View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
thesixthwoman
Joined: 25 Sep 2004 Posts: 6296 Location: NYC
Back to top |
Posted: 07/17/09 6:41 pm ::: WNBA in Tulsa? (Again?) |
Reply |
|
http://www.tulsaworld.com/sports/article.aspx?subjectid=226&articleid=20090717_226_0_AWNBAf704187
Quote: |
A WNBA franchise might be coming to Tulsa
By MIKE STRAIN World Sports Editor
Published: 7/17/2009 6:02 PM
Last Modified: 7/17/2009 6:35 PM
A group of investors from Oklahoma City and Tulsa are expected to have a press conference Wednesday announcing an effort to bring a team from the Women’s National Basketball Association to Tulsa, according to a source familiar with the situation.
WNBA commissioner Donna Orender is expected to attend a press conference that will reveal investors and the remaining issues they face in bringing a team to Tulsa, the source said. |
|
|
Spark4Life
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 4024
Back to top |
|
braveniler58
Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 10537 Location: Arizona
Back to top |
|
NOLAbballgirl
Joined: 21 Oct 2008 Posts: 1938 Location: New Orleans, LA
Back to top |
Posted: 07/17/09 6:55 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Any insiders? How likely is this to go down? |
|
scullyfu
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 8869 Location: Niagara Falls
Back to top |
Posted: 07/17/09 7:12 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
doubt we'll be seeing any involvement by clay bennett and his pack of homophobes.
_________________ i'll always bleed Storm green.
|
|
five_to_the_third
Joined: 24 Aug 2007 Posts: 695
Back to top |
Posted: 07/17/09 10:23 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Who has a press conference to talk about their business "issues"? Odd.
|
|
apocolocyntosis
Joined: 04 Jul 2009 Posts: 714 Location: Seattle
Back to top |
|
bullsky
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 20310
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 1:26 am ::: |
Reply |
|
The Big XII consistently leads the nation in attendence. I think this is a market worth pursuing. I wish them luck.
_________________ "Don't do something until you get it right, do it until you can't do it wrong."
- Geno Auriemma
|
|
scullyfu
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 8869 Location: Niagara Falls
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 12:58 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
scullyfu wrote: |
doubt we'll be seeing any involvement by clay bennett and his pack of homophobes. |
looks like i was wrong:
Cameron, the president and CEO of American Fidelity Assurance Co., is part of an Oklahoma City-based group
that owns the NBA’s Oklahoma City Thunder.
and does this woman even know wtf she's saying half the time?:
“If the investors choose to bring a franchise to Oklahoma I think it would be absolutely phenomenal,” said ESPN women’s basketball analyst Nancy Lieberman. “Oklahoma is passionate about sports, they are avid sports fans. I think it would be a great partnership. If the (Oklahoma City) Thunder are involved, that’s pretty good franchise right there.
_________________ i'll always bleed Storm green.
|
|
FS02
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 9699 Location: Husky (west coast) Country
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 1:11 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Homophobes and WBB DO mix, there is ample evidence of that.
I'd like to see the 11-player roster go away before expansion.
|
|
MNfan22
Joined: 20 Nov 2004 Posts: 2750
Back to top |
|
moleman
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 Posts: 38 Location: Italy
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 2:41 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
braveniler58 wrote: |
If so, then I hope it'll be a relocation not an expansion. |
Why? I think, like a fan of wnba, that the league will be more interesting if there are more clubs. In this way, there'll be more competitiveness to reach Playoffs and there'll be more games.
Are there any problems i didn't think about?
|
|
braveniler58
Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 10537 Location: Arizona
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 2:44 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
moleman wrote: |
braveniler58 wrote: |
If so, then I hope it'll be a relocation not an expansion. |
Why? I think, like a fan of wnba, that the league will be more interesting if there are more clubs. In this way, there'll be more competitiveness to reach Playoffs and there'll be more games.
Are there any problems i didn't think about? |
Because there are several teams that could fold. Detroit is the biggest issue here. Rumor out of Indiana is, if they don't win the championship this year, they're folding. Chicago always has such a small attendance, though I don't know if they're in danger of folding or not. Minnesota has been rumored as well.
I would prefer a relocation over one folding and another expansion.
_________________ Phoenix Mercury fan for life!
|
|
Olnezi
Joined: 19 Feb 2009 Posts: 334
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 2:57 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
With Minnesota, that is all it is-a rumor. Minnesota will not fold unless the TimberWolves fold. What you are hearing are people expecting the Lynx to fold because of average attendance and the non playoff factor. But the owner has committed to both the Wolves and the Lynx for the long haul.
|
|
moleman
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 Posts: 38 Location: Italy
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 3:11 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
braveniler58 wrote: |
Because there are several teams that could fold. Detroit is the biggest issue here. Rumor out of Indiana is, if they don't win the championship this year, they're folding. Chicago always has such a small attendance, though I don't know if they're in danger of folding or not. Minnesota has been rumored as well.
I would prefer a relocation over one folding and another expansion. |
When you talked about Detroit (in the previous post) i supposed you're thinking about money problems of many clubs.
If that's the situation, i agree with your opinion...but, maybe, the league has to understand if expansion could bring more money in the wnba (do you think is hard it happens?)
|
|
braveniler58
Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 10537 Location: Arizona
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 3:36 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
moleman wrote: |
braveniler58 wrote: |
Because there are several teams that could fold. Detroit is the biggest issue here. Rumor out of Indiana is, if they don't win the championship this year, they're folding. Chicago always has such a small attendance, though I don't know if they're in danger of folding or not. Minnesota has been rumored as well.
I would prefer a relocation over one folding and another expansion. |
When you talked about Detroit (in the previous post) i supposed you're thinking about money problems of many clubs.
If that's the situation, i agree with your opinion...but, maybe, the league has to understand if expansion could bring more money in the wnba (do you think is hard it happens?) |
It doesn't make a single difference if you have a new expansion, but another team folds. We've already lost Houston, who won the WNBA's first four championships. I don't want to also lose Detroit, and another three WNBA championships. I don't like Detroit, but I want them to survive. I would prefer them relocate to Tulsa than fold and a new franchise be formed.
_________________ Phoenix Mercury fan for life!
|
|
moleman
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 Posts: 38 Location: Italy
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 3:39 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
braveniler58 wrote: |
It doesn't make a single difference if you have a new expansion, but another team folds. We've already lost Houston, who won the WNBA's first four championships. I don't want to also lose Detroit, and another three WNBA championships. I don't like Detroit, but I want them to survive. I would prefer them relocate to Tulsa than fold and a new franchise be formed. |
Ok, now i understand. And i agree with you 100%
|
|
scullyfu
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 8869 Location: Niagara Falls
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 5:12 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
FS02 wrote: |
Homophobes and WBB DO mix, there is ample evidence of that.
|
have you forgotten that clayclay's pal came right out publicly and announced that 'we don't want *those* kind of women...'? that's what i'm talking about; not the negative recruiting type. this guy just flat out said 'those women' and i don't think it takes a lot of brain power to figure out what he meant.
_________________ i'll always bleed Storm green.
|
|
scullyfu
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 8869 Location: Niagara Falls
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 5:19 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
moleman wrote: |
braveniler58 wrote: |
If so, then I hope it'll be a relocation not an expansion. |
Why? I think, like a fan of wnba, that the league will be more interesting if there are more clubs. In this way, there'll be more competitiveness to reach Playoffs and there'll be more games.
Are there any problems i didn't think about? |
because the more teams you add, the more you dilute the talent pool. the current talent pool is not deep enough that it can stand diluting.
_________________ i'll always bleed Storm green.
|
|
TSU
Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 464
Back to top |
|
bullsky
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 20310
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 6:18 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
scullyfu wrote: |
moleman wrote: |
braveniler58 wrote: |
If so, then I hope it'll be a relocation not an expansion. |
Why? I think, like a fan of wnba, that the league will be more interesting if there are more clubs. In this way, there'll be more competitiveness to reach Playoffs and there'll be more games.
Are there any problems i didn't think about? |
because the more teams you add, the more you dilute the talent pool. the current talent pool is not deep enough that it can stand diluting. |
That's an overrated argument.
_________________ "Don't do something until you get it right, do it until you can't do it wrong."
- Geno Auriemma
|
|
abontorab9
Joined: 19 Jun 2008 Posts: 6207 Location: Connecticut
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 6:29 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I also think that there would probably be enough talent for a 14 team league.
Fifteen would definitely be too many, but 14 is good, I believe.
Think about last season. Who was untalented? The Mystics, basically.
Hell, the Dream were talented, they just had a moronic coach.
|
|
bullsky
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 20310
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 6:39 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
nickv1025 wrote: |
I also think that there would probably be enough talent for a 14 team league.
Fifteen would definitely be too many, but 14 is good, I believe.
Think about last season. Who was untalented? The Mystics, basically.
Hell, the Dream were talented, they just had a moronic coach. |
I think the WNBA can honestly be good with 16 teams. It's just sometimes the GMs are dumb, thus keeping players like Wyckoff, Robinson and Spencer around...
_________________ "Don't do something until you get it right, do it until you can't do it wrong."
- Geno Auriemma
|
|
bballfan2005
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 25315 Location: Somewhere here and there
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 6:44 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
bullsky wrote: |
I think the WNBA can honestly be good with 16 teams. It's just sometimes the GMs are dumb, thus keeping players like Wyckoff, Robinson and Spencer around... |
That's the main issue--individual GMs. Some teams look as though they can support 12 or more players while others look like they can only support six. That's not going to change through expansion, especially if teams can protect more than two players. The only way to see if the league truly could support more than 14 teams is by redistributing the talent. This way, LA doesn't have five Beijing Olympians while NY has at least one.
_________________ Avatar: The King has his ring!
Mathies to LA 2013
|
|
FS02
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 9699 Location: Husky (west coast) Country
Back to top |
Posted: 07/18/09 6:52 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I don't think every team needs 5 or 6 stars. 3 will suffice. If you fill in the rest of the roster intelligently, and have a good coaching staff, you've got a good team. So yeah, I think the current pool could support at least 14-16 teams.
|
|
|
|