View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Michelle89
Joined: 17 Nov 2010 Posts: 16464 Location: Holland
Back to top |
Posted: 03/08/16 5:48 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
And1 wrote: |
http://mysticstoday.monumentalnetwork.com/2016/03/08/meesseman-signs-contract-extension
Wow, that has to be the longest WNBA contract I have seen, I can't remember anyone else signed for that length of time. Also, they usually indicate a "multi-year" contract rather than explicitly stating the length. That said, I love Meesseman and am glad she will continue to play in the WNBA. |
They want her to be their franchise player so signing her for 4 seasons is a good idea.
_________________ "Sue Bird and Lauren Jackson were and are the dynamic duo. They're the one-two punch. They're all the clich�s possible to describe people that perfectly complement each other, who make each other better and also bring out the best in the team." �Karen Bryant
|
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008 Posts: 32335
Back to top |
Posted: 03/08/16 6:35 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Michelle89 wrote: |
And1 wrote: |
http://mysticstoday.monumentalnetwork.com/2016/03/08/meesseman-signs-contract-extension
Wow, that has to be the longest WNBA contract I have seen, I can't remember anyone else signed for that length of time. Also, they usually indicate a "multi-year" contract rather than explicitly stating the length. That said, I love Meesseman and am glad she will continue to play in the WNBA. |
They want her to be their franchise player so signing her for 4 seasons is a good idea. |
Plus it will leave their core designation available. Good job by the Mystics IMO and good for Meeseman as well. I think star players staying longterm with their franchises is a good thing for the W, like Bird in Seattle, DT in Phoenix, Catch in Indiana, Parker in LA, etc... I hope we continue to see it happen.
_________________ For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
toad455
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 22474 Location: NJ
Back to top |
Posted: 03/08/16 7:13 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
having Meesseman & Dolson up front for years is definitely something for the Mystics to build their franchise around.
_________________ LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!
Twitter: @TBRBWAY
|
|
bryan_february_
Joined: 28 Aug 2015 Posts: 702 Location: USA
Back to top |
Posted: 03/09/16 11:26 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I'm expecting big things from Meesseman.
_________________ Indiana Fever
|
|
UofDel_Alum
Joined: 10 Jul 2013 Posts: 3979 Location: Delaware
Back to top |
Posted: 03/10/16 2:01 am ::: |
Reply |
|
bryan_february_ wrote: |
I'm expecting big things from Meesseman. |
Meesserman needs to take charge on the court and shoot the ball. She has the talent to be one of the top players in the WNBA. I have enjoyed watching her play the last couple of years. It is now time to take her game to the highest level.
|
|
Michelle89
Joined: 17 Nov 2010 Posts: 16464 Location: Holland
Back to top |
|
Shades
Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 63767
Back to top |
|
UofDel_Alum
Joined: 10 Jul 2013 Posts: 3979 Location: Delaware
Back to top |
|
Luuuc #NATC
Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 21928
Back to top |
|
Str8_Butta
Joined: 24 Nov 2004 Posts: 7646
Back to top |
|
UofDel_Alum
Joined: 10 Jul 2013 Posts: 3979 Location: Delaware
Back to top |
|
Michelle89
Joined: 17 Nov 2010 Posts: 16464 Location: Holland
Back to top |
Posted: 03/10/16 4:54 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Quote: |
Not true! As a Mystics fan, I've heard Mike say numerous times that he has told her to be aggressive and he wants her to be the go-to player but that SHE is a total team player and she prefers to be that type of player. He's been trying since she got here to change her mindset! |
Telling her is not enough. Prove it by running a lot more plays for her and i dont mean only those pick&roll plays. She hardly gets any iso's on the block and her postgame is pretty nice. Her footwork is one of the best in the game.
If they are serious about wanting her to be their franchise player then she needs to get those plays run for her and they have to play through her (inside out).
She took 320 shots in 34 games last season that's 9,4 shots per game. For example Latta took 352 shots. Lets compare that with another franchise player. Candace Parker took 237 shots and she only played 16 games..
When Tina Charles was the franchise player for the Sun with Mike T she took over 500 shots per season.
_________________ "Sue Bird and Lauren Jackson were and are the dynamic duo. They're the one-two punch. They're all the clich�s possible to describe people that perfectly complement each other, who make each other better and also bring out the best in the team." �Karen Bryant
|
|
Str8_Butta
Joined: 24 Nov 2004 Posts: 7646
Back to top |
Posted: 03/10/16 6:00 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Michelle89 wrote: |
Quote: |
Not true! As a Mystics fan, I've heard Mike say numerous times that he has told her to be aggressive and he wants her to be the go-to player but that SHE is a total team player and she prefers to be that type of player. He's been trying since she got here to change her mindset! |
Telling her is not enough. Prove it by running a lot more plays for her and i dont mean only those pick&roll plays. She hardly gets any iso's on the block and her postgame is pretty nice. Her footwork is one of the best in the game.
If they are serious about wanting her to be their franchise player then she needs to get those plays run for her and they have to play through her (inside out).
She took 320 shots in 34 games last season that's 9,4 shots per game. For example Latta took 352 shots. Lets compare that with another franchise player. Candace Parker took 237 shots and she only played 16 games..
When Tina Charles was the franchise player for the Sun with Mike T she took over 500 shots per season. |
She has to call for the ball, she is fine with just watching as plays are being ran for other people. I don't care how many shots it says that she took, what I mean by that is if she took a little bit of shots it's because SHE chose to pass the ball or was double teamed and had to pass it out. She passes up too many shots! It's not all Mikes fault, he does run plays for her and I'm saying this as someone who isn't the biggest fan of Mike. Feels weird defending him!
_________________ WNBA fan since 1997
Last edited by Str8_Butta on 03/28/16 1:19 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
NYL_WNBA_FAN
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 14097
Back to top |
Posted: 03/10/16 6:56 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Being a go-to player in higher volume is a mindset. But a top scorer has to also be willing to miss shots, because a top scorer is going to see double teams and even triple teams at times, because a top scorer is going to have to receive and handle the ball in higher traffic areas. About 48% of her shots were from the 11-21 foot range, and she is remarkably efficient from those distances for a post player. This is partially due to the nature of the Mystics offense which features a lot of double high posts. It also gets her an awful lot of good looks at the basket. Charles gets a lot of flak for shooting away from the basket, but Charles attempted 57% of her shots inside of ten feet last year. Meesseman attempted 48% of hers inside of ten feet. And I would venture to say that Charles receives the ball with her back to the basket at a higher rate than Meesseman does relative to their shots in the paint, which means significantly more double teams. Don't get me wrong. EM is an excellent player. And she probably can score more than she does.
I just don't think that's the thing that the team really needs. Personally, I don't think Meesseman's shooting volume is the Mystics' primary problem. The area of improvement needed is that DC needs more scorers. If Ivory Latta is your leading scorer and your second-best offensive player, let's face the facts. 18-16 is what you are as a team. That said, Thibault has done a credible job adding talent to a barren team when he got there. Now let's see if Thibault the GM can help the team take the next step and make Thibault the coach look good.
The other thing is, Thibault regularly says things like he wants the Mystics to be a more up-tempo team. Yet their style of offense doesn't really play to that sort of thing. Just like I don't think a heavy double high post offense is going to enable EM to be a top scorer when putting the ball on the floor is the thing she's least good at. If you look at it though, as one of the league's top passing posts along with Dolson, that style of play still plays to one of her top skills. That also has to be taken into consideration. It's hard for me to take some of the things he says seriously. You could want her to be an 18 ppg scorer all you want. That doesn't mean that she has the mindset for it or the range of abilities needed to be a top scorer. I mean, I want Stokes to be a top scorer. It's been acknowledged she has untapped ability. That doesn't mean she'll be able to do it. She needs the mindset, the willingness to keep shooting even when she misses, and the ability to shoot from multiple angles. I know the analogy isn't great between Stokes and EM but I'm making a greater point. Being a scorer encompasses so many things. As a post player you need strength, you need balance, you need multiple moves with both hands, you need the ability to shoot from a variety of angles and you need the willingness to keep shooting even when missing or even when doubled. It's a hard to thing to do. Especially in the women's game where the game is played on the floor rather than in the air.
_________________ The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
|
|
ClayK
Joined: 11 Oct 2005 Posts: 11145
Back to top |
Posted: 03/10/16 7:23 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
The point about the mindset is very well-taken. The match between personality and skill set is discussed as often as it should be ...
Some players have the skills to be a point guard, say, but not the personality. Some players have the toughness and knack for rebounding to be a good power forward, but they're 5-9. And some kids have all the skills to be scorers but they don't want to be seen as ball hogs. It's more important to them to be liked than it is to maximize their scoring.
_________________ Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
|
|
Shades
Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 63767
Back to top |
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 66905 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/16 12:37 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
The Mystics uniforms are spiffy
_________________ I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
Michelle89
Joined: 17 Nov 2010 Posts: 16464 Location: Holland
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/16 4:08 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
pilight wrote: |
The Mystics uniforms are spiffy |
Yeah i like the Mystics and the Sparks jerseys so far
_________________ "Sue Bird and Lauren Jackson were and are the dynamic duo. They're the one-two punch. They're all the clich�s possible to describe people that perfectly complement each other, who make each other better and also bring out the best in the team." �Karen Bryant
|
|
NYL_WNBA_FAN
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 14097
Back to top |
Posted: 03/29/16 3:30 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I really like the DC unis too.
_________________ The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
|
|
J-Spoon
Joined: 31 Jan 2009 Posts: 6796
Back to top |
Posted: 04/14/16 10:27 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
might as well try to get them all done
Latta/Hartley
Hill/Cloud/Galdeira or Grant
TRP/Copper
Messeman/Sanders/Maloot
Dolson/Vaughn
Any chance Hawkins or Milonvic returns this season?
|
|
SportsGuru
Joined: 20 May 2005 Posts: 4977
Back to top |
Posted: 04/15/16 11:14 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Kudos to Mike Thibault and his staff for putting together a very good off season transaction of players. I like the drafting of Kahleah Copper, Liable Galderia, Danaejah Grant and the February free agent signing of Zoo Dimitrakou.
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 66905 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 04/19/16 11:46 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Mystics sign Chelsey Lee
_________________ I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 66905 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
|
toad455
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 22474 Location: NJ
Back to top |
Posted: 04/20/16 12:31 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I thought the Mystics were a bubble team to make the play-offs, but with Latta missing 4-6 weeks will have the Mystics starting from behind. I guess Cloud will start at PG unless they opt to bring back Lawson??
_________________ LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!
Twitter: @TBRBWAY
|
|
Richyyy
Joined: 17 Nov 2005 Posts: 24351 Location: London
Back to top |
Posted: 04/20/16 12:43 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
toad455 wrote: |
I thought the Mystics were a bubble team to make the play-offs, but with Latta missing 4-6 weeks will have the Mystics starting from behind. I guess Cloud will start at PG unless they opt to bring back Lawson?? |
I really don't think that's an 'opt' thing based on Washington's choice. If Lawson wants to play at some point this season, there'll be multiple teams interested. |
|
|
|