| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Shades
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63758
Back to top |
 Posted: 11/04/19 3:08 pm ::: ESPN’s Top 25 College Players 2019-2020 |
Reply  |
|
https://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/27914075/the-top-25-players-women-college-basketball-2019-20
ESPN’s Top 25 College Players 2019-2020
1. Sabrina Ionescu, Oregon, G, 5-foot-11, senior
2. Lauren Cox, Baylor, F, 6-foot-4, senior
3. Chennedy Carter, Texas A&M, G, 5-foot-7, junior
4. Kaila Charles, Maryland, G, 6-foot-1, senior
5. Ruthy Hebard, Oregon, F, 6-foot-4, senior
6. Crystal Dangerfield, UConn, G, 5-foot-5, senior
7. Beatrice Mompremier, Miami, F, 6-foot-4, senior
8. Satou Sabally, Oregon, F, 6-foot-4, junior
9. Destiny Slocum, Oregon State, G, 5-foot-7, junior
10. Christyn Williams, UConn, G, 5-foot-11, sophomore
11. Michaela Onyenwere, UCLA , F, 6-foot, junior
12. Aari McDonald, Arizona, G, 5-foot-6, junior
13. Mikayla Pivec, Oregon State, G, 5-foot-10, senior
14. Kiana Williams, Stanford, G, 5-foot-8, junior
15. Megan Walker, UConn, F, 6-foot-1, junior
16. Bella Alarie, Princeton, G/F, 6-foot-4, senior
17. Rhyne Howard, Kentucky, G, 6-foot-2, sophomore
18. Chelsea Dungee, Arkansas, G, 5-foot-11, junior
19. Tynice Martin, West Virginia, G, 5-foot-11, senior
20. DiJonai Carrington, Stanford, G, 5-foot-11, senior
21. Kiah Gillespie, Florida State, F, 6-foot-2, senior
22. Peyton Williams, Kansas State, F, 6-foot-4, senior
23. Elizabeth Balgoun, Louisville, G, 6-foot-1, sophomore
24. Ae'rianna Harris, Purdue, F, 6-foot-1, senior
25. Shadeen Samuels, Seton Hall, F, 6-foot, senior
Senior
Under current CBA guidelines
Draft eligible
Draft ineligible
_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
|
|
linkster
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 5423
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/04/19 5:34 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| I think you got your colors wrong. Ionescu for one is eligible and is listed non-eligible.
|
|
Coyotes
Joined: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 1467
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/04/19 6:13 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| linkster wrote: |
| I think you got your colors wrong. Ionescu for one is eligible and is listed non-eligible. |
Bolded black is a Senior, who is eligible. Regular black is an ineligible player.
|
|
linkster
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 5423
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/04/19 6:57 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| Coyotes wrote: |
| linkster wrote: |
| I think you got your colors wrong. Ionescu for one is eligible and is listed non-eligible. |
Bolded black is a Senior, who is eligible. Regular black is an ineligible player. |
I see blue, black and bold black. The bottom key says that blue is eligible and unbolded black is ineligible. There is no designation for bolded black names.
Maybe it's my computer settings?
|
|
Coyotes
Joined: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 1467
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/04/19 9:22 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| linkster wrote: |
| Coyotes wrote: |
| linkster wrote: |
| I think you got your colors wrong. Ionescu for one is eligible and is listed non-eligible. |
Bolded black is a Senior, who is eligible. Regular black is an ineligible player. |
I see blue, black and bold black. The bottom key says that blue is eligible and unbolded black is ineligible. There is no designation for bolded black names.
Maybe it's my computer settings? |
The way I read it is that Senior is in the Black Bold in the bottom key; therefore, they are seniors who are about to graduate and draft eligible. The blue and black for unbolded is to distinguish between draft eligible and ineligible non-seniors.
|
|
Shades
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63758
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/04/19 10:13 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| Really Linkster? That’s too complicated for you?
_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
|
|
linkster
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 5423
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/04/19 10:25 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| Shades wrote: |
| Really Linkster? That’s too complicated for you? |
F you.
|
|
PickledGinger
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 1361
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/04/19 10:51 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| ESPN’s hard on for UConn is rearing it’s head again. SHM and ROFL-omg at Williams in the top 10 and Walker on the list at all, especially when Rhyne Howard is ranked below them and Shakira Austin not even there.
|
|
WNBA 09
Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 12525
Location: Dallas , Texas
Back to top |
|
Stormeo
Joined: 14 Jul 2019
Posts: 4701
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/05/19 12:29 am ::: |
Reply |
|
This list is sort of all over the place after their Top 5 imo...
Haven't seen enough of Rhyne Howard at Kentucky. I see she's listed as a 6'2 Guard - does she actually play in one of the guard spots? Or is she more of a post player with some guard skills (like a Bella Alarie or a Joyner Holmes, if that's even the right comparison)?
|
|
PickledGinger
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 1361
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/05/19 2:05 am ::: |
Reply |
|
| Stormeo wrote: |
This list is sort of all over the place after their Top 5 imo...
Haven't seen enough of Rhyne Howard at Kentucky. I see she's listed as a 6'2 Guard - does she actually play in one of the guard spots? Or is she more of a post player with some guard skills (like a Bella Alarie or a Joyner Holmes, if that's even the right comparison)? |
She mostly plays a stretch 4 role at Kentucky out of necessity, but she's a big wing. 45% of her field goal attempts were from outside the line and she had 75 assists last year.
|
|
summertime blues
Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 7816
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Back to top |
|
ClayK
Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 11132
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/05/19 9:58 am ::: |
Reply |
|
| Shades wrote: |
| Really Linkster? That’s too complicated for you? |
And the reason you felt the need to post that was ...?
_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
|
|
ClayK
Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 11132
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/05/19 10:01 am ::: |
Reply |
|
| PickledGinger wrote: |
| ESPN’s hard on for UConn is rearing it’s head again. SHM and ROFL-omg at Williams in the top 10 and Walker on the list at all, especially when Rhyne Howard is ranked below them and Shakira Austin not even there. |
I think Austin could be a much better player than she's shown, but it's pretty hard to put a post who only averaged 8.4 ppg and shot 43.2% from the field on any kind of preseason list. Oh, and the 38/57 A/TO isn't going to dazzle either.
Now that doesn't excuse the other issues with the ESPN list, but I think Austin has to put up some numbers before she can be considered elite.
_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
|
|
Shades
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63758
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/05/19 10:32 am ::: |
Reply |
|
| ClayK wrote: |
| Shades wrote: |
| Really Linkster? That’s too complicated for you? |
And the reason you felt the need to post that was ...? |
Just like with a lot of what I post, I put a lot of extra effort into putting in the color coding and looking up birthdates for some of the ones that weren’t done before (Walker is a new discovery), and what I get in return is “it looks like you messed up” and an eventual FU.... instead of a thank you. Typical ungrateful Rebkell users. And you questioning my response instead of his FU puts you in the same category. I can’t expect you to be able relate to me, somebody that voluntarily contributes a lot.
_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
|
|
PickledGinger
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 1361
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/05/19 2:47 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| ClayK wrote: |
| PickledGinger wrote: |
| ESPN’s hard on for UConn is rearing it’s head again. SHM and ROFL-omg at Williams in the top 10 and Walker on the list at all, especially when Rhyne Howard is ranked below them and Shakira Austin not even there. |
I think Austin could be a much better player than she's shown, but it's pretty hard to put a post who only averaged 8.4 ppg and shot 43.2% from the field on any kind of preseason list. Oh, and the 38/57 A/TO isn't going to dazzle either.
Now that doesn't excuse the other issues with the ESPN list, but I think Austin has to put up some numbers before she can be considered elite. |
Ok, then put Mikesell on there instead. If UConn’s weakest team in a decade gets 3 players in the Top 15, Maryland’s strongest squad in a decade should get more than one. I am of the camp that ESPN’s UConn favoritism gives them an unfair advantage in recruiting and is generally bad for the growth of the women’s game, so these shenanigans really bother me.
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18371
Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/05/19 5:01 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Once again...
Cutting and pasting the ENTIRE rankings list, so no one clicks on the link -- when it is well-established that clicks are measured?
And that is putting aside the fair use doctrine with respect to intellectual property...
|
|
linkster
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 5423
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/12/19 6:43 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| PickledGinger wrote: |
Ok, then put Mikesell on there instead. If UConn’s weakest team in a decade gets 3 players in the Top 15, Maryland’s strongest squad in a decade should get more than one. I am of the camp that ESPN’s UConn favoritism gives them an unfair advantage in recruiting and is generally bad for the growth of the women’s game, so these shenanigans really bother me. |
Go over to ESPN and count the feature articles on Tenn and then those of UConn.
Name one year in the last decade when MD had a better team than UConn? When was the last time MD beat UConn or even agreed to play them? Hype? MD got beat on the 2nd round last year and ESPN has them a FF team this year? UConn made the FF the last 12. ESPN is hyping MD only because they are best team in a weak B1G.
|
|
WNBA 09
Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 12525
Location: Dallas , Texas
Back to top |
|
SDHoops
Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 1183
Back to top |
|
Conway Gamecock
Joined: 23 Jan 2015
Posts: 1899
Location: Here
Back to top |
|
SDHoops
Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 1183
Back to top |
|
PickledGinger
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 1361
Back to top |
| Posted: 11/14/19 7:03 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| SDHoops wrote: |
Leave it to the irrelevant Gamecocks program to have a fan gang up with ND smh. |
Who said anything about Notre Dame? I, for one, am a fan of the game first and foremost, the Pac-12 second, and then UW. I'm by no means a Maryland fan, I was just using them as an example of ESPN's lack of, well...let's call it "sharing the wealth".
|
|
|
|
