View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stever
Joined: 16 Nov 2004 Posts: 6918 Location: https://womensbasketballdaily.net
Back to top |
Posted: 12/06/17 10:15 am ::: For the WNBA, business isn’t as bad as it looks |
Reply |
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2017/12/06/for-the-wnba-business-isnt-as-bad-as-it-looks/
Quote: |
WNBA owners have an incentive to maintain that the league is in the red, Berri said, as it gives them better bargaining position when negotiating with players. If owners said the league was profitable, players would be better positioned to ask for more money, which would drive up the cost of running a franchise — and even profitable WNBA franchises run on tight margins.
The WNBA only pays players roughly 20 percent of total league revenue, or $11 million split between every player in the league, according to Berri’s studies. The NBA pays players about half of league revenue, or about $3 billion. |
|
|
Nixtreefan
Joined: 14 Nov 2012 Posts: 2539
Back to top |
Posted: 12/06/17 11:32 am ::: |
Reply |
|
We are in an era where women could rule. Seize the moment and take advantage of all the years of guilt of the manly men.
|
|
WNBA 09
Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 12558 Location: Dallas , Texas
Back to top |
Posted: 12/06/17 11:44 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Thanks for posting this , Great read !
_________________ 3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
|
|
tfan
Joined: 31 May 2010 Posts: 9673
Back to top |
Posted: 12/06/17 1:37 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Don't think that this article made a case for the headline.
"Analysts say the league is right where it should be". And yet those analysts are burdened with the fact that "concrete financial information is scarce". And analysts say that "When WNBA teams sell, the purchase price is rarely announced ... because the teams aren’t worth much in cash."
It quotes James Dolan who says he never made a profit and says prospects to do so are slim - and he's in the most populated metro area in the United States.
Then they quote Aswath Damodaran, a professor of finance at New York University (and an analyst?) , who claims that when the league started shrinking owners began to realize that - in some cases - "they didn't make a lot of money". Damodaran then speaks cryptically of "forces that are making it more pricey as a business" which are actually good because these unspecified forces will "make more people get interested".
Then after mentioning the success of the NCAA wbb tournament and Title IX, it says that "the league needs owners to remain patient and to keep pumping resources into products that will make the game more popular".
The article does make the "we are further along than NBA was 50 years ago" case, and it quotes college professor Dave Berri saying that the league has an incentive to claim it is unprofitable for contract negotiations. But the "a lot of time to grow" case only seems to work if you are growing, and an incentive to say you are unprofitable does not mean you are profitable - particularly when the sale price of teams goes unannounced since they "aren't worth much in cash"..
|
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008 Posts: 32341
Back to top |
Posted: 12/06/17 4:56 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
It's a business. Businesses cook their books to pay the least possible tax. If it were truly totally unprofitable it's hard to believe a business person would continue in an ownership role for the goodness of his/her heart.
_________________ For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
josephkramer44
Joined: 23 Aug 2016 Posts: 136
Back to top |
Posted: 12/06/17 8:24 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
A very contradictory article to say the least with very few numbers.
|
|
ArtBest23
Joined: 02 Jul 2013 Posts: 14550
Back to top |
Posted: 12/07/17 10:13 am ::: |
Reply |
|
myrtle wrote: |
If it were truly totally unprofitable it's hard to believe a business person would continue in an ownership role for the goodness of his/her heart. |
They haven't, have they?
Is there another sport where in twenty years every original owner has dumped their franchise?
Most have just been fortunate to find someone new to replace them.
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 67020 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 12/07/17 10:48 am ::: |
Reply |
|
ArtBest23 wrote: |
Is there another sport where in twenty years every original owner has dumped their franchise? |
The NBA. Formed in 1946-47 with 13 teams. Within 20 years, 10 of them folded and the other three changed ownership at least once.
_________________ I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
tfan
Joined: 31 May 2010 Posts: 9673
Back to top |
Posted: 12/07/17 1:49 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
pilight wrote: |
ArtBest23 wrote: |
Is there another sport where in twenty years every original owner has dumped their franchise? |
The NBA. Formed in 1946-47 with 13 teams. Within 20 years, 10 of them folded and the other three changed ownership at least once. |
Wikipedia says it was 11 teams. in 1946-47, but maybe you are including some of the future merged teams from the other league.
Eastern Division
Washington Capitols
Philadelphia Warriors
New York Knicks
Providence Steamrollers
Boston Celtics
Toronto Huskies
Western Division
Chicago Stags
St. Louis Bombers
Cleveland Rebels
Detroit Falcons
Pittsburgh Ironmen
The interesting item from the Wikipedia article on the NBA is that while there were two existing pro leagues which had some of their teams in small markets and also played in places as small as high school gyms and hotel ballrooms, the BAA (what became the NBA) was formed to utilize large ice hockey arenas in big cities on days they would normally sit empty. So back then hockey was more popular than basketball.
If the NBA history is a guide, there is a good chance that the WNBA cities which lost teams, could get new versions in the future.
|
|
root_thing
Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 7365 Location: Underground
Back to top |
Posted: 12/07/17 4:21 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
tfan wrote: |
the BAA (what became the NBA) was formed to utilize large ice hockey arenas in big cities on days they would normally sit empty. So back then hockey was more popular than basketball. |
Maybe those were college or semi-pro arenas? The NHL started with four teams, and then from 1942 through 1967 they still only had six teams. I started watching around 1965-1966, so I remember the 6 team NHL and a 12 team NBA. My recollection of NY television in those days is that Roller Derby was on TV more than either the NBA or the NHL.
_________________ You can always do something else.
|
|
toad455
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 22477 Location: NJ
Back to top |
Posted: 12/07/17 5:53 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
if we're to judge expansion based in the NBA's history, the league didn't reach 12 teams(without contraction afterwards) until it's 21st season. By the NBA's 25th season, it reached 18 teams. And by it's 30th year the league reached 22 teams. Though I doubt the WNBA reaches even 20 teams by it's 30th year, I hope we get back up to 16 teams by then(2026) and possibly 24 teams by it's 50 anniversary(2046).
Dream scenario by 2046(*returning franchise):
NORTHEAST
New York Liberty
Connecticut Sun
Boston WNBA
Philadelphia WNBA
SOUTHEAST
Washington Mystics
Atlanta Dream
Nashville WNBA
Louisville WNBA
CENTRAL
Detroit Shock*
Indiana Fever
Chicago Sky
Cleveland Rockers*
MIDWEST
Kansas City WNBA
Minnesota Lynx
Oklahoma City WNBA
Denver WNBA
SOUTHWEST
Houston Comets*
Dallas Wings
Phoenix Mercury
Los Angeles Sparks
NORTHWEST
Sacramento Monarchs*
San Francisco WNBA
Portland Fire*
Seattle Storm
_________________ LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!
Twitter: @TBRBWAY
|
|
tfan
Joined: 31 May 2010 Posts: 9673
Back to top |
Posted: 12/07/17 5:54 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
root_thing wrote: |
tfan wrote: |
the BAA (what became the NBA) was formed to utilize large ice hockey arenas in big cities on days they would normally sit empty. So back then hockey was more popular than basketball. |
Maybe those were college or semi-pro arenas? |
I guess so. Or they were actually built for reasons other than ice hockey. One was built in 1890.
Eastern Division
Washington Capitols - Uline Arena - capacity 7,000 - built 1941
Philadelphia Warriors - Philadelphia Arena - capacity 7,000 - built 1920
New York Knicks - Madison Square Garden - capacity 16,000 - built 1925
Providence Steamrollers - Rhode Island Auditorium - capacity 5,300 - built 1926
Boston Celtics - Boston Arena - capacity 5,900 - built 1910
Toronto Huskies - Maple Leaf Gardens - capacity 15,000 - built 1931
Western Division
Chicago Stags - Chicago Stadium - capacity 18,676 - built 1929
St. Louis Bombers - St. Louis Arena - capacity 15,000 - built 1929
Cleveland Rebels - Cleveland Arena - capacity 10,000 - built 1937
Detroit Falcons - Detroit Olympia - capacity ?? - built 1927
Pittsburgh Ironmen - Duquesne Gardens - capacity 6,500 - built 1890
|
|
calbearman76
Joined: 02 Nov 2009 Posts: 5163 Location: Carson City
Back to top |
Posted: 12/08/17 4:09 am ::: |
Reply |
|
root_thing wrote: |
tfan wrote: |
the BAA (what became the NBA) was formed to utilize large ice hockey arenas in big cities on days they would normally sit empty. So back then hockey was more popular than basketball. |
Maybe those were college or semi-pro arenas? The NHL started with four teams, and then from 1942 through 1967 they still only had six teams. I started watching around 1965-1966, so I remember the 6 team NHL and a 12 team NBA. My recollection of NY television in those days is that Roller Derby was on TV more than either the NBA or the NHL. |
Expansion happened in the NBA and the NHL between 1966 and 1968. In 1966 there were 9 teams in the NBA and 6 teams in the NHL, and only 3 cities (New York, Boston and Detroit) had both. The NBA added Chicago in the 1966-7 year and then added Seattle and San Diego (who later moved to Houston) in 1967-8. The NHL expanded from 6 teams to 12 teams in the 1967-8 season. Of the 3 cities that had both an NHL and an NBA team the NHL was far more popular in Detroit but was roughly equal in Boston and New York. By the early seventies Chicago and Philadelphia, which due to expansion both had teams in each league, were both hockey towns and Boston, without the success of the Celtics, had become such a hockey town that it had a minor league hockey team that outdrew the Celtics. On the other hand the Knicks were far more popular than the Rangers in New York. And outside of the Northeast and the Upper Midwest the NHL could not gain a foothold.
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 67020 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 12/08/17 7:58 am ::: |
Reply |
|
tfan wrote: |
pilight wrote: |
The NBA. Formed in 1946-47 with 13 teams. Within 20 years, 10 of them folded and the other three changed ownership at least once. |
Wikipedia says it was 11 teams. in 1946-47, but maybe you are including some of the future merged teams from the other league. |
Two teams folded before the first season even started.
The current NBA has plenty of ownership turnover as well. The league had 29 teams when the WNBA was founded. 21 of them have changed owners since then. The league expanded by one team in that period, and that team has also changed owners.
_________________ I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
miller40
Joined: 29 Jun 2006 Posts: 1334
Back to top |
Posted: 12/08/17 1:28 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Comparisons to the NBA at the same time in its growth don't seem that helpful at all given how different society, technology and communication is now.
|
|
Hawkeye
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Posts: 764 Location: Houston, TX
Back to top |
Posted: 12/08/17 3:57 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
If Dolan coudn't make money on the Liberty in New York, he wasn't trying very hard. A team in a large market like New York, Chicago, LA, or even Houston and Phoenix has the population and resources to make a profit....the team just has to give a damn and market themselves to the city. WNBA teams fail because the teams marketing/Advertising departments fail.
|
|
Bob Lamm
Joined: 11 Apr 2010 Posts: 5065 Location: New York City
Back to top |
Posted: 12/08/17 4:35 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
miller40 wrote: |
Comparisons to the NBA at the same time in its growth don't seem that helpful at all given how different society, technology and communication is now. |
Exactly.
_________________ Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
|
|
Bob Lamm
Joined: 11 Apr 2010 Posts: 5065 Location: New York City
Back to top |
Posted: 12/08/17 4:40 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Hawkeye wrote: |
If Dolan coudn't make money on the Liberty in New York, he wasn't trying very hard. A team in a large market like New York, Chicago, LA, or even Houston and Phoenix has the population and resources to make a profit....the team just has to give a damn and market themselves to the city. WNBA teams fail because the teams marketing/Advertising departments fail. |
Why would the hideous Jimmy Dolan try hard to make money on the New York Liberty? Because he needs that money? No. Because he cares about MSG stockholders? No. Because he cares about women's basketball or women's sports in general? No.
I'd be careful, though: your last sentence can be read as blaming the staff of teams' marketing/advertising departments. They may be terrific but not have nearly the budget and resources to produce outstanding results.
_________________ Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
|
|
Randy
Joined: 08 Oct 2011 Posts: 10911
Back to top |
Posted: 12/08/17 9:49 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Having looked at ticket prices from time to time, it seems the Liberty have some of the highest ticket prices among WNBA teams and they are one of the attendance leaders. I don't see much support for the notion they are doing a poor job of marketing, at least compared to their peers.
|
|
toad455
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 22477 Location: NJ
Back to top |
Posted: 12/08/17 10:00 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Randy wrote: |
Having looked at ticket prices from time to time, it seems the Liberty have some of the highest ticket prices among WNBA teams and they are one of the attendance leaders. I don't see much support for the notion they are doing a poor job of marketing, at least compared to their peers. |
I always found it hard to believe the Liberty weren't making a profit. I know their three years at the Prudential Center set them back and apparently were on the verge of getting sold then, but all of what you stated Randy should have made them a profit.
_________________ LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!
Twitter: @TBRBWAY
|
|
Bob Lamm
Joined: 11 Apr 2010 Posts: 5065 Location: New York City
Back to top |
Posted: 12/08/17 10:06 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
toad455 wrote: |
Randy wrote: |
Having looked at ticket prices from time to time, it seems the Liberty have some of the highest ticket prices among WNBA teams and they are one of the attendance leaders. I don't see much support for the notion they are doing a poor job of marketing, at least compared to their peers. |
I always found it hard to believe the Liberty weren't making a profit. I know their three years at the Prudential Center set them back and apparently were on the verge of getting sold then, but all of what you stated Randy should have made them a profit. |
We don't know that the Liberty aren't making a profit. There are many ways for sports owners to cook the books, especially when a franchise has the same principal owner as the corporation that owns the arena where they play. To be clear, I'm not saying that the Liberty are making a profit. They may well be losing money. But I believe there's no way for us to genuinely know.
_________________ Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
|
|
tfan
Joined: 31 May 2010 Posts: 9673
Back to top |
Posted: 12/08/17 11:25 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Bob Lamm wrote: |
Hawkeye wrote: |
If Dolan coudn't make money on the Liberty in New York, he wasn't trying very hard. A team in a large market like New York, Chicago, LA, or even Houston and Phoenix has the population and resources to make a profit....the team just has to give a damn and market themselves to the city. WNBA teams fail because the teams marketing/Advertising departments fail. |
Why would the hideous Jimmy Dolan try hard to make money on the New York Liberty? Because he needs that money? No. Because he cares about MSG stockholders? No. Because he cares about women's basketball or women's sports in general? No.
|
Why did he own the team for 21 years if he didn't care about making money for himself or others and didn't care about women's basketball and didn't care about women's sports in general?
|
|
Bob Lamm
Joined: 11 Apr 2010 Posts: 5065 Location: New York City
Back to top |
Posted: 12/08/17 11:55 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
tfan wrote: |
Bob Lamm wrote: |
Hawkeye wrote: |
If Dolan coudn't make money on the Liberty in New York, he wasn't trying very hard. A team in a large market like New York, Chicago, LA, or even Houston and Phoenix has the population and resources to make a profit....the team just has to give a damn and market themselves to the city. WNBA teams fail because the teams marketing/Advertising departments fail. |
Why would the hideous Jimmy Dolan try hard to make money on the New York Liberty? Because he needs that money? No. Because he cares about MSG stockholders? No. Because he cares about women's basketball or women's sports in general? No.
|
Why did he own the team for 21 years if he didn't care about making money for himself or others and didn't care about women's basketball and didn't care about women's sports in general? |
He's a bored rich guy who's never achieved anything himself, who's gotten everything from Daddy. Bored rich guys like toys. That's why a bunch of them are sports owners.
_________________ Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
|
|
tfan
Joined: 31 May 2010 Posts: 9673
Back to top |
Posted: 12/09/17 10:33 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Bob Lamm wrote: |
tfan wrote: |
Bob Lamm wrote: |
Hawkeye wrote: |
If Dolan coudn't make money on the Liberty in New York, he wasn't trying very hard. A team in a large market like New York, Chicago, LA, or even Houston and Phoenix has the population and resources to make a profit....the team just has to give a damn and market themselves to the city. WNBA teams fail because the teams marketing/Advertising departments fail. |
Why would the hideous Jimmy Dolan try hard to make money on the New York Liberty? Because he needs that money? No. Because he cares about MSG stockholders? No. Because he cares about women's basketball or women's sports in general? No.
|
Why did he own the team for 21 years if he didn't care about making money for himself or others and didn't care about women's basketball and didn't care about women's sports in general? |
He's a bored rich guy who's never achieved anything himself, who's gotten everything from Daddy. Bored rich guys like toys. That's why a bunch of them are sports owners. |
Don't see how he can have no interest in women's basketball and yet owning a women's basketball team makes him less bored. Seems like you have to give him credit for something.
|
|
Bob Lamm
Joined: 11 Apr 2010 Posts: 5065 Location: New York City
Back to top |
Posted: 12/09/17 1:04 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
tfan wrote: |
Bob Lamm wrote: |
tfan wrote: |
Bob Lamm wrote: |
Hawkeye wrote: |
If Dolan coudn't make money on the Liberty in New York, he wasn't trying very hard. A team in a large market like New York, Chicago, LA, or even Houston and Phoenix has the population and resources to make a profit....the team just has to give a damn and market themselves to the city. WNBA teams fail because the teams marketing/Advertising departments fail. |
Why would the hideous Jimmy Dolan try hard to make money on the New York Liberty? Because he needs that money? No. Because he cares about MSG stockholders? No. Because he cares about women's basketball or women's sports in general? No.
|
Why did he own the team for 21 years if he didn't care about making money for himself or others and didn't care about women's basketball and didn't care about women's sports in general? |
He's a bored rich guy who's never achieved anything himself, who's gotten everything from Daddy. Bored rich guys like toys. That's why a bunch of them are sports owners. |
Don't see how he can have no interest in women's basketball and yet owning a women's basketball team makes him less bored. Seems like you have to give him credit for something. |
Sorry, but I don't have to give credit to bored rich guys for playing with their toys. I will reserve my credit for the coaches and players of the New York Liberty and the other WNBA teams. I have great respect for them.
_________________ Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
|
|
|
|