RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

AP Poll
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 1992
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/20/17 4:08 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

UCLA's AP ranking this week (#5) is its highest ranking since Week 1 of 1999, when current UCLA freshman Michaela Onyenwere was 3 months old.


readyAIMfire53



Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 5320
Location: Durham, NC


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/20/17 4:48 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:
Ay Mate wrote:
ArtBest23 wrote:
So Baylor only drops to 8? I have to assume none of these voters actually watched the game. They didn't look that good to me.

Name and reputation drives so much of the voting.


They were without one of their best players and without their coach. That’s why they didn’t drop too much. 8 seems about right to me.


Did all their guards stay home? Because if not the things you cited had zero to do with where they should be ranked.

If you watched the game, their shortcomings are obvious and not temporary.


A team playing without their head coach and key post player, after a week of strong and very sad emotions, against a top 5 team - dropping them as far as they did is about right. That was also an asst coach who found out her baby had some horrible defects and then died. I'm glad the voters recognize the effect on the players of human tragedy even if some posters act like they're robots without hearts.



_________________
Follow your passion and your life will be true down to your core.

~rAf
readyAIMfire53



Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 5320
Location: Durham, NC


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/20/17 4:50 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
http://collegebasketball.ap.org/ap-womens-basketball-poll-week-3-2017

UConn still unanimous

South Carolina up to #3

South Florida up to #17

Duke down to #16

Oklahoma out
Arizona State in


Duke dropped only to 16 after losing to an unranked team? Awfully generous. It's hard for them to admit when they've drastically overranked a team, isn't it?



_________________
Follow your passion and your life will be true down to your core.

~rAf
ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 12300



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/20/17 4:58 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

readyAIMfire53 wrote:
ArtBest23 wrote:
Ay Mate wrote:
ArtBest23 wrote:
So Baylor only drops to 8? I have to assume none of these voters actually watched the game. They didn't look that good to me.

Name and reputation drives so much of the voting.


They were without one of their best players and without their coach. That’s why they didn’t drop too much. 8 seems about right to me.


Did all their guards stay home? Because if not the things you cited had zero to do with where they should be ranked.

If you watched the game, their shortcomings are obvious and not temporary.


A team playing without their head coach and key post player, after a week of strong and very sad emotions, against a top 5 team - dropping them as far as they did is about right. That was also an asst coach who found out her baby had some horrible defects and then died. I'm glad the voters recognize the effect on the players of human tragedy even if some posters act like they're robots without hearts.


The likelihood of voters knowing about, much less voting based on, personal tragedies of coaching staff is less than zero. I'm glad that you filled in the People magazine details though. Rolling Eyes

Though given the total absence of basketball related comments, I assume you didn't bother actually to watch the Baylor loss.

Hmm. Let's see. I'm sure that deep in the sports editorial offices of the Somerville NJ Home News Tribune, Rutgers Beat Reporter Ryan Dunleavy was filling out his AP women's rankings and thought to himself "Wow, except for Kalani Brown, Baylor really looked like crap against UCLA. Nowhere near what I expected. They have no guards. That's really going to be a problem. Based on their performance, they don't belong near the top ten. Probably around thirteen would be right. But considering what those coaches are going through in their family lives, I can't pile on by dropping them that far, so I'll put them at 8."

Or....

Deep in the sports editorial offices of the Somerville NJ Home News Tribune, Rutgers Beat Reporter Ryan Dunleavy is rushing to meet his deadlines on his Rutgers football stories while worrying about how Saturday's games change his Heisman ballot when he remembered he had to get his AP WBB ballot done. Checking the scores, he saw that Baylor lost to UCLA and thought to himself "I've been busy with football and haven't watched any basketball except Rutgers. I'm surprised at that score. UCLA must be pretty good. But Baylor is always good and it was on the road, so I can't drop them very far. Eight sounds about right. I'll move UCLA up a couple spots too."

Now I wonder which of those is more likely?


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55299
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/27/17 2:40 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

https://collegebasketball.ap.org/ap-womens-basketball-poll-week-4-0

UConn still unanimous

Notre Dame up to #3

Missouri up to #19

California down to #24

Villanova in
Arizona State out



_________________
He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing. And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners
FrozenLVFan



Joined: 08 Jul 2014
Posts: 629



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/27/17 2:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Tenn won 4 games last week, granted only one was against a ranked opponent, but that's more than Oregon, Baylor, and WVU did. They didn't budge from #12. I guess it's going to take a lot to regain any respect.




Last edited by FrozenLVFan on 11/27/17 2:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 14012
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/27/17 2:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Why in Tara's name is 3-loss Stanford still rated in the Top 15? They have lost to good teams, but they are also 4-3 and with no quality wins.

It reminds me of the those last few relevant LaTech teams that got credit for playing and decidedly losing to a few other good teams.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45595



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/27/17 3:35 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

If you lose a close game against a higher ranked team, it may not hurt you.... might even cause your team to rise because you can argue the teams are comparable. Of course, the poll is an accumulated opinion of 39 people. It's not going to be of one mind.

I thought for sure GB would chart this week. They had a somewhat disappointing loss against Mississippi St, but otherwise they have been mowing down teams.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
SpaceJunkie



Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 2847
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/27/17 4:55 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:
Why in Tara's name is 3-loss Stanford still rated in the Top 15? They have lost to good teams, but they are also 4-3 and with no quality wins.

It reminds me of the those last few relevant LaTech teams that got credit for playing and decidedly losing to a few other good teams.


Reputation. Stanford has always been a top-25 team, so they'll stay top 25 until proven otherwise. (I'd be hard-pressed to find any teams after #15 that I know for sure are better than Stanford anyways).


myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 21243



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/27/17 8:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:


The likelihood of voters knowing about, much less voting based on, personal tragedies of coaching staff is less than zero. I'm glad that you filled in the People magazine details though. Rolling Eyes

Though given the total absence of basketball related comments, I assume you didn't bother actually to watch the Baylor loss.

Hmm. Let's see. I'm sure that deep in the sports editorial offices of the Somerville NJ Home News Tribune, Rutgers Beat Reporter Ryan Dunleavy was filling out his AP women's rankings and thought to himself "Wow, except for Kalani Brown, Baylor really looked like crap against UCLA. Nowhere near what I expected. They have no guards. That's really going to be a problem. Based on their performance, they don't belong near the top ten. Probably around thirteen would be right. But considering what those coaches are going through in their family lives, I can't pile on by dropping them that far, so I'll put them at 8."

Or....

Deep in the sports editorial offices of the Somerville NJ Home News Tribune, Rutgers Beat Reporter Ryan Dunleavy is rushing to meet his deadlines on his Rutgers football stories while worrying about how Saturday's games change his Heisman ballot when he remembered he had to get his AP WBB ballot done. Checking the scores, he saw that Baylor lost to UCLA and thought to himself "I've been busy with football and haven't watched any basketball except Rutgers. I'm surprised at that score. UCLA must be pretty good. But Baylor is always good and it was on the road, so I can't drop them very far. Eight sounds about right. I'll move UCLA up a couple spots too."

Now I wonder which of those is more likely?


Thank you Art. Gave me the best laugh! [even though it's really kinda sad, but true]



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 12300



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/28/17 12:24 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

myrtle wrote:
ArtBest23 wrote:


The likelihood of voters knowing about, much less voting based on, personal tragedies of coaching staff is less than zero. I'm glad that you filled in the People magazine details though. Rolling Eyes

Though given the total absence of basketball related comments, I assume you didn't bother actually to watch the Baylor loss.

Hmm. Let's see. I'm sure that deep in the sports editorial offices of the Somerville NJ Home News Tribune, Rutgers Beat Reporter Ryan Dunleavy was filling out his AP women's rankings and thought to himself "Wow, except for Kalani Brown, Baylor really looked like crap against UCLA. Nowhere near what I expected. They have no guards. That's really going to be a problem. Based on their performance, they don't belong near the top ten. Probably around thirteen would be right. But considering what those coaches are going through in their family lives, I can't pile on by dropping them that far, so I'll put them at 8."

Or....

Deep in the sports editorial offices of the Somerville NJ Home News Tribune, Rutgers Beat Reporter Ryan Dunleavy is rushing to meet his deadlines on his Rutgers football stories while worrying about how Saturday's games change his Heisman ballot when he remembered he had to get his AP WBB ballot done. Checking the scores, he saw that Baylor lost to UCLA and thought to himself "I've been busy with football and haven't watched any basketball except Rutgers. I'm surprised at that score. UCLA must be pretty good. But Baylor is always good and it was on the road, so I can't drop them very far. Eight sounds about right. I'll move UCLA up a couple spots too."

Now I wonder which of those is more likely?


Thank you Art. Gave me the best laugh! [even though it's really kinda sad, but true]


You want to see the ballot of someone who was obviously busy with something else last week? Look at SI's Richard Dietsch's top ten:

UConn
Louisville
MissSt
OhioSt
Notre Dame
Texas
UCLA
SCar
Baylor
Stanford

That is so completely arbitrary and random it looks like he drew names from a hat. I can't see how one could arrive at that list by actually watching games. Is he unaware Stanford is 4-3?

After 10 it doesn't get any better. E.g., AzSt ( who didn't make the actual top 25) at 15, undefeated FSU at 20 behind such notables as Missouri, USF, and 2-loss OreSt (and behind the aforementioned AzSt).

Credit him at least, I guess, for not just following the crowd.

Some of these voters are either completely clueless about or disinterested in WBB, or both. It's depressing they can't find 31 people to take it seriously


SpaceJunkie



Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 2847
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/28/17 1:26 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:

You want to see the ballot of someone who was obviously busy with something else last week? Look at SI's Richard Dietsch's top ten:

UConn
Louisville
MissSt
OhioSt
Notre Dame
Texas
UCLA
SCar
Baylor
Stanford

That is so completely arbitrary and random it looks like he drew names from a hat. I can't see how one could arrive at that list by actually watching games. Is he unaware Stanford is 4-3?


I don't see anything wrong with that top 10. The teams Stanford lost to are all ranked ahead of them, one being UConn and the other being an OT loss.


ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 12300



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/28/17 10:22 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

SpaceJunkie wrote:


I don't see anything wrong with that top 10. The teams Stanford lost to are all ranked ahead of them, one being UConn and the other being an OT loss.


That you Richard? Very Happy

Stanford's placement is far from the only problem. But did you notice that in addition to losing thrice, Stanford has beaten exactly no one with a pulse?

If you only consider ten teams, then putting Stanford 10th is perfectly sensible. But there are a lot more than ten teams to consider. I'll point out that even among the 31 AP voters, Dietsch's #10 is the outlier. No one else put them that high, the consensus was 16, and two voters didn't even include them on their ballot. So more voters felt they didn't belong in the top 25 at all than felt they belonged at ten. (Those two voters probably actually watched them play.)

You were correct with your initial comment up the page. They are ranked entirely on reputation. Not because they belong there this year.


Nixtreefan



Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 1384



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/28/17 4:19 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Yep I agree Stanford and Ohio state should not be in the top 10 Laughing Laughing


SpaceJunkie



Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 2847
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/28/17 9:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:
If you only consider ten teams, then putting Stanford 10th is perfectly sensible. But there are a lot more than ten teams to consider. I'll point out that even among the 31 AP voters, Dietsch's #10 is the outlier. No one else put them that high, the consensus was 16, and two voters didn't even include them on their ballot. So more voters felt they didn't belong in the top 25 at all than felt they belonged at ten. (Those two voters probably actually watched them play.)

You were correct with your initial comment up the page. They are ranked entirely on reputation. Not because they belong there this year.


It's still early in the year, so I don't see what the outrage is for. Heck, even UConn was ranked #1 in the preseason (and still is) despite the fact they have yet to prove they can beat a top-4 ranked team this year.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55299
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/04/17 1:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

https://collegebasketball.ap.org/ap-womens-basketball-poll-week-5

UConn still unanimous

Baylor up to #8

Villanova up to #22

Ohio State down to #12

Green Bay in
Marquette out



_________________
He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing. And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45595



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/04/17 1:58 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

In the real world, Baylor is higher.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 1992
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/04/17 4:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
In the real world, Baylor is higher.


If you move Baylor higher than 8, then you gotta move UCLA higher than 7.


CBiebel



Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 416
Location: AC, NJ


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/05/17 3:11 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

patsweetpat wrote:
Shades wrote:
In the real world, Baylor is higher.


If you move Baylor higher than 8, then you gotta move UCLA higher than 7.


I was kind of curious about the voting after the ND-UConn game. Apparently a few pollsters decided to punish ND for losing by 9 at UConn (one dropped ND 4 spots). I noticed that 2 put ND behind South Carolina. I guess they must have missed the whole "ND beat USC on a neutral court recently" thing, and for one pollster losing at UCLA by 14 is better than losing at UConn by 9. Huh?

I know, polls don't matter in Women's Basketball, but it still was curious.


Nixtreefan



Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 1384



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/05/17 12:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I bet some already sent their votes in before all the games were played


Fighting Artichoke



Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 3108



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/05/17 12:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nixtreefan wrote:
I bet some already sent their votes in before all the games were played

That would have been especially embarrassing if Notre Dame had held on to their lead.


CBiebel



Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 416
Location: AC, NJ


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/08/17 3:24 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nixtreefan wrote:
I bet some already sent their votes in before all the games were played


Yeah, but it doesn't explain those who dropped ND, particularly the guy who dropped them 4 spots, or those who put ND behind SC.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55299
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/11/17 1:06 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

https://collegebasketball.ap.org/ap-womens-basketball-poll-week-6-0

UConn still unanimous

Notre Dame up to #2

Tennessee up to #7

South Florida down to #22

Iowa in
Kentucky out



_________________
He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing. And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45595



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/11/17 1:28 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Welcome to the real world!


I noticed New Mexico got a #17 vote from Scott Nulph. They still get leap-frogged by Iowa and Oklahoma St.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 12300



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/11/17 1:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Wow. Some of these votes are amazing.

One guy has Tenn and Texas ahead of ND, Baylor and S.Car.

Another has Tenn and Texas at 4 and 5 ahead of Miss St, Baylor and S.Car.

Another has Texas ahead of Baylor and Louisville and Tennessee.

Uhhhhh, Tenn beat Texas yesterday, right? So they're three spots behind Texas today? Really?

And did any of you actually watch that slop fest of a game? You're confident those two are better than Baylor, S.Car, Louisville, MissSt, and Notre Dame?


adamj95



Joined: 09 May 2014
Posts: 1246



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/11/17 2:25 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Surprised to see that SDSU only has 3 points in this weeks poll. They almost beat the now #3 team Louisville.



_________________
4 time WNBA Champion, 3rd all time in Assists, Minnesota's own: LINDSAY WHALEN.
GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 4321
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/11/17 2:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The Old Big East is 1, 2, 3, 10, 20 and 22 with three others receiving votes.
Ladyvol777



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 217



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/11/17 4:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

SEC has 3 teams in the top 10.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55299
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/18/17 2:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

http://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/rankings/_/poll/1/week/7/seasontype/2

UConn still unanimous

West Virginia up to #9

Florida State down to #13

Same 25 teams as last week



_________________
He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing. And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55299
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/25/17 1:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

http://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/rankings/_/poll/1/week/8/seasontype/2

UConn still unanimous

Villanova up to #18

California up to #20

South Florida down to #25

Oklahoma State in
Stanford out



_________________
He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing. And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45595



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/25/17 2:58 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Same Top 17 as last week

Villanova up 2 to 18 after a win over LaSalle
Green Bay up 2 to 19 after a win over Northwestern
California up 4 to 20 after a victory at Kentucky
Michigan up 2 to 21 after a thorough drubbing of Delaware State
Texas A&M down 3 to 22 after a thumping by Oregon. If they had kept it close maybe they wouldn't have dropped
Iowa up 2 to 23 after a victory over Drake
Oklahoma State up 2 to 24 after a couple of 100+ pt wins over cupcakes
South Florida down 3 to 25 after being bumped by Michigan State
--------------
Stanford free-falling down 8 to 26 after losses to Western Illinois and Tennessee



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
calbearman76



Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 1924
Location: Carson City


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/25/17 3:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
http://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/rankings/_/poll/1/week/8/seasontype/2

Stanford out


While it is true that Stanford dropped out, the Cardinal is still #26 despite being 6-6 with a loss at home to W Illinois and a best win over Belmont. Some of the teams they are ahead of include:

Michigan St - Losses to UConn, @Notre Dame, and @Miami, win over S Florida
Syracuse - Only loss to Mississippi St, win over Drexel
Ball St. - Undefeated, win over Western Kentucky, and yet got only 1 vote.

At some point I would hope that polls would rank teams based on how teams have actually played. Stanford has played one of the toughest schedules in the country and 5 of their losses are to top 15 teams, but that still leaves them only 6-1 against unranked teams, none of whom are in the top 50. If voters aren't going to take the polls seriously maybe it is time we don't either.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55299
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/25/17 4:08 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I wasn't aware that we were taking the polls seriously.



_________________
He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing. And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners
FrozenLVFan



Joined: 08 Jul 2014
Posts: 629



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/25/17 4:35 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Good to see Okla St has finally cracked the list. They're one of the most underestimated teams in the country.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45595



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/25/17 8:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

For the first-time in 312 weeks - the streak started in 2001 -- Stanford is no longer ranked in the AP Top 25 poll. Their streak was tied for third longest all-time in the AP Poll with Duke.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
calbearman76



Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 1924
Location: Carson City


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/25/17 10:37 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
I wasn't aware that we were taking the polls seriously.


Good point


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45595



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/01/18 1:49 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Week 9

http://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/rankings/_/poll/1/week/9/seasontype/2

Same Top 8 as last week. Here's how the Bottom 17 faired.



Stanford and Arizona St sneak back in.

Green Bay and USF out



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
FrozenLVFan



Joined: 08 Jul 2014
Posts: 629



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/01/18 2:43 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Every week I see teams that move up by virtue of someone else losing and falling down, rather than doing anything impressive themselves.


calbearman76



Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 1924
Location: Carson City


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/01/18 2:47 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Six Pac 12 teams in the top 25. Oregon is the only top 10 team, but what that means is tremendous balance and an exciting regular season, even if the conference won't have too many teams left after the first weekend in the NCAA.


ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 12300



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/01/18 3:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

calbearman76 wrote:
Six Pac 12 teams in the top 25. Oregon is the only top 10 team, but what that means is tremendous balance and an exciting regular season, even if the conference won't have too many teams left after the first weekend in the NCAA.


I'm not sure I understand the "logic" of this, if there is any.
You have an entire conference that lost every meaningful game it played except 1 ( UCLA over Baylor) during the OOC portion of the schedule. But teams that beat no one, now beat other teams from the same conference who also beat no one, and that merits a top 25 ranking? How does that work exactly?


calbearman76



Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 1924
Location: Carson City


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/01/18 7:40 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:
calbearman76 wrote:
Six Pac 12 teams in the top 25. Oregon is the only top 10 team, but what that means is tremendous balance and an exciting regular season, even if the conference won't have too many teams left after the first weekend in the NCAA.


I'm not sure I understand the "logic" of this, if there is any.
You have an entire conference that lost every meaningful game it played except 1 ( UCLA over Baylor) during the OOC portion of the schedule. But teams that beat no one, now beat other teams from the same conference who also beat no one, and that merits a top 25 ranking? How does that work exactly?


I will expound on my logic, and what I see as the logic of the voters, but I really don't understand yours. First, you contend that the entire conference lost every meaningful game but 1. That is a sad commentary on women's basketball if wins over top 20 teams like Oregon had at Texas A&M and again vs. the Aggies on a neutral court aren't considered meaningful. By that standard exactly how many meaningful games have there been this season; maybe a dozen. There have been only 22 losses by teams ranked higher than Texas A&M (six of them by Pac 12 schools so they clearly can't be that meaningful). The 6 ranked schools have a combined record of 53-17 (excluding conference games). That includes a record of 0-7 vs top 5, 1-11 vs top 10, and 3-15 vs top 20. Of those 18 games, only 5 were at home, 4 were at neutral sites and 9 were on the road. The only 2 losses outside the top 20 were ASU to Green Bay and Stanford to Western Illinois.

As an unabashed fan of the Pac 12 I am happy that our teams challenge themselves with tough schedules non-conference. This year we lost to some of the best teams on the road, but those games just prepare us more for the conference games and NCAA tournament to come. And if you look a little further you will see that Washington St beat Rutgers, the surprise team in the Big 10. Washington beat Creighton (who just handed Villanova its first loss). Both games were on neutral sites. And USC was within a 1 point loss to Texas A&M of being undefeated non-conference. I made clear that I didn't think the Pac 12 would be heavily represented in late March, but I believe that throughout January and February it will feature the most consistent high quality competitive matchups in women's basketball this season.

So the question is turned to you. Who do you believe should be ranked instead? What is a meaningful game? Would you prefer to just have four team conferences (Notre Dame, Louisville, Florida St, Duke) or (Mississippi St, Tennessee, South Carolina, Missouri) where each team plays everyone else 6 times, so every game matters? Or do you just want to forget the season altogether and pick the final four right now since we have four worthy undefeated teams? I'd rather watch a few months of very good basketball, even if there are a few teams that are better.


readyAIMfire53



Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 5320
Location: Durham, NC


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/01/18 9:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
Week 9

http://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/rankings/_/poll/1/week/9/seasontype/2

Same Top 8 as last week. Here's how the Bottom 17 faired.



Stanford and Arizona St sneak back in.

Green Bay and USF out


Predictions for next week:
Oregon UP
Ohio St DOWN
Oregon St DOWN
Duke DOWN (playing AT Louisville
Oklahoma St UP
Stanford UP



_________________
Follow your passion and your life will be true down to your core.

~rAf
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45595



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/01/18 10:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

readyAIMfire53 wrote:

Predictions for next week:
Oregon UP


You don't say how this happens. Only way it happens is if a team from the Top 8 drops. So either there'd be a big upset of one of the teams in the Top 7, or a relatively minor upset of #8 Texas to Oklahoma St.

I think it's more likely Oregon drops rather than go up, and most likely just stays the same.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
calbearman76



Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 1924
Location: Carson City


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/01/18 10:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
readyAIMfire53 wrote:

Predictions for next week:
Oregon UP


You don't say how this happens. Only way it happens is if a team from the Top 8 drops. So either there'd be a big upset of one of the teams in the Top 7, or a relatively minor upset of #8 Texas to Oklahoma St.

I think it's more likely Oregon drops rather than go up, and most likely just stays the same.


And with Oregon playing at UCLA there is a good chance the Ducks will lose.


toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 14778



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/02/18 1:55 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Rutger's still not in the top 25. Rolling Eyes Evil or Very Mad



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
purduefanatic



Joined: 10 Aug 2011
Posts: 2225
Location: Indiana


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/02/18 2:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

toad455 wrote:
Rutger's still not in the top 25. Rolling Eyes Evil or Very Mad


True. But by God we will get Stanford back in there as soon as we possibly can. Rolling Eyes


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45595



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/02/18 4:24 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

purduefanatic wrote:
toad455 wrote:
Rutger's still not in the top 25. Rolling Eyes Evil or Very Mad


True. But by God we will get Stanford back in there as soon as we possibly can. Rolling Eyes


Like it or not, they did have a couple nice conference wins.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
bballjunkie



Joined: 12 Aug 2014
Posts: 429



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/02/18 5:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Coaches didn’t agree, no Stanford, Cal or ASU.


purduefanatic



Joined: 10 Aug 2011
Posts: 2225
Location: Indiana


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/02/18 5:35 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
purduefanatic wrote:
toad455 wrote:
Rutger's still not in the top 25. Rolling Eyes Evil or Very Mad


True. But by God we will get Stanford back in there as soon as we possibly can. Rolling Eyes


Like it or not, they did have a couple nice conference wins.


To raise their record to 8-6.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55299
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/08/18 1:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

https://collegebasketball.ap.org/ap-womens-basketball-poll-week-10-4

UConn still unanimous

Mississippi State up to #4

Arizona State up to #18

Oregon State down to #22

Rutgers and Green Bay in
Villanova and Stanford out



_________________
He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing. And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin