View previous topic :: View next topic |
Who should win Rookie of the Year? |
Ariel Atkins |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Diamond DeShields |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Kelsey Mitchell |
|
4% |
[ 2 ] |
Kia Nurse |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
Victoria Vivians |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Gabby Williams |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
A'ja Wilson |
|
88% |
[ 37 ] |
someone else |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 42 |
|
Author |
Message |
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 67057 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 06/25/18 7:34 am ::: ROY |
Reply |
|
Monday Poll time!
_________________ I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 06/25/18 2:00 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Five rookies - Wilson, Mitchell, DeShields, Nurse, and Atkins - are averaging double digit points per game. This has not happened since 2006 (Augustus, Pondexter, Dupree, Young, Currie).
Wilson is averaging 20.1 ppg. The last time a rookie averaged over 20 ppg was 2006 (Augustus).
What stood out for me were a few things regarding Wilson.
-- Overall, she is averaging 20.1 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 2.3 apg, 1.5 bpg, while shooting 45.4 percent from the floor and 76.9 percent from the line.
-- Watching Wilson, she has been more willing to take jumpers outside of the paint. Not all are falling, but her form looks good. Developing this mid-range jumper and using it consistently (whether from the baseline, the free throw line, etc.) will only help her.
-- Wilson's 2.3 assists per game is pretty impressive for a rookie post player (especially against 1.5 turnovers, for an A/TO ratio of 1.533).
-- Wilson leads the entire WNBA in free throw attempts per game (8.1) and made free throws per game (6.2). Even bumping up her percentage from the line to 82-83 percent will make her that much more formidable.
-- She is top five in the WNBA in points and rebounds per game. By my count, the last rookie to do that was Candace Parker (2008).
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 06/26/18 6:02 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Quote: |
After opening the season 1-7, the Aces have gone 4-3 in their last seven games behind the brilliant play of rookie forward A’ja Wilson. The 2018 No. 1 overall pick joins the 2013 No. 1 overall pick (Brittney Griner) as the only players to rank in the top five in both scoring and rebounding this far into the season. |
http://www.wnba.com/news/2018-power-rankings-week-6/
|
|
PUmatty
Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 16379 Location: Chicago
Back to top |
Posted: 06/26/18 8:28 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
CamrnCrz1974 wrote: |
Five rookies - Wilson, Mitchell, DeShields, Nurse, and Atkins - are averaging double digit points per game. This has not happened since 2006 (Augustus, Pondexter, Dupree, Young, Currie).
Wilson is averaging 20.1 ppg. The last time a rookie averaged over 20 ppg was 2006 (Augustus).
What stood out for me were a few things regarding Wilson.
-- Overall, she is averaging 20.1 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 2.3 apg, 1.5 bpg, while shooting 45.4 percent from the floor and 76.9 percent from the line.
-- Watching Wilson, she has been more willing to take jumpers outside of the paint. Not all are falling, but her form looks good. Developing this mid-range jumper and using it consistently (whether from the baseline, the free throw line, etc.) will only help her.
-- Wilson's 2.3 assists per game is pretty impressive for a rookie post player (especially against 1.5 turnovers, for an A/TO ratio of 1.533).
-- Wilson leads the entire WNBA in free throw attempts per game (8.1) and made free throws per game (6.2). Even bumping up her percentage from the line to 82-83 percent will make her that much more formidable.
-- She is top five in the WNBA in points and rebounds per game. By my count, the last rookie to do that was Candace Parker (2008). |
It's another indication of how important to for teams to get No. 1 picks. The gap between No. 1 and No. 2 is enormous in most years.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but the 8 of the top 11 scorers in the league are former No. 1 picks, and that group includes neither Candace Parker nor Nneka Oguwumike.
|
|
Richyyy
Joined: 17 Nov 2005 Posts: 24401 Location: London
Back to top |
Posted: 06/26/18 10:28 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
PUmatty wrote: |
It's another indication of how important to for teams to get No. 1 picks. The gap between No. 1 and No. 2 is enormous in most years.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but the 8 of the top 11 scorers in the league are former No. 1 picks, and that group includes neither Candace Parker nor Nneka Oguwumike. |
On the bright side, your team got arguably the greatest player in league history at #3. So at least it's not always true. |
|
PUmatty
Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 16379 Location: Chicago
Back to top |
Posted: 06/26/18 11:17 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Richyyy wrote: |
PUmatty wrote: |
It's another indication of how important to for teams to get No. 1 picks. The gap between No. 1 and No. 2 is enormous in most years.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but the 8 of the top 11 scorers in the league are former No. 1 picks, and that group includes neither Candace Parker nor Nneka Oguwumike. |
On the bright side, your team got arguably the greatest player in league history at #3. So at least it's not always true. |
True. Though the player who might be better is league history was selected first in the same draft.
|
|
WNBA 09
Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 12579 Location: Dallas , Texas
Back to top |
|
Luuuc #NATC
Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 21953
Back to top |
Posted: 06/26/18 11:19 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
PUmatty wrote: |
Richyyy wrote: |
PUmatty wrote: |
It's another indication of how important to for teams to get No. 1 picks. The gap between No. 1 and No. 2 is enormous in most years.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but the 8 of the top 11 scorers in the league are former No. 1 picks, and that group includes neither Candace Parker nor Nneka Oguwumike. |
On the bright side, your team got arguably the greatest player in league history at #3. So at least it's not always true. |
True. Though the player who might be better is league history was selected first in the same draft. |
And of course there were extenuating circumstances that caused her to drop to #3. It wasn't a normal #3 pick.
_________________ Thanks for calling. I wait all night for calls like these.
|
|
WNBA 09
Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 12579 Location: Dallas , Texas
Back to top |
Posted: 06/26/18 11:24 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Id hate to be bibb...you deliver the talent but cant get a successful motivator. Then have to worry about possibly your most consistent player not coming back due to personal ties. Poor Bibb
_________________ 3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 67057 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 06/26/18 11:24 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Luuuc wrote: |
PUmatty wrote: |
Richyyy wrote: |
PUmatty wrote: |
It's another indication of how important to for teams to get No. 1 picks. The gap between No. 1 and No. 2 is enormous in most years.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but the 8 of the top 11 scorers in the league are former No. 1 picks, and that group includes neither Candace Parker nor Nneka Oguwumike. |
On the bright side, your team got arguably the greatest player in league history at #3. So at least it's not always true. |
True. Though the player who might be better is league history was selected first in the same draft. |
And of course there were extenuating circumstances that caused her to drop to #3. It wasn't a normal #3 pick. |
Anne Donovan wanted to take Catchings #2 for Charlotte, but ownership was pressuring her to take someone who could play right away.
_________________ I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
Richyyy
Joined: 17 Nov 2005 Posts: 24401 Location: London
Back to top |
Posted: 06/27/18 7:13 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Funny how similar it is to the NBA draft that introduced the generally-considered-GOAT:
#1 All-time Legend
#2 Dear god what were you thinking
#3 Arguable Greatest Ever
Not a perfect parallel, but oddly close. |
|
|
|