RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Taurasi, Parker, Moore
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Which of these three current greats has the best argument as the "greatest of all time"?
Diana Taurasi
46%
 46%  [ 30 ]
Candace Parker
15%
 15%  [ 10 ]
Maya Moore
37%
 37%  [ 24 ]
Total Votes : 64

Author Message
chamomile1800



Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 227



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 10:27 am    ::: Taurasi, Parker, Moore Reply Reply with quote

These three, in my opinion, are some of the greatest to ever play. Past greats like Cooper, Swoopes, Leslie, etc. aside, the modern day legacy of these three are still being written and I think it's an interesting discussion about what each of these three have done and may or may not need to do to cement their legacy as the greatest of all time. If you take a look at championships, 7 out of the last 10 WNBA titles have been won by teams including one of these three:

Taurasi: 2007, 2009, 2014
Parker: 2016
Moore: 2011, 2013, 2015

Obviously, each of these players were drafted into different teams with different levels of talent, and each of them have multiple NCAA titles (Taurasi 3, Parker 2, Moore 2) as well as several championships overseas. Taking all of this into consideration, and given that Parker and Moore are playing in another pivotal game 5 for a title tonight, who would you currently consider has the best claim to being the greatest of all time? And does tonight's outcome affect this?



_________________
Im usually not able to say, but Diana is my favorite player. She will continue to be, I think, the best in the world." -Lisa Leslie
chamomile1800



Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 227



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 10:36 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Obviously, my profile gives away my bias, but I will say that Candace Parker has really impressed me recently. I was very critical of her when she was on a team with Leslie, Thompson, Milton Jones, etc. and failed to win a championship and then struggled for many years, but when she's on there is no one in the world that can do the things she does at her size, and her passing ability is really impressive. I think with a win tonight, she has a great argument for being on the greatest of all time and can cement a really solid legacy. And her team will surely be in the mix for a title for several years after this. Most impressive has been her ability to involve her teammates and lately has demonstrated a knack for performing at her best in crucial games and in late game moments.

Moore, I think, was drafted onto a team with the greatest talent of the three. She is a superstar in her own right, but Minnesota has been loaded with talent every year since her arrival (obviously Moore has something to do with this as well). She has the most titles of the three in the shortest amount of time, but I do think that her losing in multiple WNBA finals is a knock on her legacy, and if she loses tonight that will come to the forefront. With a win tonight, four titles would be hard to argue with, but I do think she's benefited from being on a superbly talented team year after year.

Taurasi, in my opinion, currently has the best argument for greatest of all time out of these three (comparing her to past greats like Cooper, Swoopes, Leslie, Jackson, etc. is another discussion) but her window for winning another title is certainly closing. She's a winner at every level and her performance in clutch situations (11-0 in winner take all games, etc.) is the most impressive of the three. But, she has not won WNBA championships at the consistency that Moore has; and Parker, assuming her current LA roster remains relatively intact, has a chance to really compete for titles and shine in the coming years.

Just my two cents, what are all of your thoughts? Smile



_________________
Im usually not able to say, but Diana is my favorite player. She will continue to be, I think, the best in the world." -Lisa Leslie
Aladyyn



Joined: 23 Jul 2017
Posts: 502
Location: Czech Republic


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 10:58 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Right now it's Taurasi but I think Maya will overtake her at some point. Maybe with her 2nd FMVP tonight? Wink


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45066



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 11:16 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I do believe I inspired this poll after you saw this graphic in another thread.



The fact that you include Maya who is so much younger than the rest should tell you something. When it's all said and done, it's Maya who will be #1. She's already the leader as far as winning championships. If it's points you value, it's only a matter of time. Dan Hughes and Thibault aren't the greatest coaches just because they've been around forever. Same goes for players.

Oh, and there's another new accomplishment that I haven't seen mentioned. Maya is the All Time leader in playoff field goals made, and she's just a pup in her 20's.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Genero36



Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 8516



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 11:48 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Diana. And I don't think the other two are close to her. As much as I respect their games I wouldn't rank either higher than Catchings.

3x WNBA Champion
4x Olympic Gold Medalist
2x World Champion
2× WNBA Finals MVP (2009, 2014)
WNBA MVP (2009)
8× WNBA All-Star (2005–2007, 2009, 2011, 2013–2014, 2017)
9× All-WNBA First Team (2004, 2006–2011, 2013, 2014)
3× All-WNBA Second Team (2005, 2016, 2017)
WNBA all-time scoring leader
WNBA Rookie of the Year (2004)
5× WNBA scoring champion (2006, 2008–2011)
6× WNBA Peak Performer (2006, 2007, 2009–2011, 2014)
4× USA Basketball Female Athlete of the Year (2006, 2010, 2012, 2016)
6× Euroleague champion (2007–2010, 2013, 2016)
7× Russian National League champion (2007, 2008, 2013–2017)
3× Russian Cup winner (2013–2014, 2017)
3× Russian League Player of the Year (2007, 2008, 2009)
Turkish National League champion (2011)
Turkish Cup winner (2012)
3× NCAA champion (2002–2004)
NCAA Tournament MOP (2003, 2004)
Wade Trophy (2003)
Naismith Award (2003, 2004)
USBWA Women's National Player of the Year (2003)
AP College Player of the Year (2003)
Nancy Lieberman Award (2003, 2004)


<EMBED><iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9VO7aFUMcWc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></EMBED>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VO7aFUMcWc



_________________
I'm all for the separation of church and hate.
lynxmania



Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Posts: 8005
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 12:47 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aladyyn wrote:
Maybe with her 2nd FMVP tonight? Wink


She'd have to win one first.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45066



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 1:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

lynxmania wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:
Maybe with her 2nd FMVP tonight? Wink


She'd have to win one first.


Who do you think won in 2013?



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55128
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 1:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

It hardly seems fair to compare people whose careers are around the mid-point to those who are done or close to done.



_________________
Come love come, the road lies low
The way is long and hard I know
Speebs56



Joined: 19 Aug 2015
Posts: 57
Location: Orange county, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 1:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

While I agree that all three are remarkable talents, I think an element of attitude also plays a role in assessing each.

Whatever the accomplishments are among each of them, I've seen Parker and DT "take nights off." And I don't mean literally sit on the bench, as DT has done occasionally. I mean not play all out. Parker when she's disgruntled, has checked out. DT has in more recent years, although rarely, if ever, when the game really mattered (playoffs etc). Maya NEVER takes a night off. She may have poor playing nights -- and we've seen a few this season that were uncharacteristically poor, at least by the standards we've come to expect from her -- but she plays all out every game. The only other player of this caliber who played that way (again, in my opinion) was Catchings.

Many, if not most of you, may disagree that this is a factor worth noting. I think it is. I was a DT fan from the time she stepped on the UCONN campus and for years loved her game above all others. But in the past few years I've really come to dislike the attitude she displays in Merc games. I do not see the same rancor demonstrated by her in USA games. She plays with the old joy she once did in college and WNBA. I miss that. And it colors my perception of her in every respect.

Parker played for Lady Vols -- already a mark against her in my book! She is a phenomenal player, as long as she's on. And in this years' finals she's been all in -- in ways I've not seen consistently from her. But even she checks out - much mentioned on this board when it has occurred. And that may/may not have affected LA's chances for a title before that which was secured last season. If LA wins this year and Parker is a major force in tonight's game, she rises. And she still has some good years ahead, so could pull away from any others who are great players.

Maya has time....and tonight will factor in to assessments of her - now and going forward.

All above is just opinion. We all have 'em, and you know what they say about that. I am just happy that we've had the good fortune to watch these amazing players and may be lucky enough to watch and enjoy their games for a few more years. Very Happy


tfan



Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 5627



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 2:23 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Taurasi has been in the lottery the most - 5 times, but only played 8 games in the tank year. Parker has been on 2 lottery teams, but played only 10 and 17 games due to injury. Moore has never played on a lottery team.


barryi22



Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Location: In the USA


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 5:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Individual skill wise, I think Parker may be the best ever. She's proven she can dominate inside on the low block, hit midrange, extend to 3pt and she's one of the best passers in the league in a 6-4 frame.

The last two years she has also impressed me with her ability to lead the Sparks to be a dominant team. I think they have another 2-3 years are glory ahead if they can keep Nneka/Candace/Gray/Sims in tact.

When she played with Leslie/Thompson/DMJ, all were way past their prime and she barely missed out on the finals in 2 consecutive years. In 2008, San Antonio pulled a miracle out of their butts to force a game 3 in the western finals, and in game 3 it was close but they caught a few breaks down the stretch. In 2009, Parker only played half the season after having her daughter and they lost in game 3 at Phoenix (who went on to win it all).

After that, she sat out most of 2010 and 2011 when they had down years. In 2012 and 2013 they had stellar season but the west was loaded. 2014 was a bad year for the Sparks, in 2015 the team was very good once she returned, and in 2016 they finally won it all.

When looking at best ever on paper, it's really hard not to go with Maya Moore IMO. Taurasi has the scoring stats, 3 titles, All-WNBA awards, and Gold Medals...but Maya is just flat out the best winner out there. She rarely loses and she breeds success:
-In college she went 150-4 and was a 4x 1st Team All American and 3x POY
-In the pros she's been in the league for 7 years and has made it to 6 Finals. --In 7 years as a pro, she's a 5x 1st team All-WNBA player, 1x 2nd team in 7 seasons
-Prior to Maya, the Lynx had made the playoffs twice in 12 years, losing both times in the first round. With Maya, they've finished 1st in the West 6 of the 7 years and have played in 6 of 7 Finals.
-Her record in the pros is 182-56, good for a 76.5% winning percentage
-Her record in the playoffs is 39-15, good for 72% winning percentage


For all of Taurasi's successes, her teams have underperformed throughout her career. Her teams in 2006, 2008, 2013, 2016 and 2017 all underperformed considering the talent she had on her team. She's played with some of the best players in the world (Cappie, Penny, Griner), and if you look at full seasons played (we'll scratch 2012 since she was only there for 8 games), her numbers are:
-12 years in the pros and 3 Finals appearances (and wins)
-12 years in the pros and 9x 1st Team All WNBA, 3x 2nd Team All WNBA
-Team record over 12 years is 229-179, good for 56% winning percentage
-Her record in the playoffs is 31-21, good for 59.6%

Give Maya 3-4 more years and I don't think there'll be much doubt that she surpasses Taurasi in individual awards and successes.

Also, I tend to put less emphasize on All-WNBA awards since being 1st Team All-WNBA as a forward is much more competitive than making it as a guard (hence how Moore and Taurasi made their teams this year over more deserving forwards) and number of gold medals also isn't as significant to me...the US is a virtual lock for gold each Olympic run so if you make the team, you can have Olympic gold medal on your resume. Leading the team in scoring like Taurasi did this last run is a distinguishable piece that could be used in a debate like this.

If Parker has a big game and wins tonight, plus brings home another title in the next 2-3 years, I think she stakes a strong case for best ever. I do think she's the most unique player on the women's side with her skill set but she needs another title or two to have a strong case.

If Maya wins tonight and continues to lead the Lynx to final appearances/wins over the next 5 years, she'll go out the best ever.


Silky Johnson



Joined: 29 Sep 2014
Posts: 421



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 7:38 pm    ::: Re: Taurasi, Parker, Moore Reply Reply with quote

chamomile1800 wrote:
These three, in my opinion, are some of the greatest to ever play. Past greats like Cooper, Swoopes, Leslie, etc. aside, the modern day legacy of these three are still being written and I think it's an interesting discussion about what each of these three have done and may or may not need to do to cement their legacy as the greatest of all time. If you take a look at championships, 7 out of the last 10 WNBA titles have been won by teams including one of these three:

Taurasi: 2007, 2009, 2014
Parker: 2016
Moore: 2011, 2013, 2015

Obviously, each of these players were drafted into different teams with different levels of talent, and each of them have multiple NCAA titles (Taurasi 3, Parker 2, Moore 2) as well as several championships overseas. Taking all of this into consideration, and given that Parker and Moore are playing in another pivotal game 5 for a title tonight, who would you currently consider has the best claim to being the greatest of all time? And does tonight's outcome affect this?


I'm not fond of the notion of using championships in a team sport as a metric for determining who the greatest player is, as there are too many moving parts involved in winning a championship, too many factors that are out of the control of the player. I mean, I can't imagine that any of the people using "RINGZ~!" as the crux of their argument would ever fix their mouths to make the case that Ruth Riley was better than Candice Dupree, or that Katie Douglas was better than Angel McCougthry, or even Becky Hammon.

Taurasi is the weakest defender of the three players brought up in this thread, and I tend to be biased against players who aren't good defenders, but she probably has the strongest argument for being called the Greatest. Her post-season record pushes her past Parker, even though I consider Parker to be a better player overall, or at least more talented.

I find myself of the opinion that Maya Moore may be overrated. Not, like, massively overrated, but overrated nonetheless. I feel like I won't have a good sense of how good she actually is, until after I see her play with a sub-par team. Even going back to when she was in high school, she played with as many as three teammates that also went on to play in Division I (Four, if you count Carmen Fowler); she's never really played on a team that wasn't loaded. She's also the only one of the three to fail to win a championship, when they had the best record.

Personally, I don't think any one of these three women can be considered the Greatest of All Time. Of the three, Taurasi has the best claim to being the GOAT, and she's arguably the greatest offensive player of all time, but because of my personal bias for players who are great on both sides of the ball, I put her at fifth, behind (in no particular order) Swoopes, Leslie, Jackson and Catchings. I think that Moore has the potential to become the Greatest, but even that remains to be seen: I think that a lot of people are taking for granted that she's going to continue to keep winning championships, once Augustus, Whelan and Brunson all retire. And, if she finishes her career with three, I don't think that I can say she's the Greatest. Now, if she finishes with three, but wins multiple MVP's and breaks the scoring record, that would have to put Greatest back on the table, but I'm firmly in 'wait and see' mode when it comes to Moore.



_________________
Professional Hater. The Baron of #HateHard
calbearman76



Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 1625
Location: Carson City


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 8:29 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
It hardly seems fair to compare people whose careers are around the mid-point to those who are done or close to done.


Agree 100%.

I still believe that Lisa Leslie is the GOAT, or at least in the WNBA era. I voted for Diana only because she has the closest to a full career. Maya Moore is the best non-center now, and has been the best player by far for this decade. Candace Parker may be the best in a single series, but has not shown that she can play a full season at a top level for many years and I doubt she ever will again. I suspect that by 2025 the debate for GOAT will be between Moore and Griner (she is not there yet but still has the greatest upside), if anyone, Taurasi would be on my starting 5 and Parker would be a backup to Lauren Jackson.


mercfan3



Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 17818



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 9:08 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Taurasi (although I agree with pilight that the comparison is unfair.)

Maya can't do as much as Diana and Candace on the court, and Candace doesn't have the accomplishments Diana has.

She's got an argument for GOAT. I don't think Maya or Candace do (yet).



_________________
TALENT

What it takes to play a gay pirate, a gay candymaker, and a gay mad hatter, and still land a role as John Dilinger.
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55128
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 9:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Just counting championships would make Rebekkah Brunson the greatest WNBA player ever



_________________
Come love come, the road lies low
The way is long and hard I know
miller40



Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 971



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 9:40 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

mercfan3 wrote:
Taurasi (although I agree with pilight that the comparison is unfair.)

Maya can't do as much as Diana and Candace on the court, and Candace doesn't have the accomplishments Diana has.

She's got an argument for GOAT. I don't think Maya or Candace do (yet).


Uh, such as?

I'm also assuming you are speaking entirely of offence.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45066



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 9:48 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote




_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
ucbart



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 1122
Location: New York


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 10:58 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

It’s Diana....and it’s not close.


blaase22



Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 3515
Location: Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 11:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ucbart wrote:
It’s Diana....and it’s not close.

Her and ace are neck and neck for biggest whiners.


YlwJckt999



Joined: 11 Jun 2017
Posts: 8



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/04/17 11:18 pm    ::: Maya is adding to her tally Reply Reply with quote

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_Moore

Her list is not quite as long as Dirty Diana but it is growing at an incredibly fast rate.

Smile
2x Olympic Gold
2x Gold World Championship
4× WNBA champion (2011, 2013, 2015, 2017)
WNBA Finals MVP (2013)
WNBA MVP (2014)
5× WNBA All-Star (2011, 2013–2015, 2017)
2× WNBA All-Star Game MVP (2015, 2017)
5× All-WNBA First Team (2013–2017)
All-WNBA Second Team (2012)
2× WNBA All-Defensive Second Team (2014, 2017)
WNBA scoring leader (2014)
WNBA Rookie of the Year (2011)
WNBA All-Rookie Team (2011)
WNBA Top 20@20 (2016)
FIBA World Championship MVP (2014)
EuroLeague Women champion (2012)
Liga Femenina champion (2012)
3× WCBA champion (2013–2015)
2× NCAA champion (2009–2010)
4× AP All-America First Team (2008-2011)
3× CoSIDA Academic All-America First Team (2009-2011)
4× WBCA Coaches' All-America Team (2008-2011)
4× USBWA All-America Team (2008-2011)
3× Wade Trophy (2009-2011)
2× Naismith College Player of the Year (2009, 2011)
2× John R. Wooden Award (2009, 2011)
2× AP College Player of the Year (2009, 2011)
2× USBWA Women's National Player of the Year (2009, 2011)
2x Honda Sports Award for basketball (2010, 2011)
3× Big East Player of the Year (2008, 2009, 2011)
2× Academic All-America of the Year (2010-2011)
All-sports Academic All-America of the Year (2011)
NCAA Tournament Most Outstanding Player (2010)
USBWA National Freshman of the Year (2008)


mavcarter



Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 4316
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 9:30 am    ::: Re: Taurasi, Parker, Moore Reply Reply with quote

Silky Johnson wrote:
Personally, I don't think any one of these three women can be considered the Greatest of All Time.


Agreed. Hard for me to rank anyone of these three the GOAT when the one in Minnesota played for a Hall of Fame coach in Connecticut with a great system surrounded by great players and proceeded to have the same environment in Minnesota. While Taurasi does have three rings, she's also been in the lottery five times, technically four if we're not counting 2012. Parker doesn't really have a strong resume in part due to injuries and not giving a full 100% effort day in and out.



_________________
Quote:
EDD will not come in and dominate like some of you are thinking.
adamj95



Joined: 09 May 2014
Posts: 1216



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 10:06 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Well, according to Kaela Davis on twitter, it’s Parker and apparently she was cheated out a title last night.

Quote:
@Candace_Parker is and always will be the 🐐. Don't @ me. ✋🏾


Quote:
Lol far from salty, just hate to see someone I love get cheated out of something they worked so hard to earn. 🤷🏾‍♀️ #Dismissed



_________________
4 time WNBA Champion, 3rd all time in Assists, Minnesota's own: LINDSAY WHALEN.
miller40



Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 971



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 10:10 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

adamj95 wrote:
Well, according to Kaela Davis on twitter, it’s Parker and apparently she was cheated out a title last night.

Quote:
@Candace_Parker is and always will be the 🐐. Don't @ me. ✋🏾


Quote:
Lol far from salty, just hate to see someone I love get cheated out of something they worked so hard to earn. 🤷🏾‍♀️ #Dismissed


She certainly takes after her mother.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45066



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 11:23 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I think Kaela Davis is trying to get herself on the Sparks team. Probably wouldn't be that bad of a fit.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 4300
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 1:39 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
I think Kaela Davis is trying to get herself on the Sparks team. Probably wouldn't be that bad of a fit.


Could become AB 2.0 honestly would not be a bad fit at all. No We do not want Lavender or Riquana Or Wiese so before it starts. #NO



_________________
2-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-2-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
lynxmania



Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Posts: 8005
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 3:23 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
lynxmania wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:
Maybe with her 2nd FMVP tonight? Wink


She'd have to win one first.


Who do you think won in 2013?


I clearly blanked on the entire 2013 season. Oops Laughing Embarassed


Genero36



Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 8516



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 4:14 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I never took the question of this thread as if any of them are the best ever. I took the question as to which of the three options would make the best argument for themselves.

To the naked eye, Taurasi is one of the best five players this league has ever employed (along with Cooper, Jackson, Leslie and Swoopes). Of course the last three have six DPOY honors between them.



_________________
I'm all for the separation of church and hate.
GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 4132
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 6:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ucbart wrote:
It’s Diana....and it’s not close.


I agree with this.

Diana is a much better passer than the other two, and is in my opinion one of the top five passers of all time. She may be the top three point shooter of all time -- not in terms of statistical percentage, but in the ability to get them off consistently and accurately under intense defensive pressure.

Finally, with her ability to control the ball with her dribbling, driving, passing and shooting skills, Diana can control the entire game more comprehensively than Parker or Moore. She's much more of an on court leader.
blaase22



Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 3515
Location: Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 6:41 pm    ::: Re: Taurasi, Parker, Moore Reply Reply with quote

mavcarter wrote:
Silky Johnson wrote:
Personally, I don't think any one of these three women can be considered the Greatest of All Time.


Agreed. Hard for me to rank anyone of these three the GOAT when the one in Minnesota played for a Hall of Fame coach in Connecticut with a great system surrounded by great players and proceeded to have the same environment in Minnesota. While Taurasi does have three rings, she's also been in the lottery five times, technically four if we're not counting 2012. Parker doesn't really have a strong resume in part due to injuries and not giving a full 100% effort day in and out.

But didn't Houston have THREE of the best players of all time at the same time and a great coach and great system also.


blaase22



Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 3515
Location: Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 6:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GlennMacGrady wrote:
ucbart wrote:
It’s Diana....and it’s not close.


I agree with this.

Diana is a much better passer than the other two, and is in my opinion one of the top five passers of all time. She may be the top three point shooter of all time -- not in terms of statistical percentage, but in the ability to get them off consistently and accurately under intense defensive pressure.

Finally, with her ability to control the ball with her dribbling, driving, passing and shooting skills, Diana can control the entire game more comprehensively than Parker or Moore. She's much more of an on court leader.


Basketball aint all about offense, Diana doesn't play defense.


justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 6575
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 6:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GlennMacGrady wrote:
ucbart wrote:
It’s Diana....and it’s not close.


I agree with this.

Diana is a much better passer than the other two, and is in my opinion one of the top five passers of all time. She may be the top three point shooter of all time -- not in terms of statistical percentage, but in the ability to get them off consistently and accurately under intense defensive pressure.

Finally, with her ability to control the ball with her dribbling, driving, passing and shooting skills, Diana can control the entire game more comprehensively than Parker or Moore. She's much more of an on court leader.

Right now, I would agree. Taurasi has been so elite for so many years. It's hard to make a case for anyone else. Now whether in 10 years that remains the case will be another question. If Moore keeps up her play, especially as the other Lynx stars retire, she could easily unseat Taurasi.

While Taurasi is a better ball handler, Maya isn't that far back as a passer. But the place that Taurasi is vulnerable is on defense. It isn't just that she isn't an elite defender, it's that she is a terrible defender. Maya on the other hand is a 2x all-defense team member.

But Taurasi has done it and is now at the end of her career. For Moore to overtake her she still has to go out and prove it, and a lot of things can happen. I mean in 2010 Lauren Jackson would have been in tbis discussion and likely drawn more than a few votes. But injuries are the devil.



_________________
Covfefe when the walls fell.
mavcarter



Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 4316
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 7:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GlennMacGrady wrote:
Diana is a much better passer than the other two.


Much better than a 6-4 PF who lead the league in assists in 2015, 3rd in 2016, and top ten in 2014 and 2017? Parker’s vision and passing ability is underrated, IMO.



_________________
Quote:
EDD will not come in and dominate like some of you are thinking.
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 5979



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 7:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

As much as I like Parker.Taurasi/Moore would never have the close out game 4 performances Parker had the last two finals,at home no less.




Last edited by zune69 on 10/05/17 8:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
mercfan3



Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 17818



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 7:49 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

blaase22 wrote:
GlennMacGrady wrote:
ucbart wrote:
It’s Diana....and it’s not close.


I agree with this.

Diana is a much better passer than the other two, and is in my opinion one of the top five passers of all time. She may be the top three point shooter of all time -- not in terms of statistical percentage, but in the ability to get them off consistently and accurately under intense defensive pressure.

Finally, with her ability to control the ball with her dribbling, driving, passing and shooting skills, Diana can control the entire game more comprehensively than Parker or Moore. She's much more of an on court leader.


Basketball aint all about offense, Diana doesn't play defense.


Diana is old now, and was always a part of teams that didn't focus on defense.
She's an average defender, and in the playoffs on her championship teams, she was above average.

Her offensive ability is/was so far ahead of everyone else, that, IMO, it overcomes her being weaker on defense than some other great players.

That all being said, I think it's difficult to compare posts and guards. How can we really say who was better, LJ or DT? LJ was more dominant, DT was more skilled. That's the nature of post vs. guard. I prefer guards, so I'm always going to be biased there..but both positions exist for a reason.



_________________
TALENT

What it takes to play a gay pirate, a gay candymaker, and a gay mad hatter, and still land a role as John Dilinger.
PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 13950
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 8:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Moore hasn't blown off games and seasons like Taurasi and Parker have, so she gets extra credit from me.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55128
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 8:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:
Moore hasn't blown off games and seasons like Taurasi and Parker have, so she gets extra credit from me.


Not yet. Even though it seems like she's been around forever, Moore is only 28 years old.



_________________
Come love come, the road lies low
The way is long and hard I know
PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 13950
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/05/17 8:47 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
PUmatty wrote:
Moore hasn't blown off games and seasons like Taurasi and Parker have, so she gets extra credit from me.


Not yet. Even though it seems like she's been around forever, Moore is only 28 years old.


If she proves to have as little commitment as they do, I'll adjust my thought process Wink


ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 8491



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 9:19 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:
pilight wrote:
PUmatty wrote:
Moore hasn't blown off games and seasons like Taurasi and Parker have, so she gets extra credit from me.


Not yet. Even though it seems like she's been around forever, Moore is only 28 years old.


If she proves to have as little commitment as they do, I'll adjust my thought process Wink


Actually, that's an interesting point, as Moore is getting to the age that taking some time off really starts to make sense. If she does, then does she skip a WNBA season, or the far more lucrative overseas season?

If she doesn't take some time off, burnout and/or injury becomes more and more possible, if not likely.



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 19629
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 9:35 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Moore hasn't done 'overseas' like many, including Taurasi, have though. She's played the much shorter and less competitive Chinese season, and already sat out at least one offeason entirely. This isn't the eight-month grind of domestic and continental European competition that Taurasi played in for year after year.

So the considerations aren't quite the same, or at least not yet.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
bballgrl



Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 3138



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 10:32 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

blaase22 wrote:
ucbart wrote:
It’s Diana....and it’s not close.

Her and ace are neck and neck for biggest whiners.


No Way. Ace is the biggest whinner of all, even tried to be the ref in one game. ALWAYS running to the ref!


justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 6575
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 11:19 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

bballgrl wrote:
blaase22 wrote:
ucbart wrote:
It’s Diana....and it’s not close.

Her and ace are neck and neck for biggest whiners.


No Way. Ace is the biggest whinner of all, even tried to be the ref in one game. ALWAYS running to the ref!

Let's be fair, it would be significantly easier to list the star players who don't whine/complain to the refs. Maya, too, does more than her share of it. And we can't really blame them, because it works. Expecting a competitor to not use every legal tool in her disposal to win a game is not realistic. If the league has an issue with it, it is up to them to police it stricter.

I guess a tangential argument could be made against Taurasi for picking up so many techs that she has been suspended under the Taurasi Rule on a bunch of occasions, but those missed games are really not super significant when looked at in the scope of an entire career.



_________________
Covfefe when the walls fell.
Hoops9092



Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 1342



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 12:06 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Maya was always drafted onto a team full of winners.

She should've been drafted to the Tulsa Shock should the lottery had panned out as expected.

She also went to UConn.

Had Maya gone to say Georgia and Tulsa Shock, would her legacy be far different? She didn't when at UConn when it was all on her.


Hoops9092



Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 1342



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 12:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Lauren Jackson ... GOAT.


PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 13950
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 12:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Hoops9092 wrote:
Lauren Jackson ... GOAT.


I'd probably agree, though Leslie and Swoopes would have an argument as well. I didn't see much of Cooper and her time was so limited in the WNBA, I think she is hard to assess.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55128
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 12:14 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Hoops9092 wrote:
Maya was always drafted onto a team full of winners.


She got drafted onto a team that went 13-21, was seven years removed from their last playoff appearance, and whose major offseason acquisition was an undersized 40-year-old center.



_________________
Come love come, the road lies low
The way is long and hard I know
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 6575
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 12:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Hoops9092 wrote:
Lauren Jackson ... GOAT.

LJ is the Jim Brown of women's basketball, imo. Had injuries not hampered her after 2010, I think she would be the GOAT hands down. She was just hitting her stride...and then she was never the same.

But when we discuss GOAT, the ability to have a long career matters greatly. If we were just going to ask who the Greatest of 2001-2010 was, it's clearly LJ.



_________________
Covfefe when the walls fell.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 45066



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 2:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Hoops9092 wrote:
Maya was always drafted onto a team full of winners.


Oh yeah, what was their record in 2010?

I am a witness in the change of culture once Maya joined the team. It started with her and revolved around her and still does more than anyone else. Nobody is driven to win more than Maya. Nobody does things the right way to help her achieve success. That rubs off her teammates. She makes her teammates better wherever she goes. It's not all luck with Maya, unless you're willing to look foolish and say she's been lucky all her life and that's all it's ever been.

Hoops9092 wrote:
She should've been drafted to the Tulsa Shock should the lottery had panned out as expected.


Hard to say. Her culture and influence follows her.

Hoops9092 wrote:
She also went to UConn.


Taurasi went to UConn. Parker went to Tennessee. Did they not contribute to the success of their teams? Seems like Tennessee was never the same once Maya joined UConn.

Hoops9092 wrote:
Had Maya gone to say Georgia and Tulsa Shock, would her legacy be far different? She didn't when at UConn when it was all on her.


Do you play the "what if" game with anyone who achieves any kind of sustained success? Seems like sour grapes to me.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
mavcarter



Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 4316
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 2:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
Hoops9092 wrote:
Maya was always drafted onto a team full of winners.


She got drafted onto a team that went 13-21, was seven years removed from their last playoff appearance, and whose major offseason acquisition was an undersized 40-year-old center.


All facts, but hard to ignore that she joined a team that had 11 All Star appearances combined before she even got there. That's damn near unheard of for a team that was so bad before. What other lottery pick has been drafted to a team with that many? I'm guessing Candace Parker?



_________________
Quote:
EDD will not come in and dominate like some of you are thinking.
miller40



Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 971



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 3:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

mavcarter wrote:
pilight wrote:
Hoops9092 wrote:
Maya was always drafted onto a team full of winners.


She got drafted onto a team that went 13-21, was seven years removed from their last playoff appearance, and whose major offseason acquisition was an undersized 40-year-old center.


All facts, but hard to ignore that she joined a team that had 11 All Star appearances combined before she even got there. That's damn near unheard of for a team that was so bad before. What other lottery pick has been drafted to a team with that many? I'm guessing Candace Parker?


Brittney Griner


Nerd2



Joined: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 7365



Back to top
PostPosted: 10/06/17 6:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
Hoops9092 wrote:
Maya was always drafted onto a team full of winners.


She got drafted onto a team that went 13-21, was seven years removed from their last playoff appearance, and whose major offseason acquisition was an undersized 40-year-old center.


She got drafted onto a team who went 13-21 because both their SGs - #1 draft pick Augustus and 6th woman Wiggins - went out with injuries early in the 2010 season and they were forced to play their rookie Wright there. Even then, they barely missed the playoffs. Their 2011 lineup (top 7 players) consisted of 2 #1 picks and 3 other lottery picks.


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin