RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Plum and the league agenda
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SDHoops



Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 681



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 8:14 pm    ::: Plum and the league agenda Reply Reply with quote

I debated on making this topic, but I feel it needs to be made. What has Plum done to warrant having her picture all over WNBA.com and the WNBA app every time the Stars play or all this hype? And how did she go from bench player barely getting any PT to starter playing big minutes literally over night? I'm not saying the front office is saying "play this player," but there has to be some kind of pressure that finds it's way down to the team. Are we just supposed to sit here and accept it? I get it, she's hot, has a nice smile, and all the works. But why can Reb users put other players through the washer and hung out to dry yet a player like Plum it's "oh she's just finding her stride," "oh it's just a bad a game, she'll come around," "her teammates aren't passing to her," etc etc. Right now, Chong is more effective as a third round pick. I sat here and read people calling my favorite player fat, overrrated, overhyped, etc. for years.yet Plum comes along and gets a free pass?


Ay Mate



Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 902



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 8:50 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Plum is a Banham clone and both are going to be huge busts and will never amount to much of anything. Mark my words. Shame that Moriah Jefferson lost her starting job to Her and is only about 100x the player Plum is. The entire Stars organization, from front office to coaching to GM don't have two clues about anything. I hope the Stars trade Jefferson to a worthy team where she can become one of the top PGs in the league. They already traded Robinson which was stupid. In no sane world is Jefferson a backup PG to Plum. I guess if Jefferson were white she'd probably still be the starting PG. The Stars should have stayed with plan A and traded Plum to Chicago.

I have a feeling both Plum and Banham will fizzle out of the league entirely over the next several years.


NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 11460



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 8:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I think fans are too quick to dismiss the likelihood of development so I think showing understanding that she's a rookie who will improve eventually is a good thing.

But I was taken aback by her pic being on WNBA.com also. But she looks good and in my opinion that hasn't necessarily hurt the wiggle room that players have been given to improve in the past.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 11460



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 8:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I think Plum is a long way from WNBA game shape. Just a hunch I could be wrong. But that's what I see.

She has skills that she can't use because she looks like she's stuck in quicksand. It's not just being slow for sake of athleticism. I think there's a conditioning issue.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.


Last edited by NYL_WNBA_FAN on 06/10/17 8:56 pm; edited 1 time in total
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 19635
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 8:55 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

And she was the #1 overall pick and the leading scorer in NCAA history. That player's going to be paid some attention, even if they haven't done anything in the League yet.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55145
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 8:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

When you're the #1 pick in the draft you're gonna get hype.

Plum is better than Banham, but not a likely star.

As for Jefferson, she's overrated but not terrible. Stars should have kept Robinson, who is better than either Jefferson or Plum.



_________________
Come love come, the road lies low
The way is long and hard I know
RP



Joined: 17 Jul 2010
Posts: 1201



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 8:58 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

What did Shoni Schimmel do?


SDHoops



Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 681



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 9:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

RP wrote:
What did Shoni Schimmel do?

This isn't about Shoni. She can be donezo for all I care..but if you must ask, two time All Star, All Star MVP, Celeb NBA All-Star, Player of the Week, one of League wise leaders in assists as a rookie and part of regular season conference champ. Even Sammy P put up way better numbers than Plum at this point.


Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 15259
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 9:43 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I think assuming the league has an agenda is assuming the league is competent enough to have an organized agenda. I work under the assumption they have a very short list of talking points and have trouble thinking outside the box (and it's a small box).

There's still an element of the hype train present, don't get me wrong, but on the other hand, what serves as a better advertisement for the Stars? "Kelsey Plum might do something!" or "Do you like dumpster fires? Because boy howdy do we have a dumpster fire for you!"?



_________________
We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty.
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 14692



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 10:36 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Not sure what to make of Plum. She's looked terrible. Question for pilight: has a #1 pick ever failed to make the All-Rookie team?



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55145
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 10:40 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

toad455 wrote:
Not sure what to make of Plum. She's looked terrible. Question for pilight: has a #1 pick ever failed to make the All-Rookie team?


Yes. Janel McCarville did not make the All Rookie team in 2005, the first year the team was named.



_________________
Come love come, the road lies low
The way is long and hard I know
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 20922



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 11:25 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

"league agenda" Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
Laughing Laughing
Laughing



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 5979



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/10/17 11:49 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I never thought Plum was a good fit with SA.However,I believe Plum's struggles has more to do with her ankle,lack of fitness,timing,and VJ inconsistent rotations.Plum had a great preseason game 19p/5a/0to...then all of a sudden,she gets hurt.The ankle injury took away Plum's momentum,rhythm,and confidence.She's become tentative on offense,and has no real chemistry with her teammates.What Plum needs is steady minutes in a consistent rotation.Not 25 minutes one night,then 10 minutes the next.VJ's main concern should be developing SA young players,not winning basketball games.Acquiring Desouza,and not trading Currie was stupid imo........Plum,Coffey,and Harrison should all be playing 20+ minutes a game.......Plum will be fine.


J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4078



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 12:07 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I still think Plum can turn it around. With that said it is really weird that she is the starting PG, when their sophomore starting PG is clearly the better PG. I wouldn't be too shocked if pressure came from somewhere to make that happen. I don't think the league, maybe team management thought focusing on their exciting #1 draft pick was a better selling point for a young team that isn't going to win much, or from the players agent, though I'm not so sure how much power they have, but possibly the threat to sit out wasn't as far from the truth as we were lead to believe. On the other hand Plum played 12 minutes tonight and Jefferson 31, it was a close, winnable game, which leads me to believe VJ has more faith in Jefferson than Plum when push comes to shove.


stever



Joined: 16 Nov 2004
Posts: 6295
Location: Ann Arbor


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 7:06 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

When SA gave Johnson a one year contract, it seemed a little odd...now...notsomuch.



_________________
Women's Basketball Daily
Celebrating the Women's Game Since 2005
WBBDaily Mobile Edition
blaase22



Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 3515
Location: Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 7:47 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

plum - I aint impressed... at all!
Players have gotten twisted ankles before and played much better when they got back.
Yeah she put up crazy stats in the pac 12 but so did Jillian Alleyne and she's not even on a W roster.


miller40



Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 971



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 8:13 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
And she was the #1 overall pick and the leading scorer in NCAA history. That player's going to be paid some attention, even if they haven't done anything in the League yet.


How does Plum hype compare to Stiles hype? I don't remember.


stever



Joined: 16 Nov 2004
Posts: 6295
Location: Ann Arbor


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 8:30 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

miller40 wrote:
Richyyy wrote:
And she was the #1 overall pick and the leading scorer in NCAA history. That player's going to be paid some attention, even if they haven't done anything in the League yet.


How does Plum hype compare to Stiles hype? I don't remember.


Coming from a (low)mid-major program, I remember Stiles' hype being much larger, and then she's named ROY over Lauren Jackson, to boot.



_________________
Women's Basketball Daily
Celebrating the Women's Game Since 2005
WBBDaily Mobile Edition
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55145
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 8:43 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

stever wrote:
miller40 wrote:
Richyyy wrote:
And she was the #1 overall pick and the leading scorer in NCAA history. That player's going to be paid some attention, even if they haven't done anything in the League yet.


How does Plum hype compare to Stiles hype? I don't remember.


Coming from a (low)mid-major program, I remember Stiles' hype being much larger, and then she's named ROY over Lauren Jackson, to boot.


Stiles also played much better as a rookie than Plum has so far.



_________________
Come love come, the road lies low
The way is long and hard I know
caune



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 17919
Location: Valley of the Bun


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 8:45 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
And she was the #1 overall pick and the leading scorer in NCAA history. That player's going to be paid some attention, even if they haven't done anything in the League yet.



Exactly.
I just don't get why everybody seems to dislike her. She's awesome. She may not get to show it in SA but I think she'll pan out sooner then later.



_________________
Because there is only one Diana Taurasi.
@Phoenix Mercury
jap



Joined: 01 Apr 2007
Posts: 7151



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 11:05 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

caune wrote:
Richyyy wrote:
And she was the #1 overall pick and the leading scorer in NCAA history. That player's going to be paid some attention, even if they haven't done anything in the League yet.



Exactly.
I just don't get why everybody seems to dislike her. She's awesome. She may not get to show it in SA but I think she'll pan out sooner then later.


Folks don't like to give players time to develop - especially if they are being hyped. They want instantaneous results or their money back - NOW!!! Laughing



_________________
Regards,
J A P
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 19635
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 11:16 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Does anyone remember how awful Diggins was as a rookie? Sometimes it takes a while. One of the main things Plum needs to work on is her core strength, just to live with the athletes at this level. Diggins had the same issue, and it's going to take some time.

Which isn't to say that she won't be a bust. Just that declaring her a bust already is kinda crazy and unfair.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 14692



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 11:28 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Also, PGs tend to have the hardest time transitioning to the pro level. Now whether Plum stays a PG in the league has yet to be determined. But we've seen plenty of SGs transition to PG(Clarendon, Pondexter, Taurasi, Quinn, etc.). Way too early to determine Plum's future based off of a few games.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
tfan



Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 5646



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 11:30 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

toad455 wrote:
Also, PGs tend to have the hardest time transitioning to the pro level. Now whether Plum stays a PG in the league has yet to be determined. But we've seen plenty of SGs transition to PG(Clarendon, Pondexter, Taurasi, Quinn, etc.).


Becky Hammon, to name another.


myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 20922



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 11:34 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The thing I notice is that she seems to be playing tentative and not just letting it flow. It's almost like she's trying hard to 'fit in' or maybe do what she thinks she is supposed to do instead of letting instinct take over. And yeah, it looks like there is tension between teammates on that team. It's kind of natural for that to happen with a loser team and a rookie getting lots of hype that some of them are going to resent her. Hopefully her natural good humor and good grace will smooth the way. She needs to be like Becky her rookie year and just keep getting back up when VJ clobbers her. She has a lot of talent but hasn't shown it yet.

Also the face of the team right now should be KMac. She should be the one getting the hype!


root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 3921
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 11:37 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I don't recall if it was on a separate thread, but I remember people lining up to say Jewell Loyd was a bust early in 2015. Plum has played 6 games. Below are Loyd's numbers after 8 games. Unfortunately, WNBA.com no longer has the minutes played.

5.9 ppg (20-61 .328), 3.4 rpg, 1.1 apg, 1.1 TO, 1.75 PF, -43 +/-

Loyd broke out for 21 pts (7-12) in her ninth game and seem to right the ship after that.

If the rumors we heard after the draft are true, Plum is in a difficult position. It sounds like SAS took Kelsey in hopes of trading her. Management doesn't want you, the fans expect you to be a savior and your agent is at war with management. And then there's the question of how you fit in position and system-wise. Throw in missed time from an injury, and it's one big mess.



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 19635
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 12:18 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

A lot of this is why I thought Plum and Jefferson playing together this year might not be a bad thing. Ignoring the issues it creates on defense (where they suck anyway), they both have the ability to initiate and create offense, so they could take pressure off each other. We see this all over the League - Loyd runs possessions in Seattle, Hayes in Atlanta, Augustus/Moore in Minnesota and on and on. Multiple players who can create is a good thing.

But the offense in San Antonio is so dull and the ball sticks way too much. If you're not 'running' the possession, you seem to spend most of it standing on the wing watching. If they can just try to speed up and get more flow into their game, things should at least improve, even if the results don't get much better.

I agree that Plum doesn't look like she knows where or how she fits yet, but I don't think it's impossible for her to settle into this team and this roster. They just haven't done a very good job of making it happen yet.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
caune



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 17919
Location: Valley of the Bun


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 12:47 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
A lot of this is why I thought Plum and Jefferson playing together this year might not be a bad thing. Ignoring the issues it creates on defense (where they suck anyway), they both have the ability to initiate and create offense, so they could take pressure off each other. We see this all over the League - Loyd runs possessions in Seattle, Hayes in Atlanta, Augustus/Moore in Minnesota and on and on. Multiple players who can create is a good thing.

But the offense in San Antonio is so dull and the ball sticks way too much. If you're not 'running' the possession, you seem to spend most of it standing on the wing watching. If they can just try to speed up and get more flow into their game, things should at least improve, even if the results don't get much better.

I agree that Plum doesn't look like she knows where or how she fits yet, but I don't think it's impossible for her to settle into this team and this roster. They just haven't done a very good job of making it happen yet.
Seems a Coaching issue to me.



_________________
Because there is only one Diana Taurasi.
@Phoenix Mercury
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55145
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 12:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

caune wrote:
Richyyy wrote:
A lot of this is why I thought Plum and Jefferson playing together this year might not be a bad thing. Ignoring the issues it creates on defense (where they suck anyway), they both have the ability to initiate and create offense, so they could take pressure off each other. We see this all over the League - Loyd runs possessions in Seattle, Hayes in Atlanta, Augustus/Moore in Minnesota and on and on. Multiple players who can create is a good thing.

But the offense in San Antonio is so dull and the ball sticks way too much. If you're not 'running' the possession, you seem to spend most of it standing on the wing watching. If they can just try to speed up and get more flow into their game, things should at least improve, even if the results don't get much better.

I agree that Plum doesn't look like she knows where or how she fits yet, but I don't think it's impossible for her to settle into this team and this roster. They just haven't done a very good job of making it happen yet.
Seems a Coaching issue to me.


The transition from assistant to head coach is often difficult. I remember all the Lynx fans who wanted to get rid of Cheryl Reeve when the team started badly in 2010.



_________________
Come love come, the road lies low
The way is long and hard I know
dtbtbtb



Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 109



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 12:55 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The transition from college to the WNBA is difficult. You are playing every night against the best athlets/players in the game and you are not the superstar anymore where you dictate everything the team does...Plum needs time just like Diggins and others did


justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 6584
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 2:02 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
caune wrote:
Richyyy wrote:
A lot of this is why I thought Plum and Jefferson playing together this year might not be a bad thing. Ignoring the issues it creates on defense (where they suck anyway), they both have the ability to initiate and create offense, so they could take pressure off each other. We see this all over the League - Loyd runs possessions in Seattle, Hayes in Atlanta, Augustus/Moore in Minnesota and on and on. Multiple players who can create is a good thing.

But the offense in San Antonio is so dull and the ball sticks way too much. If you're not 'running' the possession, you seem to spend most of it standing on the wing watching. If they can just try to speed up and get more flow into their game, things should at least improve, even if the results don't get much better.

I agree that Plum doesn't look like she knows where or how she fits yet, but I don't think it's impossible for her to settle into this team and this roster. They just haven't done a very good job of making it happen yet.
Seems a Coaching issue to me.


The transition from assistant to head coach is often difficult. I remember all the Lynx fans who wanted to get rid of Cheryl Reeve when the team started badly in 2010.

Yeah, that was just stupid. As I noted at the time, the WNBA doesn’t exactly have a huge training camp. It will take time for a coach to be able to both instill their system and get the players to buy in. Not to mention getting them to actually execute it. With players coming in late from Europe how many full practices have teams had so far this season?



_________________
Covfefe when the walls fell.
tfan



Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 5646



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 2:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

miller40 wrote:
Richyyy wrote:
And she was the #1 overall pick and the leading scorer in NCAA history. That player's going to be paid some attention, even if they haven't done anything in the League yet.


How does Plum hype compare to Stiles hype? I don't remember.


Stiles was known by aficionados due to her big scoring numbers, but the fact that she was a star at a rinky dink school in the Missouri Valley Conference limited her national recognition by the average fan. She did break out at the end of her senior season when she led a mid-major full of nobodies to the Final Four, vanquishing teams like Duke with Alana Beard along the way. But even after doing that, Jackie Stiles was only the 4th pick in the 2001 WNBA draft behind Lauren Jackson, Kelly Miller, and Tamika Catchings. I could be wrong, but I remember Jackson as the consensus #1 pick at the time. Maybe Catchings would have challenged for the #1 pick had she not blown out her knee her senior season.


ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 8495



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 3:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The WNBA is in the entertainment business.

The all-time NCAA leading scorer -- and a relatively attractive young woman -- is the first overall pick. On top of that, she's a perimeter player of average size who, presumably, many old and young fans can identify with. She is also, of course, white.

So you're the WNBA. Who would you promote?



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
miller40



Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 971



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 3:23 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ClayK wrote:
The WNBA is in the entertainment business.

The all-time NCAA leading scorer -- and a relatively attractive young woman -- is the first overall pick. On top of that, she's a perimeter player of average size who, presumably, many old and young fans can identify with. She is also, of course, white.

So you're the WNBA. Who would you promote?


From San Antonio? McBride.


Michelle89



Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 14489
Location: Holland


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 3:29 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

miller40 wrote:
ClayK wrote:
The WNBA is in the entertainment business.

The all-time NCAA leading scorer -- and a relatively attractive young woman -- is the first overall pick. On top of that, she's a perimeter player of average size who, presumably, many old and young fans can identify with. She is also, of course, white.

So you're the WNBA. Who would you promote?


From San Antonio? McBride.


You always promote the first overall pick. Im not saying she is the only one that you should promote but there is no reason why you should choose McBride who is coming off an injury and not Plum



_________________
"Sue Bird and Lauren Jackson were and are the dynamic duo. They're the one-two punch. They're all the clich�s possible to describe people that perfectly complement each other, who make each other better and also bring out the best in the team." �Karen Bryant
miller40



Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 971



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 3:48 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Michelle89 wrote:
miller40 wrote:
ClayK wrote:
The WNBA is in the entertainment business.

The all-time NCAA leading scorer -- and a relatively attractive young woman -- is the first overall pick. On top of that, she's a perimeter player of average size who, presumably, many old and young fans can identify with. She is also, of course, white.

So you're the WNBA. Who would you promote?


From San Antonio? McBride.


You always promote the first overall pick. Im not saying she is the only one that you should promote but there is no reason why you should choose McBride who is coming off an injury and not Plum


Lol ok. I mean, if I'm in charge of putting up SA game promos I'd promote a player actually performing well right now regardless of her coming off an injury.


Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 2706
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 6:14 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ClayK wrote:
The WNBA is in the entertainment business.

The all-time NCAA leading scorer -- and a relatively attractive young woman -- is the first overall pick. On top of that, she's a perimeter player of average size who, presumably, many old and young fans can identify with. She is also, of course, white.

So you're the WNBA. Who would you promote?


Are you saying that the league is always in search for the next GWH? Smile



_________________
Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you to pieces.
adamj95



Joined: 09 May 2014
Posts: 1220



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 6:23 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

She's a rookie. Give her time. She's also the #1 pick playing under a coach who has AWFUL rotations and isn't playing her consistently.


toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 14692



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 6:50 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I do wonder how Plum would be doing if under a different coach & on a better team.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
calbearman76



Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 1636
Location: Carson City


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 7:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

While I believe it is safe to say that Kelsey Plum will not be an all-time great in the WNBA, it is too early to say that she will be an all-time bust either. I suspect she will wind up in the category with Ann Wauters, LaToya Thomas, Janel McCarville and Lindsay Harding as the least outstanding #1 picks, but in all these cases there was not another player that was demonstrably better at the time that showed over time that she was the wrong choice.

Ann Wauters was the best of a bad lot in 2000. She was an All-Star and had she chosen to play her whole career in the WNBA she may have been a real star, but there weren't any other options. The next best was Betty Lennox, and the only other All-Star from the draft was Adrian Williams. LaToya Thomas was never an All-Star, but the only All-Stars were Cheryl Ford, Plenette Piersen and Kara Lawson. In retrospect Cheryl Ford would have been a better choice, but at the time Ford was considered by some as a "reach". Janel McCarville was also a serviceable player but never an All-Star. The only All-Stars were Sancho Lyttle and Kara Braxton, but neither had a better career than McCarville. And Lindsay Harding was the best of the worst draft, where Ivory Latta was the only All-Star.

Kelsey Plum may still become a solid WNBA player, and could even become an All-Star, but even now it is hard to say who among the 2017 class would have been a better choice or if there will be an All-Star in the group. Alaina Coates may have been better, but she got hurt before the draft, not during training camp. This was a bad draft and Plum got hurt during training camp which has slowed her progress. She also got drafted by the wrong team, one that needed front court help and who believed they could get a little more value if they were to exercise a trade, but it didn't work out as they had hoped.

Don't hate on Plum for this and don't blame this on race. Plum is charismatic in the same way as Skyler Diggins, but Diggins was not EDD or Britney Griner and appropriately went third in the draft, even though she was not deserving of being one of the "3 to see." Plum was a great college ball player and could still be a good WNBA player. It is time to wait and see.


Angus24



Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 671
Location: South Dakota


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 10:30 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

SAS lineups and player rotations are beyond belief in my opinion. Putting bench players in the starting lineup with a rookie PG like Plum is a recipe for disaster if there ever was one. VJ's actions are so unlike the coaches he played for are amazing. I could hardly believe my eyes when he put Colson in at a crucial point at the end of the game. I guess she is truly committed to using all 12 players as she told one of the announcers.


Silky Johnson



Joined: 29 Sep 2014
Posts: 422



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 10:59 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

calbearman76 wrote:
...Janel McCarville was also a serviceable player but never an All-Star. The only All-Stars were Sancho Lyttle and Kara Braxton, but neither had a better career than McCarville...


What? Sancho Lyttle didn't have a better career than Janel McCarville? Based on what, the fact that McCarville rode Maya Moore's coattails to a ring? McCarville has a higher career field goal percentage, and that's it. I can't think of one other aspect of basketball in which Janel McCarville was better than Sancho Lyttle.



_________________
Professional Hater. The Baron of #HateHard
bballgrl



Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 3138



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/11/17 11:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
I never thought Plum was a good fit with SA.However,I believe Plum's struggles has more to do with her ankle,lack of fitness,timing,and VJ inconsistent rotations.Plum had a great preseason game 19p/5a/0to...then all of a sudden,she gets hurt.The ankle injury took away Plum's momentum,rhythm,and confidence.She's become tentative on offense,and has no real chemistry with her teammates.What Plum needs is steady minutes in a consistent rotation.Not 25 minutes one night,then 10 minutes the next.VJ's main concern should be developing SA young players,not winning basketball games.Acquiring Desouza,and not trading Currie was stupid imo........Plum,Coffey,and Harrison should all be playing 20+ minutes a game.......Plum will be fine.


I've said before that I thought her time in games was too off and on and for awhile her teammates, mainly Currie, was not giving her the ball. Maybe her ankle is not up to par since she had such a good preseason game. Many of the draft picks behind her have been playing longer minutes. Even after her ankle got better she still wasn't getting many minures. Give her some time and more minutes then she will probably show what she has. She can't be that bad since she was the leading scorer in college. If SA was not wanting to use her they should not have picked her. The cemistry with the team members could me a problem as well. I remember in one game as Plum was walking away Currie gave her quite a look of distain. It was said that SA didn't want her and that may be true since they couldn't trade her. It might have been better for her if she had sat out and reentered the draft next year.


adamj95



Joined: 09 May 2014
Posts: 1220



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/12/17 12:03 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Silky Johnson wrote:
calbearman76 wrote:
...Janel McCarville was also a serviceable player but never an All-Star. The only All-Stars were Sancho Lyttle and Kara Braxton, but neither had a better career than McCarville...


What? Sancho Lyttle didn't have a better career than Janel McCarville? Based on what, the fact that McCarville rode Maya Moore's coattails to a ring? McCarville has a higher career field goal percentage, and that's it. I can't think of one other aspect of basketball in which Janel McCarville was better than Sancho Lyttle.


Being the best post passer in the WNBA. Being a starting center on two Lynx teams that won 26 and 25 games. Winning a WNBA title.


myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 20922



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/12/17 12:04 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Angus24 wrote:
SAS lineups and player rotations are beyond belief in my opinion. Putting bench players in the starting lineup with a rookie PG like Plum is a recipe for disaster if there ever was one. VJ's actions are so unlike the coaches he played for are amazing. I could hardly believe my eyes when he put Colson in at a crucial point at the end of the game. I guess she is truly committed to using all 12 players as she told one of the announcers.


VJ has provided numerous WTF moments already this season. I guess she's trying to be a 'player's' coach by playing everybody but it all seems pretty random. Yeah, when she put Colson in there at a critical time, I did a double take too. She didn't leave her in long, but still it seemed like an amazing gaffe. All you need is a couple of those, and boom, you lose another close game.

I would like to see the 'go little' lineup in some cases with MoJeff, Plum, KMac - if Phoenix can play DRob, FLB, and DT together successfully then it can be done. I'd like to see her start her best players - MoJeff, KMac, and Mo but also give Plum some minutes with two of them as well. The random shuffling of players in and out is just crazy. I think bringing Mo and MoJeff off the bench just makes them sullen and resentful. Neither look like they're enjoying playing all that much, which is too bad. And Plum looks out of sync and uncomfortable as well. Some of that has gotta be the coach. Which is too bad. I've always like VJ.



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4078



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/12/17 12:37 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I agree SA should experiment with the go little and go younger line up, maybe even see if they can make the small ball and shooters thing that is getting popular work for them. Run, Shoot, Develop. Maybe something like

start Jefferson, Plum, McBride, Hamby, Harrison

Shorten the rotation, have Currie back up the perimeter 1/2 and some 3, Coffey the 3/4 and Alexander the 5

use De Souza, Colson and Dos Santos sparingly.

I might go a step further and see if a mid to top team would be interested in Currie or De Souza for some veteran depth. Dallas and Seattle (if Swords continues to flounder) need some size maybe a 2nd round pick for De Souza? Would LA trade for a little more size, they would probably have to move one of their more expensive contracts? Could Washington afford Currie, they need a little more scoring at the 3 would a 2nd round pick be enough, would Latta be a better veteran influence if swapped to SA? When Vaughn comes back would Zahui B and a 2nd round pick for Currie be a good move for both SA and NY?


Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 6706



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/12/17 7:23 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:

I might go a step further and see if a mid to top team would be interested in Currie or De Souza for some veteran depth. Dallas and Seattle (if Swords continues to flounder) need some size maybe a 2nd round pick for De Souza?


Swords for Erika+something else, though I would rather do Morello for Erika, once her foot is better. Seattle really ought to deal Swords soon before her market value drops to zero.


Silky Johnson



Joined: 29 Sep 2014
Posts: 422



Back to top
PostPosted: 06/12/17 10:02 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

adamj95 wrote:
Being the best post passer in the WNBA.

Better than peak Candace Parker? I'd question that.

Quote:
Being a starting center on two Lynx teams that won 26 and 25 games. Winning a WNBA title.

Congratulations; that makes her the Andrew Bogut of the WNBA. Anybody who tried to make the claim that Andrew Bogut had a better career than Marc Gasol would get summarily laughed at.



_________________
Professional Hater. The Baron of #HateHard
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 55145
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/12/17 10:07 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

adamj95 wrote:
Being a starting center on two Lynx teams that won 26 and 25 games. Winning a WNBA title.


A "starter" who played 22 minutes/game. She was splitting time Devereaux Peters. McCarville only started because of Our Girls Syndrome.



_________________
Come love come, the road lies low
The way is long and hard I know
WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 4306
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 06/12/17 11:14 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
Does anyone remember how awful Diggins was as a rookie? Sometimes it takes a while. One of the main things Plum needs to work on is her core strength, just to live with the athletes at this level. Diggins had the same issue, and it's going to take some time.

Which isn't to say that she won't be a bust. Just that declaring her a bust already is kinda crazy and unfair.


Yeah skylar had a rough rookie season but her team was horrible in Tulsa . I do verbatim remember her saying "I had to get a grown woman body for a grown woman's league"



_________________
2-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-2-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin