View previous topic :: View next topic |
Are you less interested in WCBB because of UConn's dominance? |
Yes, and I am NOT a UConn fan |
|
41% |
[ 36 ] |
Yes, and I AM a UConn fan |
|
5% |
[ 5 ] |
No, and I am NOT UConn fan |
|
36% |
[ 31 ] |
No, and I AM a UConn fan |
|
16% |
[ 14 ] |
|
Total Votes : 86 |
|
Author |
Message |
GlennMacGrady
Joined: 03 Jan 2005 Posts: 8227 Location: Heisenberg
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 10:30 am ::: Has UConn dominance lowered your interest in WCBB? |
Reply |
|
Have you become less interested in following, watching or posting about WCBB because of the dominance of UConn over the past several years than you used to be? |
|
FollowtheCardinalRule
Joined: 12 Oct 2011 Posts: 5153 Location: Denver
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 10:31 am ::: |
Reply |
|
"Dominance."
*cough* Stanford. *cough*
|
|
summertime blues
Joined: 16 Apr 2013 Posts: 7841 Location: Shenandoah Valley
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 10:36 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Not at all. I'm just more interested in everyone else. UConn? Eh.
_________________ Don't take life so serious. It ain't nohows permanent.
It takes 3 years to build a team and 7 to build a program.--Conventional Wisdom
|
|
FollowtheCardinalRule
Joined: 12 Oct 2011 Posts: 5153 Location: Denver
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 10:41 am ::: |
Reply |
|
summertime blues wrote: |
Not at all. I'm just more interested in everyone else. UConn? Eh. |
Exactly, and when UConn does lose to unheralded Stanford teams, it's groundbreaking.
|
|
ArtBest23
Joined: 02 Jul 2013 Posts: 14550
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 10:57 am ::: |
Reply |
|
No. I still watch a lot of games from a lot of conferences, majors and mids, maybe more this year than ever because there seem to be more games available. But I certainly don't waste my time watching UConn players pad their stats against the AAC high school team of the week.
|
|
Durantula
Joined: 30 Mar 2013 Posts: 5223
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 11:14 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Less interested in the NCAA tournament because you feel like no one has a chance. Part of that is UConn already played the top contenders in the regular season so now there is very little intrigue, except for them maybe matching up with ND since Turner didn't play in their matchup. It sounds counter intuitive but maybe it would bring more intrigue if UConn didn't play a couple of the top teams because they you could see them blow out AAC teams and at least think someone will trip them up. I think UConn needs the top OOC games more than their opponents due to conference affiliation though.
Regular season I am very interested in but its not just concentrated to UConn, there are a lot of blowouts in televised games these days because now you see some of the bad teams get on TV too. The good and the bad of more tv exposure.
|
|
RP
Joined: 17 Jul 2010 Posts: 1299
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 11:35 am ::: |
Reply |
|
No. The field was truly hopeless in 2009, but in the years since there has always been at least one team with the talent to beat UConn.
|
|
ripleydc
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 4778 Location: Washington, DC
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 11:39 am ::: |
Reply |
|
No, I'm just less interested in UConn, not less interested in WCBB in general. Now that they've been thrown into a mis-matched conference, their games are not anything I enjoy watching.
UConn was dominant before, but in the old conf, they met up with ND, UL, RU, DePaul . . . though they won most of those games, they were more competitive and fun to watch.
|
|
Oldfandepot2
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 Posts: 996 Location: Northeast
Back to top |
|
summertime blues
Joined: 16 Apr 2013 Posts: 7841 Location: Shenandoah Valley
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 12:24 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
ArtBest23 wrote: |
No. I still watch a lot of games from a lot of conferences, majors and mids, maybe more this year than ever because there seem to be more games available. But I certainly don't waste my time watching UConn players pad their stats against the AAC high school team of the week. |
Exactly. And the conference tourneys and the lower rounds of the NCAA will still be fun. NC game, not so much....although strange things have happened in the past and could happen again.
_________________ Don't take life so serious. It ain't nohows permanent.
It takes 3 years to build a team and 7 to build a program.--Conventional Wisdom
|
|
SueFavor
Joined: 20 May 2013 Posts: 387 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 12:28 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
FollowtheCardinalRule wrote: |
"Dominance."
*cough* Stanford. *cough* |
In case you haven't noticed, Stanford ain't shit this year._________________ hoopism.blogspot.com
womenshoopsworld.com
twitter.com/hoopism
whoopsworld@aol.com |
|
SueFavor
Joined: 20 May 2013 Posts: 387 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 12:29 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
summertime blues wrote: |
Not at all. I'm just more interested in everyone else. UConn? Eh. |
X_________________________________ hoopism.blogspot.com
womenshoopsworld.com
twitter.com/hoopism
whoopsworld@aol.com |
|
FollowtheCardinalRule
Joined: 12 Oct 2011 Posts: 5153 Location: Denver
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 1:05 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
SueFavor wrote: |
FollowtheCardinalRule wrote: |
"Dominance."
*cough* Stanford. *cough* |
In case you haven't noticed, Stanford ain't shit this year. |
I never said that Stanford was anything good. Quite how they beat UConn, while these other heralded teams like South Carolina is a mystery to me.
|
|
Homyonkel
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 Posts: 123
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 2:46 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
How they beat them is easily explained. First, they played a beautiful game and I think they would have beaten any team in the country that night.
Add to that, UCONN gave their worst defensive effort I've seen since 1990.
The consequence was inescapable.
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 66908 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 2:51 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
FollowtheCardinalRule wrote: |
SueFavor wrote: |
FollowtheCardinalRule wrote: |
"Dominance."
*cough* Stanford. *cough* |
In case you haven't noticed, Stanford ain't shit this year. |
I never said that Stanford was anything good. Quite how they beat UConn, while these other heralded teams like South Carolina is a mystery to me. |
A: Stanford has a much better coach than South Carolina
B: Stuff happens, especially in early season games.
_________________ I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
Richard 77
Joined: 19 Nov 2004 Posts: 4141 Location: Lake Mills, Wisconsin
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 3:17 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
In answer to the question, nope. It's just a lot harder for me to do so. I don't have a car to get to the Kohl Center to see games played, I don't have cable, so I can't watch the Big Ten Network or ESPN2, I'm much more limited as to the news and games I have access to. Rebkell and Internet sites are the only things I can turn to for my interest women's college basketball, as well as the WNBA._________________ If you cannot inspire yourself to read a book about women's basketball, or any book about women's sports, you cannot inspire any young girl or boy to write a book about them. http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/Richardstrek |
|
FS02
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 9699 Location: Husky (west coast) Country
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 4:31 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Durantula wrote: |
Regular season I am very interested in but its not just concentrated to UConn, there are a lot of blowouts in televised games these days because now you see some of the bad teams get on TV too. The good and the bad of more tv exposure. |
Good point, TV exposure is no longer limited to UConn games and what are considered "good matchups".
_________________ @dtmears2
|
|
sigur3
Joined: 18 Jun 2013 Posts: 6191 Location: Chicago-ish
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 4:59 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
No and I'm not a UConn fan. With the competitiveness of the B1G this season and scouting potential picks for the upcoming WNBA draft, that's more than enough college basketball for me.
|
|
readyAIMfire53
Joined: 20 Nov 2004 Posts: 7372 Location: Durham, NC
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 5:30 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Yes. But it's probably more related to how non-competitive my own team (Duke) has become. Glad the Duke/UConn series was ended for now. This Duke coach will never beat UConn.
Regarding Coach Staley: I believe she will become a very good coach. At least one poster here continuously knocks Staley's coaching. She's currently not as good as some of the best - Geno, Tara and Muffet - but she's already WAY better than most of the others. And she's still early in her coaching career, with this season being her first shot at really playing with the big guns. I think she'll continue to draw her share of the top talent and continue to grow as a coach developing her talent.
_________________ Follow your passion and your life will be true down to your core.
~rAf
|
|
cthskzfn
Joined: 21 Nov 2004 Posts: 12851 Location: In a world where a PSYCHOpath like Trump isn't potus.
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 6:17 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Nope.
_________________ Silly, stupid white people might be waking up.
|
|
markinct
Joined: 22 May 2011 Posts: 671 Location: Daytona Beach Florida
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 6:31 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I AM a UConn fan, have been since 1994.... but I watch as much of Women's Hoops as I can...ESPN3 has certainly helped that out a LOT.
I understand the thoughts behind this post but in UConn's defense, there are other teams with more talented rosters, they just aren't obviously coached as well. If you look at the starting five, Morgan Tuck was a big question mark with her health/knee issues so she's turned out to be great. Mo Jefferson wasn't thought of to be the second coming of Sue Bird but has developed into one of the elite point guards in the country. Kia Nurse is a freshman who wasn't even supposed to be playing big minutes right away. Stewie obviously is the core of the team and KML one of the better shooters ever to play the game but she also has deficiencies that have been pointed out on here many times. They have a big shot blocker in Kiah Stokes but she adds nearly nothing offensively....Sinaya Chong, she's struggled in the past and we will have to wait and see what she actually develops into. Then Gabby Williams, a nice young surprise off the bench. It's the passion they are coached with that brings them the attitude they have. There are teams out there who can beat them but they have to bring their A game in order to do so because UConn teams are very smart. I love watching the crispness of their game but I will admit, after the first half, I typically lose interest. This team is not nearly as talented as the team of Sue, Swin, Diana, Ajsha and Tamika but they certainly can be just as successful.
|
|
Queenie
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18030 Location: Queens
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 7:43 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
ArtBest23 wrote: |
No. I still watch a lot of games from a lot of conferences, majors and mids, maybe more this year than ever because there seem to be more games available. But I certainly don't waste my time watching UConn players pad their stats against the AAC high school team of the week. |
X________
Why should I watch a glorified UConn drill when I live in a city with seven D-I teams, plus too many to count in the surrounding area? Why should I watch another mind-blowingly ridiculous blowout when I can flip between game after game after game? One Sunday, maybe a week or two ago, I rotated among six games.
What irks me about UConn is that they become the only story anyone who isn't already sworn into the fandom hears about, and then something like the South Carolina game happens, and the people who aren't already fans go "welp, one good team and 344 shitty teams, why bother?" (No, *your* team is not shitty. Whoever you are. I'm not saying that. Unless you're a UCSB fan right now. But newcomers to the fandom don't know that.)
_________________ Ardent believer in the separation of church and stadium.
|
|
summertime blues
Joined: 16 Apr 2013 Posts: 7841 Location: Shenandoah Valley
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 8:26 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
You are beyond lucky, Queenie. Some of us are stuck with whatever ESPN deigns to put on its various channels, and really crappy coverage of local teams. ESPN has a serious pro-UConn bias, IMNSHO, and in other ways is biased towards certain other "marquee" teams (thank goodness I do happen to be a fan of one of those!). But otherwise the coverage in the rest of the country STINKS. I live where there is a damn good and usually RANKED team (JMU) and they don't even get local coverage, fuhgawdsakes, let alone national.....despite the fact that right now they have one player on the Naismith watch list and another on the Lieberman watch list. Being a WBB fan is NOT easy!
_________________ Don't take life so serious. It ain't nohows permanent.
It takes 3 years to build a team and 7 to build a program.--Conventional Wisdom
|
|
ArtBest23
Joined: 02 Jul 2013 Posts: 14550
Back to top |
Posted: 02/15/15 11:51 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
summertime blues wrote: |
You are beyond lucky, Queenie. Some of us are stuck with whatever ESPN deigns to put on its various channels, and really crappy coverage of local teams. ESPN has a serious pro-UConn bias, IMNSHO, and in other ways is biased towards certain other "marquee" teams (thank goodness I do happen to be a fan of one of those!). But otherwise the coverage in the rest of the country STINKS. I live where there is a damn good and usually RANKED team (JMU) and they don't even get local coverage, fuhgawdsakes, let alone national.....despite the fact that right now they have one player on the Naismith watch list and another on the Lieberman watch list. Being a WBB fan is NOT easy! |
I'm pretty sure I saw that JMU-DEL was on TV today, and I've noticed several of their games on Comcast or other RSNs.
|
|
lvf08
Joined: 11 Jun 2008 Posts: 624
Back to top |
Posted: 02/16/15 12:48 am ::: |
Reply |
|
No, I still watch as much as ever.
|
|
|
|