RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

New York Liberty 2017
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 78, 79, 80  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sigur3



Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 6191
Location: Chicago-ish


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 12:49 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Happycappie25 wrote:
sigur3 wrote:
Rodgers and Allen re-sign


Allen as a reserved if she didn't come over the team would be in 911 danger so knew that was a done deal

And as I said...things are different in NY due to how bad things happened when they brought back christon to promote the team then traded her...it was a near revolt and was a factor in costing Blaze her job despite a very strong 2010 season...they were NOT making the same mistake twice IMHO...also why I think those pining for Boyd to be moved are out of luck as well

I think IF there's a deal it's Zellous...Stokes a possibility but NEVER MOVE A POST ENTERING THEIR THIRD YEAR...that's playing with fire.


Especially when that post has already proven to be one of the league's best defensive players in her first and second years.


Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 24416
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 1:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

sigur3 wrote:
Especially when that post has already proven to be one of the league's best defensive players in her first and second years.

And she facilitates their star playing to her optimum level. The Libs really shouldn't be giving up Stokes in any deal unless they're getting a legitimate star back. And even then, unless it's a star that plays center, I'd think really hard.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 1:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

NYL_WNBA_FAN wrote:
Libs re-sign Sugar and Allen. LFO had high praise for Sugar's work ethic and work for the organization in the community. Sounds like she ain't going anywhere. And he said he looked forward to a whole season of Allen. Hmmm.


If you're right, if Sugar Rodgers isn't going to be traded, is Bill Laimbeer envisioning Rebecca Allen as the starter at SF and playing 25+ minutes per game?

Without Rodgers in a trade--and I'm not eager to see Rodgers sent elsewhere--it's hard for me to imagine any other trade that's going to bring New York a significant starter at SF. And I don't want to see the Liberty go with a three-guard approach this season.

But Bill Laimbeer's trades have pleasantly surprised me many times, so perhaps one more is coming.



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63976



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 1:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Burdick & Barbee signings officially announced, both training camp contracts.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 6831



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 2:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

You know what, maybe this will be enough? We've been close the two years until the playoffs, and we've been hit with injuries entering the playoffs the last two seasons. Internal development and good luck with health might be enough.

Prince/Boyd/Hartley
Rodgers/Wright
Allen/Zellous
Charles/Zahui B./Burdick
Stokes/Vaughn

And we still have Schimmel, Barbee and the #14 pick so I wouldn't relax in camp if I was Burdick or Hartley.

The only question mark I have now is why did we have to core Wright? Is there something brewing there?


Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 24416
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 3:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
The only question mark I have now is why did we have to core Wright? Is there something brewing there?

Laimbeer has always been a classic 'asset manager'. From things like drafting Latta when he didn't really want her because he knew there'd be trade options with her later on, to last year when Schimmel and Zahui B presented themselves at low costs. So they had a core spot they didn't need for anyone else, the cap room to use it, and a player they could theoretically lose for nothing if she decided she wanted to leave. So he used it to make sure. I'm not convinced there's any more to it than that.

(and yes, I know Laimbeer's technically not the GM any more, but I bet he's still essentially in control (or heavily influential) on stuff like that)



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63976



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 3:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

With Barbee, technically she was drafted, so don't they sign a rookie contract and not a training camp contract? I know it's not likely she'll make the cut, but it'd still be nice to know the proper syntax.

Quote:
Liberty announced that 2016 3rd Round draft pick guard Shacobia Barbee and free agent forward Cierra Burdick have signed training camp contracts.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned


Last edited by Shades on 02/07/17 3:28 pm; edited 1 time in total
cappa23MVP



Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 411



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 3:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:
The only question mark I have now is why did we have to core Wright? Is there something brewing there?

Laimbeer has always been a classic 'asset manager'. From things like drafting Latta when he didn't really want her because he knew there'd be trade options with her later on, to last year when Schimmel and Zahui B presented themselves at low costs. So they had a core spot they didn't need for anyone else, the cap room to use it, and a player they could theoretically lose for nothing if she decided she wanted to leave. So he used it to make sure. I'm not convinced there's any more to it than that.

(and yes, I know Laimbeer's technically not the GM any more, but I bet he's still essentially in control (or heavily influential) on stuff like that)


Haven't you heard, Bill's only in charge of the successful moves. Zeke is in charge of all others...lol 😂😱



_________________
TINA CHARLES IS A MOTHERFUKIN BOSS.
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 3:43 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
You know what, maybe this will be enough? We've been close the two years until the playoffs, and we've been hit with injuries entering the playoffs the last two seasons. Internal development and good luck with health might be enough.

Prince/Boyd/Hartley
Rodgers/Wright
Allen/Zellous
Charles/Zahui B./Burdick
Stokes/Vaughn

And we still have Schimmel, Barbee and the #14 pick so I wouldn't relax in camp if I was Burdick or Hartley.

The only question mark I have now is why did we have to core Wright? Is there something brewing there?


Even had there been no late-season injuries in 2015 or 2016, I don't believe either of those two Liberty teams was a genuine championship contender. And I don't believe we are with this current 2017 roster. It's a very good squad and I will support them passionately, but I don't see this roster winning a title.



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
Happycappie25



Joined: 07 Feb 2006
Posts: 4174
Location: QUEENS!!!!


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 3:44 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

cappa23MVP wrote:
Richyyy wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:
The only question mark I have now is why did we have to core Wright? Is there something brewing there?

Laimbeer has always been a classic 'asset manager'. From things like drafting Latta when he didn't really want her because he knew there'd be trade options with her later on, to last year when Schimmel and Zahui B presented themselves at low costs. So they had a core spot they didn't need for anyone else, the cap room to use it, and a player they could theoretically lose for nothing if she decided she wanted to leave. So he used it to make sure. I'm not convinced there's any more to it than that.

(and yes, I know Laimbeer's technically not the GM any more, but I bet he's still essentially in control (or heavily influential) on stuff like that)


And Swin Cash for everything in between LOL I actually agree with that at least on how fans treat it Razz

Haven't you heard, Bill's only in charge of the successful moves. Zeke is in charge of all others...lol 😂😱



_________________
"Leave it to the NCAA women's basketball committee to turn a glass slipper into glass ceiling" Graham Hays
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 22482
Location: NJ


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 6:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

At this point it's Allen & Zellous at SF. Prince likely starting at PG.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63976



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 6:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

toad455 wrote:
At this point it's Allen & Zellous at SF. Prince likely starting at PG.


Wright is averaging more assists overseas than her teammate Chelsea Gray who plays PG... just saying. Maybe she's embracing this PG thing since discovering she's a natural born leader.




_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 6831



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 9:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I want Wright to stay I/m still suspicious that she might want to go or get traded to LA. (The fact that she is playing with Gray right now, the player she would back up in LA, LA needs a back up PG, and she would be reunited with an old coach isn't making me any less suspicious.)

Wright and #14 to LA for #4?

If LA is in win now mode I could see them consider it. NY could have some interesting choices at #4.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63976



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 9:28 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Oh, you're liking that #4 spot after my discussion of that pick Smile



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 6831



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/07/17 9:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
Oh, you're liking that #4 spot after my discussion of that pick Smile


I have been thinking that the Liberty would want to get back into the first round for a while now. Swords for #6 was what I thought was going to do it, until we sent it to Washington for two decent bench depth assets.

And while I think it is possible because Dallas needs a post, I think taking Coates over Deshields, Mitchell (assuming they both come out) and Plum is a risky proposition. But hey if it happens and we have #4 that would be great.

It was more your pointing out that Gray and Wright play for the same team that added to my Wright to LA theory. Combine that with Agler not loving rookies and this trade seems possible.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63976



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/08/17 12:46 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Overseas Liberty player of the week: Amanda Zahui
http://liberty.wnba.com/news/liberty-international-update-2-7/



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 14097



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/17 10:00 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Tell you this, the change in the WNBA landscape may help the Libs in some ways. LA is going to have a very different look without Toliver. I like Gray, but losing a player who was a "big 3" offensive player who spaced the floor and had a terrific A/TO is still going to weaken them. On paper, DC looks like they have some pieces to potentially be there at the end, if they can figure the defensive part out and supplement their depth.

But where I hated NY's matchups with LA, I don't hate them as much against DC. I mean, I don't love them either, lol. But I feel there may be some parts of DC that we can exploit defensively. And where you're looking at some tremendous 3 point shooting on the Mystics, if the Libs are intent on a Piph/Rodgers backcourt, the Libs will have two of the better 3 ball shooters in Sugar and Allen along with Piph, Charles and Hartley supplementing that.

I also like the fact that adding Vaughn gives another post player with solid 15-17 foot range. Not a high-profile trade, but I think it makes the Libs significantly more balanced offensively. I never could understand why Kia requested a trade from NY the first time around, as I felt that Laimbeer could do a lot with a big-bodied post who can run. Kia has never really been coached by someone whose philosophy matched her skills. I wouldn't be shocked if Hartley's percentages exceed her career numbers either, as I think the Libs' system fits her game and Charles' presence will likely lead to more open shots.

I thought when Wright was cored that it was a given that Wright would be the point guard. But if Sugar is staying, then I'd have to think Piph and Rodgers will play together, as nothing else makes any sense. The moves they are making...and Katie Smith's commentary about them...clearly indicate they are looking to spread the floor more in order to get Charles space to do work. The only way you can do that is to have multiple scorers on the floor together. It does, however, make me wonder what their plans are for Wright.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 7365
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/17 11:20 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Prince is looking better over in Russia. I watched a couple of recent games, and you're seeing those dipsy-do, one-on-one moves that make her special. She's not shooting the ball well from deep, but that comes and goes. The important thing is that Prince is moving confidently. Her minutes are up too, so the coaching staff must be happier with her performance.

Right now, Wright projects as the backup small forward. I keep seeing people list Zellous as the backup 3, but they must be living in the past and think we're Indiana. Razz Wright started at SF for the first five games of 2016. Based on the current roster, it's her and Allen at SF and then we debate who is the starter. Of course, if the right deal comes along...



_________________
You can always do something else.
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 22482
Location: NJ


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/17 11:36 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I'm fine with Wright at SF. I believe she played SF with Seattle, too. Unless another trade happens, I guess our starters will be Prince, Rodgers, Wright, Charles & Vaughn. Wright wouldn't need to score much with that lineup and would mostly be there for defensive purposes.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 14097



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/17 12:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Main concern about Wright at SF is that Bill mentioned more than once earlier last season that she couldn't play a lot of consecutive minutes due to physical limitations. I could be wrong, but if they've never shown an inclination to use Piph, Sugar and Wright together...even when it would have benefited them offensively...then why are they going to do it now? Even in the playoff game against Phoenix, Piph played 25 minutes, and I still don't think this group of 3 was used together at all. 2015 game 3 vs. Indy was also an opportunity screaming for us to use that group. Even if Wright played point on offense and forward on defense. And they either didn't play together at all, or for a very limited time.

I'm not even saying I agree, disagree or whatever, personally. I just don't see them going to a lineup they've had no inclination of using even when they've needed it during the last two seasons. Obviously last year, the opportunity wasn't there until the playoff game. But in a one-and-done game they STILL didn't use it much, if at all.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 22482
Location: NJ


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/17 1:23 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

as of right now, we might see some interesting combos for spots 1-2-3. Wright-Prince-Rodgers, Boyd-Prince-Allen, Boyd-Rodgers-Zellous, Hartley-Rodgers-Allen. Who knows at this point what's going to work.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63976



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/17 1:33 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I'm a little skeptical that Hartley is the "upgrade" at PG Laimbeer was looking for.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 7365
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/17 1:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

If Wright is the backup SF, then the minutes limit becomes irrelevant. I think Allen is the starter unless they make a deal. It's time to move on. We said two years ago that the Liberty were bringing in some veterans to be respectable now and some young players to compete later. Two years have passed -- later is now. Allen has the length and athletic ability to be a prototypical SF. It now looks as if she's developed enough offensive skill to take the next step. Remember, in Australia Allen functioned as a defensive specialist. Maybe she struggled a bit with the Liberty defensive system, but she can defend individually. If Bec gets to training camp this year, that should be a big help. My only concern is that her Slovakian team plays in 3 leagues and there may be a separate tournament for each.



_________________
You can always do something else.
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 22482
Location: NJ


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/17 1:43 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
I'm a little skeptical that Hartley is the "upgrade" at PG Laimbeer was looking for.


she's not. she's insurance and replaces Schimmel. When Wright was out(injured), it was a hot mess for anyone to run PG besides Boyd.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/17 2:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

root_thing wrote:
If Wright is the backup SF, then the minutes limit becomes irrelevant. I think Allen is the starter unless they make a deal. It's time to move on. We said two years ago that the Liberty were bringing in some veterans to be respectable now and some young players to compete later. Two years have passed -- later is now. Allen has the length and athletic ability to be a prototypical SF. It now looks as if she's developed enough offensive skill to take the next step. Remember, in Australia Allen functioned as a defensive specialist. Maybe she struggled a bit with the Liberty defensive system, but she can defend individually. If Bec gets to training camp this year, that should be a big help. My only concern is that her Slovakian team plays in 3 leagues and there may be a separate tournament for each.


I agree.

Having Wright on the team this year will be valuable for her leadership, especially with Cash no longer in uniform. But I don't want to see Wright, Zellous, or any other guard starting at SF. If a major trade for a SF isn't possible, then I'm hoping for a lesser trade for someone who can back up Allen. (Unless Burdick is good enough to fill that role.)

I don't believe the formula of Charles, Vaughn or Stokes, and three of our many guards is a winning formula.



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 78, 79, 80  Next
Page 17 of 80

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin