RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Glory Johnson pregnant
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20 ... 23, 24, 25  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 8183



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/28/15 12:17 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Waiting for the anti-Glory fans to put a spin on this video.
SCook



Joined: 09 Oct 2013
Posts: 3254
Location: New Jersey


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/28/15 1:19 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
zune69 wrote:
Waiting for the anti-Glory fans to put a spin on this video.


Why is it that when someone disagrees with specific things they are considered a hater or Anti something? I'm sure nobody on this thread hates Glory or is Anti-Glory, maybe the fans on Instagram or Twitter who have taken a side in this but on here, I doubt that's the case.

Now about the video. This is evidence that BG indeed was there so I'm waiting for the surfacing of the legal documents ( Arizona law states that you have to have legal documentation signed to be liable) cause BG is about to be paying for 18 yrs. Oh How beautiful marriage is!



_________________
In La'Kech: I Am You. You Are Me. We Are Us
ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/28/15 2:18 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
SCook wrote:
This is evidence that BG indeed was there


I suppose there's some question about where "there" is, and when. Was this the procedure itself? Some preliminary tests? Or what?

My impression is that throughout this process, a lot of people have read into things whatever they wanted the outcome to be.
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 8183



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/28/15 2:28 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
SCook wrote:
zune69 wrote:
Waiting for the anti-Glory fans to put a spin on this video.


Why is it that when someone disagrees with specific things they are considered a hater or Anti something? I'm sure nobody on this thread hates Glory or is Anti-Glory, maybe the fans on Instagram or Twitter who have taken a side in this but on here, I doubt that's the case.

Now about the video. This is evidence that BG indeed was there so I'm waiting for the surfacing of the legal documents ( Arizona law states that you have to have legal documentation signed to be liable) cause BG is about to be paying for 18 yrs. Oh How beautiful marriage is!


Everytime there is information that favors Griner some rebkell posters make anti-Glory remarks.However,when the news is in favor of Johnson,rebkell posters are silent That is the true definition of a hater.Johnson and Griner are both acting like spoiled brats.Lets not pile up on Glory and give Griner a pass.Criticize them both or don't criticize them at all,I choose to do the latter.
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66910
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/28/15 3:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
They're never in the frame together. Could be two separate videos cut together to make Griner look bad. That swish pan could be covering an edit.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
Genero36



Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 11188



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 1:37 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Live that single life Brittney Griner.

http://websta.me/p/1063876560891248925_320874703
kojthiabkuv



Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 1860



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 5:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Genero36 wrote:
Live that single life Brittney Griner.

http://websta.me/p/1063876560891248925_320874703



I wish I can unsee that.
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 8183



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 5:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
pilight wrote:
They're never in the frame together. Could be two separate videos cut together to make Griner look bad. That swish pan could be covering an edit.


We also don't know the date of this video.
Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18030
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 6:55 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
I remain astounded at how much of their personal lives these women think is appropriate to put on social media, especially during a divorce case that seems to have gotten uglier and uglier.



_________________
Ardent believer in the separation of church and stadium.
ChicagoAnnie



Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Posts: 9199
Location: St. Paul, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 7:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
kojthiabkuv wrote:
Genero36 wrote:
Live that single life Brittney Griner.

http://websta.me/p/1063876560891248925_320874703



I wish I can unsee that.

+1
bballgrl



Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 3629



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 8:32 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Queenie wrote:
I remain astounded at how much of their personal lives these women think is appropriate to put on social media, especially during a divorce case that seems to have gotten uglier and uglier.


I don't think the players themselves posted this. Looks like it came from another site and was posted here but not by them. So why was it posted here? I see that as an invasion of privacy. They were out at some function and that has nothing to do with basketball, should not have been posted here.
Genero36



Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 11188



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 8:36 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
bballgrl wrote:
I don't think the players themselves posted this. Looks like it came from another site and was posted here but not by them. So why was it posted here? I see that as an invasion of privacy. They were out at some function and that has nothing to do with basketball, should not have been posted here.


Did she look like she wanted privacy in that public place?



Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63770



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 8:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Because of limited bandwidth, I can't view the video but can only presume what it contains by the responses. I think it's established that Johnson and Griner are no longer a couple. Is Griner supposed to act like she's not 24 because she's going through a divorce proceeding? What difference does it make?



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
mercfan3



Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 19760



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 8:49 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Queenie wrote:
I remain astounded at how much of their personal lives these women think is appropriate to put on social media, especially during a divorce case that seems to have gotten uglier and uglier.


Taurasi made a comment once (last season), about how surprising it was at how open Britt was with her personal life, and she thought that being so open might not always be the best thing and that as Britt got older she might grow into feeling that way.

Yea..



_________________
“Anyone point out that a Donald Trump anagram is ‘Lord Dampnut’”- Colin Mochrie
hyperetic



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 5360
Location: Fayetteville


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 8:59 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
On a side note, I saw a dude in Burger King that, at first glance, looked a lot like BG. At second glance, it was minimal similarity. Slender, tall, frosted dreads. That's about it. But for half a second, my mind was like, "Hey! He looks like BG!"
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 8183



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 9:49 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
hyperetic wrote:
On a side note, I saw a dude in Burger King that, at first glance, looked a lot like BG. At second glance, it was minimal similarity. Slender, tall, frosted dreads. That's about it. But for half a second, my mind was like, "Hey! He looks like BG!"




PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 16358
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 10:01 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Shades wrote:
Because of limited bandwidth, I can't view the video but can only presume what it contains by the responses. I think it's established that Johnson and Griner are no longer a couple. Is Griner supposed to act like she's not 24 because she's going through a divorce proceeding? What difference does it make?


Probably makes a difference to her pregnant wife that she left.
SueFavor



Joined: 20 May 2013
Posts: 387
Location: Los Angeles, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 10:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Queenie wrote:
I remain astounded at how much of their personal lives these women think is appropriate to put on social media, especially during a divorce case that seems to have gotten uglier and uglier.


Same here.



_________________
hoopism.blogspot.com

womenshoopsworld.com

twitter.com/hoopism

whoopsworld@aol.com
Libra_Girl



Joined: 12 Jul 2013
Posts: 1237



Back to top
PostPosted: 08/31/15 10:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Shades wrote:
Because of limited bandwidth, I can't view the video but can only presume what it contains by the responses. I think it's established that Johnson and Griner are no longer a couple.Is Griner supposed to act like she's not 24 because she's going through a divorce proceeding? What difference does it make?
Well legally they are still a couple.
Admiral_Needa



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 10479
Location: Tiburon, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/01/15 1:05 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Shades wrote:
Because of limited bandwidth, I can't view the video but can only presume what it contains by the responses. I think it's established that Johnson and Griner are no longer a couple. Is Griner supposed to act like she's not 24 because she's going through a divorce proceeding? What difference does it make?




No difference at all.


The video is of Griner being 'Grinded' on by another woman to club music at a party. Twisted Evil

Certain people think there is something wrong with this, or look down on them for putting this on their social media, but that is sophistry. Idea

Brittney Griner and Monique Curry were invited to host a party in DC, and it was advertised as such. There were many people who went and many people who took pictures with, or danced with BG&MC. That in fact was the main draw to the event.. There is nothing wrong with anything that they, or the fans did. Idea

Here is the advertisement and a picture. The party was on 8/28/15, after the PHO@WAS game: Arrow





_________________
2002 WNBA Virtual GM Overall Winner
2006 WNBA Triple Threat Overall Winner
2007 NBA ESPN Fast Break Overall Winner
hyperetic



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 5360
Location: Fayetteville


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/01/15 12:30 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
zune69 wrote:
hyperetic wrote:
On a side note, I saw a dude in Burger King that, at first glance, looked a lot like BG. At second glance, it was minimal similarity. Slender, tall, frosted dreads. That's about it. But for half a second, my mind was like, "Hey! He looks like BG!"




Whaaaaa?!!! Shocked Laughing Laughing Laughing
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 8183



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/01/15 1:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
hyperetic wrote:

Whaaaaa?!!! Shocked Laughing Laughing Laughing


Smile Your comment came Out of left field.I was just wondering...did you really see a male Griner look-alike,or were you thowing subtle shade at Brittney Laughing Laughing
SCook



Joined: 09 Oct 2013
Posts: 3254
Location: New Jersey


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/01/15 2:50 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
SueFavor wrote:
Queenie wrote:
I remain astounded at how much of their personal lives these women think is appropriate to put on social media, especially during a divorce case that seems to have gotten uglier and uglier.


Same here.


But BG didnt post this on her social media.



_________________
In La'Kech: I Am You. You Are Me. We Are Us
bballgrl



Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 3629



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/01/15 3:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Genero36 wrote:
bballgrl wrote:
I don't think the players themselves posted this. Looks like it came from another site and was posted here but not by them. So why was it posted here? I see that as an invasion of privacy. They were out at some function and that has nothing to do with basketball, should not have been posted here.


Did she look like she wanted privacy in that public place?



My point was it had nothing to do with basketball and those of us would not have seen it if it hadn't been posted. BG never posted anything, didn't even mention she was hosting. JMO that it should have been left off of this board, especially when taken from another web site.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63770



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/30/15 2:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
If this is her at 22 weeks, she's going to be massive at 36-39 weeks.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20 ... 23, 24, 25  Next
Page 19 of 25

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin