| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bballjunkee212
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 1906
Back to top |
 Posted: 03/13/05 3:26 pm ::: OT: GT v. Duke men |
Reply  |
|
| GT's coach doesn't dare say it, so I will: The refs read the newspapers. They know who is supposed to win.
_________________
~Bill
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66905
Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/13/05 4:02 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| I didn't see it. What happened?
_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
ucbart
Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 2815
Location: New York
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/13/05 4:29 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
So, GaTech caught up to Duke and was down one with about 25 seconds to go. Duke is trying to inbound the ball and GTis pressing. Redick grabs the jersey of the GT player and escapes his man. The GT kid never even laid as much as a finger on Redick. However, the GT player gets called for a foul, Redick doesn't miss FT's and puts Duke up 3.
Even Dukie V said it was a bad call, and that if anything it was a Princess JJ. Man, I hate that kid.
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18371
Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/13/05 6:37 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| While it was a bad call (in an otherwise well-officiated game), the notion that it is part of a larger conspiracy...well, see the Poop Sheet's investigation.
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18371
Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/13/05 6:41 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Bball, your comment about the papers is laughable. This was in DC. The local papers have more allegiance to Maryland than to Duke...and the anti-Duke crap that comes from College Park is well-documented.
Incidentally, I was curious about the "evidence" for your comment, or if you were just repeating lore...
|
|
bballjunkee212
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 1906
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/13/05 6:45 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
So where were the zebras from? I don't have any "evidence" for my comment, apart from the phantom foul against Reddick which was called, and the over the back foul Williams committed on his tip-in which was not called but obvious on the above-the-rim replay. My comment is just something a lot of high school fans say here in Illinois when they think a team is getting jobbed.
| CamrnCrz1974 wrote: |
Bball, your comment about the papers is laughable. This was in DC. The local papers have more allegiance to Maryland than to Duke...and the anti-Duke crap that comes from College Park is well-documented.
Incidentally, I was curious about the "evidence" for your comment, or if you were just repeating lore... |
_________________
~Bill
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18371
Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/13/05 6:51 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| Quote: |
| Williams committed on his tip-in which was not called but obvious on the above-the-rim replay. |
Schensher wrapped his hands behind him around Shelden's back and waist...squeezing him from behind.
| Quote: |
| My comment is just something a lot of high school fans say here in Illinois when they think a team is getting jobbed. |
High school fans in Illinois blame a Duke bias in officiating? Wow, that is power!
| Quote: |
| I don't have any "evidence" for my comment |
I didn't think so.
You can always point to a few bad calls in a game. Look at Duke-UNC...May bear hugs Shelden from behind, and it is called a jump ball.
Sounds like a little bit of Terping on your part...
|
|
|
|
