RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

David Beckham to play for Los Angeles Galaxy

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » Area 51
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
fancy_daniel



Joined: 12 Oct 2005
Posts: 4489
Location: Los Angeles


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 1:42 pm    ::: David Beckham to play for Los Angeles Galaxy Reply Reply with quote

Now, I have a reason to go to a soccer game. Thank god I live in L.A.

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=399465&cc=5901


PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 16359
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 1:54 pm    ::: Re: David Beckham to play for Los Angeles Galaxy Reply Reply with quote

Quote:
The Galaxy, citing industry experts, said Beckham's deal is worth more than $250 million in salary and commercial endorsements and is "thought to be the biggest in sporting history."


Shocked


baker10



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 2560
Location: California


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 2:03 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Although I liked the movie Bend It Like Beckham. I don't think much of his and spicy chicks front page highlights. More boring Tinsletown couples to come to Los Angeles for yet more scandalous tabloid stories..
I guess he belongs in LA!

I'm not much of a soccer fan either, just really tired of hearing about him!


rooky



Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 840



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 2:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I think it's great! I'll be making the trek to SoCal to see Becks!


dtsnms



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 18815



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 2:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Maybe it's time to check out a Revs game in Mass.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66922
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 2:32 pm    ::: Re: David Beckham to play for Los Angeles Galaxy Reply Reply with quote

Quote:
The Galaxy, citing industry experts, said Beckham's deal is worth more than $250 million in salary and commercial endorsements and is "thought to be the biggest in sporting history."



Let's do some math.

MLS had an averaged announced attendance of 15502 in 2006. That's about twice the WNBA's 7476. MLS plays fewer total games, so their total announced attendance of 2976423 was about 67% higher than the WNBA's 1779366.

Last summer the Washington Post reported that the WNBA has higher TV ratings than MLS:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/11/AR2006071100988.html?nav=rss_sports/index/wnba

Quote:
The WNBA's television ratings are higher than the National Hockey League's cable ratings and Major League Soccer's TV audience.


A few weeks later, MLS signed a new TV deal:

http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6360146.html

Quote:
ESPN inked a new eight-year multimedia agreement with Soccer United Marketing, the league's commercial arm, for rights to MLS. Under terms of the deal -- which industry executives in the TV-soccer community placed at some $8 million annually -- ESPN2 will air 26 regular-season matches principally in primetime on Thursdays, plus three playoff games each season. In addition, ABC will televise the season-opener, the All-Star Game and the MLS Cup final.



So, logically, we can expect the WNBA to get a similar or better deal from ESPN next year when the current contract expires, and teams will be able to offer contracts not too much less than what Beckham is getting.

Right?



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
BCBG25



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 20112
Location: Sampa


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 3:25 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

First Barry Zito, now David Beckham. Who said looks matter only in women's sports?
If anyone thinks he's being paid for his talent, think again. Beckham is mediocre at best. He's not even in the top 50 best players in the world right now. Maybe with the level of talent in the US he can have it easy, but he's been rotting on Real's bench for sometime now and he's been kicked off the English Team.
He used to be a good long passer and had some skill with free kicks, but the Galaxy is paying for his looks, his tatoos, and his anorexic wife. Unfuckingbelievable.



_________________
Kings of the World!
PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 16359
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 3:31 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

And just like Anna Kournikova, Beckham is attractive but really nothing special. I don't follow soccer, and even I know that there are far more attractive soccer players than him.


rooky



Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 840



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 3:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I love Becks cuz he' s gorgeous and has a nice a$$.


harlem_basketball



Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 2666
Location: Gee I don't know...Harlem maybe?


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 3:39 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

So, have the Galaxy watched their own sport in the last 5 years? I thought Galaxy was just a nickname. Apparently it's also a state of mind for that front office. The next time someone asks Blaze how she keeps her job, she should just point to Alexi Lalas.
BCBG25



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 20112
Location: Sampa


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 3:49 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

rooky wrote:
I love Becks cuz he' s gorgeous and has a nice a$$.


Well, which goes back to what I said... Rolling Eyes



_________________
Kings of the World!
rooky



Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 840



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 4:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Absolutely. It's all about the entertainment. I wish I could have seen him play in his prime, but logistically, I couldn't. I'll now enjoy him in the MLS.


BCBG25



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 20112
Location: Sampa


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 4:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

He'll bring awareness to MLS, no doubt about that. The type of publicity many sports league can only dream of. BUT...in his prime he was nothing special and he doesn't have now the kind of conditioning he had then. So what this amounts to is that he'll reinforce the bad image Americans already have of football, that of an inferior sport. People will be sold on his being the best player in the world only to be disapoointed when they watch the real deal. When he starts playing and has absolutely no impact in the game, which is all he's done for 4 years, then people will have yet another reason to diss football. Heck, Pel, the greatest ever, couldn't make football work in the US (not to mention Beckembauer played there, too).
One of the things that attract people to football and Americans can't understand is the aesthetics of the game. The beautiful plays that don't result in goals, but capture the imagination of fans around the world. Pel was most famous for incredible goals he didn't make, like the ones against Uruguay in the 1970 World Cup just because he did the impossible to even create those goal opportunities so much so the goal was a mere detail. Becks doesn't have the improvisation skills of Ronaldinho, the genius of Zidane or the killer instinct of Drogba or even Eto'o.
He's the equivalent of paying top dollar for a fantastic FT shooter. But he's a damn good product, that's for sure.


BTW, this is a great video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7Pbbs94EhA



_________________
Kings of the World!
Ballwinner



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 656
Location: Indianapolis


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 5:19 pm    ::: Gettin' my KC or Chicago trip lined up Reply Reply with quote

America has a long track record of paying attention to talentless, somewhat attractive people (What does Paris Hilton actually do?) . Beckham still has a bit of talent and looks.

Americans don't know the more talented Wayne Rooney or the better looking Cristiano Ronaldo. MLS does not need the talent of one player but does need the celebrity attention. Beckham brings the international marketing of Adidas, Gillette, Pepsi, etc. Candice Parker could walk on the Tennessee River and not bring that to the WNBA.



_________________
There are good ships, and there are wood ships, the ships that sail the sea. But the most important ships for a viable WNBA future are ownerships, and that will always be.
jammerbirdi



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 21046



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 7:44 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

BCBG25 wrote:
He'll bring awareness to MLS, no doubt about that. The type of publicity many sports league can only dream of. BUT...in his prime he was nothing special and he doesn't have now the kind of conditioning he had then. So what this amounts to is that he'll reinforce the bad image Americans already have of football, that of an inferior sport. People will be sold on his being the best player in the world only to be disapoointed when they watch the real deal. When he starts playing and has absolutely no impact in the game, which is all he's done for 4 years, then people will have yet another reason to diss football. Heck, Pel, the greatest ever, couldn't make football work in the US (not to mention Beckembauer played there, too).
One of the things that attract people to football and Americans can't understand is the aesthetics of the game. The beautiful plays that don't result in goals, but capture the imagination of fans around the world. Pel was most famous for incredible goals he didn't make, like the ones against Uruguay in the 1970 World Cup just because he did the impossible to even create those goal opportunities so much so the goal was a mere detail. Becks doesn't have the improvisation skills of Ronaldinho, the genius of Zidane or the killer instinct of Drogba or even Eto'o.
He's the equivalent of paying top dollar for a fantastic FT shooter. But he's a damn good product, that's for sure.

BTW, this is a great video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7Pbbs94EhA


Why don't you collect your objections and send them over? Sounds like you have a good piece here.



_________________
Every woman who has ever been presented with a career/sex quid pro quo in the entertainment industry should come forward and simply say, “Me, too.” - jammer The New York Times 10/10/17
jammerbirdi



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 21046



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 7:46 pm    ::: Re: David Beckham to play for Los Angeles Galaxy Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
Quote:
The Galaxy, citing industry experts, said Beckham's deal is worth more than $250 million in salary and commercial endorsements and is "thought to be the biggest in sporting history."



Let's do some math.

MLS had an averaged announced attendance of 15502 in 2006. That's about twice the WNBA's 7476. MLS plays fewer total games, so their total announced attendance of 2976423 was about 67% higher than the WNBA's 1779366.

Last summer the Washington Post reported that the WNBA has higher TV ratings than MLS:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/11/AR2006071100988.html?nav=rss_sports/index/wnba

Quote:
The WNBA's television ratings are higher than the National Hockey League's cable ratings and Major League Soccer's TV audience.


A few weeks later, MLS signed a new TV deal:

http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6360146.html

Quote:
ESPN inked a new eight-year multimedia agreement with Soccer United Marketing, the league's commercial arm, for rights to MLS. Under terms of the deal -- which industry executives in the TV-soccer community placed at some $8 million annually -- ESPN2 will air 26 regular-season matches principally in primetime on Thursdays, plus three playoff games each season. In addition, ABC will televise the season-opener, the All-Star Game and the MLS Cup final.



So, logically, we can expect the WNBA to get a similar or better deal from ESPN next year when the current contract expires, and teams will be able to offer contracts not too much less than what Beckham is getting.

Right?


You, too. Great tie in to WNBA economics. If you don't blog on this pilight you're nuts.



_________________
Every woman who has ever been presented with a career/sex quid pro quo in the entertainment industry should come forward and simply say, “Me, too.” - jammer The New York Times 10/10/17
Smoovie



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 3960
Location: H-Town


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 7:47 pm    ::: Re: David Beckham to play for Los Angeles Galaxy Reply Reply with quote

fancy_daniel wrote:
Now, I have a reason to go to a soccer game. Thank god I live in L.A.

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=399465&cc=5901


That what I was thinking when I heard about it. Houston has a team now. WOW. I can't wait to see him



_________________
(¯`v´¯Wink
`*.¸.*´
¸.•´¸.•*¨Wink ¸.•*¨Wink
(¸.•´ (¸.•´ .•´ ¸¸.•¨¯`•.•´*~Smoov
jammerbirdi



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 21046



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 7:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

jammerbirdi wrote:
BCBG25 wrote:
He'll bring awareness to MLS, no doubt about that. The type of publicity many sports league can only dream of. BUT...in his prime he was nothing special and he doesn't have now the kind of conditioning he had then. So what this amounts to is that he'll reinforce the bad image Americans already have of football, that of an inferior sport. People will be sold on his being the best player in the world only to be disapoointed when they watch the real deal. When he starts playing and has absolutely no impact in the game, which is all he's done for 4 years, then people will have yet another reason to diss football. Heck, Pel, the greatest ever, couldn't make football work in the US (not to mention Beckembauer played there, too).
One of the things that attract people to football and Americans can't understand is the aesthetics of the game. The beautiful plays that don't result in goals, but capture the imagination of fans around the world. Pel was most famous for incredible goals he didn't make, like the ones against Uruguay in the 1970 World Cup just because he did the impossible to even create those goal opportunities so much so the goal was a mere detail. Becks doesn't have the improvisation skills of Ronaldinho, the genius of Zidane or the killer instinct of Drogba or even Eto'o.
He's the equivalent of paying top dollar for a fantastic FT shooter. But he's a damn good product, that's for sure.

BTW, this is a great video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7Pbbs94EhA


Why don't you collect your objections and send them over? Sounds like you have a good piece here.


A good piece? Let me correct myself. That's some brilliant shit right there.



_________________
Every woman who has ever been presented with a career/sex quid pro quo in the entertainment industry should come forward and simply say, “Me, too.” - jammer The New York Times 10/10/17
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66922
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 8:08 pm    ::: Re: David Beckham to play for Los Angeles Galaxy Reply Reply with quote

jammerbirdi wrote:
You, too. Great tie in to WNBA economics. If you don't blog on this pilight you're nuts.


I keep thinking that someone will tell me I've missed something here. Yes, MLS has higher average attendance*, but they also have more players on each team that must be paid and uniformed and transported and all the other little expenses that add up after a while.

How can they pay this guy that much money? Something doesn't add up.


* MLS attendance figures are fictitious in a way Val Ackerman only dreamed of. Check here:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20060514/news_lz1s14zeig.html

Quote:
Stadium turnstile counts obtained by the Union-Tribune show on average a 60 percent inflation over the past three seasons from the actual attendance


http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/soccer/20060927-9999-lz1s27goal.html

Quote:
Subtract the international doubleheaders that swell MLS crowds the seven last season had an average announced crowd of 48,589 and the per-game paid attendance in 2005 drops below 10,000.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 24356
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 8:29 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Well for one thing, the actual playing salary is in the 'single-digit millions' per year. The rest is inclusive of endorsements and image rights and everything else that goes along with the 'Beckham brand'. It's like they've included everything Jordan was making through Nike, Hanes, Wheaties etc. from back when he was hugely underpaid by the Bulls before coming up with the final number. Some of it is explained here. Not played up by that piece is the fact that Adidas will be trying to use Beckham's move to try and 'break' America more than they've managed so far, and push into Nike's stranglehold on the US market.

Also, the Galaxy are owned by 'sports and entertainment giants' AEG, as mentioned here, who Beckham is already partnered with for his soccer schools. They'll be underwriting the costs of his wages, presumably. They opened up the MLS salary cap rules a month or two ago to allow signings above the cap to be paid for by individual teams (rather than underwritten by the league as a whole) to allow for signings like this. It's like if Cablevision or a Mark Cuban dipped into their own pocket to pay for a global superstar women's basketball player (if such a thing existed) to play in the WNBA. The Galaxy as a franchise obviously couldn't afford that salary within a typical red/black running budget.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66922
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 8:34 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Even if only 20% of his salary comes from the Galaxy that's $10M per year. That exceeds the salary cap of all 14 WNBA teams put together.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
BCBG25



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 20112
Location: Sampa


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 9:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Real Madrid couldn't afford the 50 million/year he's allegedly going to make, be it salary/incentives/endorsements and they're the richest club in the world this side of the Yankees (thanks in no small part to Beckham himself).
It's funny that this all happened today. Last night I watched a documentary on how Real Madrid is a global brand. They showed this teenage girl in Japan who's obsessed with Beckham and only cares about his looks. OTOH, there's this other teenage girl in NYC who plays soccer/football in college and suffers a bad injury, so her coach tells her how Ronaldo overcame a possible career-ending injury to resurrect his career and lead Real Madrid to a Toyota Cup (not to mention winning the World Cup with Brazil in the process), so she starts emulating him.
So they portray these two sides as a backstory, the duality of fandom. On one side you have the business part of the game which can't be ignored, so you have to capitalize on that because you need it to support and fuel the passion of your fans by putting the best available product out there. As I said, this will certainly put MLS on the map as far as brand awareness goes, maybe they won't flatline on a top of mind survey, but by selling fans on an overrated player, they might be shooting themselves in the foot and burying any chance soccer had to ever catch on in the US. The talent level just isn't there, still, they've got to give it a shot.



_________________
Kings of the World!
Smoovie



Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 3960
Location: H-Town


Back to top
PostPosted: 01/11/07 9:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

jammerbirdi wrote:
jammerbirdi wrote:
BCBG25 wrote:
He'll bring awareness to MLS, no doubt about that. The type of publicity many sports league can only dream of. BUT...in his prime he was nothing special and he doesn't have now the kind of conditioning he had then. So what this amounts to is that he'll reinforce the bad image Americans already have of football, that of an inferior sport. People will be sold on his being the best player in the world only to be disapoointed when they watch the real deal. When he starts playing and has absolutely no impact in the game, which is all he's done for 4 years, then people will have yet another reason to diss football. Heck, Pel, the greatest ever, couldn't make football work in the US (not to mention Beckembauer played there, too).
One of the things that attract people to football and Americans can't understand is the aesthetics of the game. The beautiful plays that don't result in goals, but capture the imagination of fans around the world. Pel was most famous for incredible goals he didn't make, like the ones against Uruguay in the 1970 World Cup just because he did the impossible to even create those goal opportunities so much so the goal was a mere detail. Becks doesn't have the improvisation skills of Ronaldinho, the genius of Zidane or the killer instinct of Drogba or even Eto'o.
He's the equivalent of paying top dollar for a fantastic FT shooter. But he's a damn good product, that's for sure.

BTW, this is a great video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7Pbbs94EhA


Why don't you collect your objections and send them over? Sounds like you have a good piece here.


A good piece? Let me correct myself. That's some brilliant shit right there.


Hey, this is too heavy for me. I just think he's hot. I've been meaning to check out a soccer game. Now, I have an excuse. Forgive me for having a shallow moment.



_________________
(¯`v´¯Wink
`*.¸.*´
¸.•´¸.•*¨Wink ¸.•*¨Wink
(¸.•´ (¸.•´ .•´ ¸¸.•¨¯`•.•´*~Smoov
luvDhoops



Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 8229



Back to top
PostPosted: 01/12/07 9:42 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I've always had this fear that if soccer actually becomes the next big sport in this country as many are pushing for, we can then expect to see even fewer WNBA games on tv. They would be replaced by soccer. I'm I being overly paranoid or is there some validity to that in the new tv deal MLS just signed and the addition of Beck to the league here?


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » Area 51 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin