RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Liberty @ Dream - 7/02/17
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who will win this game?
Liberty
73%
 73%  [ 11 ]
Dream
26%
 26%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 15

Author Message
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 8193



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 6:44 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GlennMacGrady wrote:
zune69 wrote:
Liberty played better without Vaughn/Prince.Both players should be coming off the bench.


I just logged into this thread to post exactly that thought.


Big Bill's starting lineup has killed the Liberty.


toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 22482
Location: NJ


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 6:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Sugar & Prince on the court together needs to happen from here on out. No double teaming.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 22482
Location: NJ


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 7:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Liberty only played well in the second half. They need to get their act together, we're falling fast.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 14097



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 7:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Plus side is with Sugar out there we are clearly faster. Her presence also opens the floor for everyone else. I'm not down with blaming the slide on the returns of Piph and Kia. In some of those wins Stokes was a dominant force. Now she's a non-factor again. To lose Sugar and Boyd, that's also a large portion of our speed. Plodding our way through these last two games was how it went till Sugar gave us life.

If we can ever get Piph, Sugar and Z out there simultaneously I think our offense is pretty potent. But now we are trending toward Stokes playing fewer minutes. While it's understandable, as Kiah is not earning minutes, it leaves our paint defense ordinary and our rebounding just decent. And you know what we are if our paint performance is ordinary? We're a .500 team in that scenario, folks, maybe 18 or 19 wins. That's it. It's not a complicated formula. We regularly struggle to rebound and we regularly struggle to defend the paint. When you struggle to do what you're built on, well then what? And even if we weren't built from the paint out, you need rim protectors. And if Stokes isn't that player this year, well let's be honest. We don't have another one.

In the meantime, we'll outscore some teams. And on paper we match up well to Indy and Chicago, neither of whom we've played yet. But I'm not optimistic from the defensive side though, overall. Disappointing because I figured Kiah had turned the corner in June. It's just so hard to explain the peaks and valleys in her performance. You gotta wonder if something else is physically not right with her or something. Or is it just recurrence of the early season stuff? Who knows?



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 7365
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 7:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Tina was ridiculously bad in the first half, throwing all kinds of dumb passes and settling for long jump shots. When Charles misses jump shots, it's almost always a one and done. When NY made their first couple of comeback attempts, Tina stopped the momentum by missing long shots. She has no sense of situational play. In her last three games, it's been two bad first halves and one entire bad game. That explains a lot of the problem.

On the bright side, NY is only one game away from skipping over the pack for 10th place. TANK! Laughing



_________________
You can always do something else.
Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 7:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

NYL_WNBA_FAN wrote:
Plus side is with Sugar out there we are clearly faster. Her presence also opens the floor for everyone else. I'm not down with blaming the slide on the returns of Piph and Kia. In some of those wins Stokes was a dominant force. Now she's a non-factor again. To lose Sugar and Boyd, that's also a large portion of our speed. Plodding our way through these last two games was how it went till Sugar gave us life.

If we can ever get Piph, Sugar and Z out there simultaneously I think our offense is pretty potent. But now we are trending toward Stokes playing fewer minutes. While it's understandable, as Kiah is not earning minutes, it leaves our paint defense ordinary and our rebounding just decent. And you know what we are if our paint performance is ordinary? We're a .500 team in that scenario, folks, maybe 18 or 19 wins. That's it. It's not a complicated formula. We regularly struggle to rebound and we regularly struggle to defend the paint. When you struggle to do what you're built on, well then what? And even if we weren't built from the paint out, you need rim protectors. And if Stokes isn't that player this year, well let's be honest. We don't have another one.

In the meantime, we'll outscore some teams. And on paper we match up well to Indy and Chicago, neither of whom we've played yet. But I'm not optimistic from the defensive side though, overall. Disappointing because I figured Kiah had turned the corner in June. It's just so hard to explain the peaks and valleys in her performance. You gotta wonder if something else is physically not right with her or something. Or is it just recurrence of the early season stuff? Who knows?


I agree with all your analysis here. Where I especially agree is on the continuing disaster of our team's rim protection. If Stokes is playing badly, or if Stokes is on the bench, we have none. There have been SO many times in recent games where opposing players have gotten past their defenders and they're home free.



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.


Last edited by Bob Lamm on 07/02/17 8:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 14097



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 7:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Well, to add to the post by Root I thought her overall intensity just didn't amp up until Sugar gave the team a jolt. No pun intended. First play of the third quarter bounce pass from Z to where she expects Tina to be. She gets beat to the spot and reaches awkwardly with one hand. Turnover.

A short time later she lobs an inexplicable and uncatchable high-low pass up near the ceiling to Vaughn, who was surrounded by two people. Turnover.

Once Sugar got some run, Tina was passing and the offense was flowing. But 10 minutes of solid mental play out of the last 80 from our "leader" is nowhere near good enough. And I know she's asked to do a lot and I know she plays a ton of minutes. But that's the price of being the leader. And right now she isn't getting it done, from a mental/IQ standpoint. Not acceptable.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
sigur3



Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 6191
Location: Chicago-ish


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 8:01 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

root_thing wrote:

On the bright side, NY is only one game away from skipping over the pack for 10th place. TANK! Laughing


You wouldn't dare.


LibFan25



Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 895
Location: NY


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 8:02 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

root_thing wrote:
Tina was ridiculously bad in the first half, throwing all kinds of dumb passes and settling for long jump shots. When Charles misses jump shots, it's almost always a one and done. When NY made their first couple of comeback attempts, Tina stopped the momentum by missing long shots. She has no sense of situational play. In her last three games, it's been two bad first halves and one entire bad game. That explains a lot of the problem.

On the bright side, NY is only one game away from skipping over the pack for 10th place. TANK! Laughing



lol! that's why im not even mad or frustrated anymore root, this team aint goin nowhere. just to damn inconsistent, coaching and injuries. ofcourse we will beat up on the Indiana's, Chicago's, and San Antonio's of world but the real teams? not even close to that level.


NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 14097



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 8:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

What's very disappointing is we have the talent to be. Sad



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 22482
Location: NJ


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 8:43 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Even playing poorly, I can't see us slipping below 8th and having teams like Indiana & Dallas both making the play-offs. We'll find our rhythm again. It would also be nice if Stokes showed up. Seems like once Vaughn came back, Stokes' A game went away.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63976



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 9:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

toad455 wrote:
Even playing poorly, I can't see us slipping below 8th and having teams like Indiana & Dallas both making the play-offs. We'll find our rhythm again. It would also be nice if Stokes showed up. Seems like once Vaughn came back, Stokes' A game went away.


Indiana is never in the lottery. The last one (going by memory) was Catch?
I guess they kinda deserve Wilson if they're in it.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 67162
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 9:14 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
toad455 wrote:
Even playing poorly, I can't see us slipping below 8th and having teams like Indiana & Dallas both making the play-offs. We'll find our rhythm again. It would also be nice if Stokes showed up. Seems like once Vaughn came back, Stokes' A game went away.


Indiana is never in the lottery. The last one (going by memory) was Catch?
I guess they kinda deserve Wilson if they're in it.


The last time the Fever missed the playoffs was 2004. They got the #2 pick in the lottery and selected Tan White.



_________________
The truth is like poetry

Most people hate poetry
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63976



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 9:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Tan White has to be one of your more forgettable #2 picks.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 10911



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/02/17 9:17 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

sigur3 wrote:
root_thing wrote:

On the bright side, NY is only one game away from skipping over the pack for 10th place. TANK! Laughing


You wouldn't dare.


WHO's tanking now???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNF1Rh1RQFo


This loss will pay off
next season
Bet your bottom dollar
That next season
There'll be fun!

Just thinkin' about
next season
Clears away the cobwebs,
And the sorrow
'Til there's none!

When I'm stuck with a team
That's weak,
And losing,
I just stick out my chin
And Grin,
And Say,
Oh

This loss will pay off
next season
So ya gotta hang on
'Til next season
Come what may

next April!
next season!
I love ya
next season!

You're only
A tank
Away!

Oh Aja!
O Kelsey!
We'll draft ya
next April!

You're only
A tank
Away!


snlMINAJ



Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 1237



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/03/17 4:46 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

is stokes hurt? is she just not getting time because her play isn't good?

i cant understand why she played 7 minutes and none in second half. furthermore, it looks like AZB is strictly tinas backup, but why not play a 3-post rotation of kia kiah and tina, regardless of which 2 start?


LibFan25



Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 895
Location: NY


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/03/17 5:39 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

snlMINAJ wrote:
is stokes hurt? is she just not getting time because her play isn't good?

i cant understand why she played 7 minutes and none in second half. furthermore, it looks like AZB is strictly tinas backup, but why not play a 3-post rotation of kia kiah and tina, regardless of which 2 start?



Because Bill doesn't know what the hell he's doing lol

Im ready for a new coach to be honest with you


Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18076
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/03/17 6:33 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

If Tina could remember she's a post player before the fourth quarter of games that would be greaaaaaaaaaaat.



_________________
"We all have a platform. We all have a voice & they all hold weight. Silence is a luxury."
Ay Mate



Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 1280



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/03/17 6:43 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Queenie wrote:
If Tina could remember she's a post player before the fourth quarter of games that would be greaaaaaaaaaaat.


She's still a great player, and I was angry when she bailed on the CT Sun. But now that we have Jonquel Jones, whom I think has a more well rounded game and WILL be a better player by the time her 4 year rookie deal is up then Charles was, I don't miss Miss Diva Charles so much anymore. The Liberty can keep her. Not to mention, we got Alyssa Thomas out of the deal as well. And since Charles plays the 4, as does Thomas this season, I'd say Thomas is outplaying Charles too.


NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 14097



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/03/17 9:47 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

It's pointless to talk about the lottery because the Liberty aren't going to be there unless they have more injuries. Seems like Tina becomes much more of a passer when Sugar's presence spreads the floor. It's also easier for her to score inside. Offensively we'll be fine if we can keep what he have healthy. Defense is anyone's guess.

Listening to Bill in the post game interviews of late, he seems to feel that execution solves everything. I don't agree. It solves some things but teams like Atlanta and CT (athletic teams with midrange elevators like Sykes and Williams) have confidence against us to hit tough shots because they know we don't have the defensive talent to contest them. Looking at Stokes, she missed 8 games last year where we were awful defensively. This year when she's a non-factor we tend to be bad or average at best defensively. It's not a small sample size anymore. It's 22 games going back to last year. Even worse, the rebounding isn't there consistently either.



_________________
The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 10911



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/03/17 9:52 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

NY lost by 9. Dantas has been bricking 3's all season long, and before yesterday was at 16%. It made perfect sense to just leave her to brick. Except she made 3 in row. Even the best game plan can be killed by randomness. NY fans might be over thinking this.


root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 7365
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/03/17 10:31 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

As I've been saying all along, Laimbeer is trying to figure it out. They lost three starters, and even though two were faux starters, it still changes the rotations. On top of that, I think he finally came to the realization that you can't win championships anymore playing 2000's grind-it-out basketball. So, he's trying to find some other way of playing. Then, throw in some real or self-inflicted problems with the young players, and now he really has a giant puzzle to solve. That four-game winning streak was a mirage. He was just piecing it together while Prince and Vaughn were away. Three of those games took advantage of Stokes pushing people around, but obviously opposing coaches were going to adjust. So, now Laimbeer is back to square one. The new stuff isn't working and the old stuff isn't working. The Liberty are now 7th in defensive rating and 9th in offense. That's probably not a lottery team, but it's bottom playoff with the trend going downward. I said after the 2014 season that Laimbeer should hire a lifer-type coach who knows everything about Xs and Os. I still think that's the case. He's a good leader in the sense that he communicates well and his players seem to like him. They play hard for him. I just don't think Bill is up to snuff when it comes to the Xs and Os, and it doesn't seem like Katie and Herb are helping either.


Ay Mate wrote:

She's still a great player, and I was angry when she bailed on the CT Sun. But now that we have Jonquel Jones, whom I think has a more well rounded game and WILL be a better player by the time her 4 year rookie deal is up then Charles was, I don't miss Miss Diva Charles so much anymore. The Liberty can keep her. Not to mention, we got Alyssa Thomas out of the deal as well. And since Charles plays the 4, as does Thomas this season, I'd say Thomas is outplaying Charles too.

You should have stopped at Jones. The idea that Thomas is even comparable to Charles is laughable. I've always been a fan of Alyssa's going back to her Maryland days, but there is no way she can carry the load that Tina has to shoulder. What would happen to Alyssa Thomas if she were constantly double and triple teamed? What would happen to her if she was the focus of every opponent's game plan? Thomas would get erased, she would disappear. Tina with all her flaws continues to fight through the attention and perform at a high level on most nights.



_________________
You can always do something else.
snlMINAJ



Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 1237



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/03/17 12:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

i think someone like stokes needs PT to flourish. 3-5 any given quarter does nothing. when she has played good, and NY has played good, she is on the floor for extended PT.

ugh i totally wish we had swords still instead of vaughn.


Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 10911



Back to top
PostPosted: 07/03/17 12:25 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

snlMINAJ wrote:
i think someone like stokes needs PT to flourish. 3-5 any given quarter does nothing. when she has played good, and NY has played good, she is on the floor for extended PT.

ugh i totally wish we had swords still instead of vaughn.



Liberty won that trade for sure. Seattle would be better off with Vaughn and Hartley, while Swords was much more effective for NY. (I'd still do it if I was NY, in spite of that, but not Seattle.)


Bob Lamm



Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 5065
Location: New York City


Back to top
PostPosted: 07/03/17 1:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Made a comment here but have moved it to the New York Liberty page.



_________________
Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin