Click_ here to Help Support the Junkie Boards

RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums NEW
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Graf's sacking could be good for Caps

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 27767
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 8:57 am    ::: Graf's sacking could be good for Caps Reply Reply with quote

http://canberra.yourguide.com.au/detail.asp?class=sport&subclass=local&category=general%20sport&story_id=421326&y=2005&m=9

"I personally think she was harshly done by, given the fact she didn't have access to her full roster until about 10 games into the season ... but then again that's America, that's the big league."



_________________
If you want a revolution, the only solution's evolve

My WNBA Fan Site
Keegan



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 9:01 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Hmmmmm but I'm led to believe she wasn't "sacked". So what's the deal? I wouldn't be surprised if the Canberra Times was talking out of its arse though.

Quote:
Despite having not spoken to Graf since her dismissal from the Phoenix job, Cartwright remained confident the sacking would not in any way hinder her preparation for the Capitals' season.


It's possible the Canberra Times got the AP article and then asked Mr Cartwright "So what do you feel about Graf being fired?" Rolling Eyes
caune



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 14000
Location: Valley of the Bun


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 9:07 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Keegan wrote:
Hmmmmm but I'm led to believe she wasn't "sacked". So what's the deal? I wouldn't be surprised if the Canberra Times was talking out of its arse though.

Quote:
Despite having not spoken to Graf since her dismissal from the Phoenix job, Cartwright remained confident the sacking would not in any way hinder her preparation for the Capitals' season.


It's possible the Canberra Times got the AP article and then asked Mr Cartwright "So what do you feel about Graf being fired?" Rolling Eyes



Gosh, American journalism techniques are invading Australia, huh?
She wasn't sacked, or fired.



_________________
"When Glenn Beck speaks, a little more truth dies."
Karoli
Luuuc



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8847



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 9:26 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

caune wrote:
She wasn't sacked, or fired.


Yeah, I thought the AzCentral article a couple of days ago made that pretty clear:
Quote:
The Mercury and Graf decided to go separate ways Thursday night, said General Manager Seth Sulka, who just six days ago had said he expected her back.
"It's a little surprising, but at the end of the day, it was pretty much her decision," Sulka said Friday.

Mercury, Graf part ways after 2 years



_________________
Seems rike no one takes me serirousreee
dukemayo



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 659
Location: Durham, NC


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 9:44 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Keegan wrote:
Hmmmmm but I'm led to believe she wasn't "sacked". So what's the deal? I wouldn't be surprised if the Canberra Times was talking out of its arse though.

Quote:
Despite having not spoken to Graf since her dismissal from the Phoenix job, Cartwright remained confident the sacking would not in any way hinder her preparation for the Capitals' season.


It's possible the Canberra Times got the AP article and then asked Mr Cartwright "So what do you feel about Graf being fired?" Rolling Eyes


Here's the lead paragraph from the Mercury's own press release on Friday:

The Phoenix Mercury announced today that Head Coach Carrie Graf’s contract which expired at the end of the 2005 season will not be renewed. The two parties decided not to enter into a new contract and the search for a new head coach will begin immediately.

That's management's best presentation of the decision.

I don't mind the Mercury putting it this way and being as tactful and considerate as possible, especially when management is sincere in its feelings toward her, which I believe it is in this case. There doesn't seem to be hypocrisy even of the sometimes necessary benign kind operating here.

But the phrase "[t]he two parties decided" is a fig leaf. At least, it is unless someone has solid information that Graf did not want to return, and I haven't seen any indication of that.

They're ownership and she's labor. All she could do was accede. I guess you could say she "decided" to accede, but it's an empty decision because she had no choice.

"[C]ontract...will not be renewed" is a soft sacking, but a sacking nonetheless.

Personally, with all she had to deal with, including the underappreciated effect of Penny Taylor having to play injured in those last several games, I think not renewing was mildly unfair. But management, in its own words, made a judgment call that she'd taken the team as far as she could.

“Our commitment is to bring a WNBA Championship to Phoenix,” said Robert Sarver, the Mercury and Phoenix Suns Managing Partner. “In the last two seasons the Mercury have gone from a team that won just eight games to the doorstep of the playoffs. We will begin the search immediately for the person who can take us to the next level in our effort to bring a championship to our very loyal fans.”


caune



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 14000
Location: Valley of the Bun


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 9:44 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Luuuc wrote:
caune wrote:
She wasn't sacked, or fired.


Yeah, I thought the AzCentral article a couple of days ago made that pretty clear:
Quote:
The Mercury and Graf decided to go separate ways Thursday night, said General Manager Seth Sulka, who just six days ago had said he expected her back.
"It's a little surprising, but at the end of the day, it was pretty much her decision," Sulka said Friday.

Mercury, Graf part ways after 2 years



Clear as an LA sky Wink



_________________
"When Glenn Beck speaks, a little more truth dies."
Karoli
Swoopes_O'grady



Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 1180
Location: Houston, Tx


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 9:45 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Well from what I've read here, if the new owners are leaning for a man coach, maybe they did sort of push Graf out the door. You know when they kind of nudge you a little bit and then you decide it's better to leave before you're "sacked" thing. Don't know...just my feelings of the situation.


Keegan



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 9:48 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

http://www.insaneplatypus.com/archives/2005/09/06/carrie_graf_was/index.html

Shameless self-advertising and possibly informative Wink
dukemayo



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 659
Location: Durham, NC


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 10:01 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

caune wrote:
Luuuc wrote:
caune wrote:
She wasn't sacked, or fired.


Yeah, I thought the AzCentral article a couple of days ago made that pretty clear:
Quote:
The Mercury and Graf decided to go separate ways Thursday night, said General Manager Seth Sulka, who just six days ago had said he expected her back.
"It's a little surprising, but at the end of the day, it was pretty much her decision," Sulka said Friday.

Mercury, Graf part ways after 2 years



Clear as an LA sky Wink


Exactly. "Clear as an LA sky."

If it really was largely Graf's decision, the Phoenix press release would have said that.

There are also some telltale tics in the unscripted comment of the GM:

"It's a little [not "very"?] surprising, but at the end of the day [several days of management hints and nudges], it was pretty much [not "entirely"?] her decision."

The appearance of a mutual decision is the best thing for both parties. I don't mind.


Keegan



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 10:03 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

dukemayo wrote:
There are also some telltale tics in the unscripted comment of the GM:

"It's a little [not "very"?] surprising, but at the end of the day [several days of management hints and nudges], it was pretty much [not "entirely"?] her decision."


That line of reasoning was also as clear as an L.A sky.
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 27767
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 10:05 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The Merc haven't even changed scripts...

Quote:
“I’m proud of what I accomplished with the Mercury the last two seasons and I’m leaving the team in a strong position for the future,” said Graf


http://www.wnba.com/mercury/news/graf_050902.html

Quote:
"I'm very proud of what I accomplished with the Mercury last season and I'm leaving the team in a very strong position for the future," Shumate said


http://www.allsports.com/cgi-bin/showstory.cgi?story_id=47618

The Mercury have never "fired" a coach. They always just happen to resign just when the team wants to make a change.



_________________
If you want a revolution, the only solution's evolve

My WNBA Fan Site
caune



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 14000
Location: Valley of the Bun


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 10:09 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Frankly, I thought it was quite clear Carrie had other things in mind (Coaching the Opals in the 2008 Olympics) when she signed a contract with Canberra when she was still coaching the Mercury.
She knew her contract was to be up and she knew what she really wanted to do, Coach the Australian Olympic team.

She'll get her wish and the Merc will get a new Coach who will build on the foundation Carrie left...it's not a half bad foundation Shocked so we should be able to lure a decent Coach to Phoenix.



_________________
"When Glenn Beck speaks, a little more truth dies."
Karoli
Keegan



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 10:11 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

caune wrote:
She'll get her wish


I hope so but who knows when it comes to BA...

Maybe they'll get the hint when the players hand in another round of scathing feedback sheets Wink
librarygeek



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 142
Location: Boston


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 10:15 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Frankly, I don't know whose decision it was, if she was sacked, or if she was upset about it. BUT... she has just removed, or had removed for her, the biggest hurdle between herself and the Opals head coach position. Go Carrie! If I were Jan Stirling, I would be updating my resume. Wink


Luuuc



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 8847



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 10:20 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

librarygeek wrote:
she has just removed, or had removed for her, the biggest hurdle between herself and the Opals head coach position.


She certainly has. The only other hurdle is Jan, and as hurdles go ... well ... let's just say that even an exhausted Dydek could clear her with ease



_________________
Seems rike no one takes me serirousreee
dukemayo



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 659
Location: Durham, NC


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 10:41 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

caune wrote:
Frankly, I thought it was quite clear Carrie had other things in mind (Coaching the Opals in the 2008 Olympics) when she signed a contract with Canberra when she was still coaching the Mercury.
She knew her contract was to be up and she knew what she really wanted to do, Coach the Australian Olympic team.

She'll get her wish and the Merc will get a new Coach who will build on the foundation Carrie left...it's not a half bad foundation Shocked so we should be able to lure a decent Coach to Phoenix.


Maybe I truly am being too cynical in my interpretation. But I have to ask whether coaching the national team in 2008 and coaching the Mercury in 2006 are incompatible.

Or is that it she has to be back in Australia pretty extensively in order to position herself to be selected national coach? Is the position open, and a decision to be made in the coming months? I'm trying to make sense of this and am truly just asking.

And as I just said, maybe I'm being too cynical. It may be a cultural thing. In the U.S. there are so many coaching changes every year in pro sports and the hundred or so most important college football and basketball programs, that you don't take this "mutual decision" presentation seriously. You hear variations of it all the time. And then there are the departing corporate CEO's "deciding to pursue other interests" etc.

The same language is used so often that you tend not to believe it, even in the few cases when perhaps you should.

EDIT: While I was writing this, I see that my question about the national team position was answered.


Keegan



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 10:47 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

dukemayo wrote:
caune wrote:
Frankly, I thought it was quite clear Carrie had other things in mind (Coaching the Opals in the 2008 Olympics) when she signed a contract with Canberra when she was still coaching the Mercury.
She knew her contract was to be up and she knew what she really wanted to do, Coach the Australian Olympic team.

She'll get her wish and the Merc will get a new Coach who will build on the foundation Carrie left...it's not a half bad foundation Shocked so we should be able to lure a decent Coach to Phoenix.


Maybe I truly am being too cynical in my interpretation. But I have to ask whether coaching the national team in 2008 and coaching the Mercury in 2006 are incompatible.

Or is that it she has to be back in Australia pretty extensively in order to position herself to be selected national coach? Is the position open, and a decision to be made in the coming months? I'm trying to make sense of this and am truly just asking.


As mentioned, Carrie Graf would have been head coach of the Opals post-Athens if not for her WNBA commitments. BA wanted her to commit to the program full-time (which involves coaching in offseason tours that occur at the same time as the WNBA) and obviously she could not.

BA now appoints coaches in two year blocks and the job is up for grabs after the World Champs in 2006. If Carrie still had the Mercury job and could not commit to the Opals full time from 2006 onwards, she would probably miss out on the chance to coach at the Olympics in 2008.
Keegan



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 11:26 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Even the Age (what I would consider a reputable newspaper), has succumbed to the "Graf sacked" headline Rolling Eyes (thanks to Women's Hoop Blog for the link)

http://www.theage.com.au/news/basketball/graf-sacked-after-mercury-takes-plunge/2005/09/03/1125302783466.html

Time to fire off a letter of query...
dukemayo



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 659
Location: Durham, NC


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/05/05 12:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

If the national team would perform better under Graf than the present coach, then the powers-that-be should hire her and I hope they do. I'll pull for the U.S. in '08 but want to see the highest level of competition. The sport deserves no less.

The terms "sacked" and "fired" are inappropriate even in my interpretation of a not entirely mutual decision and should be strongly objected to. Using them could be an innocent mistake or could be successful spin from those who want to keep the present regime.

If it was "pretty much" her decision in Phoenix, then the Mercury should do the honorable thing and clarify the initial press release to read "Carrie Graf today informed the Phoenix Mercury that she will not seek to renew her contract with the team in order to return fulltime to basketball in Australia." Make it clear that she was an actor.

Failing that, the best I can think of is to get the press, since they're averse to using the language handed to them in a press release (the "contract...will not be renewed" wording), to simply just say she was "let go" and to point out that she got hit with a "perfect storm." If any one of the following four things had not happened, the Mercury would have made the playoffs:

1. Penny T. missing the early games and then needing several more to settle in;

2. Penny T. having to play injured in the final stretch;

3. Stepanova leaving; and

4. LA sacking* Henry Bibby when they did and not waiting just a game or two more.

*His really was one.

Just my thoughts. Good luck getting better reporting of all this.


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin