RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

6th Woman

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  

6th Woman??
Bria Holmes
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Rebecca Allen
1%
 1%  [ 1 ]
Emma Meesseman
24%
 24%  [ 13 ]
Alex Bentley
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Cheyenne Parker
7%
 7%  [ 4 ]
Teaira McCowan
7%
 7%  [ 4 ]
Tiffany Mitchell
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Lexie Brown
1%
 1%  [ 1 ]
Kaela Davis
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Yvonne Turner
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Dearica Hamby
49%
 49%  [ 26 ]
Chiney Ogwumike
3%
 3%  [ 2 ]
Sami Whitcomb
1%
 1%  [ 1 ]
someone else
1%
 1%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 53

Author Message
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 20196



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/09/19 8:29 am    ::: 6th Woman Reply Reply with quote

end of season voting.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 9315



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/09/19 9:59 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

You have to scraping the bottom of the barrel to put in Bentley. Laughing


toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 20196



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/09/19 10:08 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
You have to scraping the bottom of the barrel to put in Bentley. Laughing


she's Atlanta's 6th woman, so that's why she's in the poll.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 9315



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/09/19 10:10 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Thanks for thinking of the Dream. Smile


Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 21486
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/09/19 11:16 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Seemed for a long time like this award was going to Hamby and there wasn't much debate about it. But she did rather fade away later in the season, along with most people in Vegas. I'm just not sure anyone else did enough to take it away from her.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 14900
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/09/19 11:22 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
Seemed for a long time like this award was going to Hamby and there wasn't much debate about it. But she did rather fade away later in the season, along with most people in Vegas. I'm just not sure anyone else did enough to take it away from her.


Meesseman seems like the clear choice to me, if people don't think she missed too many games.

McCowan is also eligible and was the best rebounder in the league this season. That has to count for something, but she probably started too many games.

Also, this award is silly.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 52470



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/09/19 11:34 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

When you’ve been a starter for years is this even an award you want to win? It belongs to Hamby.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Michelle89



Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 15704
Location: Holland


Back to top
PostPosted: 09/10/19 1:40 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Hawkins?



_________________
"Sue Bird and Lauren Jackson were and are the dynamic duo. They're the one-two punch. They're all the clich�s possible to describe people that perfectly complement each other, who make each other better and also bring out the best in the team." �Karen Bryant
toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 20196



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/10/19 7:32 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Michelle89 wrote:
Hawkins?


Meesseman's numbers are better. Hawkins could be their 7th woman I guess. or even 8th. Powers might be their 7th. The curse of having a deep bench, I guess.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7739



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/10/19 8:14 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

SMH at Meesseman getting so many more votes than Hawkins when she's only played 23 games. Why isn't A.Powers listed as an option?... And don't give me that "someone else" nonsense.


toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 20196



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/10/19 8:54 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
SMH at Meesseman getting so many more votes than Hawkins when she's only played 23 games. Why isn't A.Powers listed as an option?... And don't give me that "someone else" nonsense.


In terms of stats, the bench order for the Mystics goes as follows:

1. Meesseman(23 games): 23.6mpg, 13.1ppg, 42.rpg, 3.2apg
2. Powers(30 games): 19.8mpg, 11.4ppg, 3.2rpg, 1.5apg
3. Hawkins(31 games): 15.4mpg, 9.5ppg, 4.2rpg, 0.7apg
4. Walker-Kimbrough(34 games): 17.1mpg, 6.7ppg, 1.6rpg, 1.2apg

Again, when you have a deep bench, it's hard to pick a 6th woman. But Meesseman's stats prove she's the Mystics' candidate for 6th woman.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
Luuuc



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 19693



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/10/19 9:18 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

To put it another way
Meesseman 543 min, 301 pts @ 55%, 97 reb, 73 ast, 20 stl, 15 blk
Hawkins 477 min, 296 pts @ 51%, 130 reb, 23 ast, 14 stl, 4 blk
Powers 593 min, 343 pts @ 43%, 96 reb, 45 ast, 25 stl, 6 blk



_________________
Is there gas in the car?
Yes there's gas in the car.


Last edited by Luuuc on 09/10/19 9:21 am; edited 1 time in total
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 7739



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/10/19 9:21 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

toad455 wrote:
zune69 wrote:
SMH at Meesseman getting so many more votes than Hawkins when she's only played 23 games. Why isn't A.Powers listed as an option?... And don't give me that "someone else" nonsense.


In terms of stats, the bench order for the Mystics goes as follows:

1. Meesseman(23 games): 23.6mpg, 13.1ppg, 42.rpg, 3.2apg
2. Powers(30 games): 19.8mpg, 11.4ppg, 3.2rpg, 1.5apg
3. Hawkins(31 games): 15.4mpg, 9.5ppg, 4.2rpg, 0.7apg
4. Walker-Kimbrough(34 games): 17.1mpg, 6.7ppg, 1.6rpg, 1.2apg

Again, when you have a deep bench, it's hard to pick a 6th woman. But Meesseman's stats prove she's the Mystics' candidate for 6th woman.


I'm not giving an award to a player who's missed 11 gms/32% of the season.....Would we give EDD the MVP if she missed 11 gms?....I highly doubt it.


toad455



Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 20196



Back to top
PostPosted: 09/10/19 9:28 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:
toad455 wrote:
zune69 wrote:
SMH at Meesseman getting so many more votes than Hawkins when she's only played 23 games. Why isn't A.Powers listed as an option?... And don't give me that "someone else" nonsense.


In terms of stats, the bench order for the Mystics goes as follows:

1. Meesseman(23 games): 23.6mpg, 13.1ppg, 42.rpg, 3.2apg
2. Powers(30 games): 19.8mpg, 11.4ppg, 3.2rpg, 1.5apg
3. Hawkins(31 games): 15.4mpg, 9.5ppg, 4.2rpg, 0.7apg
4. Walker-Kimbrough(34 games): 17.1mpg, 6.7ppg, 1.6rpg, 1.2apg

Again, when you have a deep bench, it's hard to pick a 6th woman. But Meesseman's stats prove she's the Mystics' candidate for 6th woman.


I'm not giving an award to a player who's missed 11 gms/32% of the season.....Would we give EDD the MVP if she missed 11 gms?....I highly doubt it.


I doubt Meesseman wins it anyway. Seems like this is Hamby's award. So let's no split hairs over something that's not likely to happen.



_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!

Twitter: @TBRBWAY
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin