 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aladyyn wrote:

I mean sure, you can offer it. That's about as far as you'll get though.


You could be right...but you could also be wrong.With Atkins now being #1 on the depth chart at SF.Playing Edd or Emma at SF is less of an option...Playing Edd/Emma at 4/5 is an option I think would work...but only Mike T knows what he's going to do.

If Mike T can trade L.Whalen...then he can also trade Meesseman.


ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 9294



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 9:46 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

As usual, wishful thinking trades are one team's junk/borderline/draft pick for proven player ...

I haven't looked at it closely, but trading Emma Meesseman for anything less than a top-shelf starter makes no sense at all. And you have a proven young player in Emma, and you'll trade her for a No. 3 pick who may or may not even be a starter?



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 3118
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 10:03 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ClayK wrote:
As usual, wishful thinking trades are one team's junk/borderline/draft pick for proven player ...

I haven't looked at it closely, but trading Emma Meesseman for anything less than a top-shelf starter makes no sense at all. And you have a proven young player in Emma, and you'll trade her for a No. 3 pick who may or may not even be a starter?

Yes, Clayk. It's just your common Rebkell trade idea.
I will trade you the lint in my pocket for your ten gold coins.



_________________
Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you to pieces.
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7169



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 10:18 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Wow ,what a shock...The Diamond Deshields hater not high on the 3rd pick in the draft which will most likely be A.Durr.

Rock Hard now has a Diamond DeShields Avatar after he was hating on her.

Rock Hard wrote:

THANK YOU, CLAYK. Every time I read someone's 2018 mock draft they always have DeShields name with Chicago attached to it. No and HELL NO!
DeShields reminds me of a retired NBA player Todd Day. Day would flash a great game with the frequency of Planet X orbiting our solar system. Milwaukee Bucks fans would pull all the hair from their scalps waiting for this man to deliver on his potential. The man did not blow up to be a superstar. Neither will DeShields.


Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes


A.Durr with be a legit 16-20 All-Star caliber player....Mark it down.


ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 9294



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 10:27 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Diamond DeShields is the real deal. Whatever problems she had in college or with USA Basketball were not visible this year with the Sky.

Not only did she play well, she got better throughout the course of the season, and if she continues on this path, she's an All-Star.

The Sky definitely made the right call on her ...

(Of course, you could view Gabby Williams as the third pick -- would you trade Emma for her?)



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 49319



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 10:27 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ClayK wrote:
As usual, wishful thinking trades are one team's junk/borderline/draft pick for proven player ...

I haven't looked at it closely, but trading Emma Meesseman for anything less than a top-shelf starter makes no sense at all. And you have a proven young player in Emma, and you'll trade her for a No. 3 pick who may or may not even be a starter?


If Sanders comes back next year, and you don’t want to mess up the successful chemistry the Mystics stumbled onto this season, then Meesseman is probably coming off the bench. If she’s accepting of that role, I don’t see why it would be a problem. Quality bench play wins you championships. Losing a quality bench can dismantle a dynasty, as Reeve has done her best to demonstrate.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 3118
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 10:30 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
Wow ,what a shock...The Diamond Deshields hater not high on the 3rd pick in the draft which will most likely be A.Durr.

Rock Hard now has a Diamond DeShields Avatar after he was hating on her.

Rock Hard wrote:

THANK YOU, CLAYK. Every time I read someone's 2018 mock draft they always have DeShields name with Chicago attached to it. No and HELL NO!
DeShields reminds me of a retired NBA player Todd Day. Day would flash a great game with the frequency of Planet X orbiting our solar system. Milwaukee Bucks fans would pull all the hair from their scalps waiting for this man to deliver on his potential. The man did not blow up to be a superstar. Neither will DeShields.


Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes


A.Durr with be a legit 16-20 All-Star caliber iPlayer....Mark it down.

Check it out folks. I am man enough to admit when I am wrong. My new avatar is my testimony dedicated to DeShields. How did Durr enter this conversation? This is about people making wacky one sided trade deals.



_________________
Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you to pieces.
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7169



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 10:36 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ClayK wrote:
As usual, wishful thinking trades are one team's junk/borderline/draft pick for proven player ...

I haven't looked at it closely, but trading Emma Meesseman for anything less than a top-shelf starter makes no sense at all. And you have a proven young player in Emma, and you'll trade her for a No. 3 pick who may or may not even be a starter?


There are two reasons why I think Mike T would consider a Meesseman trade:

1.Edd/Emma wasn't a perfect fit last season.If i'm correct,the Mystics had a better record when one of the two did not play.

2.K.Toliver will be 32 year old at the start of next season.A.Durr being Toliver's understudy for 3-4 years then taking over as the SG wouldn't be a bad idea.Durr will be a legit 16-20 All-Star imo...Washington could also use some backcourt scoring off the bench.

That being said,I'd probably keep Emma and play Edd/Emma at the 4/5.

I never siad Mike T would okay a Meesseman for #3 pk trade...only that Chicago should make an inquire.


Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 3118
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 10:42 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Chicago needs to be better defensively and they need to rebound a LOT better. Chicago does not need more players that cannot play great defense.



_________________
Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you to pieces.
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7169



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 5:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

@ Rock Hand

I owe you somewhat of an apology.....After the 2018 draft you really didn't say anything negative about Diamond...Calling you(or ClayK) a Diamond hater was/is over the top on my part...You and Clay have both come to appreciate and respect Diamond's game....Shades is really the only person on this board who continues to take shots at Diamond.

To Rock Hard and ClayK


#Occasionalwnbafan



Joined: 01 Mar 2012
Posts: 1365



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/21/18 6:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Overall the Sky are just a bad team, they need a starting power forward and center. I think Quigley should be moved to the bench in favor of Williams and Diamond, and Dolson could also be moved to a bench role at this point. I’m also not really sold on the idea of Parker being a starting power forward.
sigur3



Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 6180
Location: Chicago-ish


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/18 12:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Quote:
Sherron Shabazz @SherronShabazz
The Chicago Sky has relieved Amber Stocks of her duties as general manager and head coach, the team announced today. #WNBA


HAPPY FRIDAYYYYYYYYY


toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 17633



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/18 12:29 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

sigur3 wrote:
Quote:
Sherron Shabazz @SherronShabazz
The Chicago Sky has relieved Amber Stocks of her duties as general manager and head coach, the team announced today. #WNBA


HAPPY FRIDAYYYYYYYYY


WOW! Thought they'd give her another off-season at least.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
SpaceJunkie



Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 3517
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/18 12:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

sigur3 wrote:
Quote:
Sherron Shabazz @SherronShabazz
The Chicago Sky has relieved Amber Stocks of her duties as general manager and head coach, the team announced today. #WNBA


HAPPY FRIDAYYYYYYYYY


May the Chicago Sky actually hire a replacement who is better than the predecessor for a change. Smile


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 57515
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/18 12:47 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Wonder why they waited so long after the season ended



_________________
Don't take no rhythm,
Don't take no style
Gotta thirst for killin',
Grab your vial
#Occasionalwnbafan



Joined: 01 Mar 2012
Posts: 1365



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/18 12:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The sky should add the Quality guard from Notre Dame, she should be best player available when they pick.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 49319



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/18 12:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

It does seem like female coaches are given a way shorter window to achieve success than men coaches, some of which have been around forever.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 5082
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/18 12:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Quote:
The Chicago Sky has relieved Amber Stocks of her duties as general manager and head coach, the team announced today.

“The entire organization would like to thank Amber for the hard work and dedication that she has given to the Chicago Sky for the past two seasons,” said Sky President and CEO Adam Fox. “At this time, we felt a change was necessary for the 2019 season. We wish her nothing but the best in the future. Our search for a new coach will begin immediately.”

Stocks was named general manager and head coach of the Sky in December 2016, after serving as an assistant coach for the Los Angeles Sparks. In her first year with Chicago, Stocks finished the 2017 regular season with a record of 12-22. The Sky recently completed its 2018 campaign with a 13-21 record.


http://sky.wnba.com/news/chicago-sky-amber-stocks/
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 49319



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/18 12:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

#Occasionalwnbafan wrote:
Quality guard from Notre Dame


Are you doing your Laimbeer imitation? Surprised



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 57515
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/18 12:57 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
It does seem like female coaches are given a way shorter window to achieve success than men coaches, some of which have been around forever.


That's probably not the only outside factor that has such an effect



_________________
Don't take no rhythm,
Don't take no style
Gotta thirst for killin',
Grab your vial
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7169



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/18 1:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I would have given Stocks another season as HC.....but I understand.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 49319



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/18 1:35 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
I would have given Stocks another season as HC.....but I understand.


I wonder how DeShields will respond? That was her coach, the one person that believed in her. It’s really not fair!

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/r43Rfh6Csjg" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin