RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Best of three format stats

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66921
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/03/14 8:40 pm    ::: Best of three format stats Reply Reply with quote

1-2 format
71 series
55 wins for higher seed 77%
40 three game series 56%
26 sweeps for higher seed 37%
5 sweeps for lower seed 7%

1-1-1 format
30 series
20 wins for higher seed 67%
13 three game series 43%
13 sweeps for higher seed 43%
4 sweeps for lower seed 13%


The 1-1-1 format continues to produce more sweeps and be better for the low seeds than the 1-2.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
PhoenixxLily
I Voted


Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 3909
Location: South Carolina, United States, North America, Earth


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/03/14 9:40 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

sooo... one could argue that the 1-1-1 format works better to even the odds? make things a little more "fair"?



_________________
the Few. the Proud. Nursing Students
Tumblr: http://phoenixxlily.tumblr.com
Buy My Book: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/NadiyahWalton843
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66921
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/03/14 9:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PhoenixxLily wrote:
sooo... one could argue that the 1-1-1 format works better to even the odds? make things a little more "fair"?


Depends on your definition of "fair".



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
PhoenixxLily
I Voted


Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 3909
Location: South Carolina, United States, North America, Earth


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/03/14 9:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
PhoenixxLily wrote:
sooo... one could argue that the 1-1-1 format works better to even the odds? make things a little more "fair"?


Depends on your definition of "fair".


not skewing the odds and circumstances to favor one team over the other



_________________
the Few. the Proud. Nursing Students
Tumblr: http://phoenixxlily.tumblr.com
Buy My Book: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/NadiyahWalton843
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66921
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/03/14 9:48 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PhoenixxLily wrote:
pilight wrote:
PhoenixxLily wrote:
sooo... one could argue that the 1-1-1 format works better to even the odds? make things a little more "fair"?


Depends on your definition of "fair".


not skewing the odds and circumstances to favor one team over the other


How often should the best team win? Perhaps it is skewing to favor one team over the other.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
shadowboxer



Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 2126



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/04/14 10:19 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Costs ESPN less than any further game investment-think that was the deciding factor, not increased fairness to any team.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66921
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/30/15 12:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

2015 update

1-2 format
71 series
55 wins for higher seed 77%
40 three game series 56%
26 sweeps for higher seed 37%
5 sweeps for lower seed 7%

1-1-1 format
36 series
24 wins for higher seed 67%
17 three game series 47%
15 sweeps for higher seed 42%
4 sweeps for lower seed 11%

The 1-1-1 continues to be better for lower seeds and to produce more sweeps.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66921
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/20/23 9:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Guess I need to bring this back

1-2 format
71 series
55 wins for higher seed 77%
40 three game series 56% (29-11 high 73%)
26 sweeps for higher seed 37%
5 sweeps for lower seed 7%

1-1-1 format
36 series
24 wins for higher seed 67%
17 three game series 47% (9-8 high 53%)
15 sweeps for higher seed 42%
4 sweeps for lower seed 11%

2-1 format
8 series
8 wins for higher seed 100%
3 three game series 38% (3-0 high 100%)
5 sweeps for higher seed 62%
0 sweeps for lower seed 0%



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
Hawkeye



Joined: 10 Aug 2010
Posts: 760
Location: Houston, TX


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/21/23 12:13 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Best of 3 should be 1-1-1. There have been enough off days to fit the series in over 5 days with a travel day after games 1 and 2. More than one day off between games is just silly. To get in the playoffs and not have a home game just costs that lower seed much needed home gate revenue....this isn't MLB wild card round. Razz


WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 12538
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/21/23 9:32 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Hawkeye wrote:
Best of 3 should be 1-1-1. There have been enough off days to fit the series in over 5 days with a travel day after games 1 and 2. More than one day off between games is just silly. To get in the playoffs and not have a home game just costs that lower seed much needed home gate revenue....this isn't MLB wild card round. Razz


Im only for 1-1-1 if Charter flights are "Truly" happening. Overall i like how 2-1 gives the better team a reward for their regular season work. 1-1-1is kind of a split reward .



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
BamaEd



Joined: 11 May 2014
Posts: 855
Location: United States


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/21/23 12:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I am also a proponent of 1-1-1. The higher seed should open on their own floor and have the decider on their own floor as well. I'm sure money and logistics are the reasons given for 1-2 previously and 2-1 now. Given the choice between those 2, I guess that I would prefer 2-1? Neither is great though.


Silky Johnson



Joined: 29 Sep 2014
Posts: 3318



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/21/23 1:03 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Agreed; if you're not going to do 1-1-1, then 2-1 is the least objectionable of the remaining options.



_________________
Professional Hater. The Baron of #HateHard

My team no longer exists, so I'll have to settle for hating yours.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin