RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

New York Liberty 2018
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 20, 21, 22  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 22112



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/13/18 8:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

You forgot Sugar.



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
basketballologist



Joined: 05 Aug 2013
Posts: 180



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/13/18 8:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

myrtle wrote:
You forgot Sugar.



Sure did. My bad

Depth Chart:

PG:
1. Bria Hartley
2. Brittany Boyd
3. Lindsay Allen

SG:
1. Epiphanny Prince
2. Sugar Rodgers
3. Shay Murphy
4. Kelly Faris

SF:
1. Shavonte Zellous
2. Kia Nurse
3. Rebecca Allen
4. Leslie Robinson

PF:
1. Tina Charles
2. Kiah Stokes
3. Reshanda Gray
4. Jillian Alleyne

C:
1. Kia Vaughn
2. Mercedes Russell
3. Amanda Zahui B
4. Rachel Hollivay


NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 11574



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/14/18 8:54 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The discussion of Nurse’s height is overkill. Someone said 5’9” or 5’10”? Laughing

In every pic I’ve seen where Nurse and Gabby Williams are standing or sitting straight up Nurse is taller. In Root’s picture Nurse is at least an inch taller than Taurasi if not two. She definitely has SF height for the WNBA. And length. And hops. The question is does she have the weight. But I like her guarding Angel. I like her guarding Stricklen. I like her guarding any of DT, EDD or Bonner more so than any of the options we put out there last year.

I also think people may be forgetting one thing. Nurse and Zellous can play at the same time. Both have guard skills. If Boyd is out to start the season then we will probably see pockets of time where Piph plays the 1 spot. Not to mention if something happens to any of Piph, Sugar, L. Allen, Hartley or Z, Nurse immediately moves into a 20-30 mpg situation.

Regarding Bec, I’m not thrilled with going with only two people at SF, but what has she shown? Her game has not developed in two seasons. I guarantee any team who’s scouted her knows what her game consists of because it’s almost always two things. Shoot an open 3 or dribble once to the left, pull up and shoot...and miss. She can’t pass, she can’t handle and her defense is ok but nothing more.

Russell I see as a lot like Jantel Lavender as a rookie. Good offense, not much D. Quick, long, athletic. Decent out to 18 feet but as a rookie will probably do more work near the basket. And her game is projectible to Lavender’s today also in that her face-up ability is good enough to improve her range if you give her a few years. She probably won’t play much but will be a nice change of pace in situations where we need offense or a little more height.

Also, good offense helps your D more than vice versa. Making shots means less transition D. It means getting less tired. Also Stokes and Vaughn can’t really guard players like Fowles and Griner anyway. Getting another offensive threat on the floor...which impacts the whole offense...at times outweighs defense. I’m not saying play Russell 25 minutes. Just saying that there are times where she will definitely serve a function we haven’t had.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.


Last edited by NYL_WNBA_FAN on 04/16/18 5:04 am; edited 2 times in total
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4367



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/18 5:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

based on reading some of the post draft responses could this be the team in 2018

Hartley/L. Allen/Boyd (until healthy)
Prince/Rodgers (I would start Rodgers and let Prince be the 1st option on the 2nd unit)
Zelous/Nurse
Chalres/Gray
Stokes/Vaughn/Russell

This seems a little more balanced, Stokes or Vaughn can also play some 4, but it basically gives up two young players with potential that we've been developing.

Also did our trade window close with the draft or could someone see something happening before opening day?

Also could Gray play some 3? I realize she doesn't have any range, but if she was on the court with shooters could she be a slashing/post up wing and defend the bigger SFs in the league?

On a different not Bria Hartley was the top scorer in the Turkish league regular season this year and that league has a lot of great WNBA players so maybe she'll be bringing that scoring touch back to NY.


myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 22112



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/18 5:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:


Also could Gray play some 3? I realize she doesn't have any range, but if she was on the court with shooters could she be a slashing/post up wing and defend the bigger SFs in the league?



Unless she has changed her skill set a whole lot since college, she has no range and no handle so no, I can't imagine she could make a SF anyway anytime. I really doubt she makes the team.



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4123
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/18 7:01 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Gray played center in college and is basically a low post banger. She can slide over to PF, but using her at SF is a major stretch.

I could see management making some more moves, especially as cutdown day approaches and other teams look to unload their excess depth. However, combo forwards are hard to find. Washington currently has both Dev Peters and Myisha Hines-Allen as quick PFs, which is a bit redundant. If they're willing to part with MHA in a trade, she would work as a potential combo forward. Myisha is another local player (Montclair NJ) which seems to be a recent Liberty trend.

More likely the team will live with being thin at SF and make an emergency move when necessary. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, there are only 144 rosters spots in the WNBA. Teams can always find people floating around who can fill out their bench almost as well as existing players. You can even keep R. Allen or Zahui B in that 12th slot if you feel strongly about them. If an injury occurs or you find some other unmet need that has to be addressed, a move could be made at that time.



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 2163
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/18 9:30 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
based on reading some of the post draft responses could this be the team in 2018

Hartley/L. Allen/Boyd (until healthy)
Prince/Rodgers (I would start Rodgers and let Prince be the 1st option on the 2nd unit)
Zelous/Nurse
Chalres/Gray
Stokes/Vaughn/Russell

This seems a little more balanced, Stokes or Vaughn can also play some 4, but it basically gives up two young players with potential that we've been developing.

Also did our trade window close with the draft or could someone see something happening before opening day?

Also could Gray play some 3? I realize she doesn't have any range, but if she was on the court with shooters could she be a slashing/post up wing and defend the bigger SFs in the league?

On a different not Bria Hartley was the top scorer in the Turkish league regular season this year and that league has a lot of great WNBA players so maybe she'll be bringing that scoring touch back to NY.


Your projected roster--with Rebecca Allen and Zahui B. not making the team--seems a reasonable guess to me. Perhaps one of them ahead of Gray. Perhaps someone released by another team ahead of R. Allen, Zahui B., or Gray.

It's so hard to guess at any of this--including whether there could still be a trade--since we have so little idea of who is actually making roster decisions. And since we know so little about Katie Smith's approach as a head coach. Or how she feels about all the Liberty players (including Boyd) she's already worked with who could be on this year's team.

I don't believe we'll know all that much until (a) we get to the end of training camp and see which 11 players (+ Boyd) remain on the roster; and (b) we've watched about 10 regular-season games to see who Smith plays, at what positions, for how many minutes, at what points in the game, and what her general approach is as a head coach.



_________________
Let's remember Anucha Browne, who was sexually harassed by Isiah Thomas. In recent years, she has served as a vice president of the NCAA focusing on women's basketball championships.
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 11574



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/18 10:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I'm not sure of anything except that these are all good points and all reasonable guesses. And one other thing. That Zahui and Bec are on notice. Remembering Bill saying Zahui didn't know the plays after the Columbia exhibition game and seeing Bec not improve any facets of her game last year. This year numerous post players have been added, who will either make the team or compete with Zahui for a spot. Same with Nurse, who definitely will make the team, and Robinson, who almost certainly will not, but nonetheless will compete with Allen. Kelly Faris is also a big guard/SF type.

No PGs or SGs have been added unless you count Nurse as a 2. That suggests to me that the Libs are pretty satisfied with Hartley and Lindsay Allen. Or that they intend to use Piph at the 1 at times, something that didn't work well last year but might this year if Nurse is on the floor at the same time. Whatever it is (probably mostly Hartley/L. Allen), they seem happy with their PG situation because no moves have been made in that area. Makes me think they'd have taken Vadeeva over Brown had Nurse gone 9th. Or maybe Nared would have been their choice.

My personal guess is that one of Zahui or Bec make the team. No way they both do IMO. But one probably will. I'd lean Zahui. I don't think Gray will make the team. She's even more one-dimensional than Zahui.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 11574



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/18 10:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

On another note here's how I see the league right now:

1) LA
2) MIN
3) PHX
4) CT
Tie 5th) NY
Tie 5th) ATL
7) LV
Cool SEA
9) DC
10) DAL
11) IND
12) CHI

Right now everyone loves Dallas. I don't. They finish in the bottom third in D every year with or without Cambage. I don't see how that changes this year even with all the offensive talent. And you need D to win close games. I do think the difference between 5 and 10 could be just 2 or 3 games though. There's a lot of parity after the top 3. Libs could finish 18-16 and still finish 5th. Things could also fall right in the sense they could get a major contribution from Nurse and win their usual 21-23. That remains to be seen. It's hard to pick them higher than 5th or 6th without seeing how their style of play changes and what the lineups are. I do think they could finish as high as 3 if things go right though. And this time around, they'd have another 3 point shooter. In a one-game elimination, that's extremely important. The inferior perimeter team loses an elimination game more than half the time, IMO. Being able to create perimeter offense is important in playoff games.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 2163
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/18 12:37 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Its now mid-April and I continue to wonder: what will Katie Smith be like as a WNBA head coach? Obviously there's no track record to draw on other than her work in lesser positions under Bill Laimbeer. Any thoughts or guesses as to what Smith may be like in this new role?



_________________
Let's remember Anucha Browne, who was sexually harassed by Isiah Thomas. In recent years, she has served as a vice president of the NCAA focusing on women's basketball championships.
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4123
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/18 1:40 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I view this as an orderly succession, similar to Stephanie White replacing Linn Dunn 3-4 years ago, rather than a disruptive coaching change. As such, you would expect a number of things to remain the same. Since the defense has worked well for the last three years, I'm guessing that system and philosophy will stay in place. Where Smith is more likely to put her stamp on the team is with offensive changes. However, it's important to remember that the Liberty already overhauled their offense last season. I don't know how much of that effort was based on ideas from Katie, but if she had significant input then maybe even the offense will be similar. At the very least, Smith will likely make alterations to account for changes in personnel.



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 11574



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/18 10:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

You have to wonder...if Laimbeer was still the coach would Nared have been the choice? Not only is she a big SF, but she's a penetrator who got to the foul line a lot in college. That's the kind of skill set he typically prefers. In turn, that would make one wonder whether Smith's plan was to alter the offensive structure to a more balanced one.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 11574



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/18 10:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

You have to wonder...if Laimbeer was still the coach would Nared have been the choice over Nurse? Not only is she a big SF, but she's a penetrator who got to the foul line a lot in college. That's the kind of skill set he typically prefers. In turn, that would make one wonder whether Smith's plan is to alter the offensive structure to a more balanced one.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
LibFan25



Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 453
Location: Yonkers, NY


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/18 11:33 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

NYL_WNBA_FAN wrote:
You have to wonder...if Laimbeer was still the coach would Nared have been the choice? Not only is she a big SF, but she's a penetrator who got to the foul line a lot in college. That's the kind of skill set he typically prefers. In turn, that would make one wonder whether Smith's plan was to alter the offensive structure to a more balanced one.


I think they might have concerns about Boyd .Cuz why would they go with another guard? They possibly just went best player available but you right it makes you wonder if Bill was still here would go with "need"(SF) then best available.


root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4123
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/18 12:25 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I'm not convinced things would be different. Nurse has enough height to play SF even though it's not her natural position. Without overthinking it, Nurse had a good year and Nared didn't. I came into the season a big Jaime Nared fan, but to be perfectly honest she had a bad year and was particularly bad against good teams. It wasn't only that she missed shots, she took a lot of ill-advised shots -- like three-pointers early in the clock even though she only shot 24% from deep this season. Yes, it could be that Jaime was trying too hard to carry her team, but the bottom line is she played a lot of dumb basketball. I'm sure that got a lot of coaches wondering.

As for penetrating, Nared typically forced her way to the basket. It's not like she has slick crossover or hesitation moves. So, I'd take those 206 free throws with a grain of salt. I'm not convinced Jaime would get the calls at the next level. It reminds me that Trudi Lacey drafted both LaSondra Barrett and Natalie Novosel in the first round of 2012. Barrett got to the line 236 times and Novosel 199 in their senior years. However, Lasondra never made it out of training camp and Natalie only lasted one season. Interestingly, Barrett was athletically similar to Nared: a versatile, mobile 6-2 player. She started the year at PF, but ended up playing point when LSU's PG went down for the season. Anyway, getting to the line in college is not necessarily translatable... although it's certainly easier to trust Bill Laimbeer's judgement compared to Trudi Lacey's. Smile



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 15494



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/18 8:42 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

In terms of talent & best available, I'm glad we picked Nurse. Was never high on Nared.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4367



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/18 9:49 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

So upon further review I've got nine locks

Hartley/Boyd
Prince/Rodgers
Zelous/Nurse
Charles
Stokes/Vaughn

with
closer to making it than not making it
L. Allen
Russell

in the middle
Zahui B
B. Allen

fighting their way in from the outside
Gray
Alleyne
Faris
S. Murphy
Holivay

I still think there might be some people on the waiver wire who could leap into the mix, and I'm still waiting for the trade that shakes things up, but not counting on it.




Last edited by J-Spoon on 04/18/18 1:28 am; edited 1 time in total
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 2163
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/18 10:02 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
So upon further review I've got nine locks

Hartley/Boyd
Prince/Rodgers
Zelous/Nurse
Charles
Stokes/Vaughn

with
closer to making it than not making it
L. Allen
Russell

in the middle
Zahui B
B. Allen

fighting their way in from the outside
Gray
Alleyne
Faris

I still think there might be some people on the waiver wire who could leap into the mix, and I'm still waiting for the trade that shakes things up, but not counting on it.


Barring something quite unexpected, I believe you've got this right. As for player #12, I view that as a crap shoot. Probably Zahui B. or Rebecca Allen; possibly Gray, Alleyne, or Faris; possibly someone from the waiver wire; possibly a fringe player on another team's roster who can be acquired at a reasonably low cost.

I'd be very surprised if there is a major trade, though I'd guess that the Liberty are still exploring whether they can get a good return on trading Prince or Rodgers.



_________________
Let's remember Anucha Browne, who was sexually harassed by Isiah Thomas. In recent years, she has served as a vice president of the NCAA focusing on women's basketball championships.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 46682



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/18 10:06 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
So upon further review I've got nine locks

Hartley/Boyd
Prince/Rodgers
Zelous/Nurse
Charles
Stokes/Vaughn

with
closer to making it than not making it
L. Allen
Russell

in the middle
Zahui B
B. Allen

fighting their way in from the outside
Gray
Alleyne
Faris

I still think there might be some people on the waiver wire who could leap into the mix, and I'm still waiting for the trade that shakes things up, but not counting on it.


What do you think of Rachel Hollivay and Shay Murphy?



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4367



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/18 10:14 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I've been trying to think of a mega trade that could shake things up the best I could come up with was (I'm not saying I want this, or it could happen, just trying to really think outside the box but still work with some reality.)

Stokes, Rodgers and Hartley (originally I was thinking Boyd our injured PG for yours but I though Hartley would make it seem more appealing to Laimbeer) for Harrison and Jefferson

Jefferson/Boyd/L. Allen
Zelous/Prince
Nurse/B. Allen
Charles/Zahui B
Harrison/Vaughn/Russell

Hartley/Plum/Colson
McBride/Rodgers
Young/Burdick
Wilson/Stokes
Bone/Swords/Park




Last edited by J-Spoon on 04/17/18 11:37 pm; edited 2 times in total
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4367



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/18 10:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:
So upon further review I've got nine locks

Hartley/Boyd
Prince/Rodgers
Zelous/Nurse
Charles
Stokes/Vaughn

with
closer to making it than not making it
L. Allen
Russell

in the middle
Zahui B
B. Allen

fighting their way in from the outside
Gray
Alleyne
Faris

I still think there might be some people on the waiver wire who could leap into the mix, and I'm still waiting for the trade that shakes things up, but not counting on it.


What do you think of Rachel Hollivay and Shay Murphy?


Crap I forgot them, they can be added to trying to fight their way in.

I've always liked Murphy I just don't see her beating out Prince, Rodgers, Hartley, Nurse or Zelous.

Holivay will have to do a lot to get past Russell I think the risk/reward with Russell is very appealing to roll the dice on. If Russell is out Holivay would still have to outshine Alleyne or Gray but who knows?


root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4123
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 12:40 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Hollivay and Murphy were available all along. The fact that they got signed last tells you where they are in the pecking order. I could've gone for Murphy maybe 3 years ago. Now at 33, she would need to be clearly better than the younger players to beat them out.

I'm not expecting a major trade, but over the years we've gotten Mitchell, Hollingsworth, Rodgers, Schimmel and Zahui B in firesale deals near cutdown day. I see some potential crowding situations on a couple of teams that could lead to moves like that.



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 46682



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 1:03 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:

Stokes, Rodgers and Hartley (originally I was thinking Boyd our injured PG for yours but I though Hartley would make it seem more appealing to Laimbeer) for Harrison and Jefferson

Jefferson/Boyd/L. Allen
Zelous/Prince
Nurse/B. Allen
Charles/Zahui B
Harrison/Vaughn/Russell


You love LAllen so much, this is your way of starting her.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4367



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 1:22 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:

Stokes, Rodgers and Hartley (originally I was thinking Boyd our injured PG for yours but I though Hartley would make it seem more appealing to Laimbeer) for Harrison and Jefferson

Jefferson/Boyd/L. Allen
Zelous/Prince
Nurse/B. Allen
Charles/Zahui B
Harrison/Vaughn/Russell


You love LAllen so much, this is your way of starting her.


Nah, I just wanted to do something dramatic after doing my very realistic take on the team roster. It is clearly an exercise in fantasy GMing, while trying to keep things slightly realistic.

TBH my first draft of the trade was Stokes, Rodgers and Laimbeer's choice of Boyd or L. Allen (We all know Bill likes his retreads and a PG who can already run the system might seem appealing) but I switched it to Hartley in an attempt to up the ante from NY's side and avoid accusations of a lop sided homer trade.

I do like Jefferson and have been trying to get her while she might come at a cheaper price. MoJeff would be the starting PG in NY for a long time to come when she is healthy. Harrison seems very attainable at the moment and would probably be the best scoring post NY has had in the Charles era to play alongside Tina.

And while I realize a couple of my comments of late might make me seem like a huge L. Allen fan, my overall assessment is that she is a very good back up PG. Someone who is a reliable ball handler and a good defender, but someone whose game is limited by her lack of a long range shot, and her lack of offense. Though I do think she can improve in those areas, and I think most teams would benefit from having a player like her on board. While I'm usually more drawn to the flashy "It" factor type of players, I also have a place in my heart for the hard working, blue collar type of players, teams need both to be successful.


Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 2163
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 8:26 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
Shades wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:

Stokes, Rodgers and Hartley (originally I was thinking Boyd our injured PG for yours but I though Hartley would make it seem more appealing to Laimbeer) for Harrison and Jefferson

Jefferson/Boyd/L. Allen
Zelous/Prince
Nurse/B. Allen
Charles/Zahui B
Harrison/Vaughn/Russell


You love LAllen so much, this is your way of starting her.


Nah, I just wanted to do something dramatic after doing my very realistic take on the team roster. It is clearly an exercise in fantasy GMing, while trying to keep things slightly realistic.

TBH my first draft of the trade was Stokes, Rodgers and Laimbeer's choice of Boyd or L. Allen (We all know Bill likes his retreads and a PG who can already run the system might seem appealing) but I switched it to Hartley in an attempt to up the ante from NY's side and avoid accusations of a lop sided homer trade.

I do like Jefferson and have been trying to get her while she might come at a cheaper price. MoJeff would be the starting PG in NY for a long time to come when she is healthy. Harrison seems very attainable at the moment and would probably be the best scoring post NY has had in the Charles era to play alongside Tina.

And while I realize a couple of my comments of late might make me seem like a huge L. Allen fan, my overall assessment is that she is a very good back up PG. Someone who is a reliable ball handler and a good defender, but someone whose game is limited by her lack of a long range shot, and her lack of offense. Though I do think she can improve in those areas, and I think most teams would benefit from having a player like her on board. While I'm usually more drawn to the flashy "It" factor type of players, I also have a place in my heart for the hard working, blue collar type of players, teams need both to be successful.


As a fan of Lindsay Allen, I'm puzzled that some people (not you) write as if the limitations in her offensive game are permanent. They may be proven right over time, no question. But we can't know that yet. Last season she was a rookie point guard (a very difficult challenge), she was cut at the end of training camp (that couldn't have helped), and then brought back. Could she have asserted herself more offensively while in the court? Maybe, but we don't know what Bill Laimbeer was telling her and asking of her. And many players take time to reach their full potential as professionals.

I believe she'll be on the team this season and will get enough minutes, at least for a good while, to show if she can take a step forward. I think she will.



_________________
Let's remember Anucha Browne, who was sexually harassed by Isiah Thomas. In recent years, she has served as a vice president of the NCAA focusing on women's basketball championships.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 46682



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 10:23 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
Shades wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:

Stokes, Rodgers and Hartley (originally I was thinking Boyd our injured PG for yours but I though Hartley would make it seem more appealing to Laimbeer) for Harrison and Jefferson

Jefferson/Boyd/L. Allen
Zelous/Prince
Nurse/B. Allen
Charles/Zahui B
Harrison/Vaughn/Russell


You love LAllen so much, this is your way of starting her.


Nah, I just wanted to do something dramatic after doing my very realistic take on the team roster. It is clearly an exercise in fantasy GMing, while trying to keep things slightly realistic.


I’m not sure you fully understood what I was getting at. It sounds like neither Jefferson or Boyd will be healthy enough to start the season.

That would a risky proposition just in case neither really got healthy this season.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4123
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 10:48 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:
Shades wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:

Stokes, Rodgers and Hartley (originally I was thinking Boyd our injured PG for yours but I though Hartley would make it seem more appealing to Laimbeer) for Harrison and Jefferson

Jefferson/Boyd/L. Allen
Zelous/Prince
Nurse/B. Allen
Charles/Zahui B
Harrison/Vaughn/Russell


You love LAllen so much, this is your way of starting her.


Nah, I just wanted to do something dramatic after doing my very realistic take on the team roster. It is clearly an exercise in fantasy GMing, while trying to keep things slightly realistic.


I’m not sure you fully understood what I was getting at. It sounds like neither Jefferson or Boyd will be healthy enough to start the season.

That would a risky proposition just in case neither really got healthy this season.


I didn't say anything because I realize that J-Spoon was just suggesting this trade for fun. That said, I had the same reaction. The Liberty are in win-now mode. There's no way they would intentionally start the season with two injured PGs who both have open-ended time frames for their return. Even if you're fairly sure they will return, you have no idea how they'll perform. It's like Piph two years ago -- she came back for a few games looking gimpy and rusty. On top of that, you'd be competing with only 10 players for much of the season since neither Boyd nor Jefferson can be suspended and temporarily replaced.



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 6254



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 11:24 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

People are really overrating Nurse on both sides of the ball...80% of her shot attempts were wide open 3's/long range 2's or layups.She's below average at creating her own shot.Nurse led Uconn in minutes(33.1) by a good margin(3.4 more than KS)...But yet,was only 5th on the team in rebounding(3.5) and 5th in asst(2.Cool...Even A.Stevens had a higher asst rate(1.9 in 20mpg).I don't believe Kia will have the same success shooting the 3 ball at the pro level unless she changes her form.Nurse does three things that will not fly at the next level:1.Low release point on her shot...2.Sticks the ball out before she goes into her shooting motion/Shot is not tight/ball isn't close to her body...3.Gets very little lift on her shot...By comparison,Vivians/Brown have a higher release point,both keep the ball tight when going into their shooting motion,and both get more lift on their shot.Nurse will sometimes rush/increase the speed on the release of her shot,but that only compromises the form.Kia shoots a higher percentage when she takes her time.

On the defensive side of the ball,Nurse had the luxury of having Gabby,Stevens,and Collier as back stop defenders.Nurse was 4th in steals.When you lead the team in minutes as a guard,and have a reputation for being an elite defender,being top 2 or 3 in steals should be a given.However,to be fair,having a bunch of steals doesn't equate to being a great defender.Futhermore,there's no way in hell Kia Nurse is taller/Longer than Gabby Williams.Gabby is closer to 6'0 than 5'11,and has a huge wingspan...Can Kia play SF?...That depends on the opponent.


root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4123
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 12:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
People are really overrating Nurse on both sides of the ball...80% of her shot attempts were wide open 3's/long range 2's or layups.She's below average at creating her own shot.Nurse led Uconn in minutes(33.1) by a good margin(3.4 more than KS)...But yet,was only 5th on the team in rebounding(3.5) and 5th in asst(2.Cool...Even A.Stevens had a higher asst rate(1.9 in 20mpg).I don't believe Kia will have the same success shooting the 3 ball at the pro level unless she changes her form.Nurse does three things that will not fly at the next level:1.Low release point on her shot...2.Sticks the ball out before she goes into her shooting motion/Shot is not tight/ball isn't close to her body...3.Gets very little lift on her shot...By comparison,Vivians/Brown have a higher release point,both keep the ball tight when going into their shooting motion,and both get more lift on their shot.Nurse will sometimes rush/increase the speed on the release of her shot,but that only compromises the form.Kia shoots a higher percentage when she takes her time.

On the defensive side of the ball,Nurse had the luxury of having Gabby,Stevens,and Collier as back stop defenders.Nurse was 4th in steals.When you lead the team in minutes and have a reputation for being an elite defender,being top 2 or 3 in steals should be a given.However,to be fair,having a bunch of steals doesn't equate to being a great defender.Futhermore,there's no way in hell Kia Nurse is taller/Longer than Gabby Williams.Gabby is closer to 6'0 than 5'11,and has a huge wingspan...Can Kia play SF?...That depends on the opponent.


I used to believe what you do about 3-pt shooting, but I've been proven wrong. I was concerned about Candice Wiggins and Tiffany Hayes coming out of college, but their low release points didn't hurt them at the next level. I didn't see Katie Douglas in college, but she had that awkward shot with a lowish release point in the pros. She still had a very good career. What I've learned is that most 3pt shots are taken off kick-out passes or during fastbreaks. Also, defenders are taught to be really careful about fouling 3pt shooters. Consequently, most 3pt shots actually are wide open or fairly open. That's why when the Kristi Toliver/Alex Bentley/Ivory Latta types shoot fade away 3s over outstretched arms and in people's faces, they elicit oohs and ahhs. Tightly contested 3s are not the norm.

As far as defense goes, it's primarily a team effort. I forget which coach said it recently, but he commented that everyone gets beat on defense. It's just a matter of whether you get beat on the first, second or third move. If you can hang in there for the first two, it gives your teammates a chance to provide help. For good defensive teams, that's usually enough. For bad defensive teams, you're on your own anyway. Laughing

My concern for Nurse is the same I have for all rookie perimeter players who have to make the transition to playing off the bench. It's hard for anyone to maintain their shooting rhythm when coming in cold off the bench, but it's particularly hard if you're not used to it. Nurse became a starter in her 3rd game at UConn. I don't know how long she's been a starter for Team Canada, but it's been awhile. Kia has very little experience coming off the bench. For someone who is a historically streaky shooter, that's going to be a tremendous challenge. These days, the norm for people who shoot mostly 3s seems to be an overall FG% of under 40%. It's just a matter of whether they can keep their 3pt% at 33% or higher. So, I'm not expecting Nurse to shoot anywhere near her college percentages.



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 4739
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 1:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

root_thing wrote:
zune69 wrote:
People are really overrating Nurse on both sides of the ball...80% of her shot attempts were wide open 3's/long range 2's or layups.She's below average at creating her own shot.Nurse led Uconn in minutes(33.1) by a good margin(3.4 more than KS)...But yet,was only 5th on the team in rebounding(3.5) and 5th in asst(2.Cool...Even A.Stevens had a higher asst rate(1.9 in 20mpg).I don't believe Kia will have the same success shooting the 3 ball at the pro level unless she changes her form.Nurse does three things that will not fly at the next level:1.Low release point on her shot...2.Sticks the ball out before she goes into her shooting motion/Shot is not tight/ball isn't close to her body...3.Gets very little lift on her shot...By comparison,Vivians/Brown have a higher release point,both keep the ball tight when going into their shooting motion,and both get more lift on their shot.Nurse will sometimes rush/increase the speed on the release of her shot,but that only compromises the form.Kia shoots a higher percentage when she takes her time.

On the defensive side of the ball,Nurse had the luxury of having Gabby,Stevens,and Collier as back stop defenders.Nurse was 4th in steals.When you lead the team in minutes and have a reputation for being an elite defender,being top 2 or 3 in steals should be a given.However,to be fair,having a bunch of steals doesn't equate to being a great defender.Futhermore,there's no way in hell Kia Nurse is taller/Longer than Gabby Williams.Gabby is closer to 6'0 than 5'11,and has a huge wingspan...Can Kia play SF?...That depends on the opponent.


I used to believe what you do about 3-pt shooting, but I've been proven wrong. I was concerned about Candice Wiggins and Tiffany Hayes coming out of college, but their low release points didn't hurt them at the next level. I didn't see Katie Douglas in college, but she had that awkward shot with a lowish release point in the pros. She still had a very good career. What I've learned is that most 3pt shots are taken off kick-out passes or during fastbreaks. Also, defenders are taught to be really careful about fouling 3pt shooters. Consequently, most 3pt shots actually are wide open or fairly open. That's why when the Kristi Toliver/Alex Bentley/Ivory Latta types shoot fade away 3s over outstretched arms and in people's faces, they elicit oohs and ahhs. Tightly contested 3s are not the norm.

As far as defense goes, it's primarily a team effort. I forget which coach said it recently, but he commented that everyone gets beat on defense. It's just a matter of whether you get beat on the first, second or third move. If you can hang in there for the first two, it gives your teammates a chance to provide help. For good defensive teams, that's usually enough. For bad defensive teams, you're on your own anyway. Laughing

My concern for Nurse is the same I have for all rookie perimeter players who have to make the transition to playing off the bench. It's hard for anyone to maintain their shooting rhythm when coming in cold off the bench, but it's particularly hard if you're not used to it. Nurse became a starter in her 3rd game at UConn. I don't know how long she's been a starter for Team Canada, but it's been awhile. Kia has very little experience coming off the bench. For someone who is a historically streaky shooter, that's going to be a tremendous challenge. These days, the norm for people who shoot mostly 3s seems to be an overall FG% of under 40%. It's just a matter of whether they can keep their 3pt% at 33% or higher. So, I'm not expecting Nurse to shoot anywhere near her college percentages.


Two very perceptive critical analyses of Nurse, in my opinion. She's always been somewhat of an enigma to me, especially whether she's a good shooter or not, and I'm curious to see how she performs outside of her UConn role cocoon.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 46682



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 1:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nurse is a great defender. She covers her man so close that they are a very poor option to go to. Kinda hard to get steals when your man isn’t at the receiving end of a pass. Zune probably prefers defenders who gamble and jump passing lanes to amass steals, like McCoughtry.

I forget, who won the AAC defensive player of the year?



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 6254



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 1:43 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

root_thing wrote:

I used to believe what you do about 3-pt shooting, but I've been proven wrong. I was concerned about Candice Wiggins and Tiffany Hayes coming out of college, but their low release points didn't hurt them at the next level. I didn't see Katie Douglas in college, but she had that awkward shot with a lowish release point in the pros.


Wiggins,Hayes,and Douglas could create offense and space off the dribble.Nurse is more of a catch and shoot 3 point shooter.However,Nurse not being a primary scorer just might work to her advantage.The defense will be so focused on Charles,Prince,etc....that Nurse will get more open looks.

root_thing wrote:
As far as defense goes, it's primarily a team effort. I forget which coach said it recently, but he commented that everyone gets beat on defense. It's just a matter of whether you get beat on the first, second or third move. If you can hang in there for the first two, it gives your teammates a chance to provide help. For good defensive teams, that's usually enough. For bad defensive teams, you're on your own anyway. Laughing


Nurse should be fine against the shorter SF's(Clark,McBride,Christmas,KML)...But she'll be overmatched against the bigger ones(Moore,McCoughtry,Bonner)...Although I firmly believe Nurse has the size/strength to be a very good defensive shooting guard...And you're 100% spot on.Having a good defense comes down to the team as a whole,not one individual.

root_thing wrote:
My concern for Nurse is the same I have for all rookie perimeter players who have to make the transition to playing off the bench. It's hard for anyone to maintain their shooting rhythm when coming in cold off the bench, but it's particularly hard if you're not used to it. Nurse became a starter in her 3rd game at UConn. I don't know how long she's been a starter for Team Canada, but it's been awhile. Kia has very little experience coming off the bench. For someone who is a historically streaky shooter, that's going to be a tremendous challenge. These days, the norm for people who shoot mostly 3s seems to be an overall FG% of under 40%. It's just a matter of whether they can keep their 3pt% at 33% or higher. So, I'm not expecting Nurse to shoot anywhere near her college percentages.


Nurse wasn't one of the primary offensive players at UCONN.The offense mostly ran through GW,KS,NC,and AS.So I think coming off the bench won't impact her game.Nurse might actually play better coming off the bench(No pressure)




Last edited by zune69 on 04/18/18 1:56 pm; edited 1 time in total
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 6254



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 1:50 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
Nurse is a great defender. She covers her man so close that they are a very poor option to go to. Kinda hard to get steals when your man isn’t at the receiving end of a pass. Zune probably prefers defenders who gamble and jump passing lanes to amass steals, like McCoughtry.

I forget, who won the AAC defensive player of the year?


Did you not read my last post?...I clearly stated that getting a bunch of steals does not make a player a great defender....I believe Nurse for the most part will be overmatched at SF...Shooting guard is a different story.kia has the size and speed to be a very good defender at the SG position.


WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 5404
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 1:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
People are really overrating Nurse on both sides of the ball...80% of her shot attempts were wide open 3's/long range 2's or layups.She's below average at creating her own shot.Nurse led Uconn in minutes(33.1) by a good margin(3.4 more than KS)...But yet,was only 5th on the team in rebounding(3.5) and 5th in asst(2.Cool...Even A.Stevens had a higher asst rate(1.9 in 20mpg).I don't believe Kia will have the same success shooting the 3 ball at the pro level unless she changes her form.Nurse does three things that will not fly at the next level:1.Low release point on her shot...2.Sticks the ball out before she goes into her shooting motion/Shot is not tight/ball isn't close to her body...3.Gets very little lift on her shot...By comparison,Vivians/Brown have a higher release point,both keep the ball tight when going into their shooting motion,and both get more lift on their shot.Nurse will sometimes rush/increase the speed on the release of her shot,but that only compromises the form.Kia shoots a higher percentage when she takes her time.

On the defensive side of the ball,Nurse had the luxury of having Gabby,Stevens,and Collier as back stop defenders.Nurse was 4th in steals.When you lead the team in minutes as a guard,and have a reputation for being an elite defender,being top 2 or 3 in steals should be a given.However,to be fair,having a bunch of steals doesn't equate to being a great defender.Futhermore,there's no way in hell Kia Nurse is taller/Longer than Gabby Williams.Gabby is closer to 6'0 than 5'11,and has a huge wingspan...Can Kia play SF?...That depends on the opponent.


That Part ___________ x Also that little minny hop she takes before she shoots needs to be watched more closely and most likely called a travel in the WNBA.



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 46682



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 2:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
Shades wrote:
Nurse is a great defender. She covers her man so close that they are a very poor option to go to. Kinda hard to get steals when your man isn’t at the receiving end of a pass. Zune probably prefers defenders who gamble and jump passing lanes to amass steals, like McCoughtry.

I forget, who won the AAC defensive player of the year?


Did you not read my last post?...I clearly stated that getting a bunch of steals does not make a player a great defender....I believe Nurse for the most part will be overmatched at SF...Shooting guard is a different story.kia has the size and speed to be a very good defender at the SG position.


You made a pitch that being 4th in steals makes you a poor defender. I just wanted to explain why that was a crock because you didn’t explain it at all. If you’re retracting that notion, then your whole premise for calling her a poor defender falls apart. Not tall enough to guard SF? I guess there are many SF that aren’t tall enough. She seems ideal height to me. Is she strong enough? I suppose that’s debatable. I just know that she doesn’t deserve to be slighted for defense.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4367



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 2:19 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

root_thing wrote:
Shades wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:
Shades wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:

Stokes, Rodgers and Hartley (originally I was thinking Boyd our injured PG for yours but I though Hartley would make it seem more appealing to Laimbeer) for Harrison and Jefferson

Jefferson/Boyd/L. Allen
Zelous/Prince
Nurse/B. Allen
Charles/Zahui B
Harrison/Vaughn/Russell


You love LAllen so much, this is your way of starting her.


Nah, I just wanted to do something dramatic after doing my very realistic take on the team roster. It is clearly an exercise in fantasy GMing, while trying to keep things slightly realistic.


I’m not sure you fully understood what I was getting at. It sounds like neither Jefferson or Boyd will be healthy enough to start the season.

That would a risky proposition just in case neither really got healthy this season.


I didn't say anything because I realize that J-Spoon was just suggesting this trade for fun. That said, I had the same reaction. The Liberty are in win-now mode. There's no way they would intentionally start the season with two injured PGs who both have open-ended time frames for their return. Even if you're fairly sure they will return, you have no idea how they'll perform. It's like Piph two years ago -- she came back for a few games looking gimpy and rusty. On top of that, you'd be competing with only 10 players for much of the season since neither Boyd nor Jefferson can be suspended and temporarily replaced.


No I got that part too, but how long are they both really going to be out? I bet both are playing by June. My guess is their timelines are being overly cautious.


zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 6254



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/18 3:02 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
zune69 wrote:
Shades wrote:
Nurse is a great defender. She covers her man so close that they are a very poor option to go to. Kinda hard to get steals when your man isn’t at the receiving end of a pass. Zune probably prefers defenders who gamble and jump passing lanes to amass steals, like McCoughtry.

I forget, who won the AAC defensive player of the year?


Did you not read my last post?...I clearly stated that getting a bunch of steals does not make a player a great defender....I believe Nurse for the most part will be overmatched at SF...Shooting guard is a different story.kia has the size and speed to be a very good defender at the SG position.


You made a pitch that being 4th in steals makes you a poor defender. I just wanted to explain why that was a crock because you didn’t explain it at all. If you’re retracting that notion, then your whole premise for calling her a poor defender falls apart. Not tall enough to guard SF? I guess there are many SF that aren’t tall enough. She seems ideal height to me. Is she strong enough? I suppose that’s debatable. I just know that she doesn’t deserve to be slighted for defense.


I never called Nurse a poor defender,not one time.You can be a very good defender and still be overrated.Case in point,Nurse being named DPOTY..We all know Gabby was the best defender on UConn.When Arike Ogunbowale was going off late in the game vs UConn,who was mostly guarding her?...the answer is G.Williams.I also pointed out that Nurse is big enough to guard some of the small forwards but not all...And how did I slight Nurse's defense when clearly said she has the size/strength to be a very good defensive shooting guard?

1.Stop putting words in peoples mouths.

2.Stop trying to be a mind reader.

3.Stop assuming that you know more about women's basketball just because you're good at debating/arguing your point.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 46682



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 8:20 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Melbourne Boomers sign Lindsay Allen



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4123
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 11:51 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

WNBA 09 wrote:
zune69 wrote:
People are really overrating Nurse on both sides of the ball...80% of her shot attempts were wide open 3's/long range 2's or layups.She's below average at creating her own shot.Nurse led Uconn in minutes(33.1) by a good margin(3.4 more than KS)...But yet,was only 5th on the team in rebounding(3.5) and 5th in asst(2.Cool...Even A.Stevens had a higher asst rate(1.9 in 20mpg).I don't believe Kia will have the same success shooting the 3 ball at the pro level unless she changes her form.Nurse does three things that will not fly at the next level:1.Low release point on her shot...2.Sticks the ball out before she goes into her shooting motion/Shot is not tight/ball isn't close to her body...3.Gets very little lift on her shot...By comparison,Vivians/Brown have a higher release point,both keep the ball tight when going into their shooting motion,and both get more lift on their shot.Nurse will sometimes rush/increase the speed on the release of her shot,but that only compromises the form.Kia shoots a higher percentage when she takes her time.

On the defensive side of the ball,Nurse had the luxury of having Gabby,Stevens,and Collier as back stop defenders.Nurse was 4th in steals.When you lead the team in minutes as a guard,and have a reputation for being an elite defender,being top 2 or 3 in steals should be a given.However,to be fair,having a bunch of steals doesn't equate to being a great defender.Futhermore,there's no way in hell Kia Nurse is taller/Longer than Gabby Williams.Gabby is closer to 6'0 than 5'11,and has a huge wingspan...Can Kia play SF?...That depends on the opponent.


That Part ___________ x Also that little minny hop she takes before she shoots needs to be watched more closely and most likely called a travel in the WNBA.


I don't know how we're "overrating" Nurse when the discussion has mostly been about where she will get minutes as a backup. Are you guys suggesting that she'll be nailed to the bench and get no minutes at all except garbage time?



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 2163
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 12:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

root_thing wrote:
WNBA 09 wrote:
zune69 wrote:
People are really overrating Nurse on both sides of the ball...80% of her shot attempts were wide open 3's/long range 2's or layups.She's below average at creating her own shot.Nurse led Uconn in minutes(33.1) by a good margin(3.4 more than KS)...But yet,was only 5th on the team in rebounding(3.5) and 5th in asst(2.Cool...Even A.Stevens had a higher asst rate(1.9 in 20mpg).I don't believe Kia will have the same success shooting the 3 ball at the pro level unless she changes her form.Nurse does three things that will not fly at the next level:1.Low release point on her shot...2.Sticks the ball out before she goes into her shooting motion/Shot is not tight/ball isn't close to her body...3.Gets very little lift on her shot...By comparison,Vivians/Brown have a higher release point,both keep the ball tight when going into their shooting motion,and both get more lift on their shot.Nurse will sometimes rush/increase the speed on the release of her shot,but that only compromises the form.Kia shoots a higher percentage when she takes her time.

On the defensive side of the ball,Nurse had the luxury of having Gabby,Stevens,and Collier as back stop defenders.Nurse was 4th in steals.When you lead the team in minutes as a guard,and have a reputation for being an elite defender,being top 2 or 3 in steals should be a given.However,to be fair,having a bunch of steals doesn't equate to being a great defender.Futhermore,there's no way in hell Kia Nurse is taller/Longer than Gabby Williams.Gabby is closer to 6'0 than 5'11,and has a huge wingspan...Can Kia play SF?...That depends on the opponent.


That Part ___________ x Also that little minny hop she takes before she shoots needs to be watched more closely and most likely called a travel in the WNBA.


I don't know how we're "overrating" Nurse when the discussion has mostly been about where she will get minutes as a backup. Are you guys suggesting that she'll be nailed to the bench and get no minutes at all except garbage time?


Agreed. I haven't seen any "overrating" of Nurse. No one has written of her as a sure-fire All Star or anything within a mile of that. No one has suggested she'll be a starter. All I've seen is that some people have slightly higher or lower opinions of her offensive skills and possibilities. And some people have slightly higher or lower opinions of her defensive skills and possibilities. Why this is such a divisive discussion baffles me.



_________________
Let's remember Anucha Browne, who was sexually harassed by Isiah Thomas. In recent years, she has served as a vice president of the NCAA focusing on women's basketball championships.
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 6254



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 1:40 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

NYL_WNBA_FAN wrote:

In every pic I’ve seen where Nurse and Gabby Williams are standing or sitting
straight up Nurse is taller. In Root’s picture Nurse is at least an inch taller than Taurasi if not two. She definitely has SF height for the WNBA. And length. And hops. The question is does she have the weight. But I like her guarding Angel. I like her guarding Stricklen. I like her guarding any of DT, EDD or Bonner more so than any of the options we put out there last year.

Nurse guarding McCoughtry,a 6'4 Bonner,or 6'6 EDD better than any Liberty player from last season is very high Praise IMO.

J-Spoon hypothetical post-trade lineup had Nurse starting.

J-Spoon wrote:

Jefferson/Boyd/L. Allen
Zelous/Prince
Nurse/B. Allen
Charles/Zahui B
Harrison/Vaughn/Russell



And comparing the Senior seasons of Nurse/Nared's is a bit unfair...Nurse was the 5th option on UConn while Nared was 1st.Nurse got wide open looks while Nared had to create her own offense...I'd bet my life savings that if Nared/Nurse switched teams,Nared would have been the higher pick.


J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4367



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 2:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
NYL_WNBA_FAN wrote:

In every pic I’ve seen where Nurse and Gabby Williams are standing or sitting
straight up Nurse is taller. In Root’s picture Nurse is at least an inch taller than Taurasi if not two. She definitely has SF height for the WNBA. And length. And hops. The question is does she have the weight. But I like her guarding Angel. I like her guarding Stricklen. I like her guarding any of DT, EDD or Bonner more so than any of the options we put out there last year.

Nurse guarding McCoughtry,a 6'4 Bonner,or 6'6 EDD better than any Liberty player from last season is very high Praise IMO.

J-Spoon hypothetical post-trade lineup had Nurse starting.

J-Spoon wrote:

Jefferson/Boyd/L. Allen
Zelous/Prince
Nurse/B. Allen
Charles/Zahui B
Harrison/Vaughn/Russell



And comparing the Senior seasons of Nurse/Nared's is a bit unfair...Nurse was the 5th option on UConn while Nared was 1st.Nurse got wide open looks while Nared had to create her own offense...I'd bet my life savings that if Nared/Nurse switched teams,Nared would have been the higher pick.


You mean the fantasy trade where I'm trading Stokes, Rodgers and Hartley for Harrison and Jefferson that is a reliable source.

In the first line up I created after the draft she is right behind Rodgers and Prince as the 3rd SG.

If you read earlier in the same thread I'm pretty un-inspired by our draft which certainly isn't a ringing endorsement of Nurse and I question whether Nurse should knock off B. Allen.


J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4367



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 2:55 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
I think people are under estimating where B. Allen is on the depth chart

I've got

Hartley/L. Allen/Boyd
Prince/Rodgers/Nurse
Zelous/B. Allen
Charles/Zahui B or Gray
Stokes/Vaughn/Russell

I think if we keep Russell I could see Gray or Alleyne beating out Zahui B if we want to go with a more physical player, I also don't think Russell is guaranteed, and we won't go wih 8 on the perimeter so if the person in charge decides to keep B. Allen the really only true SF we have than one of the 6 guards have to go.

Also I really like Nurse but I wouldn't play her ahead of Prince, Rodgers, Hartley or Zelous ATM, and probably not L. Allen either maybe in a few months.

I almost feel like something has to give on the perimeter, either a trade involving Rodgers, Prince or L. Allen, and I think to a certain degree L. Allen is the last one we should give up. If there isn't a trade the cut is between Boyd, L. Allen, and B. Allen but I don't think it as clear as we're making it out to be.


bballjunkie



Joined: 12 Aug 2014
Posts: 528



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 3:01 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I will take that bet. Nared would not have been a Geno type player and if she had gone to Uconn she would have transferred having sat the bench. I get some of the comments on Nurse as yes, her 3s were wide open as the perimeter defense focused more on where KLS was but isn’t that what she will be expected to do in the W. The only problem could come with the extra distance from the basket and even KML has shown struggles with that. But Nurse will work her butt of on defense which is more than I can say about the majority of college players.

BTWs won’t try to take your life savings Smile


WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 5404
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 3:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

bballjunkie wrote:
I will take that bet. Nared would not have been a Geno type player and if she had gone to Uconn she would have transferred having sat the bench. I get some of the comments on Nurse as yes, her 3s were wide open as the perimeter defense focused more on where KLS was but isn’t that what she will be expected to do in the W. The only problem could come with the extra distance from the basket and even KML has shown struggles with that. But Nurse will work her butt of on defense which is more than I can say about the majority of college players.

BTWs won’t try to take your life savings Smile


Players who struggle to create their own shot , dont seem to last long in this league. Ijs



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
bballjunkie



Joined: 12 Aug 2014
Posts: 528



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 3:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The league needs and also has role players.


WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 5404
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 3:28 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

bballjunkie wrote:
The league needs and also has role players.


That can create their own shot. Thats where this league is headed. Players who can create vs those who cannot. Example : NBA



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
bballjunkie



Joined: 12 Aug 2014
Posts: 528



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 3:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Every team needs someone who can spread the floor so that some other player has space to get to the basket. Not enough teams have those types of shooters. The question will be whether the extra distance will make her less efficient.


zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 6254



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 3:40 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Having a difference of opinion on Rebkell now means you're being divisive?...okay Laughing ....I guess breaking down a players shooting mechanics,scrutinizing their height,and debating how impactful they’ll be on defense in the pros is frowned upon on this website.

J-Spoon wrote:

You mean the fantasy trade where I'm trading Stokes, Rodgers and Hartley for Harrison and Jefferson that is a reliable source.


@J-Spoon...I wasn’t being critical of your trade proposal/Hypothetical lineup...I was Just pointing out the starting lineup that included Nurse,even if it was a fantasy trade.

bballjunkie wrote:
I will take that bet. Nared would not have been a Geno type player and if she had gone to Uconn she would have transferred having sat the bench.


Auriemma quote
Quote:
"Jaime's really good and really talented," Auriemma said. "As is Mercedes Russell. I haven't really seen them play a lot since high school. I don't see them that often now since we don't play them. But I thought the two of them were really impressive for a lot of reasons out in Colorado. I'm not surprised that they both made the team. They were really, really good."


J.Nared:Geno Auriemma Is 'So Dope'

https://youtu.be/N94PTS4gN-E


bballjunkie



Joined: 12 Aug 2014
Posts: 528



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/19/18 3:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nared doesn’t go hard that’s my opinion and not going hard gets you a spot on the bench, that’s why there were certain players on the bench who some thought should have been playing.


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 20, 21, 22  Next
Page 21 of 22

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin