| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 18815
Back to top |
 Posted: 03/07/05 3:28 pm ::: Stanford #1 in AP Poll |
Reply  |
|
Guess that answers who will be a #1 seed; even if they lost, I think they stay a #1 seed. MSU is 7th, so I don't see it.
1 Stanford 28-2 1089 2
2 LSU 29-2 1059 1
3 Tennessee 26-4 1022 5
4 North Carolina 26-3 971 4
5 Duke 28-3 909 6
6 Baylor 24-3 894 7
7 Michigan State 27-3 871 8
8 Ohio State 28-4 829 3
9 Rutgers 24-5 813 9
10 Notre Dame 26-4 730 10
11 Texas 20-7 646 11
12 Minnesota 24-6 623 15
13 Connecticut 21-7 576 14
14 Texas Tech 21-6 518 13
15 Temple 26-3 485 16
16 DePaul 25-4 426 12
17 Kansas State 21-6 402 17
18 Iowa State 22-5 327 20
19 Vanderbilt 22-7 322 18
20 North Carolina State 21-7 215 19
21 Georgia 22-9 206 21
22 Penn State 19-10 152 23
23 Boston College 19-9 91 22
24 Wis.-Green Bay Phoenix 26-3 80 _
25 TCU Lady Frogs
|
|
BBallFanCT729
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 2666
Location: UConn Territory
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/07/05 3:55 pm ::: Re: Stanford #1 in AP Poll |
Reply |
|
| A team that has gotten it's act together recently is Texas. They seem to be in much better shape than when UConn played them in January. Whoever wins tonight's ACC Championship will be the last #1 seed, along with Stanford, Tennessee, and LSU. It's a shame, really, because even if MSU destroys Minnesota, they won't get a #1 seed.
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66903
Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/07/05 4:22 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| The polls have absolutely no bearing on seeding. In 1998 La Tech was #4 in the polls and got a 3 seed.
_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
KatValeska
Joined: 04 Oct 2004
Posts: 1830
Location: Colorado
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/07/05 4:37 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Figures. Just when my skepticism about the Cardinal started to wane I watched a replay of yesterday's gams against USC ...
I still can't see them in the Finl Four.
|
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 18815
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/07/05 4:49 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| pilight wrote: |
| The polls have absolutely no bearing on seeding. In 1998 La Tech was #4 in the polls and got a 3 seed. |
But they don't play anyone...Pac10 may not be great, but it's not as bad as La Tech's opponents.
|
|
Keegan
Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/07/05 5:12 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| ProfessorChaos06 wrote: |
Figures. Just when my skepticism about the Cardinal started to wane I watched a replay of yesterday's gams against USC ...
I still can't see them in the Finl Four. |
Did you see LSU/Alabama? |
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66903
Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/07/05 5:18 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| Stanford is barely in the top 50 of SOS and #7 in RPI. They have only 4 wins against the RPI top 25, fewer than any of the #1 seed candidates.
_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 18815
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/07/05 5:19 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| pilight wrote: |
| Stanford is barely in the top 50 of SOS and #7 in RPI. They have only 4 wins against the RPI top 25, fewer than any of the #1 seed candidates. |
Would you like to wager a beverage at the ASG that Stanford is a #1 regardless of the outcome of the PAc10 championship pilight?
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66903
Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/07/05 5:23 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Well, no, because they might get it if they win and I think they will win.
They won't get it if they lose.
_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 18815
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/07/05 5:27 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| ok; next time.
|
|
Keegan
Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/07/05 5:31 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I don't expect Stanford to get a #1 seed but if the committee wants to give us one, I won't object  |
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 18815
Back to top |
|
Keegan
Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 6861
Location: The Cathedral of Snark
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/07/05 5:37 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| The committee supposedly doesn't pay attention to polls. I guess we'll see whether they stick to that or not. I think we deserve a high #2. |
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 18815
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/08/05 10:55 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Well I sure hope you're right about ignoring the polls based on the Coach's poll.
UNC jumps to #2 over LSU? C'mon!
|
|
|
|
