RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Why WNBA MVP Elena Delle Donne wants to lower the rims
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 54450
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 1:26 pm    ::: Why WNBA MVP Elena Delle Donne wants to lower the rims Reply Reply with quote

http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/03/elena-delle-donne-wnba-rims-lower-chicago-sky-mvp

Quote:
“I have Geno on my side,” Delle Donne said on Wednesday. “And I feel like having Geno Aurriema in your back pocket is always a great thing. If the greatest coach in the world believes we should do it, then we probably should do it.”



_________________
All the bad boys are standing in the shadows
All the good girls are home with broken hearts
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 14025



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 1:50 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

nope. still don't want them lowered. no thanks!



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 6227
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 1:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Respectfully, I have to disagree with her. Besides the obvious logistical problems of not having adjustable rims on every court out there (leaving young girls practicing and playing on rims set at different heights), I disagree with her assumption about dunking.

While "they don't dunk" is an excuse I hear a lot from people who refuse to watch women's basketball, it is only an excuse. I find it highly unlikely that they would watch if women did dunk. They would find some other reason to not watch. And then after every accomplishment, or amazing play, there would always be that asterisk by it. "Well, of course they can do that, the rim is lower." We saw it when ESPN highlighted that EDD was the best free throw shooter in basketball, man or woman. People were falling all over themselves to point out that the ball is smaller.

There is no need to change the game. It just needs to continue to be grown as is, and let society catch up. It will not happen fast, but it will eventually happen. Steph Curry should be exhibit one about how dunking is overrated and how it is not necessary for people to find the game exciting.



_________________
Covfefe when the walls fell.
mb1



Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 4645
Location: Scottsdale,AZ,USA


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 6:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

justintyme wrote:
Respectfully, I have to disagree with her. Besides the obvious logistical problems of not having adjustable rims on every court out there (leaving young girls practicing and playing on rims set at different heights), I disagree with her assumption about dunking.

While "they don't dunk" is an excuse I hear a lot from people who refuse to watch women's basketball, it is only an excuse. I find it highly unlikely that they would watch if women did dunk. They would find some other reason to not watch. And then after every accomplishment, or amazing play, there would always be that asterisk by it. "Well, of course they can do that, the rim is lower." We saw it when ESPN highlighted that EDD was the best free throw shooter in basketball, man or woman. People were falling all over themselves to point out that the ball is smaller.

There is no need to change the game. It just needs to continue to be grown as is, and let society catch up. It will not happen fast, but it will eventually happen. Steph Curry should be exhibit one about how dunking is overrated and how it is not necessary for people to find the game exciting.


x______________x

Have not read the view from EDD yet, however am certain I will still concur with justintyme. FYI, tend to be a huge fan of EDD (except when she is playing the Mercury).



_________________
I've got a crush on Rebby!

LONG LIVE THE WNBA!
Luuuc



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 17545



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 7:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Quote:
From a visibility point of view, she has a point. Think about how many times Brittney Griner grabs headlines when she dunks

Headlines where though? Preaching to the choir doesn't expand anything.

Just my opinion, but I think people who dismiss the women's game and don't bother watching it are unlikely to have their opinions changed by lowering the standards. If you make "F" the new pass mark for an exam, are people really going to be impressed when you pass it?
So I guess I'm wondering does she want to do this to attract additional people to be fans of women's basketball, or does she think it would make the game better for those of us who already watch? To me it's inviting disrespect/mockery for very little potential gain. It also seems like female players get serious injuries at a disproportionately high rate even as it is, without trying to play above the rim, so that aspect concerns me too.



_________________
Seems rike no one takes me serirousreee
jammerbirdi



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 19075



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 7:18 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

justintyme wrote:
Respectfully, I have to disagree with her. Besides the obvious logistical problems of not having adjustable rims on every court out there (leaving young girls practicing and playing on rims set at different heights),


Equally respectfully, WHAT? lol. I think she was talking about lowering the rim in the WNBA. Not the world. Summer pro league in the US with 12 teams. Period. This has nothing at all to do with nor should or would it impact what young girls are doing anywhere at all and I'm sure they won't all find themselves somehow left practicing and playing on rims set at different heights.

The WNBA is the PERFECT candidate for this move. Go Elena and Geno. Wish the league would listen to two of the most important stars in the game.


jammerbirdi



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 19075



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 7:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Just want to add that I like the fact that EDD is opening her mouth and saying things that get attention. Big thumbs up there.


Genero36



Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 8334



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 7:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The whole objective of lowering the rims is to choose style over substance. The women's game is just fine without lowering the rims for the reasons stated in posts above.



_________________
I'm all for the separation of church and hate.
jammerbirdi



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 19075



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 7:35 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

One reason people watch sports is for the thrill of admiring the athletic prowess of the competitors.

Chucking a ball at a rim that's higher in relation to their physical stature than it is for men playing at all levels, even high school, impacts the way in which people perceive the athleticism of the woman and their appreciation for it and the sport itself.

I covered women's basketball in near empty arenas in the US and in sports crazy Brazil. The woman's game is NOT fine as a marketable spectator sport product. Not by a mile and the WNBA is running out of time to make every effort to kindle the interest of the public at large.


Jet Jaguar



Joined: 11 Feb 2014
Posts: 1072



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 7:44 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

jammerbirdi wrote:
justintyme wrote:
Respectfully, I have to disagree with her. Besides the obvious logistical problems of not having adjustable rims on every court out there (leaving young girls practicing and playing on rims set at different heights),


Equally respectfully, WHAT? lol. I think she was talking about lowering the rim in the WNBA. Not the world. Summer pro league in the US with 12 teams. Period. This has nothing at all to do with nor should or would it impact what young girls are doing anywhere at all and I'm sure they won't all find themselves somehow left practicing and playing on rims set at different heights.
The WNBA is the PERFECT candidate for this move. Go Elena and Geno. Wish the league would listen to two of the most important stars in the game.

This issue with that is if girls are practicing on 10 foot rims at parks, gyms, etc. wherever they go, and even all throughout college, it's not an easy adjustment to all of the sudden try an play with lower rims. It's fine for layups, but it completely throws you off for jump shots. And if they go back overseas do they have to readjust to the 10 foot rims if they don't adopt this rule change? Sorry, it's just a bad idea. I also wanted to say I'm pretty sure the rims were set at 10 feet when the game was conceived to try and make it SOMEWHAT of a challenge to make a basket. It was most likely thought that most people playing the game would be of average male height, around 6 feet. So IMO if anything, they should actually RAISE the men's rim. But then we have the whole logistics issue with gyms and park rim height again. So just leave it at 10 across the board.



_________________
Oderint dum metuant - Let them hate, so long as they fear
Jet Jaguar



Joined: 11 Feb 2014
Posts: 1072



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 7:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

jammerbirdi wrote:
One reason people watch sports is for the thrill of admiring the athletic prowess of the competitors.

Chucking a ball at a rim that's higher in relation to their physical stature than it is for men playing at all levels, even high school, impacts the way in which people perceive the athleticism of the woman and their appreciation for it and the sport itself.

I covered women's basketball in near empty arenas in the US and in sports crazy Brazil. The woman's game is NOT fine as a marketable spectator sport product. Not by a mile and the WNBA is running out of time to make every effort to kindle the interest of the public at large.

Jammer, this is not going to change people's attitudes towards women's basketball. Don't kid yourself. Basketball is considered a male sport by many and women dunking at a lower height is not going to change that. The detractors are just going to say, "Big deal, it's only at 9 feet" or whatever. And even if women can dunk at a lower rim it's not going to look like the men's dunks. Look at Griner's dunks, they are just average dunks, noting spectacular or exciting like Blake Griffin or anything. The women's game is different and I think it needs to embrace what they are good at. The one thing I think they could do is play a more exciting style of basketball. More flair, no-looks, behind the back passes, skilled moves. Display the skills, since the athleticism will never be on par with the men.



_________________
Oderint dum metuant - Let them hate, so long as they fear
FS02



Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 9700
Location: Husky (west coast) Country


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 8:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Jet Jaguar wrote:
jammerbirdi wrote:
One reason people watch sports is for the thrill of admiring the athletic prowess of the competitors.

Chucking a ball at a rim that's higher in relation to their physical stature than it is for men playing at all levels, even high school, impacts the way in which people perceive the athleticism of the woman and their appreciation for it and the sport itself.

I covered women's basketball in near empty arenas in the US and in sports crazy Brazil. The woman's game is NOT fine as a marketable spectator sport product. Not by a mile and the WNBA is running out of time to make every effort to kindle the interest of the public at large.

Jammer, this is not going to change people's attitudes towards women's basketball. Don't kid yourself. Basketball is considered a male sport by many and women dunking at a lower height is not going to change that. The detractors are just going to say, "Big deal, it's only at 9 feet" or whatever. And even if women can dunk at a lower rim it's not going to look like the men's dunks. Look at Griner's dunks, they are just average dunks, noting spectacular or exciting like Blake Griffin or anything. The women's game is different and I think it needs to embrace what they are good at. The one thing I think they could do is play a more exciting style of basketball. More flair, no-looks, behind the back passes, skilled moves. Display the skills, since the athleticism will never be on par with the men.


Well said, I agree.

At the same time though, I watch volleyball and like how the women's net is lower and so the game looks more like the men's version. That's volleyball though, a completely different sport which quite frankly would be painfully boring if you didn't have people spiking the ball over the net.



_________________
@dtmears2
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 6227
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 8:13 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Jet Jaguar wrote:
jammerbirdi wrote:
justintyme wrote:
Respectfully, I have to disagree with her. Besides the obvious logistical problems of not having adjustable rims on every court out there (leaving young girls practicing and playing on rims set at different heights),


Equally respectfully, WHAT? lol. I think she was talking about lowering the rim in the WNBA. Not the world. Summer pro league in the US with 12 teams. Period. This has nothing at all to do with nor should or would it impact what young girls are doing anywhere at all and I'm sure they won't all find themselves somehow left practicing and playing on rims set at different heights.
The WNBA is the PERFECT candidate for this move. Go Elena and Geno. Wish the league would listen to two of the most important stars in the game.

This issue with that is if girls are practicing on 10 foot rims at parks, gyms, etc. wherever they go, and even all throughout college, it's not an easy adjustment to all of the sudden try an play with lower rims. It's fine for layups, but it completely throws you off for jump shots. And if they go back overseas do they have to readjust to the 10 foot rims if they don't adopt this rule change? Sorry, it's just a bad idea. I also wanted to say I'm pretty sure the rims were set at 10 feet when the game was conceived to try and make it SOMEWHAT of a challenge to make a basket. It was most likely thought that most people playing the game would be of average male height, around 6 feet. So IMO if anything, they should actually RAISE the men's rim. But then we have the whole logistics issue with gyms and park rim height again. So just leave it at 10 across the board.

This is it, exactly. If you lower the rims it needs to be at all levels and in all leagues. This isn't like moving a 3 point line backwards or shortening the shot clock. Shooting on an 8 or 9 foot rim is entirely different from a 10 foot one. If anyone has access to an adjustable hoop they can experiment for themselves. Practice on one for a while, then switch to the other. See how it affects the shot.

Moving between the two is not a real option. Players' games will suffer in both places.

But that is just the logistics side of it. It doesn't make sense for other reasons too. Lowering the rims would only work if we truly believed that dunking is what is holding viewers back. I just don't see that being the case. There are many more factors at work here and dunking is just the excuse that some people use.



_________________
Covfefe when the walls fell.
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 6227
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 8:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

FS02 wrote:
Jet Jaguar wrote:
jammerbirdi wrote:
One reason people watch sports is for the thrill of admiring the athletic prowess of the competitors.

Chucking a ball at a rim that's higher in relation to their physical stature than it is for men playing at all levels, even high school, impacts the way in which people perceive the athleticism of the woman and their appreciation for it and the sport itself.

I covered women's basketball in near empty arenas in the US and in sports crazy Brazil. The woman's game is NOT fine as a marketable spectator sport product. Not by a mile and the WNBA is running out of time to make every effort to kindle the interest of the public at large.

Jammer, this is not going to change people's attitudes towards women's basketball. Don't kid yourself. Basketball is considered a male sport by many and women dunking at a lower height is not going to change that. The detractors are just going to say, "Big deal, it's only at 9 feet" or whatever. And even if women can dunk at a lower rim it's not going to look like the men's dunks. Look at Griner's dunks, they are just average dunks, noting spectacular or exciting like Blake Griffin or anything. The women's game is different and I think it needs to embrace what they are good at. The one thing I think they could do is play a more exciting style of basketball. More flair, no-looks, behind the back passes, skilled moves. Display the skills, since the athleticism will never be on par with the men.


Well said, I agree.

At the same time though, I watch volleyball and like how the women's net is lower and so the game looks more like the men's version. That's volleyball though, a completely different sport which quite frankly would be painfully boring if you didn't have people spiking the ball over the net.

The spike is a fundamental necessity in volleyball. Players are too good to be able to score without it. All you would have is never ending volleys returned. If dunking were the only way to score points in basketball, then lowering the rims would make sense.

Not to mention, it takes all of 30 seconds to change the height of a volleyball net since almost all nets are designed to be adjustable.



_________________
Covfefe when the walls fell.
GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 13574
Location: Los Angeles


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 8:24 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Jet Jaguar wrote:
jammerbirdi wrote:
justintyme wrote:
Respectfully, I have to disagree with her. Besides the obvious logistical problems of not having adjustable rims on every court out there (leaving young girls practicing and playing on rims set at different heights),


Equally respectfully, WHAT? lol. I think she was talking about lowering the rim in the WNBA. Not the world. Summer pro league in the US with 12 teams. Period. This has nothing at all to do with nor should or would it impact what young girls are doing anywhere at all and I'm sure they won't all find themselves somehow left practicing and playing on rims set at different heights.
The WNBA is the PERFECT candidate for this move. Go Elena and Geno. Wish the league would listen to two of the most important stars in the game.

This issue with that is if girls are practicing on 10 foot rims at parks, gyms, etc. wherever they go, and even all throughout college, it's not an easy adjustment to all of the sudden try an play with lower rims. It's fine for layups, but it completely throws you off for jump shots. And if they go back overseas do they have to readjust to the 10 foot rims if they don't adopt this rule change? Sorry, it's just a bad idea. I also wanted to say I'm pretty sure the rims were set at 10 feet when the game was conceived to try and make it SOMEWHAT of a challenge to make a basket. It was most likely thought that most people playing the game would be of average male height, around 6 feet. So IMO if anything, they should actually RAISE the men's rim. But then we have the whole logistics issue with gyms and park rim height again. So just leave it at 10 across the board.


When basketball was created the peach baskets were nailed to the hanging track above the court, there wasn't any thought put into the height and how it would affect the participates in the game, and back in the 1891 was the average male height 6'0 or was it shorter, I'd assume it was shorter. And the sport of basketball has evolved a lot since it was first invented, so it's not like the sport has been the same since the very beginning and now people want to change this one thing, there are a lot of things that have been changed, including dribbling, the 3 point shot, and the game is a lot more physical than it was intended to be.



_________________
DeLisha Milton-Jones is my favorite player Smile

Win or Lose LA Sparks Fan for life!!!
FS02



Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 9700
Location: Husky (west coast) Country


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 8:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Dunking just doesn't impress me all that much, it's not hard to do if you can jump high enough. Almost every sport I can think of has some play that takes 10x more skill and finesse than that.



_________________
@dtmears2
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 54450
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 8:57 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I don't agree with her either, but when the MVP speaks it bears further discussion.



_________________
All the bad boys are standing in the shadows
All the good girls are home with broken hearts
jammerbirdi



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 19075



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 9:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

justintyme wrote:
Lowering the rims would only work if we truly believed that dunking is what is holding viewers back.


I would have to raise my hand at saying that there is no one remotely associated with the sport of women's basketball who has made the the case for lowering the rim more, longer, and more effectively than I have. Geno and EDD are newcomers to the issue. I ain't no such thing.

And as that advocate for this change - that I claim for myself Wink I have said many times that it isn't about the dunk or dunking. So right off the bat, I dispute your claim as that being the only reason why this might be done. That's not correct and has never been the motivating factor coming from me.


Chip



Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 894
Location: NEW YORK


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 10:18 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

toad455 wrote:
nope. still don't want them lowered. no thanks!

CO-SIGN


Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 1822
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 10:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The heart of resistance to women's basketball in the U.S. isn't the fact that many NBA players can dunk while few WNBA players can. It's sexism, misogyny, racism, and homophobia, often intertwined. I'm with all those who've made many valuable points above about why this "solution" is completely bogus.



_________________
Let's remember Anucha Browne, who was sexually harassed by Isiah Thomas. She is currently a vice president of the NCAA and focuses on women's basketball.
Luuuc



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 17545



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 10:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Genero36 wrote:
The whole objective of lowering the rims is to choose style over substance.

That is true, but I don't think that on its own is a valid reason not to do it.
For a league that is still trying to be accepted by the public as a viable entertainment product, style over substance is something that should be considered.
I still lean away from the idea, but not for this reason.
eg. Having a shot clock down at 24 seconds is style over substance too, but I think the pros of it's added game watchability outweigh the cons to the integrity of the sport.



_________________
Seems rike no one takes me serirousreee
tfan



Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 5154



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/17/16 11:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

In 2005 WNBA ESPN ratings were 282,000 viewers. In 2015 they were 202,000. In 2005 WNBA attendance averaged 8,172. In 2015 WNBA attendance was the lowest in it's history - 7,318. It's not just about getting new fans, they ought to try lowering the rim to see if they can get back the fans they lost.

You don't need movable rims all over the place if you just make it a WNBA thing.


Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 6260



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 7:04 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I don't want the rims lowered either. First of all, the people who complain there is not dunking will just say "well - they lowered the rim. Its even more lame than before." They won't be impressed. Second - to recreate dunking the way it appears in the NBA or college men's games they would probably have to lower the rim to 9 feet or less. In the NBA most players even guys 6'1" or so can dunk easily with they make it look spectacular. Griner can barely dunk at 6-8. Lowering the rim 7 inches will probably mean that women 6'1 or so can bare dunk. To make it easy for them you need to go even lower.


Finally, I don't know, but I'm wording if lowering the rim will even work. To dunk well it has to be one handed. Do the the majority of WNBA players have hands big enough to palm the ball easily?


miller40



Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 910



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 8:35 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

tfan wrote:
In 2005 WNBA ESPN ratings were 282,000 viewers. In 2015 they were 202,000. In 2005 WNBA attendance averaged 8,172. In 2015 WNBA attendance was the lowest in it's history - 7,318. It's not just about getting new fans, they ought to try lowering the rim to see if they can get back the fans they lost.

You don't need movable rims all over the place if you just make it a WNBA thing.


So you want to introduce dunking and phase out jump shots? Because making only one league out of HS, NCAA, and international basketball play on a rim at a different height will do that.


UofDel_Alum



Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Posts: 3786
Location: Delaware


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 8:40 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I am not in favor of the rim being lowered. If that is done, that move will be further argument from the people, who do not like the WNBA, that the WNBA is an inferior product. Keep the rim where it is!


Luuuc



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 17545



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 8:51 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Did that just happen?
I'm screen capping this moment when UofDel_Alum betrayed Elena! Razz



_________________
Seems rike no one takes me serirousreee
tfan



Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 5154



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 9:04 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

miller40 wrote:
tfan wrote:
In 2005 WNBA ESPN ratings were 282,000 viewers. In 2015 they were 202,000. In 2005 WNBA attendance averaged 8,172. In 2015 WNBA attendance was the lowest in it's history - 7,318. It's not just about getting new fans, they ought to try lowering the rim to see if they can get back the fans they lost.

You don't need movable rims all over the place if you just make it a WNBA thing.


So you want to introduce dunking and phase out jump shots? Because making only one league out of HS, NCAA, and international basketball play on a rim at a different height will do that.


Dunking didn't phase out jump shots in the NBA or college men's basketball. The rim would probably have to be at 8 feet to get the amount of dunking in the WNBA that you see in the NBA, and they aren't talking about 8 feet.


UofDel_Alum



Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Posts: 3786
Location: Delaware


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 9:16 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Luuuc wrote:
Did that just happen?
I'm screen capping this moment when UofDel_Alum betrayed Elena! Razz


Shocked temporary insanity Laughing


ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 8190



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 9:39 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

It's likely that nine-foot rims would help female players shoot better -- after all, strength is a big part of shooting, and it takes less strength to elevate a ball over a nine-foot rim than a 10-foot rim.

Obviously, it would take a lot of adjustment for veteran players, and it would be difficult to handle shifting from one rim height to another at different times of the year.

But the question, I think, is whether that improvement would change much about the women's game.

Jammerbirdi mentions empty arenas, which is absolutely true. People don't watch women's games as much as they watch men's games, but that's true at all levels of the sport. I've often brought this up, but male students in high school and college very seldom watch women play basketball in any numbers -- and for whatever reason, neither do female students. Both groups will watch males play, and in large numbers.

So would lowering the rim impact attendance from that group? (Yes, I know he's only advocating it for the WNBA, but if it improves the WNBA game presumably it would improve the game at lower levels as well.)

Would a higher shooting percentage and occasional dunks improve TV ratings?

For the sake of argument, let's say they would increase both live attendance and TV viewership -- but another question would be, by how much?

I don't think lowering the rims would have any impact, as Bob Lamm points out, on the homophobia, gender role expectations and other larger issues that to my mind limit interest in women's sports. It might have a slight impact on a small percentage of basketball fans, but all in all, it just seem worth the trouble. So attendance goes up five percent and TV ratings do the same -- has anything substantial changed?



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 6260



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 10:52 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

UofDel_Alum wrote:
Luuuc wrote:
Did that just happen?
I'm screen capping this moment when UofDel_Alum betrayed Elena! Razz


Shocked temporary insanity Laughing


Ironically, I think Elena is one player who would benefit the least from a lower rim. Here game is based on skill, jump shooting, one on play, no jumping over people to get to the rim. Someone like Angel, might benefit since her game is more about slithering around people to get to the rim.

Another problem would be that its already tough enough for teams to figure out which college players will be good pros. Making the game entirely different would mean scouting would be even more of a crapshoot.


justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 6227
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 11:02 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

tfan wrote:
miller40 wrote:
tfan wrote:
In 2005 WNBA ESPN ratings were 282,000 viewers. In 2015 they were 202,000. In 2005 WNBA attendance averaged 8,172. In 2015 WNBA attendance was the lowest in it's history - 7,318. It's not just about getting new fans, they ought to try lowering the rim to see if they can get back the fans they lost.

You don't need movable rims all over the place if you just make it a WNBA thing.


So you want to introduce dunking and phase out jump shots? Because making only one league out of HS, NCAA, and international basketball play on a rim at a different height will do that.


Dunking didn't phase out jump shots in the NBA or college men's basketball. The rim would probably have to be at 8 feet to get the amount of dunking in the WNBA that you see in the NBA, and they aren't talking about 8 feet.

I think miller40 was addressing what would happen if women had different rim heights at different levels/leagues. Players would struggle to adapt and the FG% on jump shots would decrease noticeably.



_________________
Covfefe when the walls fell.
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 19339
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 11:28 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
UofDel_Alum wrote:
Luuuc wrote:
Did that just happen?
I'm screen capping this moment when UofDel_Alum betrayed Elena! Razz


Shocked temporary insanity Laughing


Ironically, I think Elena is one player who would benefit the least from a lower rim. Here game is based on skill, jump shooting, one on play, no jumping over people to get to the rim. Someone like Angel, might benefit since her game is more about slithering around people to get to the rim.

But Elena's just short of being able to dunk consistently. I remember as a kid being just short of being able to dunk on the lower rims (8ft maybe, not sure) we had where I played, so I bought a smaller ball that I could properly palm and therefore dunk. I reckon she wants those few extra inches to get rid of that same almostdunk frustration Smile.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
hyperetic



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 5003
Location: Fayetteville


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 11:32 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I don't think its a good idea for the consistency adjustment reason, the "not gonna make a difference with haters" reason, the stigma that would attach itself reason (W fans of the current way might grumble about the purity of the game, general basketball fans may see it as a step down because they're "making special allowances for women") logical or not.
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 54450
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 11:50 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

justintyme wrote:
tfan wrote:
miller40 wrote:
tfan wrote:
In 2005 WNBA ESPN ratings were 282,000 viewers. In 2015 they were 202,000. In 2005 WNBA attendance averaged 8,172. In 2015 WNBA attendance was the lowest in it's history - 7,318. It's not just about getting new fans, they ought to try lowering the rim to see if they can get back the fans they lost.

You don't need movable rims all over the place if you just make it a WNBA thing.


So you want to introduce dunking and phase out jump shots? Because making only one league out of HS, NCAA, and international basketball play on a rim at a different height will do that.


Dunking didn't phase out jump shots in the NBA or college men's basketball. The rim would probably have to be at 8 feet to get the amount of dunking in the WNBA that you see in the NBA, and they aren't talking about 8 feet.

I think miller40 was addressing what would happen if women had different rim heights at different levels/leagues. Players would struggle to adapt and the FG% on jump shots would decrease noticeably.


Plus the stars would have to relearn the 10' hoop when the play overseas or in the Olympics.



_________________
All the bad boys are standing in the shadows
All the good girls are home with broken hearts
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 11329



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 3:44 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I was going to say the same thing. Then when they come from overseas back to the WNBA they have to relearn shooting at the lower rim, which will not be as easy as people think. It would make quality of play worse. It's a very bad idea. Just think. The quality of WNBA play is usually shoddy in the first few weeks and then picks up substantially as teams develop chemistry. I can't imagine throwing in an adjustment to lower rims into that equation.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
eyevolley4



Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 4566



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 4:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Test it in a preseason tourney.



_________________
Some days are meant to be remembered.
PRballer



Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 1822



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 4:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Some thoughts -

- eyevolley beat me to it, but get some publicity/buzz and do it in a televised pre-season game. Call it experimental. Great PR for the league and we'll see how it goes and if the forwards actually can slam it down with ease. Maybe a few games to drum up excitement for it.

-Longer term? I doubt it would work. The game, when played at the highest level, is worth the price of admission and the playoffs have proven that. The W increased scoring and offensive efficiency with changing to the quarter system and calling fouls. I don't see

-Also has anyone watched the panel of pundits and coaches from the women's Final Four in Tampa last year? This same concept was brought up by an ESPN executive and you should just see Florida State head coach Sue Semrau's priceless reaction. Net-net (pun intended) she didn't think it was a good idea. At all.


Str8_Butta



Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 7647



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 4:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Why not shorten the FT line and 3pt line while your at it, oh and shorten them shorts and tighten them tops...smh



_________________
WNBA fan since 1997
WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 3685
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 7:08 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

tfan wrote:
In 2005 WNBA ESPN ratings were 282,000 viewers. In 2015 they were 202,000. In 2005 WNBA attendance averaged 8,172. In 2015 WNBA attendance was the lowest in it's history - 7,318. It's not just about getting new fans, they ought to try lowering the rim to see if they can get back the fans they lost.

You don't need movable rims all over the place if you just make it a WNBA thing.


#This = Volumes



_________________
2-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-2-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 3685
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 7:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Why not convert the women's game? No matter how long we wait women will never have the athleticism as their men counterparts. I say experiment with the idea if im the Pres Of The W. At least a probationary period too see the effect it has on your product. If the change does occur experimental or perm i do believe that all levels must adopt the change too. Specifically College, High School , AAU programs. We already have the smaller ball with the exception of International play i say go for it..i mean really what does the W have to lose at this point? 20 years means established in my eyes so win or lose the league will find out its true potential in my opinion. Btw if lowered id say only to 9 Ft. Most W players are already finishing somewhere near the rim so 1 ft should excell those finishes from a fan point of view.



_________________
2-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-2-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 43673



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 7:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The WNBA has been moving toward FIBA standards, not away, which makes sense.

If you guys wanna create a new sport, keep my WNBA out of it. Completely out of it.... no exhibition games. Nada.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
ChicagoAnnie



Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Posts: 7892
Location: Erotic City


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 8:35 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

FS02 wrote:
Dunking just doesn't impress me all that much, it's not hard to do if you can jump high enough. Almost every sport I can think of has some play that takes 10x more skill and finesse than that.


I can watch Steph Curry, Taurasi, Maya shoot all damn day. Agreed.


ChicagoAnnie



Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Posts: 7892
Location: Erotic City


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 8:37 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

UofDel_Alum wrote:
Luuuc wrote:
Did that just happen?
I'm screen capping this moment when UofDel_Alum betrayed Elena! Razz


Shocked temporary insanity Laughing


Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing


tfan



Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 5154



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 10:08 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
The WNBA has been moving toward FIBA standards, not away, which makes sense.

If you guys wanna create a new sport, keep my WNBA out of it. Completely out of it.... no exhibition games. Nada.


It wasn't a new sport when they added a 24 second clock or a three point line. It wouldn't be a new sport with 9 or 8 foot rims.

Your WNBA is not typical - a billionaire owner who sits courtside with a stacked team that draws a great crowd from multiple championships. There is another WNBA where only 3,112 people came to a playoff game in the massively populated LA area last September.


Richard 77



Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 3716
Location: Lake Mills, Wisconsin


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 10:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

No, to changing the height of the rim in the WNBA. Not only will men who hate the women's game not change their minds regarding the WNBA, they'll just point, hate more, and laugh even louder saying: "I told you so!"



_________________
If you cannot inspire yourself to read a book about women's basketball, or any book about women's sports, you cannot inspire any young girl or boy to write a book about them. http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/Richardstrek
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 43673



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 11:00 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

A poll on this subject was ran here about 3 and a half years ago. Not well received at all. This idea ranks up there with building a wall at the Mexican border.
http://boards.rebkell.net/viewtopic.php?t=73948



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
tfan



Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 5154



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 11:35 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
A poll on this subject was ran here about 3 and a half years ago. Not well received at all. This idea ranks up there with building a wall at the Mexican border.
http://boards.rebkell.net/viewtopic.php?t=73948


But, lowering the rims would be an attempt to increase the interest of people with marginal interest or gain the interest of people with no interest. That poll was to people who already have high interest with the way things are and probably should have asked about whether it would decrease their interest, as their interest cannot increase.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 43673



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 11:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

tfan wrote:
Shades wrote:
A poll on this subject was ran here about 3 and a half years ago. Not well received at all. This idea ranks up there with building a wall at the Mexican border.
http://boards.rebkell.net/viewtopic.php?t=73948


But, lowering the rims is an attempt to increase the interest of people with marginal interest or gain the interest of people with no interest. That poll was to people who already have high interest with the way things are.


I think it's more important to keep the current fan base happy, and not do anything to put them off, than to pick up some unreliable marginal types.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
tfan



Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 5154



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/18/16 11:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
tfan wrote:
Shades wrote:
A poll on this subject was ran here about 3 and a half years ago. Not well received at all. This idea ranks up there with building a wall at the Mexican border.
http://boards.rebkell.net/viewtopic.php?t=73948


But, lowering the rims is an attempt to increase the interest of people with marginal interest or gain the interest of people with no interest. That poll was to people who already have high interest with the way things are.


I think it's more important to keep the current fan base happy, and not do anything to put them off, than to pick up some unreliable marginal types.


You definitely don't want to alienate your base so the WNBA should consult them before making any major changes. But if the WNBA thought their base was sufficient Val Ackerman would still be president.


ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 8190



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/19/16 12:24 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Again, the question is how much is there to gain by lowering the rims?

So we'll have a couple more ordinary dunks -- no Aaron Gordon-like throwdowns, 9-foot basket or not -- slightly better shooting and a significant segment of fans and non-fans upset.

How many more people will go to WNBA games if the rims are lowered? How many more will watch on TV?

I'm very sure that the gains would be minor, at best. The WNBA will not become a major sport just by lowering the rims 12 inches, so what's the point?



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin