View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 18815
Back to top |
Posted: 11/10/05 11:53 am ::: Suggested Questions for Ann Coulter at UConn |
Reply |
|
http://www.pandagon.net/archives/2005/11/anyone_got_anyt.html
Well we have the makings of another public relations nightmare for the College Republicans in the form of Ann Coulter, who will be visiting our fair campus soon. I was wondering if you had any suggested questions that I could ask her to make her lose her cool. You seem to have a talent for pissing all the right people off and there is no person I think you would rather piss off than Ann Coulter.
Some weird, nasty and good comments all in there. I think my favorite might be:
I know Ann uses her looks and her sexuality to get lots of male attention (I've personally seen her work a room) but my real problem with her is that she's a lying, trash-talking asshole who likes to think of herself as some kind of brilliant intellectual.
|
|
womens_hoops
Joined: 20 Nov 2004 Posts: 2831
Back to top |
Posted: 11/10/05 12:14 pm ::: Re: Suggested Questions for Ann Coulter at UConn |
Reply |
|
Ms. Coulter, your face looks like a foot. What's up with that?
|
|
KeiraNY
Joined: 19 Nov 2004 Posts: 12683 Location: New York, NY
Back to top |
Posted: 11/10/05 12:55 pm ::: Re: Suggested Questions for Ann Coulter at UConn |
Reply |
|
Ms. Coulter, is it true that you are the illegitimate daughter of Adolf Hitler?
If that doesn't make ANYONE lose it, then I don't know what will...
womens_hoops wrote: |
Ms. Coulter, your face looks like a foot. What's up with that? |
_________________ Since this "FUCK this 'signature is too long' bullshit!!!" is no longer applicable, I'm gonna have to get creative - just not right now. Oh, GO LIBERTY!!!! |
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 66945 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 11/10/05 12:56 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Have you ever had, like, a job?
_________________ I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 11/10/05 1:03 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
How do you feel about Al-Pieda, after your visit to Arizona?
|
|
Keegan
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 6861 Location: The Cathedral of Snark
Back to top |
Posted: 11/10/05 8:27 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Who are you and why are you relevant? |
|
Alepp03
Joined: 25 Nov 2004 Posts: 1385
Back to top |
Posted: 11/10/05 9:07 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
This lady reminds me of a quote from An American President...
... How does someone claim to love America when they clearly can't stand Americans? ... Sydney Ellen Wade
Seriously, this girl seems like about as much fun as it would be to have your life be a part of a Final Destination movie... yeesh.
_________________ In a world full of people only some want to fly, isn't that crazy?
|
|
vanyogan
Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 9673
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 8:37 am ::: |
Reply |
|
I don't agree with Coulter's polemic style but it sells books. It's mild compared to some of those on the left, like the average Hollywood lefty or your local professor.
Reading above, I'd say Coulter is safe in CT. Nobody seems to have an actual issue question... go figure. Uh... that would be why the left is sucking hind tit in the political power department. Search Coulter on the web and you will find hundreds of thousands of posts and creative web sits etc. that delight in trashing and maligning Coulter's appearance and other sundry but irrelevant attributes. What you won't find is a plethera of informed researched issue papers rebutting her postions on issues. Well researched meaning sourced by actual studies and data. You rarely find even a pound for pound rebuttle of any kind.
Name calling 101 ain't going to get your majority status back. |
|
KeiraNY
Joined: 19 Nov 2004 Posts: 12683 Location: New York, NY
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 8:44 am ::: |
Reply |
|
I'm sorry but the words "Ann Coulter" and "mild" in the same sentence are laughable!! That woman is a hater, pure & simple!!! You can be a conservative and not hate everyone you come in contact with. Ann is one crazy, skinny (and FUGLY) bitch who does nothing but criticize and insult others. You're right, namecalling doesn't get you in the majority, although in this case the majority HATES Bush so I guess it makes us the majority. Go figure!
Loved your quote Alepp!! It's very true! And I LOVED "The American President".
vanyogan wrote: |
I don't agree with Coulter's polemic style but it sells books. It's mild compared to some of those on the left, like the average Hollywood lefty or your local professor.
Reading above, I'd say Coulter is safe in CT. Nobody seems to have an actual issue question... go figure. Uh... that would be why the left is sucking hind tit in the political power department. Search Coulter on the web and you will find hundreds of thousands of posts and creative web sits etc. that delight in trashing and maligning Coulter's appearance and other sundry but irrelevant attributes. What you won't find is a plethera of informed researched issue papers rebutting her postions on issues. Well researched meaning sourced by actual studies and data. You rarely find even a pound for pound rebuttle of any kind.
Name calling 101 ain't going to get your majority status back. |
_________________ Since this "FUCK this 'signature is too long' bullshit!!!" is no longer applicable, I'm gonna have to get creative - just not right now. Oh, GO LIBERTY!!!! |
|
Carol Anne
Joined: 09 Apr 2005 Posts: 1739 Location: Seattle
Back to top |
|
vanyogan
Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 9673
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 9:02 am ::: |
Reply |
|
KeiraNY wrote: |
and I loved the American President |
Oh good fucking grief, granted the premise is entertaining but let's look at the political inserts and take a reality check.
"I'm going to get the guns." It's political suicide and patently false. Kerry wasn't talking about about his Chinese made assault weapon or taking NRA look alike photo ops because he was "going to get the guns". Take at a look gun violence in DC. Yep that'll work.
The whole movie is based on a Lobbyist trading sex for environmental
legislation with a President. It is literally "tit for tat". Can you spell conflict of interest? Impeachment? |
|
kinkitola
Joined: 15 Feb 2005 Posts: 1089 Location: Brissy at heart
Back to top |
|
KeiraNY
Joined: 19 Nov 2004 Posts: 12683 Location: New York, NY
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 12:48 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Oh good fucking grief, IT'S A MOVIE!!!! View it for the mindless entertainment that it is not a fucking political statement!
vanyogan wrote: |
KeiraNY wrote: |
and I loved the American President |
Oh good fucking grief, granted the premise is entertaining but let's look at the political inserts and take a reality check.
"I'm going to get the guns." It's political suicide and patently false. Kerry wasn't talking about about his Chinese made assault weapon or taking NRA look alike photo ops because he was "going to get the guns". Take at a look gun violence in DC. Yep that'll work.
The whole movie is based on a Lobbyist trading sex for environmental
legislation with a President. It is literally "tit for tat". Can you spell conflict of interest? Impeachment? |
_________________ Since this "FUCK this 'signature is too long' bullshit!!!" is no longer applicable, I'm gonna have to get creative - just not right now. Oh, GO LIBERTY!!!! |
|
vanyogan
Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 9673
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 1:02 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
KeiraNY wrote: |
Oh good fucking grief, IT'S A MOVIE!!!! View it for the mindless entertainment that it is not a fucking political statement!
vanyogan wrote: |
KeiraNY wrote: |
and I loved the American President |
Oh good fucking grief, granted the premise is entertaining but let's look at the political inserts and take a reality check.
"I'm going to get the guns." It's political suicide and patently false. Kerry wasn't talking about about his Chinese made assault weapon or taking NRA look alike photo ops because he was "going to get the guns". Take at a look gun violence in DC. Yep that'll work.
The whole movie is based on a Lobbyist trading sex for environmental
legislation with a President. It is literally "tit for tat". Can you spell conflict of interest? Impeachment? |
|
Actually it is mindless entertainment and it also makes mindless political statements.
That would be my point. |
|
p_d_swanson
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 9713
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 1:56 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
vanyogan wrote: |
I don't agree with Coulter's polemic style but it sells books. |
It's well documented that the majority of these sales come in the form of bulk orders by the publisher, in order to prop up a ranking on the NYT list. Coulter's books are available for as little as 99 cents on Amazon...
|
|
KeiraNY
Joined: 19 Nov 2004 Posts: 12683 Location: New York, NY
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 3:12 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
My point is that you're making a movie to be a political statement when it doesn't have to be! Who cares if they think killing babies is good?? We know that it's not but we leave it as mindless and move on w/ the rest of our lives!
vanyogan wrote: |
KeiraNY wrote: |
Oh good fucking grief, IT'S A MOVIE!!!! View it for the mindless entertainment that it is not a fucking political statement!
vanyogan wrote: |
KeiraNY wrote: |
and I loved the American President |
Oh good fucking grief, granted the premise is entertaining but let's look at the political inserts and take a reality check.
"I'm going to get the guns." It's political suicide and patently false. Kerry wasn't talking about about his Chinese made assault weapon or taking NRA look alike photo ops because he was "going to get the guns". Take at a look gun violence in DC. Yep that'll work.
The whole movie is based on a Lobbyist trading sex for environmental
legislation with a President. It is literally "tit for tat". Can you spell conflict of interest? Impeachment? |
|
Actually it is mindless entertainment and it also makes mindless political statements.
That would be my point. |
_________________ Since this "FUCK this 'signature is too long' bullshit!!!" is no longer applicable, I'm gonna have to get creative - just not right now. Oh, GO LIBERTY!!!! |
|
womens_hoops
Joined: 20 Nov 2004 Posts: 2831
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 3:26 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
vanyogan wrote: |
Nobody seems to have an actual issue question... go figure. Uh... that would be why the left is sucking hind tit in the political power department. Search Coulter on the web and you will find hundreds of thousands of posts and creative web sits etc. that delight in trashing and maligning Coulter's appearance and other sundry but irrelevant attributes. What you won't find is a plethera of informed researched issue papers rebutting her postions on issues. Well researched meaning sourced by actual studies and data. You rarely find even a pound for pound rebuttle of any kind.
Name calling 101 ain't going to get your majority status back. |
ooh... condescending and trite political analysis from vanyogen. my favorite.
|
|
jammerbirdi
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 21046
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 4:13 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
vanyogan wrote: |
hat delight in trashing and maligning Coulter's appearance and other sundry but irrelevant attributes. What you won't find is a plethera of informed researched issue papers rebutting her postions on issues. Well researched meaning sourced by actual studies and data. You rarely find even a pound for pound rebuttle of any kind. |
Your kidding... right? Coulter's job, her franchise, is not reasoned political positions or the well reasoned rebutting of them. That is not who she is or what she does. Her career is founded on spit-flying right wing invective that routinely employs, for instance, the tactic of de-Americanizing people who are liberal or democrats or on the left.
Are we talking about the same person?
Or don't you know what you're talking about?
If you think that Coulter's positions and attitudes, which are designed for absolute maximum politics of mass destruction impact, aren't the result of a carefully calculated and executed career strategy, then you're just a little naive.
I think the lack (that YOU are claiming exists) of well researched counter arguments sourced by actual studies and data to much of what Ann Coulter offers up is due to the fact that she most certainly isn't taken seriously in terms of presenting reasoned political debate HERSELF. She doesn't exactly incite rigorous academic response. That's not who she is or what she does.
So those who do respond to her, respond in kind.
Hello!
Class over._________________ Every woman who has ever been presented with a career/sex quid pro quo in the entertainment industry should come forward and simply say, βMe, too.β - jammer The New York Times 10/10/17 |
|
kinkitola
Joined: 15 Feb 2005 Posts: 1089 Location: Brissy at heart
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 4:26 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
a post like jammer's just makes me wanna respond with a big fat "you got served!!!!"
_________________ mama can't help your jumpshot
|
|
jammerbirdi
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 21046
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 4:51 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Here is what I would ask Ann Coulter. In front of an auditorium full of college students.
Ms. Coulter. At what point in your life did you, or those around you, realize the franchise that was available to you, the fame and the fortune, in publically proclaiming that,"Liberals hate America" and "We need to execute people like (American Taliban) John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too."?_________________ Every woman who has ever been presented with a career/sex quid pro quo in the entertainment industry should come forward and simply say, βMe, too.β - jammer The New York Times 10/10/17
Last edited by jammerbirdi on 11/11/05 5:19 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
jammerbirdi
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 21046
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 5:06 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Or I would ask.
Ms. Coulter, could you explain exactly what you meant by this statement? "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."_________________ Every woman who has ever been presented with a career/sex quid pro quo in the entertainment industry should come forward and simply say, βMe, too.β - jammer The New York Times 10/10/17 |
|
jammerbirdi
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 21046
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 5:16 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
If you want to go a little more confrontational you could ask,
Ms Coulter, how can you justify the following statement? "If you don't hate Clinton and the people who labored to keep him in office, you don't love your country."_________________ Every woman who has ever been presented with a career/sex quid pro quo in the entertainment industry should come forward and simply say, βMe, too.β - jammer The New York Times 10/10/17 |
|
womens_hoops
Joined: 20 Nov 2004 Posts: 2831
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 5:21 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
so, Ann, given how things are going, do you still believe that "We should invade [Muslim] countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity"?
Do you still believe that we should "carpet-bomb" their cities and "kill civilians" just because "this is war"?
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 5:31 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Ann, in terms of analysis and substance you make People Magazine look like Mother Jones. How does that make you feel?
|
|
Keegan
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 6861 Location: The Cathedral of Snark
Back to top |
Posted: 11/11/05 9:15 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
p_d_swanson wrote: |
vanyogan wrote: |
I don't agree with Coulter's polemic style but it sells books. |
It's well documented that the majority of these sales come in the form of bulk orders by the publisher, in order to prop up a ranking on the NYT list. Coulter's books are available for as little as 99 cents on Amazon... |
With a bit of softener, it could make very nice toilet paper. |
|
|
|