| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 18815
Back to top |
 Posted: 10/16/15 4:23 pm ::: |
Reply  |
|
| kojthiabkuv wrote: |
| dtsnms wrote: |
| kojthiabkuv wrote: |
| great interview but i just hear her trying to do damage control. |
I can see how one can get that, but I think she is just expounding on her original comments that were misconstrued in her opinion.
And thanks for the compliment! |
I just find it interesting how after the first initial interview with Kate- how a lot of what Sheryl said was supposedly misconstrued. how can one person have an interview with someone and majority of what is said is interpreted wrong..? I know a lot of what Sheryl is saying is true and I agree with her (and Kate for the most part)- but I just feel like she's trying to do damage control. But i always enjoy your podcast and thought it was very insightful! |
The interview was NOT with Kate. It was with Adena Andrews, the editor of ESPNw. Kate then took that interview where Sheryl gave OPINIONS, and wrote a piece that said she was WRONG and half-baked.
How can an OPINION be wrong? You can disagree, but it's not a fact, it's not right or wrong. That's the inherent flaw with the whole tone of Kate Fagan's piece.
|
|
kojthiabkuv
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 1860
Back to top |
| Posted: 10/16/15 5:27 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| dtsnms wrote: |
| kojthiabkuv wrote: |
| dtsnms wrote: |
| kojthiabkuv wrote: |
| great interview but i just hear her trying to do damage control. |
I can see how one can get that, but I think she is just expounding on her original comments that were misconstrued in her opinion.
And thanks for the compliment! |
I just find it interesting how after the first initial interview with Kate- how a lot of what Sheryl said was supposedly misconstrued. how can one person have an interview with someone and majority of what is said is interpreted wrong..? I know a lot of what Sheryl is saying is true and I agree with her (and Kate for the most part)- but I just feel like she's trying to do damage control. But i always enjoy your podcast and thought it was very insightful! |
The interview was NOT with Kate. It was with Adena Andrews, the editor of ESPNw. Kate then took that interview where Sheryl gave OPINIONS, and wrote a piece that said she was WRONG and half-baked.
How can an OPINION be wrong? You can disagree, but it's not a fact, it's not right or wrong. That's the inherent flaw with the whole tone of Kate Fagan's piece. |
Well then Kate is one silly writer!
|
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 18815
Back to top |
| Posted: 10/16/15 7:10 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| pilight wrote: |
| Five HOFers on The Comets? I love those girls, but there are really only four HOF players there (Arcain, Cooper, Swoopes, Thompson). |
Probably correct, but had she lived to be PG on these teams Kim could've been a WBHOF candidate.
|
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 18815
Back to top |
| Posted: 10/16/15 7:11 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| kojthiabkuv wrote: |
| dtsnms wrote: |
| kojthiabkuv wrote: |
| dtsnms wrote: |
| kojthiabkuv wrote: |
| great interview but i just hear her trying to do damage control. |
I can see how one can get that, but I think she is just expounding on her original comments that were misconstrued in her opinion.
And thanks for the compliment! |
I just find it interesting how after the first initial interview with Kate- how a lot of what Sheryl said was supposedly misconstrued. how can one person have an interview with someone and majority of what is said is interpreted wrong..? I know a lot of what Sheryl is saying is true and I agree with her (and Kate for the most part)- but I just feel like she's trying to do damage control. But i always enjoy your podcast and thought it was very insightful! |
The interview was NOT with Kate. It was with Adena Andrews, the editor of ESPNw. Kate then took that interview where Sheryl gave OPINIONS, and wrote a piece that said she was WRONG and half-baked.
How can an OPINION be wrong? You can disagree, but it's not a fact, it's not right or wrong. That's the inherent flaw with the whole tone of Kate Fagan's piece. |
Well then Kate is one silly writer! |
Ask PUMatty his opinion...
|
|
|
|
