RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

MVP
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who should win MVP?
Tina Charles
9%
 9%  [ 4 ]
Elena Delle Donne
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Sylvia Fowles
65%
 65%  [ 27 ]
Brittney Griner
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Tiffany Hayes
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Nneka Ogwumike
7%
 7%  [ 3 ]
someone else
9%
 9%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 41

Author Message
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66900
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 6:49 am    ::: MVP Reply Reply with quote

Monday Poll time!



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
Ay Mate



Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 1280



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 8:00 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Griner is out of the race for me because of her injury. She'll be missing at least a few more games, probably more.

JJ will be MVP in the future.


SDHoops



Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 1183



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 8:25 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Ay Mate wrote:
Griner is out of the race for me because of her injury. She'll be missing at least a few more games, probably more.

JJ will be MVP in the future.

Rolling Eyes


Ay Mate



Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 1280



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 10:27 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

SDHoops wrote:
Ay Mate wrote:
Griner is out of the race for me because of her injury. She'll be missing at least a few more games, probably more.

JJ will be MVP in the future.

Rolling Eyes


Wow, did you burn much of your gray matter coming up with that incredibly intellectual reply? Care to explain your eye roll? You don't see Jonquel Jones as a possible future MVP candidate? I mean, if your going to take all that time to reply, at least add something to the conversation.


Ay Mate



Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 1280



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 10:28 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

SDHoops wrote:
Ay Mate wrote:
Griner is out of the race for me because of her injury. She'll be missing at least a few more games, probably more.

JJ will be MVP in the future.

Rolling Eyes


Wow, did you burn much of your gray matter coming up with that incredibly intellectual reply? Care to explain your eye roll? You don't see Jonquel Jones as a possible future MVP candidate?


Aladyyn



Joined: 23 Jul 2017
Posts: 1560
Location: Czech Republic


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 11:24 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I just can't accept someone who's not the best player on their own team as the MVP. Without injury it would be Griner easily, but I guess Charles is my front-runner now.


WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 12528
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 11:51 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aladyyn wrote:
I just can't accept someone who's not the best player on their own team as the MVP. Without injury it would be Griner easily, but I guess Charles is my front-runner now.


Who's better than Jonquel on her team in your opinon? im curious to know



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 12528
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 11:52 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aladyyn wrote:
I just can't accept someone who's not the best player on their own team as the MVP. Without injury it would be Griner easily, but I guess Charles is my front-runner now.



??????????????????????????? Easily griner ? Lets just forget Sylvia fowles whos been the front runner for MVP since game 1 this year Laughing Arrow



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 8407
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 11:53 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

WNBA 09 wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:
I just can't accept someone who's not the best player on their own team as the MVP. Without injury it would be Griner easily, but I guess Charles is my front-runner now.


Who's better than Jonquel on her team in your opinon? im curious to know

For that matter, who is playing better than Fowles on the Lynx?



_________________
↑↑↓↓←→←→BA
Aladyyn



Joined: 23 Jul 2017
Posts: 1560
Location: Czech Republic


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 12:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I never mentioned JJ. Fantastic player, will be in contention throughout her career.

As for the Lynx, are we pretending that Maya is not the best player in the world because she started slow?


adamj95



Joined: 09 May 2014
Posts: 2302
Location: East Grand Forks, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 12:06 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

justintyme wrote:
WNBA 09 wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:
I just can't accept someone who's not the best player on their own team as the MVP. Without injury it would be Griner easily, but I guess Charles is my front-runner now.


Who's better than Jonquel on her team in your opinon? im curious to know

For that matter, who is playing better than Fowles on the Lynx?


Agree. Maya may be the best player in the world, but she is having an off season shooting wise. Fowles will be MVP if she keeps up her production.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63763



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 12:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

adamj95 wrote:
justintyme wrote:
WNBA 09 wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:
I just can't accept someone who's not the best player on their own team as the MVP. Without injury it would be Griner easily, but I guess Charles is my front-runner now.


Who's better than Jonquel on her team in your opinon? im curious to know

For that matter, who is playing better than Fowles on the Lynx?


Agree. Maya may be the best player in the world, but she is having an off season shooting wise. Fowles will be MVP if she keeps up her production.


Is Fowles playing at a high level on her own? Is she creating her own shots? Does she benefit from unselfish play from not only Maya (who practices the two-man game with Fowles extensively) and Whalen but of all people former cover girl of Me-ball Magazine, Seimone Augustus? Of all the candidates, Fowles as MVP represents a team award, and I'm positive she would agree.

In 2014, Maya had to strap the team on her back. She really owned the MVP award that year.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 8407
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 12:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
adamj95 wrote:
justintyme wrote:
WNBA 09 wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:
I just can't accept someone who's not the best player on their own team as the MVP. Without injury it would be Griner easily, but I guess Charles is my front-runner now.


Who's better than Jonquel on her team in your opinon? im curious to know

For that matter, who is playing better than Fowles on the Lynx?


Agree. Maya may be the best player in the world, but she is having an off season shooting wise. Fowles will be MVP if she keeps up her production.


Is Fowles playing at a high level on her own? Is she creating her own shots? Does she benefit from unselfish play from not only Maya (who practices the two-man game with Fowles extensively) and Whalen but of all people former cover girl of Me-ball Magazine, Seimone Augustus? Of all the candidates, Fowles as MVP represents a team award, and I'm positive she would agree.

In 2014, Maya had to strap the team on her back. She really owned the MVP award that year.

Of course she benefits from people being able to get her the ball. That has always been the case for true post players (as opposed to stretch players).

But she has become the central focus of other team's defenders. Every game now, as soon as she touches the ball she is doubled. Teams are selling out to prevent her from dominating them. Not even Maya is getting thay sort of attention right now. If anything, Fowles is making it easier on the rest of the team as she is able to get them more space and clean up their misses.



_________________
↑↑↓↓←→←→BA
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 8407
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 12:39 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aladyyn wrote:

As for the Lynx, are we pretending that Maya is not the best player in the world because she started slow?

So by your definition we should only be looking at who historically has been a team's best player, not who is currently playing the best on the team? If that is your standard, I couldn't disagree more.

Maya is having a down year by her standards. She has been very inefficient. Fowles, on the other hand, has been dominate since game one this season. Say you have never watched a WNBA game before this season, and you knew nothing of the player's histories. Watching the Lynx now without listening to the commentators, who would you think was the team's best player?



_________________
↑↑↓↓←→←→BA
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 24349
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 12:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

justintyme wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:

As for the Lynx, are we pretending that Maya is not the best player in the world because she started slow?

So by your definition we should only be looking at who historically has been a team's best player, not who is currently playing the best on the team? If that is your standard, I couldn't disagree more.

Maya is having a down year by her standards. She has been very inefficient. Fowles, on the other hand, has been dominate since game one this season. Say you have never watched a WNBA game before this season, and you knew nothing of the player's histories. Watching the Lynx now without listening to the commentators, who would you think was the team's best player?

It would also mean that Nneka probably shouldn't have won it last year.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Aladyyn



Joined: 23 Jul 2017
Posts: 1560
Location: Czech Republic


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 1:00 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

justintyme wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:

As for the Lynx, are we pretending that Maya is not the best player in the world because she started slow?

So by your definition we should only be looking at who historically has been a team's best player, not who is currently playing the best on the team? If that is your standard, I couldn't disagree more.

Maya is having a down year by her standards. She has been very inefficient. Fowles, on the other hand, has been dominate since game one this season. Say you have never watched a WNBA game before this season, and you knew nothing of the player's histories. Watching the Lynx now without listening to the commentators, who would you think was the team's best player?


No, you should be looking at whatever criteria you think are important. I have my criteria and by them my top 3 before Griner's injury would be Griner/Charles/Fowles. Syl is having a brilliant season, but it's like if Klay Thompson was having a great season for the Warriors with Curry slumping, you feel me? I just personally would prefer Tina Charles, who's putting up the same/better numbers than Fowles with worse supporting cast, even if Fowles is much better defensively.

As for the "best Lynx player" question, it would depend on the game.


Aladyyn



Joined: 23 Jul 2017
Posts: 1560
Location: Czech Republic


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 1:03 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
justintyme wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:

As for the Lynx, are we pretending that Maya is not the best player in the world because she started slow?

So by your definition we should only be looking at who historically has been a team's best player, not who is currently playing the best on the team? If that is your standard, I couldn't disagree more.

Maya is having a down year by her standards. She has been very inefficient. Fowles, on the other hand, has been dominate since game one this season. Say you have never watched a WNBA game before this season, and you knew nothing of the player's histories. Watching the Lynx now without listening to the commentators, who would you think was the team's best player?

It would also mean that Nneka probably shouldn't have won it last year.


Yea I wasn't a huge fan of Nneka winning last year. But she won because of historic efficiency and since that's the precedent, Fowles is going to win this year, barring any setback.


WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 12528
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 1:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
justintyme wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:

As for the Lynx, are we pretending that Maya is not the best player in the world because she started slow?

So by your definition we should only be looking at who historically has been a team's best player, not who is currently playing the best on the team? If that is your standard, I couldn't disagree more.

Maya is having a down year by her standards. She has been very inefficient. Fowles, on the other hand, has been dominate since game one this season. Say you have never watched a WNBA game before this season, and you knew nothing of the player's histories. Watching the Lynx now without listening to the commentators, who would you think was the team's best player?

It would also mean that Nneka probably shouldn't have won it last year.


Shocked Idea Idea Idea



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63763



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 1:17 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

justintyme wrote:
Fowles, on the other hand, has been dominate since game one this season.


Team effort.

justintyme wrote:
Say you have never watched a WNBA game before this season, and you knew nothing of the player's histories.


That definitely works in favor of Fowles. She's supposed to be this indomitable force inside and yet has never won a WNBA championship or a MVP without her current teammates. On the other hand, the Core Before has won two championships without Fowles. Curious how that works.

We even have both Brunson and Whalen as legitimate three point threats this season. That's only going to loosen up the lane for Fowles. In reality this season is probably the least doubled she's ever been in her career.

I'm not saying Fowles isn't in a great position to win MVP given the usual criteria (that aren't always held up), but to completely discount what Maya in particular and the other teammates mean to the team and Fowles' game is very hard to stomach.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 24349
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 2:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aladyyn wrote:
justintyme wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:

As for the Lynx, are we pretending that Maya is not the best player in the world because she started slow?

So by your definition we should only be looking at who historically has been a team's best player, not who is currently playing the best on the team? If that is your standard, I couldn't disagree more.

Maya is having a down year by her standards. She has been very inefficient. Fowles, on the other hand, has been dominate since game one this season. Say you have never watched a WNBA game before this season, and you knew nothing of the player's histories. Watching the Lynx now without listening to the commentators, who would you think was the team's best player?


No, you should be looking at whatever criteria you think are important. I have my criteria and by them my top 3 before Griner's injury would be Griner/Charles/Fowles. Syl is having a brilliant season, but it's like if Klay Thompson was having a great season for the Warriors with Curry slumping, you feel me? I just personally would prefer Tina Charles, who's putting up the same/better numbers than Fowles with worse supporting cast, even if Fowles is much better defensively.

As for the "best Lynx player" question, it would depend on the game.

So that's the Fowles that's shooting 67% from the field for 20p/10r in 30mpg (a PER of 33, for those who like those sorts of things) vs the Charles getting her 20/10 in 33mpg shooting 46% (PER of 22)? Efficiency has to matter to some extent. Fowles is taking less than 12 shot attempts per game to get her points, while Charles needs 17.5 for hers. That's nearly six shots per game that the Lynx can do something else with.

I'm really not sure how you could see Charles as having better numbers, whatever light you're looking at them under.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Aladyyn



Joined: 23 Jul 2017
Posts: 1560
Location: Czech Republic


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 2:25 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:
justintyme wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:

As for the Lynx, are we pretending that Maya is not the best player in the world because she started slow?

So by your definition we should only be looking at who historically has been a team's best player, not who is currently playing the best on the team? If that is your standard, I couldn't disagree more.

Maya is having a down year by her standards. She has been very inefficient. Fowles, on the other hand, has been dominate since game one this season. Say you have never watched a WNBA game before this season, and you knew nothing of the player's histories. Watching the Lynx now without listening to the commentators, who would you think was the team's best player?


No, you should be looking at whatever criteria you think are important. I have my criteria and by them my top 3 before Griner's injury would be Griner/Charles/Fowles. Syl is having a brilliant season, but it's like if Klay Thompson was having a great season for the Warriors with Curry slumping, you feel me? I just personally would prefer Tina Charles, who's putting up the same/better numbers than Fowles with worse supporting cast, even if Fowles is much better defensively.

As for the "best Lynx player" question, it would depend on the game.

So that's the Fowles that's shooting 67% from the field for 20p/10r in 30mpg (a PER of 33, for those who like those sorts of things) vs the Charles getting her 20/10 in 33mpg shooting 46% (PER of 22)? Efficiency has to matter to some extent. Fowles is taking less than 12 shot attempts per game to get her points, while Charles needs 17.5 for hers. That's nearly six shots per game that the Lynx can do something else with.

I'm really not sure how you could see Charles as having better numbers, whatever light you're looking at them under.


The 3 best NYL scorers after Charles are shooting 42.1%, 35.2%, and 35.6%. That offense runs through Tina, depends on her. She has to be taking those shots in order for her team to win. Fowles doesn't. That's why Maya takes more shots than her.


Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 5376
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 7:32 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I do not want to listen to the truth or facts I demand alternative facts. Damn liberal fake news! Very Happy



_________________
You can win, as long as you keep your head to the SKY! Be OPTIMISTIC!
Luuuc
#NATC


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 21927



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 7:35 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aladyyn wrote:
I just can't accept someone who's not the best player on their own team as the MVP. Without injury it would be Griner easily, but I guess Charles is my front-runner now.

Welcome to Rebkell's, Aladyyn. Don't be shy, ok Wink



_________________
Thanks for calling. I wait all night for calls like these.
bballgrl



Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 3629



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/24/17 10:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Aladyyn wrote:
I just can't accept someone who's not the best player on their own team as the MVP. Without injury it would be Griner easily, but I guess Charles is my front-runner now.


What's to say that Griner won't come back and pick up where she left off. If no one passes her in points will she be put back at the top as the leading scorer. I'd have to look up the # of games she would need to play in order to qualify for MVP.


Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 24349
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/25/17 12:46 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

bballgrl wrote:
Aladyyn wrote:
I just can't accept someone who's not the best player on their own team as the MVP. Without injury it would be Griner easily, but I guess Charles is my front-runner now.


What's to say that Griner won't come back and pick up where she left off. If no one passes her in points will she be put back at the top as the leading scorer. I'd have to look up the # of games she would need to play in order to qualify for MVP.

There's no official qualifying number for MVP. Each voter can punish any player however much they'd like for however many games they may have missed. Candace Parker made it onto some people's ballots the year she skipped the first half of the season and only played 16.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin