RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Dream @ Aces - 6/08/18

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who will win this game?
Dream
38%
 38%  [ 5 ]
Aces
61%
 61%  [ 8 ]
Total Votes : 13

Author Message
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47828



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/07/18 10:31 am    ::: Dream @ Aces - 6/08/18 Reply Reply with quote

Las Vegas, NV - 3:00 PM ET
TV: None

Video:
https://leaguepass.wnba.com

Game page:
http://www.wnba.com/game/20180608/ATLLVA

ESPN Gamecast:
http://m.espn.com/wnba/gamecast?gameId=401018821



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 6141
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/07/18 10:52 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I Think the aces have a real shot in this one. Atlanta should be a bit worn down after that tough game against CONN the other night then having the travel to vegas the next day.



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7588



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/07/18 11:14 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Could happen. Dream lost to the Stars last year, and twice in 2016. Still I think the Dream should be able to win this one.



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47828



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 1:30 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Half-hour to this game.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7588



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 2:00 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Weird time. Kids day? Are there really kids in Sin City?



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7588



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 2:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Like Ty's new do - the one in the picture.



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.


Last edited by Randy on 06/08/18 2:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 14250
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 2:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
Weird time. Kids day? Are there really kids in Sin City?


The Las Vegas (and surrounding county) school district is the fifth largest in the the country, after only NYC, LA, Chicago, and Miami-Dade.


dinkytown



Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 2374



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 2:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

This blacked out in Denver is so dumb. Mad We better have a team next year!


myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 22506



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 2:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Apparently blacked out in my region even though there is no way to get the ATT channel here. Does this make sense?



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 20170
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 2:34 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

It's ridiculous that it's necessary, I agree, but you could try a VPN. Make the WNBA website think you're in Outer Mongolia and you're fine Smile.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47828



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 2:39 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Cmon, Laimbeer. You cant let those leads slip away so easy.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Michelle89



Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 14870
Location: Holland


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 2:39 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

For some reason Live acces says that the video is not available when i try to watch it on my tablet Confused

@Richyyy, are you able to watch this game?



_________________
"Sue Bird and Lauren Jackson were and are the dynamic duo. They're the one-two punch. They're all the clich�s possible to describe people that perfectly complement each other, who make each other better and also bring out the best in the team." �Karen Bryant
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47828



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 2:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I dont think I've ever seen that before. A ball wedgie from a FT shot.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 20170
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 3:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Michelle89 wrote:
For some reason Live acces says that the video is not available when i try to watch it on my tablet Confused

@Richyyy, are you able to watch this game?

Yeah, been working fine for me via desktop League Pass.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7588



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 3:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
I dont think I've ever seen that before. A ball wedgie from a FT shot.


Did they give her a do over on that or did it count as a miss. I thought she got a do over.



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47828



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 3:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
Shades wrote:
I dont think I've ever seen that before. A ball wedgie from a FT shot.


Did they give her a do over on that or did it count as a miss. I thought she got a do over.


Its a miss, just like when its a FGA.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7588



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 3:37 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
Randy wrote:
Shades wrote:
I dont think I've ever seen that before. A ball wedgie from a FT shot.


Did they give her a do over on that or did it count as a miss. I thought she got a do over.


Its a miss, just like when its a FGA.


Good.

A flagrant by the Lady Lady Vol.

Allen should start instead of Plum.



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 22506



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 4:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Bless her heart. Hamby's two steals in the last minute helped my FD lineup oh so much! Thank you Hamby! Cool



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47828



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 4:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

87-83 ATL final

Hayes 24 pts, 3 reb, 4 ast, 1 stl
McCoughtry 23 pts, 9 reb, 6 ast, 2 stl

Wilson 20 pts, 9 reb, 3 ast
McBride 13 pts, 6 reb, 1 ast, 2 stl


Laimbeer screwed up by not playing Hamby longer... only 16 min. She's the one who made the final score as close as it was.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 16390



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 4:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Laimbeer should dump either Swords or Bone and start Wilson and Hamby.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
Silky Johnson



Joined: 29 Sep 2014
Posts: 479



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 4:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

If Collen insists on keeping Montgomery in the starting lineup, she really should designate McCoughtry as the primary ball-handler. I mean, there's not a single player on the Dream whose first instinct when they get the ball is to pass it, but at least McCoughtry has proven that she can get her teammates easy shots, which is more than anyone else for Atlanta can say. Montgomery seems more like a catch-and-shoot type than a shoot-off-the-dribble type, anyway.



_________________
Professional Hater. The Baron of #HateHard
PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 14250
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 4:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Silky Johnson wrote:
If Collen insists on keeping Montgomery in the starting lineup, she really should designate McCoughtry as the primary ball-handler. I mean, there's not a single player on the Dream whose first instinct when they get the ball is to pass it, but at least McCoughtry has proven that she can get her teammates easy shots, which is more than anyone else for Atlanta can say. Montgomery seems more like a catch-and-shoot type than a shoot-off-the-dribble type, anyway.


Going in all in on Montgomery and leaving Clarendon to languish is baffling to me.


toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 16390



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 4:28 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Agreed about Clarendon wasting away on their bench. Someone should try and trade for her.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 56390
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 4:43 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

re: Montgomery starting

Note that Atlanta has only led at the end of the 1st quarter once this season



_________________
Beard's secret is always to be slightly on the edge but to pull back from disaster at the last minute.
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 20170
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 5:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:
Silky Johnson wrote:
If Collen insists on keeping Montgomery in the starting lineup, she really should designate McCoughtry as the primary ball-handler. I mean, there's not a single player on the Dream whose first instinct when they get the ball is to pass it, but at least McCoughtry has proven that she can get her teammates easy shots, which is more than anyone else for Atlanta can say. Montgomery seems more like a catch-and-shoot type than a shoot-off-the-dribble type, anyway.


Going in all in on Montgomery and leaving Clarendon to languish is baffling to me.

It's been said on the broadcasts multiple times that one of their key priorities this offseason was going after Montgomery. I can't help wondering if one of the things they had to do to achieve that priority was promising Montgomery the starting job.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7588



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 5:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I think Collen believes the starting PG has to have a 3 point shot and Montgomery's is (far) better than Clarendon. So as long as she holds that view, Montgomery is that starter even if Clarendon is better at every other facet of the game. To be fair 4-3 is about where this team should be. So far we beat 2 teams should should beat (Sky and Aces) and beat a couple we probably shouldn't have beat (MN and CT.) We lost to Wings twice and the Mercury - two teams I expected us to lose to. So I'm willing to go with the coach.....for now.

If this persists though - we should look into trading Clarendon and maybe Sykes as neither seems to be a vital part of the new regime.



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
Silky Johnson



Joined: 29 Sep 2014
Posts: 479



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 6:30 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
I think Collen believes the starting PG has to have a 3 point shot and Montgomery's is (far) better than Clarendon. So as long as she holds that view, Montgomery is that starter even if Clarendon is better at every other facet of the game. To be fair 4-3 is about where this team should be. So far we beat 2 teams should should beat (Sky and Aces) and beat a couple we probably shouldn't have beat (MN and CT.) We lost to Wings twice and the Mercury - two teams I expected us to lose to. So I'm willing to go with the coach.....for now.


I am far from convinced that you guys "shouldn't" have been able to beat Connecticut. I mean, the Sun are a better team, I guess, but they aren't better in a way that enables them to exploit Atlanta's weaknesses. Atlanta's margin for error against a team like Connecticut is much wider than it is against, say, the Sparks.



_________________
Professional Hater. The Baron of #HateHard
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7588



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 6:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I just think the Sun have Jones. Normally Williams is over matched against her. Add Chiney to the mix and we should be at an even bigger disadvantage. I would say we are stronger at the 2 and 3, but they have the advantage at 1,4 and 5. I think they may have hurt themselves though by going with Chiney over Jones and then going with the big lineup. Plus - we got Dantas game of the year (so far at least) - may not happen very often.



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
Silky Johnson



Joined: 29 Sep 2014
Posts: 479



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 7:30 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Eh. Jonquel Jones is better than Elizabeth Williams, but 'over matched' is a little hyperbolic. Atlanta also doesn't rely on their posts for offensive production in the same way that Connecticut does, so it's not an apples-to-apples comparison.

There's also the problem that Connecticut has an odd situation where playing their three best players (Ogwumike, A. Thomas, Jones) at the same time diminishes their ability to hurt Atlanta where they're weakest defensively (on the perimeter), but playing their best lineup (with either Ogwumike or Jones on the bench, and Thomas at PF) diminishes their ability to take away what Atlanta is best at, offensively (penetration).



_________________
Professional Hater. The Baron of #HateHard
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7588



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 7:58 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

That's a reasonable analysis, but Jones did have some big games against the Dream last year (like avg 16/14). This year, she just seems off, so that may be a problem for the Sun and due to the crowding issue.



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
Silky Johnson



Joined: 29 Sep 2014
Posts: 479



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 8:13 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
That's a reasonable analysis, but Jones did have some big games against the Dream last year (like avg 16/14).


She did but, again, Connecticut relies on their posts for offense much moreso than the Atlanta does, so Jones outscoring Elizabeth Williams doesn't hurt the Dream nearly as much as, say, Courtney Williams outscoring Tiffany Hayes would.

Also, having McCoughtry back widens Atlanta's margin for error against Connecticut because, even when she's not scoring well, she's getting Breland wide-open layups, or drawing help defense away from Montgomery, to get her a wide-open look at a three, or taking the other team's best wing defender off Tiffany Hayes. Whereas having Ogwumike back doesn't really make Jones or Thomas' jobs any easier. I mean, they're 6-1 because they're talented, and they're well coached, but having two of your three best players play the same position is probably, eventually, going to become a problem.



_________________
Professional Hater. The Baron of #HateHard
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7588



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 8:24 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

On that we both agree.



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
canadaball



Joined: 24 May 2013
Posts: 231



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 10:13 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

"I mean, they're 6-1 because they're talented, and they're well coached, but having two of your three best players play the same position is probably, eventually, going to become a problem."

Have you actually analyzed Ct's first 7 games? In the opener, they got to play Las Vegas w/o McBride (Shoni Schimmel saw minutes); then LA w/o Parker and Lavender; home game with hapless Indiana; then Chicago w/o Quigley and Dolson; on to Washington w/o DelaD and Cloud. Only in the last 2 games did they meet fairly healthy mid level teams (tho NY was minus Prince). It is not unfair to value the Sun's talents using the loss to Atlanta, and very fortunate win over NY as a better barometer than those first five victories.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47828



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 11:33 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Sounds remarkably similar to analysis found here.
http://boards.rebkell.net/viewtopic.php?t=94509&start=6



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Silky Johnson



Joined: 29 Sep 2014
Posts: 479



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/08/18 11:59 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

canadaball wrote:
"I mean, they're 6-1 because they're talented, and they're well coached, but having two of your three best players play the same position is probably, eventually, going to become a problem."

Have you actually analyzed Ct's first 7 games? In the opener, they got to play Las Vegas w/o McBride (Shoni Schimmel saw minutes); then LA w/o Parker and Lavender; home game with hapless Indiana; then Chicago w/o Quigley and Dolson; on to Washington w/o DelaD and Cloud. Only in the last 2 games did they meet fairly healthy mid level teams (tho NY was minus Prince). It is not unfair to value the Sun's talents using the loss to Atlanta, and very fortunate win over NY as a better barometer than those first five victories.


I suppose that you could, if you were so inclined. I feel comfortable evaluating their talent just as I did. The only team that they beat, whom I believe that they would have lost to at full strength was Los Angeles. Now, if Washington had been at full strength and at full rest, they might have beaten Connecticut, but I've never thought that highly of Thibault's coaching, and chances are that Delle Donne would have gone for thirty, and the Mystics would have lost by five.

I will stipulate that they've benefited from a soft early schedule, though: Las Vegas, Indiana and Chicago, I think they would have beaten regardless of whom was available. New York was a slight surprise, I guess, but only in that they were on the road; that was hardly an upset.

I reckon that we'll have a better idea of whom the 'real' Sun are after this road trip. IIRC, Atlanta got off to a fast start last year, and some people even had the audacity to imply that they might be better without McCoughtry... then they had a five-game road trip that re-introduced them to reality. We'll see what 'reality' looks like for the Sun at the end of the month.



_________________
Professional Hater. The Baron of #HateHard
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7588



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/09/18 3:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Sun just beat the team that used to be the Minnesota Lynx, so maybe the Sun are sort of real. But then again, so have some other teams including the Dream.



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin