| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ex-Ref
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 8942
Back to top |
 Posted: 03/10/19 7:49 pm ::: |
Reply  |
|
He just said 'we'll give you the 68'....
I'm guessing he is thinking about the men's draw?? I haven't heard any thing about the women going to 68 teams. Right?
_________________
"Women are judged on their success, men on their potential. It’s time we started believing in the potential of women." —Muffet McGraw
“Thank you for showing the fellas that you've got more balls than them,” Haley said, to cheers from the crowd.
|
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 7:50 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| Gotta think Hebard is not totally healthy. She doesn't miss those bunnies.
_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
Ex-Ref
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 8942
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 7:52 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
If Stanford destroys OR, will that drop OR to a 2 seed?
Would it be enough to move Stanford to a 1 seed?
Sounded like Charlie would drop them with just a loss, regardless of by how much.
_________________
"Women are judged on their success, men on their potential. It’s time we started believing in the potential of women." —Muffet McGraw
“Thank you for showing the fellas that you've got more balls than them,” Haley said, to cheers from the crowd.
|
|
huskiemaniac
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 1049
Location: NE CT
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:04 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| Ex-Ref wrote: |
If Stanford destroys OR, will that drop OR to a 2 seed?
Would it be enough to move Stanford to a 1 seed?
Sounded like Charlie would drop them with just a loss, regardless of by how much. |
Stanford isn't going to be a #1 seed. But, Oregon drops to a 2 but stays in Portland anyway. Not much of a deal, imo. If the seeds hold, you play a 3 instead of a 4.
|
|
huskiemaniac
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 1049
Location: NE CT
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:11 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Imo, what Lawson said, and Landers parroted, is Stanford is playing tough defense is why Oregon is behind.
Landers said "and Oregon doesn't like that". This has been my observation of the Ducks over the last 3 years. I have called them "soft" before. This not to say they're all wimps or something, just that they aren't bangers and don't like to bang. This is why they were beaten by Mich St.
Oregon can easily come back to win this game. But, imo, they won't beat the tough teams, and they won't outscore ND. This why I doubt they'll win the NC.
Last edited by huskiemaniac on 03/10/19 8:13 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Ex-Ref
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 8942
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:11 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Ouch!
That hurts to watch it!
_________________
"Women are judged on their success, men on their potential. It’s time we started believing in the potential of women." —Muffet McGraw
“Thank you for showing the fellas that you've got more balls than them,” Haley said, to cheers from the crowd.
|
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:14 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| ouch
_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
huskiemaniac
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 1049
Location: NE CT
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:14 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| man Oregon gets breaks.
|
|
Coyotes
Joined: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 1467
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:17 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| Both Dodson and Smith back on the bench, fyi
|
|
ArtBest23
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:17 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| huskiemaniac wrote: |
| Ex-Ref wrote: |
If Stanford destroys OR, will that drop OR to a 2 seed?
Would it be enough to move Stanford to a 1 seed?
Sounded like Charlie would drop them with just a loss, regardless of by how much. |
Stanford isn't going to be a #1 seed. But, Oregon drops to a 2 but stays in Portland anyway. Not much of a deal, imo. If the seeds hold, you play a 3 instead of a 4. |
Why wouldn't Stanford get the Portland slot and the Ducks have to go elsewhere? Stanford would be the higher seeded 2 and should get the closest location.
|
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:17 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| still not sure why she's going with Wilson. Especially when Smith is out, we need both Hulls on the floor.
_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
huskiemaniac
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 1049
Location: NE CT
Back to top |
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:19 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| ArtBest23 wrote: |
| huskiemaniac wrote: |
| Ex-Ref wrote: |
If Stanford destroys OR, will that drop OR to a 2 seed?
Would it be enough to move Stanford to a 1 seed?
Sounded like Charlie would drop them with just a loss, regardless of by how much. |
Stanford isn't going to be a #1 seed. But, Oregon drops to a 2 but stays in Portland anyway. Not much of a deal, imo. If the seeds hold, you play a 3 instead of a 4. |
Why wouldn't Stanford get the Portland slot and the Ducks have to go elsewhere? Stanford would be the higher seeded 2 and should get the closest location. |
because of the driving thing. It's a flight for Stanford. Same reason UConn is in Albany regardless of what their number is.
_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
toad455
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 22474
Location: NJ
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:21 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| not really an exciting game. Even if Oregon pulls off the win here, they're not a #1 seed.
_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!
Twitter: @TBRBWAY
|
|
Ex-Ref
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 8942
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:22 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I thought that the ACC game was physical.
This might match it. Bodies everywhere.
_________________
"Women are judged on their success, men on their potential. It’s time we started believing in the potential of women." —Muffet McGraw
“Thank you for showing the fellas that you've got more balls than them,” Haley said, to cheers from the crowd.
|
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:22 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| This may actually help Oregon. It will be easy for a #1 to underestimate them based on this performance. I guarantee that when they are all healthy, they will look a whole lot better.
_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
huskiemaniac
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 1049
Location: NE CT
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:24 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| ArtBest23 wrote: |
| huskiemaniac wrote: |
| Ex-Ref wrote: |
If Stanford destroys OR, will that drop OR to a 2 seed?
Would it be enough to move Stanford to a 1 seed?
Sounded like Charlie would drop them with just a loss, regardless of by how much. |
Stanford isn't going to be a #1 seed. But, Oregon drops to a 2 but stays in Portland anyway. Not much of a deal, imo. If the seeds hold, you play a 3 instead of a 4. |
Why wouldn't Stanford get the Portland slot and the Ducks have to go elsewhere? Stanford would be the higher seeded 2 and should get the closest location. |
Because Oregon is better, pasted them by 40 on their homecourt, has better losses and won the PAC12 reg season?
Last edited by huskiemaniac on 03/10/19 8:25 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
ArtBest23
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:24 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| myrtle wrote: |
| ArtBest23 wrote: |
| huskiemaniac wrote: |
| Ex-Ref wrote: |
If Stanford destroys OR, will that drop OR to a 2 seed?
Would it be enough to move Stanford to a 1 seed?
Sounded like Charlie would drop them with just a loss, regardless of by how much. |
Stanford isn't going to be a #1 seed. But, Oregon drops to a 2 but stays in Portland anyway. Not much of a deal, imo. If the seeds hold, you play a 3 instead of a 4. |
Why wouldn't Stanford get the Portland slot and the Ducks have to go elsewhere? Stanford would be the higher seeded 2 and should get the closest location. |
because of the driving thing. It's a flight for Stanford. Same reason UConn is in Albany regardless of what their number is. |
Yeah, but their uniforms don't read "UConn" so those bogus excuses don't apply.
BTW, Stanford's shot selection is frequently suspect. Wasted possessions.
|
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:28 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| take Wilson OUT!
_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
ArtBest23
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:30 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| huskiemaniac wrote: |
| ArtBest23 wrote: |
| huskiemaniac wrote: |
| Ex-Ref wrote: |
If Stanford destroys OR, will that drop OR to a 2 seed?
Would it be enough to move Stanford to a 1 seed?
Sounded like Charlie would drop them with just a loss, regardless of by how much. |
Stanford isn't going to be a #1 seed. But, Oregon drops to a 2 but stays in Portland anyway. Not much of a deal, imo. If the seeds hold, you play a 3 instead of a 4. |
Why wouldn't Stanford get the Portland slot and the Ducks have to go elsewhere? Stanford would be the higher seeded 2 and should get the closest location. |
Because Oregon is better, pasted them by 40 on their homecourt, has better losses and won the PAC12 reg season? |
Huh? Like Michigan St? And Oregon didn't beat the overall #1 seed.
|
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:31 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| ArtBest23 wrote: |
BTW, Stanford's shot selection is frequently suspect. Wasted possessions. |
yeah, hoisting way too many threes.(esp by someone shooting 25%) And Smith has tightened up. She's not shooting the ball, she's pushing it.
_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
huskiemaniac
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 1049
Location: NE CT
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:32 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| ArtBest23 wrote: |
| huskiemaniac wrote: |
| ArtBest23 wrote: |
| huskiemaniac wrote: |
| Ex-Ref wrote: |
If Stanford destroys OR, will that drop OR to a 2 seed?
Would it be enough to move Stanford to a 1 seed?
Sounded like Charlie would drop them with just a loss, regardless of by how much. |
Stanford isn't going to be a #1 seed. But, Oregon drops to a 2 but stays in Portland anyway. Not much of a deal, imo. If the seeds hold, you play a 3 instead of a 4. |
Why wouldn't Stanford get the Portland slot and the Ducks have to go elsewhere? Stanford would be the higher seeded 2 and should get the closest location. |
Because Oregon is better, pasted them by 40 on their homecourt, has better losses and won the PAC12 reg season? |
Huh? Like Michigan St? And Oregon didn't beat the overall #1 seed. |
Huh? Like Utah? And Stanford didn't win the PAC12 regular season title.
|
|
ArtBest23
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:36 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| huskiemaniac wrote: |
| ArtBest23 wrote: |
| huskiemaniac wrote: |
| ArtBest23 wrote: |
| huskiemaniac wrote: |
| Ex-Ref wrote: |
If Stanford destroys OR, will that drop OR to a 2 seed?
Would it be enough to move Stanford to a 1 seed?
Sounded like Charlie would drop them with just a loss, regardless of by how much. |
Stanford isn't going to be a #1 seed. But, Oregon drops to a 2 but stays in Portland anyway. Not much of a deal, imo. If the seeds hold, you play a 3 instead of a 4. |
Why wouldn't Stanford get the Portland slot and the Ducks have to go elsewhere? Stanford would be the higher seeded 2 and should get the closest location. |
Because Oregon is better, pasted them by 40 on their homecourt, has better losses and won the PAC12 reg season? |
Huh? Like Michigan St? And Oregon didn't beat the overall #1 seed. |
Huh? Like Utah? And Stanford didn't win the PAC12 regular season title. |
But the discussion assumes they will have beaten Oregon tonight and won the Tournament. Those would cancel out Oregon's only advantages leaving Mich St and Baylor as the primary distinguishing factors, both in Stanford's favor. If Stanford wins tonight they will likely be higher seeded.
|
|
toad455
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 22474
Location: NJ
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:41 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| This is going to go down to the final possession.
_________________
LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!
Twitter: @TBRBWAY
|
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32335
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/10/19 8:46 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| They both have good wins and bad losses. Oregon has been ranked higher all season. I don't think that changes even if Stanford pulls this out.
_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
|
|
