RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Let the impeachment begin
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 32, 33, 34 ... 41, 42, 43  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » Area 51
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66900
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/19 10:54 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

cthskzfn wrote:
918 folks drank the kool aid to their death at Jonestown.

I guess we shouldn't be surprised at the existence of millions of magamorons in the USA.

It still is fascinating.


FWIW, Jim Jones was a socialist. The reason he gave for the call to mass suicide was to prove their "commitment to refuse capitalism and in support of socialism".



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
Howee



Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Posts: 15734
Location: OREGON (in my heart)


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/19 10:56 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

justintyme wrote:
While as I said, there is no smoking gun, the evidence when taken in its totality, paints a clear picture of a president abusing the power of his office for personal gain. And the idea you need a "smoking gun" to impeach a president when one isn't required to send someone to death row, is nonsense.

Who even NEEDS a 'smoking gun', when the entire situation is riddled with bullets?? Laughing
Watching some of the local asshats spouting The Demagogue's talking points at his last rally is just one illustration of how contorted the thinking of these Trumpette idiots has become.[See previous select posts here for even less rational illustrations] (another fun fact: in one segment of his Dementia Rantings at the rally, there were 2 African Americans standing behind him. Several minutes later, they were gone. The 'staging' his people go through is a circus of comedies!)

One of the more telling factors in this is how McGahn, Bolton, etc., have been kept from testifying. As with the hidden tax returns, Don the Con keeps 'smoking guns' well under wraps.
pilight wrote:
cthskzfn wrote:
918 folks drank the kool aid to their death at Jonestown.

I guess we shouldn't be surprised at the existence of millions of magamorons in the USA.
It still is fascinating.

FWIW, Jim Jones was a socialist. The reason he gave for the call to mass suicide was to prove their "commitment to refuse capitalism and in support of socialism".

Of course, Jim Jones was renown for his clear-headed, insightful thinking....no wait: it was his slimy ability to control people's minds that was his forte. Had HE been around to run for office in 2016.... Shocked



_________________
Oregon: Go Ducks!
"Inévitablement, les canards voleront"
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 8407
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/19 1:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Howee wrote:
justintyme wrote:
While as I said, there is no smoking gun, the evidence when taken in its totality, paints a clear picture of a president abusing the power of his office for personal gain. And the idea you need a "smoking gun" to impeach a president when one isn't required to send someone to death row, is nonsense.

Who even NEEDS a 'smoking gun', when the entire situation is riddled with bullets?? Laughing

Exactly my point. Very, very few court cases actually have the proverbial "smoking gun". The vast majority involve putting together a bunch of different pieces of circumstantial evidence that then tells a compelling story. Which is exactly what we have here.

So I ask again, why should the standard for removing someone from their job be greater than ending someone's life through a death penalty conviction?



_________________
↑↑↓↓←→←→BA
Stonington_QB



Joined: 05 Jul 2013
Posts: 756
Location: Siege Perilous


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/19 4:17 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
Stonington_QB wrote:
What is it that he did for personal gain? Nothing. Asking Ukraine to investigate CrowdStrike is not a crime or a misdemeanor or an impeachable offense no matter how hard you want it to be one. He never asked them to investigate the Biden’s.


You seem to be in denial, but Trump’s not.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rLdqhpsrbUE" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>


What does this video prove? I agree with the President here. China and Ukraine should ABSOLUTELY investigate the Bidens.

There's a difference between saying that they should investigate, and actually asking them to do it in exchange for favors. Which didn't happen. So this video doesn't add anything to the argument that President Trump asked Ukraine to do so. He didn't.

Also, why is it that we have to have this expectation of an impeachment over something that didn't happen, while at the same time protecting the guy who had admitted to having the prosecutor fired for investigating him and his son?


Genero36



Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 11188



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/19 10:39 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

<embed><iframe width="1280" height="720" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LJ-qnp9QLV8" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></embed>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ-qnp9QLV8



_________________
I'm all for the separation of church and hate.
Ex-Ref



Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 8942



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/19 10:47 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Genero36 wrote:
<embed><iframe width="1280" height="720" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LJ-qnp9QLV8" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></embed>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ-qnp9QLV8


McConnell is a pus-filled dick.



_________________
"Women are judged on their success, men on their potential. It’s time we started believing in the potential of women." —Muffet McGraw

“Thank you for showing the fellas that you've got more balls than them,” Haley said, to cheers from the crowd.
Howee



Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Posts: 15734
Location: OREGON (in my heart)


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/19 11:33 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Ex-Ref wrote:
McConnell is a pus-filled dick.
Razz (not to put TOO fine a point on it! I do hope Elaine uses condoms Laughing )

I know he'll do what he can to save Trump's sorry azzz.....but hopefully, it will cost him HIS SEAT. His foregone conclusion will be one more mark on his crappy legacy, like obstructing Merrick Garland's nomination. We can only hope that The Dems channel the Obamas, and take the High Road in illustrating their case, so all the nation can see the buffoonery that is McConnell/Graham/etc.

Just as there were 3+ million more votes for Hillary, there are still a majority of humans in the USA who abhor this kind of illicit governing and GOP idiocy. I'm already contributing to the groups from various places that are taking donations to unseat Moscow Mitch.

One more thing: WHY has Rudy Toody been so absent in all the current conversations? What bombshells are simmering re: Rudy and his illicit 'shadow' foreign policy in Ukraine? Been way to quiet on the Rudy-and-his-Shrek buddies story line.



_________________
Oregon: Go Ducks!
"Inévitablement, les canards voleront"
GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 8225
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/12/19 11:37 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

McConnell is simply stating the obvious, something as elementary and inevitable as gravity. On the factual record developed by the House -- if something so slapdash and flimsy can be called a record -- there is zero chance that the Senate will vote to oust Trump. It would take all 47 Democrats and a defection of 20 Republicans, the first of which is unlikely and the second of which is impossible.
Stonington_QB



Joined: 05 Jul 2013
Posts: 756
Location: Siege Perilous


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/19 5:58 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Howee wrote:
Ex-Ref wrote:
McConnell is a pus-filled dick.
Razz (not to put TOO fine a point on it! I do hope Elaine uses condoms Laughing )

I know he'll do what he can to save Trump's sorry azzz.....but hopefully, it will cost him HIS SEAT. His foregone conclusion will be one more mark on his crappy legacy, like obstructing Merrick Garland's nomination. We can only hope that The Dems channel the Obamas, and take the High Road in illustrating their case, so all the nation can see the buffoonery that is McConnell/Graham/etc.

Just as there were 3+ million more votes for Hillary, there are still a majority of humans in the USA who abhor this kind of illicit governing and GOP idiocy. I'm already contributing to the groups from various places that are taking donations to unseat Moscow Mitch.

One more thing: WHY has Rudy Toody been so absent in all the current conversations? What bombshells are simmering re: Rudy and his illicit 'shadow' foreign policy in Ukraine? Been way to quiet on the Rudy-and-his-Shrek buddies story line.


You would think that someone who worked in the education system would at least know what a representative republic is. Especially since we're living in one.


Ex-Ref



Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 8942



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/19 8:55 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GlennMacGrady wrote:
McConnell is simply stating the obvious, something as elementary and inevitable as gravity. On the factual record developed by the House -- if something so slapdash and flimsy can be called a record -- there is zero chance that the Senate will vote to oust Trump. It would take all 47 Democrats and a defection of 20 Republicans, the first of which is unlikely and the second of which is impossible.


I know it's not going to go anywhere in the Senate. Doesn't keep him from being a horrible person (I'm trying to be nice calling him a person. You know, in the spirit of the season! ). Wink



_________________
"Women are judged on their success, men on their potential. It’s time we started believing in the potential of women." —Muffet McGraw

“Thank you for showing the fellas that you've got more balls than them,” Haley said, to cheers from the crowd.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63763



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/19 9:19 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Ex-Ref wrote:
GlennMacGrady wrote:
McConnell is simply stating the obvious, something as elementary and inevitable as gravity. On the factual record developed by the House -- if something so slapdash and flimsy can be called a record -- there is zero chance that the Senate will vote to oust Trump. It would take all 47 Democrats and a defection of 20 Republicans, the first of which is unlikely and the second of which is impossible.


I know it's not going to go anywhere in the Senate. Doesn't keep him from being a horrible person (I'm trying to be nice calling him a person. You know, in the spirit of the season! ). Wink


Trump probably won’t be removed from office cause of partisan politics, not because he doesn’t deserve removal.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Stonington_QB



Joined: 05 Jul 2013
Posts: 756
Location: Siege Perilous


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/19 10:58 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Ukraine Adviser Refutes Gordon Sondland's Testimony

https://time.com/5746417/ukraine-andriy-yermak-impeachment-interview/

Quote:
Since the start of the public impeachment hearings in Congress last month, Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to the President of Ukraine, has heard his name come up again and again in witness testimony. He took part in many of the events at the center of the impeachment inquiry, and the 300-page report released last week by the inquiry mentions Yermak dozens of times.

But in his first interview about those public hearings, Yermak has questioned the recollections of crucial witnesses in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump’s alleged abuse of his office for political gain.

“Listen, I want to tell you straight,” Yermak told TIME in the interview on Dec. 4, the first time he has openly discussed his views on the public impeachment hearings. “Of course, now, when I watch these shows on television, my name often comes up, and I see people there whom I recognize, whom I met and know,” he says, referring to the witness testimony. “That is their personal opinion, especially the positions they expressed while under oath. I have my own truth. I know what I know.”

One of the American diplomats who attended that meeting, Gordon Sondland, the U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, testified before the inquiry last month that he pulled Yermak aside after the Warsaw meeting and delivered an important message: U.S. aid to Ukraine would probably not resume until Zelensky’s government announced two investigations that could implicate President Trump’s political rivals.

“I told Mr. Yermak that I believed that the resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine took some kind of action on the public statement that we had been discussing for many weeks,” Sondland testified.

“Following this meeting, Ambassador Sondland pulled aside President Zelensky’s advisor, Mr. Yermak, to explain that the hold on security assistance was conditioned on the public announcement of the Burisma/Biden and the 2016 election interference investigations,” the report states.

Yermak disputes this. “Gordon and I were never alone together,” he said when TIME asked about the Warsaw meeting. “We bumped into each other in the hallway next to the escalator, as I was walking out.” He recalls that several members of the American and Ukrainian delegations were also nearby, as well as bodyguards and hotel staff, though he was not sure whether any of them heard his brief conversation with Sondland. “And I remember – everything is fine with my memory – we talked about how well the meeting went. That’s all we talked about,” Yermak says.

These comments cast doubt on an important moment in the impeachment inquiry’s reconstruction of events: specifically, the only known point at which an American official directly tells the Ukrainians about the link between U.S. aid and the announcement of specific investigations.

In a statement, Sondland’s lawyer said “Ambassador Sondland stands by his prior testimony and will not comment further.” Yermak said no one from the congressional committees that are overseeing the impeachment inquiry have contacted him to seek his testimony, nor have any other U.S. officials.


So much for the claim of President Trump witholding aid to Ukraine in exchange for an investigation into Burisma. You key witness is a LIAR.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63763



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/19 12:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

This is an interesting article that includes text messages from Yermak.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/04/read-text-message-excerpts-between-us-diplomats-giuliani-ukrainian-aide/?arc404=true



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63763



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/13/19 1:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Here’s a tweet from an honorable Republican. Can’t believe one of those actually exists.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Genero36



Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 11188



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/14/19 4:13 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

<embed><iframe width="1280" height="720" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/y5kmuVCt9bQ" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></embed>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5kmuVCt9bQ



_________________
I'm all for the separation of church and hate.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63763



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/15/19 8:03 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/GYexdOBpIR4" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63763



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/19 9:26 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/SudI-pLnQk8" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
cthskzfn



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 12851
Location: In a world where a PSYCHOpath like Trump isn't potus.


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/19 9:31 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Quote:
The U.S. has provided about $1.5 billion in military support to Kiev between 2014 and this past June, according to an updated analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. And Trump’s temporary cut off of the aid represented a significant setback for the country.


IF Don the Con and the #LawlesssGOP were really concerned with corruption in the Ukraine (anyone who believes so is stump dumb), why was aid to be withheld only in 2019? Why not 2018/2017, when the #LawlessGOP controlled both Congressional chambers?



_________________
Silly, stupid white people might be waking up.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63763



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/19 9:37 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_Y54wfyntP8" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Stonington_QB



Joined: 05 Jul 2013
Posts: 756
Location: Siege Perilous


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/19 10:48 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Article II of the impeachment scandal is officially KAPUT:

https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/12/justices-to-take-up-battle-over-trump-financial-documents/

Quote:
This afternoon the Supreme Court announced that it would wade into the fray over access to President Donald Trump’s financial records. The justices agreed to review three separate lower-court decisions that ruled against the president: Two of those decisions upheld subpoenas that would force the president’s accounting firm and lenders to turn over financial records that they have in their possession, while a third ordered the president’s accounting firm to provide prosecutors in New York City with his financial records, including his tax returns.


In other words, the House will now have to defy the Supreme Court to impeach based on Article II.


Genero36



Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 11188



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/19 1:44 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

<embed><iframe width="654" height="368" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TYHtQ8pGEzw" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></embed>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYHtQ8pGEzw



_________________
I'm all for the separation of church and hate.
Howee



Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Posts: 15734
Location: OREGON (in my heart)


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/19 4:57 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Robert DeNiro. Longtime heart-throb of mine. Cool God, I wish HE were running for president. Very Happy



_________________
Oregon: Go Ducks!
"Inévitablement, les canards voleront"
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63763



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/19 6:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Trump’s letter to Pelosi

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/read-trump-unhinged-letter-nancy-pelosi-impeachment-928353/









_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Howee



Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Posts: 15734
Location: OREGON (in my heart)


Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/19 7:58 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Quote:
....I write this letter to you for the purpose of history and to put my thoughts on a permanent and indelible record.


Done. And your letter will only enhance the understanding of The People 100 years from now as to WHY "Impeached" was indelibly etched after your name. Cool



_________________
Oregon: Go Ducks!
"Inévitablement, les canards voleront"
Genero36



Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 11188



Back to top
PostPosted: 12/17/19 9:33 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

With that psychotic signature at the end. It literally looks like a Klan rally.

Why don’t he just lay down and let Jesus take the wheel and drive his ass south like he need to be?



_________________
I'm all for the separation of church and hate.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » Area 51 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 32, 33, 34 ... 41, 42, 43  Next
Page 33 of 43

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin