RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

#9 Arizona @ #4 Stanford - 2/22/21

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - Game Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 56094



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/22/21 1:23 am    ::: #9 Arizona @ #4 Stanford - 2/22/21 Reply Reply with quote

Stanford, CA - 9:00 PM ET
TV: ESPN2 (Beth Mowins, Debbie Antonelli)

Video stream:
https://www.espn.com/watch/player/_/eventCalendarId/401263208?gameId=401263208&sourceLang=en&om-navmethod=espn%3Aglobalsearch%3Aresults (tvpli)

Audio:
https://tunein.com/radio/Stanford-Womens-Basketball-s308788/

Live stats:
http://stats.statbroadcast.com/statmonitr/?id=321314



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned


Last edited by Shades on 02/23/21 7:41 am; edited 1 time in total
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 27861



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/22/21 9:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

lots of nerves early. Hopefully we settle in.



_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 27861



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/22/21 10:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I'm trying to figure out why Tara thinks it's a good idea for Jones to be the ball handler. 7 turnovers later....

And why have Belibi in the end game when they are fouling?

Anyway, not pretty, but we will take it.


insidewinder



Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 218



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/22/21 11:48 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

myrtle wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why Tara thinks it's a good idea for Jones to be the ball handler. 7 turnovers later....

And why have Belibi in the end game when they are fouling?

Anyway, not pretty, but we will take it.


I had the same question about Jones. She is still too wild with her passing sometimes and is not really the person you want dribbling around under pressure. She is so talented. Needs to stop the goofy turnovers.


Stormeo



Joined: 14 Jul 2019
Posts: 2298
Location: Seattle, WA


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/23/21 1:03 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Last season, McDonald made 45% of her FGs. After today's game, it's down to 38% on the season... and that 3PT% is still in the 20s. Confused



_________________
"It's not a game of 'how to', it's a game of 'when to.'" –Sue Bird, on basketball but probably also life
ucbart



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 1917
Location: New York


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/23/21 6:28 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Stormeo wrote:
Last season, McDonald made 45% of her FGs. After today's game, it's down to 38% on the season... and that 3PT% is still in the 20s. Confused


I've seen a handful of her games and I've never been left with a feeling that I'm watching a player who'll be able to play in the W. What is her shooting % vs. top 25 teams?


Stormeo



Joined: 14 Jul 2019
Posts: 2298
Location: Seattle, WA


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/23/21 11:20 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ucbart wrote:
Stormeo wrote:
Last season, McDonald made 45% of her FGs. After today's game, it's down to 38% on the season... and that 3PT% is still in the 20s. Confused


I've seen a handful of her games and I've never been left with a feeling that I'm watching a player who'll be able to play in the W. What is her shooting % vs. top 25 teams?


Here's what she has done this season vs. all of Arizona's Top-25 opponents:

12-4-20 | in a 3-pt win vs. #9 UCLA: 17 pts on 7-16 FG (1-6 3PT) & 2-4 FT, 5 ast to 3 to's
1-1-21 | in a 27-pt loss vs. #1 Stanford: 12 pts on 3-18 FG (1-6 3PT) & 5-8 FT, 5 ast to 2 to's
1-14-21 | in a 16-pt win vs. #10 Oregon: 16 pts on 6-14 FG (2-6 3PT) & 2-6 FT, 2 ast to 1 to's
2-8-21 | in a 20-pt win vs. #11 Oregon: 13 pts on 4-16 FG (1-3 3PT) & 4-4 FT, 4 ast to 2 to's
This game | a 14-pt loss vs. #4 Stanford: 20 pts on 8-24 FG (0-6 3PT) & 4-4 FT, 4 ast to 3 to's

Certainly nothing stellar, although I was surprised to see how under control her to's were in each game. She has legitimately improved that part of her game, so there should be little doubt at this point that she's a 1 at the pro level (cuz she ain't a 2 shooting like that). These numbers also of course don't describe at all how effective she may have been defensively in those games.



_________________
"It's not a game of 'how to', it's a game of 'when to.'" –Sue Bird, on basketball but probably also life
ucbart



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 1917
Location: New York


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/24/21 9:07 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Stormeo wrote:
ucbart wrote:
Stormeo wrote:
Last season, McDonald made 45% of her FGs. After today's game, it's down to 38% on the season... and that 3PT% is still in the 20s. Confused


I've seen a handful of her games and I've never been left with a feeling that I'm watching a player who'll be able to play in the W. What is her shooting % vs. top 25 teams?


Here's what she has done this season vs. all of Arizona's Top-25 opponents:

12-4-20 | in a 3-pt win vs. #9 UCLA: 17 pts on 7-16 FG (1-6 3PT) & 2-4 FT, 5 ast to 3 to's
1-1-21 | in a 27-pt loss vs. #1 Stanford: 12 pts on 3-18 FG (1-6 3PT) & 5-8 FT, 5 ast to 2 to's
1-14-21 | in a 16-pt win vs. #10 Oregon: 16 pts on 6-14 FG (2-6 3PT) & 2-6 FT, 2 ast to 1 to's
2-8-21 | in a 20-pt win vs. #11 Oregon: 13 pts on 4-16 FG (1-3 3PT) & 4-4 FT, 4 ast to 2 to's
This game | a 14-pt loss vs. #4 Stanford: 20 pts on 8-24 FG (0-6 3PT) & 4-4 FT, 4 ast to 3 to's

Certainly nothing stellar, although I was surprised to see how under control her to's were in each game. She has legitimately improved that part of her game, so there should be little doubt at this point that she's a 1 at the pro level (cuz she ain't a 2 shooting like that). These numbers also of course don't describe at all how effective she may have been defensively in those games.


Yeah-she can't be a 2 in the W. Some of her misses are bad. The defense at the next level will be even better. However, if she's a 5th option and on the right team, she might be able to do something. She is certainly quick enough.


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - Game Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin