RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

2018 WNBA Mock Draft
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 26, 27, 28 ... 45, 46, 47  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BelloFratello



Joined: 04 May 2016
Posts: 51



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/18 6:07 pm    ::: Kitija Laksa Lottery Pick? Reply Reply with quote

Two years ago Howard Megdal said he would take Kitija Laksa in the lottery, after Breanna Stewart, as a freshman if she could have come out that year.



_________________
Petit a petit, l'oiseau fait son nid
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47795



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/18 10:31 pm    ::: Re: Kitija Laksa Lottery Pick? Reply Reply with quote

BelloFratello wrote:
Two years ago Howard Megdal said he would take Kitija Laksa in the lottery, after Breanna Stewart, as a freshman if she could have come out that year.


Two years ago, Megdal was pretty bad at mock draft because it was his first year covering women’s basketball. He’s gotten a lot better since then. I’m not sure if it’s from experience or he knows where to refer.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 4486



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/18 11:36 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Serious question not meant as a jab at either player, just curious what people think.

Why is K. Mitchell a better pro prospect than K. Plum?


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47795



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/11/18 11:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
Serious question not meant as a jab at either player, just curious what people think.

Why is K. Mitchell a better pro prospect than K. Plum?


I would say so. I think Mitchell will be good amongst the pros and hopefully better coaching.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4250
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/12/18 12:14 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
Serious question not meant as a jab at either player, just curious what people think.

Why is K. Mitchell a better pro prospect than K. Plum?


Mitchell is a lot faster and more athletic. She's also likely taller. The team picture of the current Team USA camp makes Plum look tiny.



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7529



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/12/18 8:00 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Plus - we already have seen what Plum can do as a pro, but not Mitchell. Imagination is often better than reality.



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4250
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/12/18 9:42 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
Plus - we already have seen what Plum can do as a pro, but not Mitchell. Imagination is often better than reality.


BINGO! Laughing



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47795



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/12/18 8:19 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote



That ball-denial defense on Durr tho.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 22489



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/12/18 9:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

root_thing wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:
Serious question not meant as a jab at either player, just curious what people think.

Why is K. Mitchell a better pro prospect than K. Plum?


Mitchell is a lot faster and more athletic. .


she's never looked particularly fast or very athletic to me.



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
hangtyme24



Joined: 21 May 2006
Posts: 2233



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/12/18 9:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

myrtle wrote:
root_thing wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:
Serious question not meant as a jab at either player, just curious what people think.

Why is K. Mitchell a better pro prospect than K. Plum?


Mitchell is a lot faster and more athletic. .


she's never looked particularly fast or very athletic to me.


Kelsey Mitchell has never looked fast to you? Wow. I wonder what games you were watching. Every time I watch OSU play Mitchell is always smashing with the ball. Sometimes I think she’s too fast with the ball. But that’s just me...



_________________
HERE 2 STAY!
Nixtreefan



Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 1870



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/12/18 10:57 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I am actually with Myrtle on this one I think she looks like she has gained a few of her daddys pounds.


Iluvacc



Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 2528



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/12/18 11:03 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nixtreefan wrote:
I am actually with Myrtle on this one I think she looks like she has gained a few of her daddys pounds.



Laughing Laughing Laughing

You are on a roll tonight. No pun intended.

I'm really thinking Nurse will be the steal of the draft.


root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4250
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/12/18 11:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nixtreefan wrote:
I am actually with Myrtle on this one I think she looks like she has gained a few of her daddys pounds.


I actually agree about Mitchell looking heavier and slower this year. But that doesn't make her as slow as Plum. Also, Mitchell's speed shows up during fastbreaks. If tOSU gets killed off the boards and can't run, like they did against South Florida, then Mitchell's speed isn't as apparent. In the half court, she's mostly a jump-shooter.



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 6522



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 9:06 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

People seem to forget that Plum got injured prior to the start of the regular season.She had a great preseason game against Dallas then sprained her ankle during practice.It took Plum some time to heal up and regain her confidence.Plum had a strong finish to the end of her rookie season.

Last 14 games:12.4p/4.8a/38%/42%/92%-Stars record:6-8

Scoring by month:
May-3.6
June-3.6
July-10.7
Aug-11.8
Sep-14.5

Plum will be one of my favorites for MIP along with B.Sykes and N.Howard.




Last edited by zune69 on 02/13/18 1:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 4250
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 11:05 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Let's keep this discussion on track. J-Spoon asked why is K. Mitchell a better pro prospect than Plum? We can only compare at the college level, and there it's pretty obvious the two are similar type players: ball-dominant scoring guards even when filling the PG slot. One player holds the all-time scoring record, the other is trying to catch her. Both are OK but not great at dishing the ball, neither is a defensive stalwart. So, what's the difference in potential? I think Mitchell is a better athlete and a little bigger. You can try to make arguments about decision-making or attitude, but I don't think there's a lot of tangible evidence in that regard -- just a lot of rumors and personal opinions. So, keeping it simple, IMHO Mitchell is a better prospect because she has physical advantages.



_________________
We live in a political world
Love don't have any place
We're living in times
Where men commit crimes
And crime don't have any face
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 20166
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 11:21 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Is Mitchell's balhandling better than Plum's? That ended up being one of the things that held Plum back as a rookie - she couldn't bring the ball up, run the offense, or break someone down off the dribble as easily as in college because her handle wasn't tight enough. Even beyond raw size/speed/strength, having tight control of the ball can be vital, especially for smaller guards.



_________________
Independent WNBA coverage: http://www.wnbalien.com/
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47795



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 11:35 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

zune69 wrote:

Plum will be one of my favorites for MOP along with B.Sykes and N.Howard.


Did you mean MIP? This will be one of your “on further review” calls. At least two out of three of those names could very well be coming off the bench. Sixth man candidates maybe?

Plum might start while Jefferson is healing, but does that mean Laimbeer might get comfortable with Plum as a starter over Jefferson? Wouldn’t bank on that. Remember, Laimbeer doesn’t like the idea of a three guard system, and he emphasizes defense over offense. If Jefferson becomes completely out of the picture for whatever reason, maybe you would be onto something.

Will ATL be playing mostly smalll ball even though they signed Breland? I have my doubts. Would Sykes start over McCoughtry or Hayes... I seriously have my doubts.

Who knows what’s going on in SEA? They added Paris and Howard and still have Langhorne. Where are you seeing Howard as a starter? Is she going to bump Clark from the SF?

This is a draft prospect thread. Even if it were an awards prediction thread, it’s too early to predict anything very plausible.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 12548



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 12:24 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
Is Mitchell's balhandling better than Plum's?.


Yes. Significantly.
Mitchell is no Jewell Loyd, but she's still quicker than Plum and better at creating her own shot 1-on-1.
And she may not bother playing defense very often, but she is a better defender when she tries.

I think Plum is mostly a one-trick-pony, and Mitchell is a substantially better WNBA prospect.

As an aside, I'm not certain Mitchell or Lexie Brown will end up as true point guards at the next level, and if I'm looking for a 2 guard, I just might consider taking Ariel Atkins instead of either of them. Taller, better defender, and I think somewhat better at creating her own shot without help, which really matters in the WNBA when for the most part these players have to face a single, athletic, defender in their face without all the collapsing and double teams and help defense they see in college. If you can consistently beat your woman for a good shot from a variety of distances and locations, you have a much greater chance of success than if you need help from teammates to get open. I think Atkins is quick, athletic, tall for her position, (assuming she plays the 2 where she belongs and doesn't get forced out of position to the 3) and pretty versatile at doing that.




Last edited by ArtBest23 on 02/13/18 12:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 56345
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 12:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
Is Mitchell's balhandling better than Plum's? That ended up being one of the things that held Plum back as a rookie - she couldn't bring the ball up, run the offense, or break someone down off the dribble as easily as in college because her handle wasn't tight enough. Even beyond raw size/speed/strength, having tight control of the ball can be vital, especially for smaller guards.


Most rookie PGs struggle with that. They usually get better as the season rolls on, as Plum did.

Lindsay Whalen as a rookie had a ATO only marginally better than Plum's. Everyone remembers her taking the Sun to the finals, but they forget the seemingly endless string of 4 and 5 turnover games she had all season (in all she had 12 games of 4+ turnovers).



_________________
Whether you're high or low
You gotta tip on the tightrope
blaase22



Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 3714
Location: Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 1:01 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Plum had problems with everything lol she shot like 34 percent lol


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 56345
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 1:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

blaase22 wrote:
Plum had problems with everything lol she shot like 34 percent lol


It only took 38% to be ROY...



_________________
Whether you're high or low
You gotta tip on the tightrope
UK1996



Joined: 03 Sep 2015
Posts: 316



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 1:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Mitchell is for sure more athletic than Plum. I’m not sold that Mitchell is bigger than Plum. I think Plum has a higher basketball IQ. Mitchell has more potential overall, but I do think Plum can be a solid starting PG with hard work. I think the biggest problem for Mitchell at the next level will be limiting her shots.


zune69



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 6522



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 1:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Yeah @shades,I meant MIP


myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 22489



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 1:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:


As an aside, I'm not certain Mitchell or Lexie Brown will end up as true point guards at the next level, and if I'm looking for a 2 guard, I just might consider taking Ariel Atkins instead of either of them. Taller, better defender, and I think somewhat better at creating her own shot without help, which really matters in the WNBA when for the most part these players have to face a single, athletic, defender in their face without all the collapsing and double teams and help defense they see in college. If you can consistently beat your woman for a good shot from a variety of distances and locations, you have a much greater chance of success than if you need help from teammates to get open. I think Atkins is quick, athletic, tall for her position, (assuming she plays the 2 where she belongs and doesn't get forced out of position to the 3) and pretty versatile at doing that.


agree. Atkins is a fascinating under the radar prospect with lots of upside.

As for Mitchell, she does have quickness which helps her get out of jams. I'm not totally sure about her ball handling. She does have the bulldog mentality of going right at 'em which serves her well in college. It also serves Taurasi and Angel well in the W so maybe...though she's considerably smaller than either of them. I suspect there will be a steep learning curve for her. If she can negotiate that, then her upside is somewhere about Cappie, which is pretty darn good and she'll have a nice long run.



_________________
“Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud.”
― Maya Angelou
icey23



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 5684
Location: Louisiana


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 2:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Why isn’t last years SEC DPOY Raigyne
Louis not on the mock boards???



_________________
A new ERA!!!! S/O to my LADIES Nikki Caldwell,Pokey Chatman,Lisa Leslie,Candace Parker and Big Syl!!!
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47795



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 2:29 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

icey23 wrote:
Why isn’t last years SEC DPOY Raigyne
Louis not on the mock boards???


I think she just made Megdal’s last mock draft, now that LSU is starting to get more noticed. Where would put her? If you say “first round”, this may get written off as another homer opinion.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
icey23



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 5684
Location: Louisiana


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 4:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
icey23 wrote:
Why isn’t last years SEC DPOY Raigyne
Louis not on the mock boards???


I think she just made Megdal’s last mock draft, now that LSU is starting to get more noticed. Where would put her? If you say “first round”, this may get written off as another homer opinion.


I wouldn’t say first round, but she has potential to be a star in the WNBA!



_________________
A new ERA!!!! S/O to my LADIES Nikki Caldwell,Pokey Chatman,Lisa Leslie,Candace Parker and Big Syl!!!
Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 15767
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 5:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

icey23 wrote:
Why isn’t last years SEC DPOY Raigyne
Louis not on the mock boards???


I think a lot of people forgot she still had eligibility, TBH. Seems like she's been at LSU forever.



_________________
We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty.
Luuuc



Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 18208



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 8:25 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
zune69 wrote:

Plum will be one of my favorites for MOP along with B.Sykes and N.Howard.


Did you mean MIP?


Nope. MOP. Seems more likely to me than MIP.

<iframe width="427" height="240" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/21OH0wlkfbc?list=FL_Y1sAcZEzXWAxtcpR3_mJw" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>



_________________
Seems rike no one takes me serirousreee
bcdawg04



Joined: 12 Apr 2016
Posts: 297
Location: Seattle


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/13/18 10:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

root_thing wrote:
Let's keep this discussion on track. J-Spoon asked why is K. Mitchell a better pro prospect than Plum? We can only compare at the college level, and there it's pretty obvious the two are similar type players: ball-dominant scoring guards even when filling the PG slot. One player holds the all-time scoring record, the other is trying to catch her. Both are OK but not great at dishing the ball, neither is a defensive stalwart. So, what's the difference in potential? I think Mitchell is a better athlete and a little bigger. You can try to make arguments about decision-making or attitude, but I don't think there's a lot of tangible evidence in that regard -- just a lot of rumors and personal opinions. So, keeping it simple, IMHO Mitchell is a better prospect because she has physical advantages.


A year ago, Swish Appeal did a statistical analysis to compare the two as college players: Who's the better Kelsey: Plum or Mitchell?

Quote:
Kelsey Plum and Kelsey Mitchell are two great college players, and play similar roles for their teams. It’s hard to say which one will be a better pro player.


Interesting article.

Plum surely isn't amongst the more athletic players in the league. Heck, she was never even considered one of the more athletic college players. She's not fast, but before the ankle injury she was quicker than defenders thought. She was able to increase her scoring average by nearly 6 points from junior year to senior year without attempting more shots, and ESPN Sport Science explained how: The science behind Plum's shot is comparable to Curry's

She gets her shot off faster than Klay Thompson does, and she's also quick enough with her footwork and a hip rotation to keep her mechanics consistent.

After watching her for four years, I said that I didn't know what kind of pro she would be or how successful she would be at the next level. We still don't know. I haven't watched Mitchell much (none this year), but when I saw her last year, I remember being impressed. I wish her all the best. When it comes to the WNBA, though, every year there is less and less space for the undersized shoot-first guards who are sub-par defenders (although, according to Swish Appeal, one of the Kelseys is not as bad a defender as everyone thinks).


GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 4812
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/14/18 8:42 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Luuuc wrote:
Shades wrote:
zune69 wrote:

Plum will be one of my favorites for MOP along with B.Sykes and N.Howard.


Did you mean MIP?


Nope. MOP. Seems more likely to me than MIP.

<iframe width="427" height="240" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/21OH0wlkfbc?list=FL_Y1sAcZEzXWAxtcpR3_mJw" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>


For MOP, I thought right away of this one:

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/VNLYnxelHZc" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7529



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/14/18 8:47 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

MOP = Most Offensive Player. Currently held by Candice Wiggins, who took it over from Sophia Young.



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
Nixtreefan



Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 1870



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/14/18 12:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

bcdawg04 wrote:
root_thing wrote:
Let's keep this discussion on track. J-Spoon asked why is K. Mitchell a better pro prospect than Plum? We can only compare at the college level, and there it's pretty obvious the two are similar type players: ball-dominant scoring guards even when filling the PG slot. One player holds the all-time scoring record, the other is trying to catch her. Both are OK but not great at dishing the ball, neither is a defensive stalwart. So, what's the difference in potential? I think Mitchell is a better athlete and a little bigger. You can try to make arguments about decision-making or attitude, but I don't think there's a lot of tangible evidence in that regard -- just a lot of rumors and personal opinions. So, keeping it simple, IMHO Mitchell is a better prospect because she has physical advantages.


A year ago, Swish Appeal did a statistical analysis to compare the two as college players: Who's the better Kelsey: Plum or Mitchell?

Quote:
Kelsey Plum and Kelsey Mitchell are two great college players, and play similar roles for their teams. It’s hard to say which one will be a better pro player.


Interesting article.

Plum surely isn't amongst the more athletic players in the league. Heck, she was never even considered one of the more athletic college players. She's not fast, but before the ankle injury she was quicker than defenders thought. She was able to increase her scoring average by nearly 6 points from junior year to senior year without attempting more shots, and ESPN Sport Science explained how: The science behind Plum's shot is comparable to Curry's

She gets her shot off faster than Klay Thompson does, and she's also quick enough with her footwork and a hip rotation to keep her mechanics consistent.

After watching her for four years, I said that I didn't know what kind of pro she would be or how successful she would be at the next level. We still don't know. I haven't watched Mitchell much (none this year), but when I saw her last year, I remember being impressed. I wish her all the best. When it comes to the WNBA, though, every year there is less and less space for the undersized shoot-first guards who are sub-par defenders (although, according to Swish Appeal, one of the Kelseys is not as bad a defender as everyone thinks).


I believe that scoring increase was due to more calls by silly refs when she jumped into defenders Laughing


adamj95



Joined: 09 May 2014
Posts: 1452



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/14/18 1:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

With LA signing Pondexter, if Nurse somehow falls, the Lynx should be able to get her.



_________________
4 time WNBA Champion, 3rd all time in Assists, Minnesota's own: LINDSAY WHALEN.
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 7529



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/14/18 1:47 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

adamj95 wrote:
With LA signing Pondexter, if Nurse somehow falls, the Lynx should be able to get her.


Not sure I get the connection. If she falls to 12 the Lynx got her (if they want).



_________________
The fault...lies not not in our stars but in ourselves that we are losers.
adamj95



Joined: 09 May 2014
Posts: 1452



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/14/18 1:48 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
adamj95 wrote:
With LA signing Pondexter, if Nurse somehow falls, the Lynx should be able to get her.


Not sure I get the connection. If she falls to 12 the Lynx got her (if they want).


LA got another guard so if Nurse is available at 11, they probably won't draft her. Didn't word my first post right.



_________________
4 time WNBA Champion, 3rd all time in Assists, Minnesota's own: LINDSAY WHALEN.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47795



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/14/18 1:58 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Randy wrote:
adamj95 wrote:
With LA signing Pondexter, if Nurse somehow falls, the Lynx should be able to get her.


Not sure I get the connection. If she falls to 12 the Lynx got her (if they want).


If it were Nurse vs Vadeeva vs Russell at #12, that would be a dilemma, but a nice dilemma to have.

But yeah, even if the Lynx were to sign a vet guard, there’d still be room for Nurse. But they wouldn’t be able to roster another guard on top of that. If the Lynx do sign a vet guard, I’m leaning for them to draft a post with #12 if a nice one is available (not 5’11 Shakayla Thomas).



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
adamj95



Joined: 09 May 2014
Posts: 1452



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/14/18 2:02 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
Randy wrote:
adamj95 wrote:
With LA signing Pondexter, if Nurse somehow falls, the Lynx should be able to get her.


Not sure I get the connection. If she falls to 12 the Lynx got her (if they want).


If it were Nurse vs Vadeeva vs Russell at #12, that would be a dilemma, but a nice dilemma to have.

But yeah, even if the Lynx were to sign a vet guard, there’d still be room for Nurse. But they wouldn’t be able to roster another guard on top of that. If the Lynx do sign a vet guard, I’m leaning for them to draft a post with #12 if a nice one is available (not 5’11 Shakayla Thomas).


I think it'd be hard to pass up Nurse at #12 but if Vadeeva is available, I think you have to go with her.



_________________
4 time WNBA Champion, 3rd all time in Assists, Minnesota's own: LINDSAY WHALEN.
bcdawg04



Joined: 12 Apr 2016
Posts: 297
Location: Seattle


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/14/18 2:59 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nixtreefan wrote:
I believe that scoring increase was due to more calls by silly refs when she jumped into defenders Laughing


I'm not sure what you're talking about. It's not like they ever gave her much of anything against the Cardinal. Razz

Like that Elite 8 game, when that late call went against her that nobody outside of Stanford fans agreed with--Ticha Penicheiro and a few current WNBA players actually tweeted their disagreement with the call. Haha, I guess I've got to give the Pac-12 refs credit for being consistent in that regard. Razz


blaase22



Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 3714
Location: Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/14/18 6:03 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

adamj95 wrote:
Shades wrote:
Randy wrote:
adamj95 wrote:
With LA signing Pondexter, if Nurse somehow falls, the Lynx should be able to get her.


Not sure I get the connection. If she falls to 12 the Lynx got her (if they want).


If it were Nurse vs Vadeeva vs Russell at #12, that would be a dilemma, but a nice dilemma to have.

But yeah, even if the Lynx were to sign a vet guard, there’d still be room for Nurse. But they wouldn’t be able to roster another guard on top of that. If the Lynx do sign a vet guard, I’m leaning for them to draft a post with #12 if a nice one is available (not 5’11 Shakayla Thomas).


I think it'd be hard to pass up Nurse at #12 but if Vadeeva is available, I think you have to go with her.




Take Nurse and run and hope Vadeeva is there at 17
Doubt she shows up much at all anyway.


LibFan25



Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 472
Location: Yonkers, NY


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/15/18 7:10 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

@BillDoyle15: Ex-Celtic Dee Brown, GM of Clippers G-league team, is at Garden tonight. Before the game he predicted his daughter, Lexie, a star at Duke, would be a top three or four pick in the WNBA draft. The Celtics took Dee No. 19 in 1990.


Nixtreefan



Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 1870



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/15/18 10:58 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

bcdawg04 wrote:
Nixtreefan wrote:
I believe that scoring increase was due to more calls by silly refs when she jumped into defenders Laughing


I'm not sure what you're talking about. It's not like they ever gave her much of anything against the Cardinal. Razz

Like that Elite 8 game, when that late call went against her that nobody outside of Stanford fans agreed with--Ticha Penicheiro and a few current WNBA players actually tweeted their disagreement with the call. Haha, I guess I've got to give the Pac-12 refs credit for being consistent in that regard. Razz


BS she got more calls than any player in the PAC. Of course you are a homer, I am not defending Stanford I am talking about the whole PAC Laughing Plus when she didn't get a call she acted like a diva and threw elbows and Neighbors whined like a B....tch and apparently a lot more according to the fans of opposing teams as demonstrated by some posters on here. How'd she do down the stretch there in the NCAA.... oh thats right Osahor and Walton were carrying the team.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47795



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/15/18 11:38 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

LibFan25 wrote:
@BillDoyle15: Ex-Celtic Dee Brown, GM of Clippers G-league team, is at Garden tonight. Before the game he predicted his daughter, Lexie, a star at Duke, would be a top three or four pick in the WNBA draft. The Celtics took Dee No. 19 in 1990.


Not the best prediction. This guy sounds like a homer Wink

She has said she wanted go to the Sparks, but I can’t see her falling quite that far, and the Sparks are already overloaded at guard.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 56345
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/15/18 11:44 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Dee Brown coached in the W, so he should have some idea what it takes to make it.



_________________
Whether you're high or low
You gotta tip on the tightrope
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47795



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/15/18 12:18 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
Dee Brown coached in the W, so he should have some idea what it takes to make it.


Two years at two different teams, I’m guessing with little success. Not much of a resume to support your assertion.

I’d be pleasantly surprised if he was following women’s basketball closely enough to know who are the top picks. He don’t know. If you don’t know Lexie Brown isn’t Top 4, that’s an even bigger disappointment.

She’ll stick around the league if she wants. Top 4? No.

If Duke wins the NCAA tournament on her back, I may think differently. I mean, Stocks is as much a rookie as Curt Miller. Otherwise, just no.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
sigur3



Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 5989
Location: Chicago-ish


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/15/18 12:48 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

blaase22 wrote:

Take Nurse and run and hope Vadeeva is there at 17


Good luck!


blaase22



Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 3714
Location: Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/15/18 12:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

sigur3 wrote:
blaase22 wrote:

Take Nurse and run and hope Vadeeva is there at 17


Good luck!

won't be losing sleep over someone that won't show up anyway. Laughing


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 47795



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/15/18 1:39 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

blaase22 wrote:
sigur3 wrote:
blaase22 wrote:

Take Nurse and run and hope Vadeeva is there at 17


Good luck!

won't be losing sleep over someone that won't show up anyway. Laughing


She’s gotten too much hype from just about everyone, even though no one can really explain the hype. She probably won’t leave the first round unless she shows a disinterest in the WNBA.



_________________
Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
#Occasionalwnbafan



Joined: 01 Mar 2012
Posts: 1302



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/15/18 2:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

blaase22 wrote:
sigur3 wrote:
blaase22 wrote:

Take Nurse and run and hope Vadeeva is there at 17


Good luck!

won't be losing sleep over someone that won't show up anyway. Laughing


other then Liz and Ann how many foreign players get drafted and miss a bunch of seasons? Maybe Vadeeva is looking forward to playing in the WNBA and will show up often, I would take her over Kia in a heartbeat.
blaase22



Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 3714
Location: Paradise


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/15/18 2:25 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

#Occasionalwnbafan wrote:
blaase22 wrote:
sigur3 wrote:
blaase22 wrote:

Take Nurse and run and hope Vadeeva is there at 17


Good luck!

won't be losing sleep over someone that won't show up anyway. Laughing


other then Liz and Ann how many foreign players get drafted and miss a bunch of seasons? Maybe Vadeeva is looking forward to playing in the WNBA and will show up often, I would take her over Kia in a heartbeat.

There's lots more that don't show up, torrens?
Also she's not just foreign she's russian and they are less likely to show hope La takes her tbh.


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 26, 27, 28 ... 45, 46, 47  Next
Page 27 of 47

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin