RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

2011 WNBA Mock Draft 4.0
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ucdt3



Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 5104



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 9:23 am    ::: 2011 WNBA Mock Draft 4.0 Reply Reply with quote
2011 WNBA Mock Draft 4.0

http://wnbamockdraft.blogspot.com/

Round One
Pick, Team, Player, School
1. Minnesota Lynx 6'0 SF Maya Moore, UConn
2. Tulsa Shock 6'8 C Liz Cambage, Australia
3. Chicago Sky 6'5 PF Amber Harris, Xavier
4. Minnesota Lynx (via CT) 6'4 C Jantel Lavendar, Ohio State
5. Los Angeles Sparks 6'3 SF Kayla Pedersen, Stanford
6. San Antonio Silver Stars 5'9 PG Danielle Robinson, Oklahoma
7. Tulsa Shock (via Pho) 6'2 PF Victoria Dunlap, Kentucky
8. Atlanta Dream 5'9 PG Jasmine Thomas, Duke
9. Indiana Fever 5'10 PG Courtney Vandersloot, Gonzaga
10. New York Liberty 6'3 PF Jessica Breland, UNC
11. Washington Mystics 6'6 C Ta'Shia Phillips, Xavier
12. Seattle Storm 6'0 SG Jeanette Pohlen, Stanford

Round Two
Pick, Team, Player, School
13. Minnesota Lynx (via CT from Tul) 6'1 PF Danielle Adams, Texas A&M
14. Minnesota Lynx 5'8 SG Italee Lucas, UNC
15. Chicago Sky 6'5 C Amy Jaeschke, Northwestern
16. Connecticut Sun 6'6 C Carolyn Swords, BC
17. Chicago Sky (via LA) 5'7 PG Dawn Evans, James Madison
18. Atlanta Dream (via SA) 6'4 C Krystal Thomas, Duke
19. Phoenix Mercury 6'0 SG Angie Bjorklund, Tennessee
20. San Antonio Silver Stars (via Atl) 5'8 PG Sydney Colson, Texas A&M
21. Tulsa Shock (via Ind) 5'6 PG Cetera DeGraffenreid, UNC
22. New York Liberty 6'1 SF Emily Carter, TCU
23. Washington Mystics 6'1 SF Kelsey Bolte, Iowa State
24. Seattle Storm 5'9 SG Kachine Alexander, Iowa
Luuuc
#NATC


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 21952



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 9:25 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Just out of curiosity, what's wrong with keeping the mock drafts together in the one thread?



_________________
Thanks for calling. I wait all night for calls like these.
ucdt3



Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 5104



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 9:28 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Luuuc wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what's wrong with keeping the mock drafts together in the one thread?


IDK... *shrugs*

....not really that big of a deal IMO Wink
Luuuc
#NATC


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 21952



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 9:31 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
No, not a big deal. I was just wondering.
Seems more logical to me to keep it all together (not that v4.0 is the first deviation from that, obviously. Not picking on you or anything)



_________________
Thanks for calling. I wait all night for calls like these.
SportsGuru



Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 4977



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 9:32 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Luuuc wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what's wrong with keeping the mock drafts together in the one thread?


I'm guessing it gives people a fresher look at the updated mock draft without their previous choices being second guessed.

I could see Phillips dropping to the Mystics but it would be a heck of a longshot. Laughing The Mystics probably will have trade-up (Ajavon + #11).




Last edited by SportsGuru on 03/07/11 9:36 am; edited 1 time in total
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 67057
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 9:36 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
I thibk they're getting closer to reality, but my gut feeling is still that Tulsa will do something nonsensical.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
Luuuc
#NATC


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 21952



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 9:43 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
pilight wrote:
I thibk they're getting closer to reality, but my gut feeling is still that Tulsa will do something nonsensical.

I don't really see how they can.
Either they take Cambage, or they trade her pick for something pretty substantial.
They'll have to really outdo themselves to stuff this one up IMO.



_________________
Thanks for calling. I wait all night for calls like these.
SportsGuru



Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 4977



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 9:44 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
pilight wrote:
I thibk they're getting closer to reality, but my gut feeling is still that Tulsa will do something nonsensical.


Excluding drafting Moore & Cambage there's a lot of room for 8 other WNBA GM's to do something nonsensical in the first round. There's a first time WNBA drafter in Chicago. Wink
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63875



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 10:00 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
SportsGuru wrote:
pilight wrote:
I thibk they're getting closer to reality, but my gut feeling is still that Tulsa will do something nonsensical.


Excluding drafting Moore & Cambage there's a lot of room for 8 other WNBA GM's to do something nonsensical in the first round. There's a first time WNBA drafter in Chicago. Wink


http://www.suntimes.com/sports/4160037-419/sky-assistant-focusing-on-wnba-draft.html



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
MuneravenMN
Champion Tipster


Joined: 01 Jun 2008
Posts: 3990



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 10:39 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Not sure why MN would take a shooting guard in the 2nd round. Seems to me they might look at a PG prospect or hedge their bets with another post option rather than bringing in an SG. That is unless said SG is a 3-point specialist of the highest order, and if that were so she would likely be gone in round 1, lol.



_________________
Winning takes talent; to repeat takes character.
--John Wooden
SportsGuru



Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 4977



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 10:40 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Shades wrote:
SportsGuru wrote:
pilight wrote:
I thibk they're getting closer to reality, but my gut feeling is still that Tulsa will do something nonsensical.


Excluding drafting Moore & Cambage there's a lot of room for 8 other WNBA GM's to do something nonsensical in the first round. There's a first time WNBA drafter in Chicago. Wink


http://www.suntimes.com/sports/4160037-419/sky-assistant-focusing-on-wnba-draft.html


Ok, who did Jeff House draft while with the Liberty or Mystics? There's a difference from scouting a player and actually having the final say selecting the player.
SportsGuru



Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 4977



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 10:45 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
MuneravenMN wrote:
Not sure why MN would take a shooting guard in the 2nd round. Seems to me they might look at a PG prospect or hedge their bets with another post option rather than bringing in an SG. That is unless said SG is a 3-point specialist of the highest order, and if that were so she would likely be gone in round 1, lol.


Does it make a difference who the Lynx select in the 2nd rd of the 2011 WNBA Draft, the Lynx will have a hard enough time squeezing in their two 1st round picks on a 11 player roster.
stever



Joined: 16 Nov 2004
Posts: 6918
Location: https://womensbasketballdaily.net


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 10:45 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Chicago needs a 4, does Harris really project as a pro power forward?...any more than say, Iciss Tillis? Wink



_________________
Women's Basketball Daily
Celebrating the Women's Game Since 2005
WBBDaily Mobile Edition
Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 5401
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 10:45 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Thank you Shades for posting that article from the Chicago Sun-Times.



_________________
You can win, as long as you keep your head to the SKY! Be OPTIMISTIC!
Ilive4griner



Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 134



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 12:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
#1 Minnesota, Maya Moore Connecticut
#2 Tulsa, Liz Cambage Australia
#3 Chicago, Amber Harris Xavier
#4 Minnesota, Jental Lavender Ohio State
#5 Los Angeles, Ta'Shia Phillips Xavier
#6 San Antonio, Danielle Robinson Oklahoma
#7 Tulsa Shock, Kayla Pedersen, Stanford
#8 Atlanta, Victoria Dunlap Kentucky
#9 Indiana, Jeanette Pohlen Stanford
#10 New York, Krystal Thomas Duke
#11 Washington, Jasmine Thomas Duke
#12 Seattle, Courtney Vandersloot, Gonzaga

If Liz Cambage doesn’t come over then

#1 Minnesota, Maya Moore Connecticut
#2 Tulsa, Amber Harris Xavier
#3 Chicago, Danielle Robinson Oklahoma
#4 Minnesota, Jental Lavender Ohio State
#5 Los Angeles, Ta'Shia Phillips Xavier
#6 San Antonio, Kayla Pedersen, Stanford
#7 Tulsa Shock, Jessica Breland UNC
#8 Atlanta, Victoria Dunlap Kentucky
#9 Indiana, Jeanette Pohlen Stanford
#10 New York, Krystal Thomas Duke
#11 Washington, Jasmine Thomas Duke
#12 Seattle, Courtney Vandersloot, Gonzaga



_________________
"Hallelu"
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32341



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 12:50 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
stever wrote:
Chicago needs a 4, does Harris really project as a pro power forward?...any more than say, Iciss Tillis? Wink


She's considerably better than Tillis, but I agree IMO she's probably more of a SF in the pros. And defense at either spot is a question.
SportsGuru



Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 4977



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 1:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
myrtle wrote:
stever wrote:
Chicago needs a 4, does Harris really project as a pro power forward?...any more than say, Iciss Tillis? Wink


She's considerably better than Tillis, but I agree IMO she's probably more of a SF in the pros. And defense at either spot is a question.


A trade down by Chicago for Pedersen, Dunlap or Breland?
mavcarter
#NATC


Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 5935
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 1:40 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Lol, Krystal Thomas in the first round. The kid will be lucky if she's even called in the third. A little shocked people don't have Chastity Reed going in the 2nd round.



_________________
wrote:
Or maybe said poster should quit being a nuisance when people don’t agree?
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 22478
Location: NJ


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 7:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
FIRST ROUND
1. Minnesota - M. Moore, F
2. Tulsa - L. Cambage, C
3. Chicago - A. Harris, F
4. Minnesota - J. Lavendar, C
5. Los Angeles - T. Phillips, C
6. San Antonio - D. Robinson, G
7. Tulsa - K. Pederson, F
8. Atlanta - V. Dunlap, F
9. Indiana - C. Vandersloot, G
10. New York - J. Breland, F
11. Washington - D. Adams, F
12. Seattle - J. Pohlen, G

SECOND ROUND
13. Minnesota - J. Thomas, G
14. Minnesota - C. Swords, C
15. Chicago - D. Evans, G
16. Connecticut - I. Ibekwe, F
17. Chicago - K. Alexander, G
18. Atlanta - A. Jaeschke, C
19. Phoenix - I. Lucas, G
20. San Antonio - A. Bjorkland, G
21. Tulsa - C. DeGraffenreid, G
22. New York - K. Thomas, C
23. Washington - S. Colson, G
24. Seattle - L. Tomlinson, F/C



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32341



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 7:14 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
Why does everyone seem to think Atlanta won't take Vandersloot? What is their weakest position....by far?
Rock Hard



Joined: 02 Aug 2010
Posts: 5401
Location: Chocolate Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 7:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
You are right again,Myrtle. Atlanta needs a high performance driver to drive that NASCAR team.



_________________
You can win, as long as you keep your head to the SKY! Be OPTIMISTIC!
GoIndeeeee



Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 1255



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 7:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
myrtle wrote:
Why does everyone seem to think Atlanta won't take Vandersloot? What is their weakest position....by far?


I hope they don't but I think you're right. If Kelly Miller is healthy they have her and Lehning. Not a pair of world beaters as it is.
SportsGuru



Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 4977



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 7:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
myrtle wrote:
Why does everyone seem to think Atlanta won't take Vandersloot? What is their weakest position....by far?


I think the Dream could draft Vandersloot or Breland.
lynxmania



Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Posts: 10697
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 7:28 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
myrtle wrote:
Why does everyone seem to think Atlanta won't take Vandersloot? What is their weakest position....by far?


Ok, I am not one who has Atlanta picking a post, as I agree they need a big upgrade at point. But one thing that sticks in my mind is that they haven't signed either Yelena or Alison back to their teams as backups. Also, I don't know but they might be missing either/or both Sancho and Erika for the Olympic qualifying tournament, but I could be completely wrong there, so maybe they want an insurance that they have someone as a post? But I could be wrong.
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 67057
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/11 8:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
myrtle wrote:
Why does everyone seem to think Atlanta won't take Vandersloot? What is their weakest position....by far?


People remember Marynell wasting last year's first round pick.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11  Next
Page 1 of 11

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin