RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

UCLA @ Seton Hall - 12/17/17

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - Game Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63779



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/16/17 9:06 pm    ::: UCLA @ Seton Hall - 12/17/17 Reply Reply with quote

South Orange, NJ - 1:00 PM ET
TV: None

Video:
http://www.shupirates.com/watch/?Live=168&type=Live (free)

https://www.iheart.com/live/WSOU-895-FM-5252/

Live stats:
http://sidearmstats.com/setonhall/wbball/



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned


Last edited by Shades on 12/17/17 3:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
RavenDog



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 6878
Location: Home


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/16/17 11:01 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Long way to go to play patsies...

Seton Hall on Dec. 17th and then,

Fordham on Dec. 20th

Must have a lot of extra time and money to blow.


Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18031
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 12:35 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Hey, who says visiting New York isn't a reason?

Also, I take exception to SHU and Fordham being labeled as patsies.

If you see a couple of loud, crazy people (possibly with a Jolly Roger) and one very confused dude sitting next to them, near the band, that would be us.



_________________
Ardent believer in the separation of church and stadium.
Happycappie25



Joined: 07 Feb 2006
Posts: 4174
Location: QUEENS!!!!


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 7:49 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

RavenDog wrote:
Long way to go to play patsies...

Seton Hall on Dec. 17th and then,

Fordham on Dec. 20th

Must have a lot of extra time and money to blow.


SHU and Fordham aren't huge threats but they are not cupcakes either...both teams will likely win 20 games...Fordham actually has a bit of a resume and if they hadn't choked vs PSU they WOULD have a resume with decent wins over Pitt and STJ. I would think they will be top 3 in a slightly down A10 and G'marice Davis may very well be a late round camp flyer for some team...one of the nation's top rebounders, very physical well sized 4.

SHU has talent...actually played RU close until they for some reason forgot you play 4 quarters of basketball instead of 3...their other loss was in similar fashion to Princeton who is an upper tier mid major...rest of the schedule I agree is Yawn (Had an argument with the coach over this because he was over hyping wake and BC) but they have talent and is about on par with the rest of the big east sans DePaul (Given how off Marquette has been so far) and have a frontline that will challenge Billings with Fountain and Brown, 2 legit rebounders who can score...Fountain played for Temple most of her career if the name sounds familiar, Ye olde Grad Transfer Smile

So 2 good workouts...plus visiting NY is a recruiting thing...you wanna rag on UCLA? Michigan flew in just to play LIU BROOKLYN in a glorified scrimmage (Sorry Steph) and then flew home to play 6 games in the homeland (Detroit and a 5 game homestand that's ongoing) so yeah I do resent that remark.



_________________
"Leave it to the NCAA women's basketball committee to turn a glass slipper into glass ceiling" Graham Hays
patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2313
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 10:02 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

RavenDog wrote:
Long way to go to play patsies...

Seton Hall on Dec. 17th and then,

Fordham on Dec. 20th

Must have a lot of extra time and money to blow.


Coach Close answers that question here:

http://www.uclawbb.com/gallery/coachs-corner-new-york-trip


GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 8227
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 1:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Go Pirates. Deflate that Pac12 helium balloon.
Nixtreefan



Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 2539



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 2:03 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aww c'mon Glenn they gotta play someone where they don't have to jack up outside shots Wink


GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 8227
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 2:37 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

60-53 at the 3Q. Pirates deporting themselves admirably.

Where have you gone, Phyllis Mangina, our conference turns its lonely eyes to you.
sigur3



Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 6191
Location: Chicago-ish


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 2:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

OK, someone who plays basketball help me out here.

Why does Billings wear her shorts like that?

Is it actually comfortable??


Nixtreefan



Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 2539



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 2:58 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Diaper dandies Laughing


GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 8227
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 3:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Bruins win unimpressively, 77-68. Jimenez and Fountain looked good.

Nice to see Walsh Gym again. I watched the great Nick "The Quick" Werkman there in the early 60's, who averaged 32 PPG for his three-year college career. He had post moves I've never seen before or since.
calbearman76



Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 5155
Location: Carson City


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 3:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

patsweetpat wrote:
RavenDog wrote:
Long way to go to play patsies...

Seton Hall on Dec. 17th and then,

Fordham on Dec. 20th

Must have a lot of extra time and money to blow.


Coach Close answers that question here:

http://www.uclawbb.com/gallery/coachs-corner-new-york-trip


Thanks for posting that. I have waffled a bit on Cori. She is a major step up from Kathy Olivier, but I'm not sure she is an elite coach. I had a chance to speak to her briefly in Las Vegas last month and I liked her. Listening to that clip, I admire her more; she understands that these are young women getting an education. Truly STUDENT-athletes. Well done Cori.

And if snow doesn't get in the way for my trip down I hope to see them lose to Cal on New Year's Eve in Berkeley.


patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2313
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 3:19 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GlennMacGrady wrote:
Bruins win unimpressively, 77-68.


Massey projected a 12 point UCLA win (75-63), and the Sagarin model projected a 4-point UCLA win (91.14 rating - 83.99 rating + 3 point home bonus for Seton Hall), so I suppose the Bruins were either 3 points less-impressive or 5 points more-impressive than projected, depending.

Anyway, as a Bruin fan, I'll happily take the road W... UCLA's first true road win of the season.

Good game to the Pirates. See you in Westwood next year.




Last edited by patsweetpat on 12/17/17 3:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2313
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 3:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

calbearman76 wrote:
And if snow doesn't get in the way for my trip down I hope to see them lose to Cal on New Year's Eve in Berkeley.


The Bruins have historically had big troubles in Berkeley, so there's certainly a very good chance you'll get to see that Bruin L you're jonesing for. Good luck to your Bears!


GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 8227
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 3:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

patsweetpat wrote:
GlennMacGrady wrote:
Bruins win unimpressively, 77-68.


the Sagarin model projected a 4-point UCLA win


I rarely look at those sites, but in my personal view I would expect the 11th ranked team in the country to be more than four points (or the actual margin, nine points) better than team of national nobodies, picked to finish sixth in the Big East, and who lost by 25 to unranked Rutgers.
Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18031
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 4:02 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GlennMacGrady wrote:
60-53 at the 3Q. Pirates deporting themselves admirably.

Where have you gone, Phyllis Mangina, our conference turns its lonely eyes to you.


Ah yes, let us yearn for a return to the days of losing 91-24 to UConn. Phyllis had long since run out of fucks to give. I'm not sorry she's gone, but I'm sorry she's playing second fiddle to an incompetent at St. Peter's.

UCLA is very tall and can be very explosive. Lawd, some of their shooting, though. I'm trying to think of how many airballs or extremely short shots they had, and the number is at least three (not to be confused with the number of extremely short shorts, good grief Billings).

If good JaQuan shows up, we have a real chance of winning this game. Or if maybe Taylor Brown doesn't keep shooting for the goddamn foul instead of the goddamn shot... but that's sour grapes. UCLA always had an answer, whether it was a Canada drive or a Hayes three.



_________________
Ardent believer in the separation of church and stadium.
patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2313
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 4:57 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Queenie wrote:
UCLA is very tall and can be very explosive. Lawd, some of their shooting, though.


This pretty much boils this Bruin team down to its essence.


patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2313
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/17 4:57 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GlennMacGrady wrote:
patsweetpat wrote:
GlennMacGrady wrote:
Bruins win unimpressively, 77-68.


the Sagarin model projected a 4-point UCLA win


I rarely look at those sites, but in my personal view I would expect the 11th ranked team in the country to be more than four points (or the actual margin, nine points) better than team of national nobodies, picked to finish sixth in the Big East, and who lost by 25 to unranked Rutgers.


Okay, right on.


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - Game Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin