RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Trade proposal thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 20597
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 05/27/18 7:20 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
Or Johnson for Harrison + LV 2nd (if they still have one?).

As far as I know we still don't know what issue Harrison's dealing with, but assuming it's short-term I'd certainly be tempted by something like that if I were Dallas. But I'm not sure how happy Glory would be stuck behind Wilson, or if Vegas would feel they need her while trying to develop Wilson as their star.

So maybe we send Harrison to Dallas, Glory to Chicago to fill that 4 spot, and one of Chicago's many wings (like, say, Copper) to Vegas. With whoever can talk their way into an extra pick getting some extra scraps to even things out.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 49070



Back to top
PostPosted: 05/27/18 7:41 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I wouldn’t just randomly trade Johnson, especially if she’s not a locker room problem and has bonded well with the team. There’s nothing wrong with a team having some serious depth. That’s how you win championships. That’s how a team manages well through injuries, a compacted season, and foul trouble. Johnson has been working on her range to be more perimeter-oriented, and she can still work in the trenches.

Just think when the Wings are back to full strength with Powers and Plaisance. What a luxury for Fred Williams. He can do frequent subs without losing the level of play.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 7491
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 05/27/18 11:43 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
I wouldn’t just randomly trade Johnson, especially if she’s not a locker room problem and has bonded well with the team. There’s nothing wrong with a team having some serious depth. That’s how you win championships. That’s how a team manages well through injuries, a compacted season, and foul trouble. Johnson has been working on her range to be more perimeter-oriented, and she can still work in the trenches.

Just think when the Wings are back to full strength with Powers and Plaisance. What a luxury for Fred Williams. He can do frequent subs without losing the level of play.



Omg ugh thanks shades , idk why people are back on the trade glory train. Its not happening especially for an unproven posts.Once again giving up scraps for a dinner plate Laughing



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
basketballologist



Joined: 05 Aug 2013
Posts: 237



Back to top
PostPosted: 05/27/18 3:03 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Glory Johnson for DeWanna Bonner and Marie Gulich. She can be reunited with Britney Griner. Laughing Laughing Laughing


myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 22988



Back to top
PostPosted: 05/27/18 11:33 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

basketballologist wrote:
Glory Johnson for DeWanna Bonner and Marie Gulich. She can be reunited with Britney Griner. Laughing Laughing Laughing


don't...even.....go.....there!



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
SO ...I lost a bet with Rock about how many wins Chicago would get this year. My punishment - T. Young as my avatar. Well it could be worse!
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7166



Back to top
PostPosted: 05/31/18 11:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Langhorne for Nared.


toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 17476



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 4:25 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
Langhorne for Nared.


Interesting. Would Wilson start at center, or Langhorne? I still think Langhorne's best option is to go to Chicago.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
chapulana



Joined: 26 May 2018
Posts: 53



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 4:40 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
Langhorne for Nared.


Could you explain?


Michelle89



Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 15325
Location: Holland


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 5:11 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Right now with Howard starting i dont see a reason to trade Langhorne right away (only if we can get a solid center). Let Langhorne come off the bench and add to the bench production. She has always been one of the most efficient players in the league. Always shooting a high fieldgoal %. So if there is anyone that can be effective off the bench it's Langhorne.



_________________
"Sue Bird and Lauren Jackson were and are the dynamic duo. They're the one-two punch. They're all the clich�s possible to describe people that perfectly complement each other, who make each other better and also bring out the best in the team." �Karen Bryant
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7166



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 12:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

chapulana wrote:
zune69 wrote:
Langhorne for Nared.


Could you explain?


Michelle89 wrote:
Right now with Howard starting i dont see a reason to trade Langhorne right away (only if we can get a solid center). Let Langhorne come off the bench and add to the bench production. She has always been one of the most efficient players in the league. Always shooting a high fieldgoal %. So if there is anyone that can be effective off the bench it's Langhorne.


1.The emergence of Howard...
2.How many more times can Seattle core Langhorne?...At some point,she's going to sign with another franchise.
3.Seattle needs a SF with size and upside(Nared...6'2)
4.In Seattle's last two postseason appearances,Langhorne was bad:4.5p/5r/37%/4.5 fouls in 21 mpg.

I believe Langhorne can provide value coming off the bench.However,Seattle can't core KL forever...Acquiring a young SF would be a wise move.


PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 14384
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 1:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
chapulana wrote:
zune69 wrote:
Langhorne for Nared.


Could you explain?


Michelle89 wrote:
Right now with Howard starting i dont see a reason to trade Langhorne right away (only if we can get a solid center). Let Langhorne come off the bench and add to the bench production. She has always been one of the most efficient players in the league. Always shooting a high fieldgoal %. So if there is anyone that can be effective off the bench it's Langhorne.


1.The emergence of Howard...
2.How many more times can Seattle core Langhorne?...At some point,she's going to sign with another franchise.
3.Seattle needs a SF with size and upside(Nared...6'2)
4.In Seattle's last two postseason appearances,Langhorne was bad:4.5p/5r/37%/4.5 fouls in 21 mpg.

I believe Langhorne can provide value coming off the bench.However,Seattle can't core KL forever...Acquiring a young SF would be a wise move.


Why would Las Vegas make that trade?


basketballologist



Joined: 05 Aug 2013
Posts: 237



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 2:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:
zune69 wrote:
chapulana wrote:
zune69 wrote:
Langhorne for Nared.


Could you explain?


Michelle89 wrote:
Right now with Howard starting i dont see a reason to trade Langhorne right away (only if we can get a solid center). Let Langhorne come off the bench and add to the bench production. She has always been one of the most efficient players in the league. Always shooting a high fieldgoal %. So if there is anyone that can be effective off the bench it's Langhorne.


1.The emergence of Howard...
2.How many more times can Seattle core Langhorne?...At some point,she's going to sign with another franchise.
3.Seattle needs a SF with size and upside(Nared...6'2)
4.In Seattle's last two postseason appearances,Langhorne was bad:4.5p/5r/37%/4.5 fouls in 21 mpg.

I believe Langhorne can provide value coming off the bench.However,Seattle can't core KL forever...Acquiring a young SF would be a wise move.


Why would Las Vegas make that trade?



Langhorne to Indiana for Victoria Vivians


PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 14384
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 2:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

basketballologist wrote:
PUmatty wrote:
zune69 wrote:
chapulana wrote:
zune69 wrote:
Langhorne for Nared.


Could you explain?


Michelle89 wrote:
Right now with Howard starting i dont see a reason to trade Langhorne right away (only if we can get a solid center). Let Langhorne come off the bench and add to the bench production. She has always been one of the most efficient players in the league. Always shooting a high fieldgoal %. So if there is anyone that can be effective off the bench it's Langhorne.


1.The emergence of Howard...
2.How many more times can Seattle core Langhorne?...At some point,she's going to sign with another franchise.
3.Seattle needs a SF with size and upside(Nared...6'2)
4.In Seattle's last two postseason appearances,Langhorne was bad:4.5p/5r/37%/4.5 fouls in 21 mpg.

I believe Langhorne can provide value coming off the bench.However,Seattle can't core KL forever...Acquiring a young SF would be a wise move.


Why would Las Vegas make that trade?



Langhorne to Indiana for Victoria Vivians


Laughing Laughing Laughing


zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7166



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 2:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:

Why would Las Vegas make that trade?


1.LV desperately needs a backup post...Bone has been shockingly bad: 1.0p/1.5r/2.5a/1.5t/18%/0% in 12.2 mpg

2.Nared continues to fall lower and lower on the LV depth chart...She only plays during blowouts...Nared had a DNP in LV's home opener against Seattle(close game=No PT)


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 49070



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 2:17 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Laimbeer can just see what he’s got until Harrison returns.

If he passed on Russell, makes me think he gave guaranteed contract to at least Swords. Not sure why he’d give one to Bone tho. She was just happy to be playing where she lives.

Not sure what’s going on with Bone. How could she go from MIP to table scraps in a few years? Patience may be best move. The whole team needs a little patience.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned


Last edited by Shades on 06/01/18 2:24 pm; edited 1 time in total
PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 14384
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 2:19 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
PUmatty wrote:

Why would Las Vegas make that trade?


1.LV desperately needs a backup post...Bone has been shockingly bad: 1.0p/1.5r/2.5a/1.5t/18%/0% in 12.2 mpg

2.Nared continues to fall lower and lower on the LV depth chart...She only plays during blowouts...Nared had a DNP in LV's home opener against Seattle(close game=No PT)


If you are building for the future (contingent on high draft picks), you don't do that by pick up fading 11-year back-ups.


Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 8503



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 2:22 pm    ::: Re: Trade proposal thread Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
I.McGee-Stafford for K.Mosqueda-lewis.

I don't think McGee-Stafford is in the future plans of the Dream...Atlanta desperately needs a 3 pt shooter.Atlanta was the worst 3 pt shooting team last season,and shot 5-18 in their season opener....Seattle could use some size in the post.


Suddenly this deal is looking a little better. Laughing



_________________
Lodestar
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7166



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 2:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:
zune69 wrote:
PUmatty wrote:

Why would Las Vegas make that trade?


1.LV desperately needs a backup post...Bone has been shockingly bad: 1.0p/1.5r/2.5a/1.5t/18%/0% in 12.2 mpg

2.Nared continues to fall lower and lower on the LV depth chart...She only plays during blowouts...Nared had a DNP in LV's home opener against Seattle(close game=No PT)


If you are building for the future (contingent on high draft picks), you don't do that by pick up fading 11-year back-ups.


If you're building for the future, you don't sign Young and Swords.


PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 14384
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 2:24 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
PUmatty wrote:
zune69 wrote:
PUmatty wrote:

Why would Las Vegas make that trade?


1.LV desperately needs a backup post...Bone has been shockingly bad: 1.0p/1.5r/2.5a/1.5t/18%/0% in 12.2 mpg

2.Nared continues to fall lower and lower on the LV depth chart...She only plays during blowouts...Nared had a DNP in LV's home opener against Seattle(close game=No PT)


If you are building for the future (contingent on high draft picks), you don't do that by pick up fading 11-year back-ups.


If you're building for the future, you don't sign Young and Swords.


Agreed. I don't they should have done that either, though you do have to fill a roster somehow.


Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 8503



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 2:25 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
PUmatty wrote:
zune69 wrote:
PUmatty wrote:

Why would Las Vegas make that trade?


1.LV desperately needs a backup post...Bone has been shockingly bad: 1.0p/1.5r/2.5a/1.5t/18%/0% in 12.2 mpg

2.Nared continues to fall lower and lower on the LV depth chart...She only plays during blowouts...Nared had a DNP in LV's home opener against Seattle(close game=No PT)


If you are building for the future (contingent on high draft picks), you don't do that by pick up fading 11-year back-ups.


If you're building for the future, you don't sign Young and Swords.


I can see a couple of experienced players in the mix to kind of lead the way for the younger ones and to provide some stability on the court. Not sure I'd go for Langhorne though if I were LV.

I would give Seattle one of the Dream's 2nd round picks in 2019 for Langhorne though.



_________________
Lodestar
PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 14384
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 2:37 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
zune69 wrote:
PUmatty wrote:
zune69 wrote:
PUmatty wrote:

Why would Las Vegas make that trade?


1.LV desperately needs a backup post...Bone has been shockingly bad: 1.0p/1.5r/2.5a/1.5t/18%/0% in 12.2 mpg

2.Nared continues to fall lower and lower on the LV depth chart...She only plays during blowouts...Nared had a DNP in LV's home opener against Seattle(close game=No PT)


If you are building for the future (contingent on high draft picks), you don't do that by pick up fading 11-year back-ups.


If you're building for the future, you don't sign Young and Swords.


I can see a couple of experienced players in the mix to kind of lead the way for the younger ones and to provide some stability on the court. Not sure I'd go for Langhorne though if I were LV.

I would give Seattle one of the Dream's 2nd round picks in 2019 for Langhorne though.


Langhorne strikes me as a player that could make a difference for a team that was close and needs some additional help to get over the hump. Say, if we're a little deeper in the season and Chicago looks like a play-off team.

On the other hand, that team could also be Seattle.


Nixtreefan



Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 2017



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 3:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

How about Requina for your lottery pick next year Laughing Laughing


chapulana



Joined: 26 May 2018
Posts: 53



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 3:24 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:


On the other hand, that team could also be Seattle.


This closes it. My exact reasoning. Veteran, rotation, on team with chances (at least judging by what we've seen so far,... The destination would exactly fill that description, and Seattle does too, so I think holding on her is the most reasonable thing.


Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 3115
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 6:45 pm    ::: Re: Trade proposal thread Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
zune69 wrote:
I.McGee-Stafford for K.Mosqueda-lewis.

I don't think McGee-Stafford is in the future plans of the Dream...Atlanta desperately needs a 3 pt shooter.Atlanta was the worst 3 pt shooting team last season,and shot 5-18 in their season opener....Seattle could use some size in the post.


Suddenly this deal is looking a little better. Laughing

Seattle pick up Russell and her talent level is equal to McGee-Stafford. No deal.



_________________
Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you to pieces.
Nixtreefan



Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 2017



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 7:14 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

What happens with Toks contract next year?


Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 8503



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/01/18 7:19 pm    ::: Re: Trade proposal thread Reply Reply with quote

Rock Hard wrote:
Randy wrote:
zune69 wrote:
I.McGee-Stafford for K.Mosqueda-lewis.

I don't think McGee-Stafford is in the future plans of the Dream...Atlanta desperately needs a 3 pt shooter.Atlanta was the worst 3 pt shooting team last season,and shot 5-18 in their season opener....Seattle could use some size in the post.


Suddenly this deal is looking a little better. Laughing

Seattle pick up Russell and her talent level is equal to McGee-Stafford. No deal.


May be Russell> IMS



_________________
Lodestar
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7166



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/02/18 11:52 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Hartley & Vaughn for Harrison..... or Nared & Hamby.


root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4399
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/02/18 12:10 pm    ::: Re: Trade proposal thread Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
May be Russell> IMS

zune69 wrote:
Hartley & Vaughn for Harrison.


Where were you guys two weeks ago? Liberty fans would have gone for either trade, maybe both. Now Russell is gone, and we can't trade Hartley because L. Allen is gone.

Not that the real GMs or coaches would agree with us. Laughing



_________________
Even now by the gate with your long hair blowing
And the colors of the day that lie along your arms
You must barter your life to make sure you are living
And the crowd that has come
You give them the colors
And the bells and wind and the dream
TotalCardinalMove



Joined: 13 Oct 2013
Posts: 1109



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/02/18 2:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
Hartley & Vaughn for Harrison..... or Nared & Hamby.


Nurse should be the only Liberty guard LV should be interested in.


basketballologist



Joined: 05 Aug 2013
Posts: 237



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/18 5:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Minnesota receive:
Kia Vaughn or Kiah Stokes

New York receive:
2019 1st round pick


WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 7491
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/18 5:23 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

basketballologist wrote:
Minnesota receive:
Kia Vaughn or Kiah Stokes

New York receive:
2019 1st round pick


Minnesota giving away possibly there only 1st Rd pick next season with an aging team sounds like a no .



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
basketballologist



Joined: 05 Aug 2013
Posts: 237



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/18 5:25 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

WNBA 09 wrote:
basketballologist wrote:
Minnesota receive:
Kia Vaughn or Kiah Stokes

New York receive:
2019 1st round pick


Minnesota giving away possibly there only 1st Rd pick next season with an aging team sounds like a no .


They are getting nothing from Lynetta Kizer


basketballologist



Joined: 05 Aug 2013
Posts: 237



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/18 5:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

And if that 1st round pick is a late first round, whose to say that that player will make the team next season.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 49070



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/18 5:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

basketballologist wrote:
And if that 1st round pick is a late first round, whose to say that that player will make the team next season.


I'll say it. She'll make the team.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 7491
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/18 6:00 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
basketballologist wrote:
And if that 1st round pick is a late first round, whose to say that that player will make the team next season.


I'll say it. She'll make the team.


+1



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 8503



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/18 6:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

And people thought the IMS trade was bad. Minny could trade a possible lottery pick (and they have 2 chances to get one) for Vaughn? Or even Stokes? Well - this would give Reeve a chance to show how much she really loves vets and hates rooks......



_________________
Lodestar
WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 7491
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/18 6:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
And people thought the IMS trade was bad. Minny could trade a possible lottery pick (and they have 2 chances to get one) for Vaughn? Or even Stokes? Well - this would give Reeve a chance to show how much she really loves vets and hates rooks......


Or give reeve a chance to show that she deserves to be fired.



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
SpaceJunkie



Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 3499
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/18 7:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
And people thought the IMS trade was bad. Minny could trade a possible lottery pick (and they have 2 chances to get one) for Vaughn? Or even Stokes? Well - this would give Reeve a chance to show how much she really loves vets and hates rooks......


It's already obvious that Reeve really loves vets and hates young players. She got rid of a player who I thought was supposed to be really good (but I hid it on here through sarcasm, because I was afraid I might be wrong, and didn't want to be made fun of for it) in Natasha Howard so she could sign the uninspiring Kizer, and as many guards as possible for her to be able to DNP-Coach's Decision Alexis Jones for the entire season.
If the Lynx don't miss the playoffs this year (as their only hope to undo the damage done is PPs), I'm canceling my tickets, because, if it wasn't for David "You're going to love Jonny Flynn (over Stephen Curry)" Kahn, this may be biggest case of incompetence I have ever seen as a Minnesota sports fan (and that's a low bar), because I thought the Lynx are supposed to be trying to win it all this year, but weakening your bench, and making mistakes 1st grade teams don't make (not using fouls-to give when the other team's most clutch player has the ball) would otherwise make this seem like this is more obvious of a tank-job than the 2012 Mercury.




Last edited by SpaceJunkie on 06/05/18 10:04 pm; edited 2 times in total
SpaceJunkie



Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 3499
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/18 7:18 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

basketballologist wrote:
WNBA 09 wrote:
basketballologist wrote:
Minnesota receive:
Kia Vaughn or Kiah Stokes

New York receive:
2019 1st round pick


Minnesota giving away possibly there only 1st Rd pick next season with an aging team sounds like a no .


They are getting nothing from Lynetta Kizer


Never forget that Reeve decided she'd rather have Kizer as the Lynx's only experienced backup post this year over Natasha Howard! Nobody, except me, Shades, and maybe 2 other people in the entire world have the guts to say this!


Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 8503



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/18 8:49 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Ok - Angel+?? for J. Jones. Sun are a contender but Jones+Chiney+Thomas at the 3 is not working and they need someone who can step up big time in the playoffs. Dream need someone to build around for the years ahead.

Dream might have to add a player - Williams for Chiney's backup? IMS+draft pick? Idk. Sun don't need any of our guards. (Maybe we get Stricklen as part of the deal?)



_________________
Lodestar
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 49070



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/18 10:33 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

seems to bRandy wrote:
Ok - Angel+?? for J. Jones. Sun are a contender but Jones+Chiney+Thomas at the 3 is not working and they need someone who can step up big time in the playoffs.


No mention of Stricklen, who is their starter at SF. Their formula seems include a deadly three point shooter at SF, which McCoughtry is not. Miller claims to be going for a certain culture (even though he shows little class himself) which I’m not sure McCoughtry fits.

Randy wrote:
Dream need someone to build around for the years ahead.


You’re not happy with how the season is going? Seems like you have a contender. Don’t go into Reeve mode and mess things up.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned


Last edited by Shades on 06/16/18 10:51 am; edited 1 time in total
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 8503



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/18 10:46 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I was thinking we should get Stricklen too and probably have to throw in another player or pick. I'm happy with the way the season is going, but I don't think we are a contender now. We are not as bad as last year's team, but that's it. We end up around 500 +_ a game or two either way.



_________________
Lodestar
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 22988



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/18 10:53 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Pretty sure CT is happy with their young crew and not looking to mess it up for years to come.



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
SO ...I lost a bet with Rock about how many wins Chicago would get this year. My punishment - T. Young as my avatar. Well it could be worse!
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 57451
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/18 10:55 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
Ok - Angel+?? for J. Jones. Sun are a contender but Jones+Chiney+Thomas at the 3 is not working and they need someone who can step up big time in the playoffs. Dream need someone to build around for the years ahead.

Dream might have to add a player - Williams for Chiney's backup? IMS+draft pick? Idk. Sun don't need any of our guards. (Maybe we get Stricklen as part of the deal?)


Why would the Dream need to add a player? Jones season last year is looking like a fluke. This year she's posting numbers just like her rookie year except with more minutes.



_________________
Ena! Ena!
Akout, akout, an déyè
Chaque amour fi nou wa na né
Chaque amour fi na né
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 8503



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/18 10:57 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

That's because Chiney+Jonquel < Either one by herself. Time to buy low. Laughing



_________________
Lodestar
willtalk



Joined: 13 Apr 2012
Posts: 503
Location: NorCal


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/18 2:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
That's because Chiney+Jonquel < Either one by herself. Time to buy low. Laughing


That is true. You can not always go by numbers. It depends on who you are playing with and how many quality minutes they are giving you.


mavcarter



Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 4644
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/18 5:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
Why would the Dream need to add a player? Jones season last year is looking like a fluke. This year she's posting numbers just like her rookie year except with more minutes.


LOL, what?

Jones is playing almost 7 less minutes per game than last year, I doubt she’s going to put up 15 and 12 in 21 MPG..


Aladyyn



Joined: 23 Jul 2017
Posts: 1137
Location: Czech Republic


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/18 5:06 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

myrtle wrote:
Pretty sure CT is happy with their young crew and not looking to mess it up for years to come.

Until they lose in the playoffs to some team with a legit superstar.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 49070



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/18 5:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aladyyn wrote:
myrtle wrote:
Pretty sure CT is happy with their young crew and not looking to mess it up for years to come.

Until they lose in the playoffs to some team with a legit superstar.


The Mystics?



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Michelle89



Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 15325
Location: Holland


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/16/18 5:24 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aladyyn wrote:
myrtle wrote:
Pretty sure CT is happy with their young crew and not looking to mess it up for years to come.

Until they lose in the playoffs to some team with a legit superstar.


They have a young team that doesnt have to go to the finals right away. Jones can be their superstar in the future (if they start going to her more and treat her that way) while Chiney will be a solid 2nd scoring option. If C Williams continues to develop and goes the Loyd route then her as your 3rd option is a luxury that many teams dont have. Combine that with a good PG and SF and a decent bench and you have a championship contender



_________________
"Sue Bird and Lauren Jackson were and are the dynamic duo. They're the one-two punch. They're all the clich�s possible to describe people that perfectly complement each other, who make each other better and also bring out the best in the team." �Karen Bryant
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 3 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin