RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Exhibition Games
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LitePal



Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 613



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 2:23 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

And good luck to you Pat. As someone who lived through the Kathy Olivier years, I can tell you firsthand that moral victories get very shallow after a while. If the program is not intended or expected to win, why should the student body support the program?

I can almost guarantee one thing. If USC with Trakh surpasses UCLA this season and/or next, some very serious questions will be asked.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66773
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 2:34 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Pitt loses to Indiana (PA)

http://iupathletics.com/news/2017/11/5/appleby-nets-20-points-iup-womens-basketball-defeats-pitt-73-68-in-final-exhibition.aspx



_________________
Let us not deceive ourselves. Our educational institutions have proven to be no bastions of democracy.
summertime blues



Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 7746
Location: Shenandoah Valley


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 2:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
Pitt loses to Indiana (PA)

http://iupathletics.com/news/2017/11/5/appleby-nets-20-points-iup-womens-basketball-defeats-pitt-73-68-in-final-exhibition.aspx


Ouch!



_________________
Don't take life so serious. It ain't nohows permanent.
It takes 3 years to build a team and 7 to build a program.--Conventional Wisdom
Fighting Artichoke



Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 4040



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 3:13 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

That's the same IUP team that Notre Dame destroyed last week, 104-40. Obviously, Pitt is in trouble. Could Suzie McConnell-Serio be in trouble as well?


Conway Gamecock



Joined: 23 Jan 2015
Posts: 1881
Location: Here


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 4:00 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:
Maybe they're not underperforming. Maybe they were just over-hyped.
Seriously, the UCLA senior class is very good, but they aren't such an overwhelmingly talented group as a whole that final fours were inevitable. A few other schools have equal or better or deeper talent.

So maybe the expectations and demands were just too high.

When considering coaching, I'd be more concerned about their frequently sloppy play than about their tournament finishes.


If ESPN's Hoopgurlz is any credible measure, then UCLA is the most talented WCBB program in the nation. They had that one class, but they haven't been slouches in bringing in talent in any of the other cycles.

Currently UCLA has 10 former 5-star rated players per Hoopgurlz on their roster. All 10 were rated top 10 nationally at their respective positions. Six of those 10 were rated top 5. They also have a high 4-star Post in Rosenblum who was also rated 7th at her position in her class, making for a total of 11 players rated in the top 10 nationally at their positions, for this coming season.

6 of those players are either Srs, RS-Jrs, or Jrs. With that type of talent, they SHOULD be voted top of their conference, and they should win their conference going away. To only get a couple of Sweet Sixteens out of that talent is definitely underachieving, or Dan Olson is a hack.....


ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 4:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

patsweetpat wrote:
ArtBest23 wrote:
When considering coaching, I'd be more concerned about their frequently sloppy play than about their tournament finishes.


UCLA's turnover margin and A/TO% were tops in the P12 last season. UCLA's turnover percentage last season (13.3) was 6th-best in the entire nation.


I wasn't basing that on stats nor was I using "sloppy" to refer only to turnovers.

Maybe I should have said "dumb" play, encompassing bad or forced shots, selfish shots, out of control play, out of position play, etc.

They just look pretty sloppy and undisciplined to me for stretches of play.

Yeah, it's just an "eyeball" test, but it's still more indicative to me of coaching than a simplistic measure of "they didn't advance far enough in the tournament". There's a million reasons for the later outcome, many of which have nothing to do with coaching.


ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 4:29 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Fighting Artichoke wrote:
That's the same IUP team that Notre Dame destroyed last week, 104-40. Obviously, Pitt is in trouble. Could Suzie McConnell-Serio be in trouble as well?


You would think so, but she such a local institution, and who could they hire who would be better?

It's seems she has really fallen on her face recruiting.

Maybe the fix should start by making her stop hiring her family and get some new assistants and staff committed to recruiting.

Or maybe it's just a Pennsylvania thing, considering that PSU lost their exhbition too.


patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2305
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 4:36 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Conway Gamecock wrote:
If ESPN's Hoopgurlz is any credible measure, then UCLA is the most talented WCBB program in the nation. They had that one class, but they haven't been slouches in bringing in talent in any of the other cycles.

Currently UCLA has 10 former 5-star rated players per Hoopgurlz on their roster. All 10 were rated top 10 nationally at their respective positions. Six of those 10 were rated top 5. They also have a high 4-star Post in Rosenblum who was also rated 7th at her position in her class, making for a total of 11 players rated in the top 10 nationally at their positions, for this coming season.

6 of those players are either Srs, RS-Jrs, or Jrs. With that type of talent, they SHOULD be voted top of their conference, and they should win their conference going away. To only get a couple of Sweet Sixteens out of that talent is definitely underachieving, or Dan Olson is a hack.....


No doubt UCLA has a lot of talent and depth this season. It's gonna be a very exciting year in Westwood, and they've got the opportunity to do some very special things, and to build on what has already been the best sustained run in UCLA womens' basketball history since the 1970s.


LitePal



Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 613



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 4:37 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

If you're also talking continued success, clearly Billie Moore had more of it than Close. Caldwell Fargas had a superior w/l record, even if you simply count the last three seasons of Close with her #1 class. Close's finishes in the Pac: T5, 3, 8, 6, T3, 4. Fargas: T4, 2, 2. Tournament: Close 2015: Quarter, 2016 Championship Game 2017: Semi. Fargas: 2010 Championship Game 2011 Championship Game

Jordin Canada and Monique Billings may sadly come out of this with no AA titles to their credit.


patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2305
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 4:41 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:
patsweetpat wrote:
ArtBest23 wrote:
When considering coaching, I'd be more concerned about their frequently sloppy play than about their tournament finishes.


UCLA's turnover margin and A/TO% were tops in the P12 last season. UCLA's turnover percentage last season (13.3) was 6th-best in the entire nation.


I wasn't basing that on stats nor was I using "sloppy" to refer only to turnovers.


Well, I hope you weren't using "sloppy" to refer *at all* to turnovers, as the statistics directly refute you.

But it appears that you're using "sloppy" to refer to things that cannot be statistically measured, which I guess makes your assertion simultaneously irrefutable and unconfirmable.


ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 4:49 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Which of course is why I said I would be more concerned about their frequently sloppy play. That's my opinion.

You of course are free to have a different view and to consider them the most orderly, planned, disciplined team in the nation if you wish. Personally I don't see any evidence of that, but of course, as you say, such a proposition would "simultaneously irrefutable and unconfirmable."


patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2305
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 5:11 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

LitePal wrote:
If you're also talking continued success, clearly Billie Moore had more of it than Close.


Billie Moore is a legend, but I was talking about continued success in the NCAA era. Moore coached UCLA for 11 seasons of NCAA basketball (between '82-'83 and '92-'93) and in those 11 seasons, UCLA went to the NCAA tournament a total of 4 times, featuring two appearances in the Sweet 16, and two outs in the 1st round. I'm guessing that would not be satisfactory to you today.

LitePal wrote:
Caldwell Fargas had a superior w/l record, even if you simply count the last three seasons of Close with her #1 class.


That's true. Wanna bet whether or not that ends up being the case when this season is completed and we can compare Caldwell's 3-year W/L record to UCLA's record in the 3 seasons spanning 2015-16 to 2017-18?

In any event, this remains the case: before this current run, UCLA had sent a women's basketball team to the NCAA Sweet 16 exactly three times in the program's entire history. If the Bruins should happen to make it to the Sweet 16 this current season (and, again, care to bet on that?), then this current team will have matched-- in 3 consecutive seasons-- what the UCLA women's basketball program had done in its entire NCAA tournament history, combined. I just can't find it in myself to mull that fact and conclude that the coach needs to be fired.


patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2305
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 5:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:
You of course are free to have a different view and to consider them the most orderly, planned, disciplined team in the nation if you wish."


Please cite specifically where I called them that. I can't seem to find it.


ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 5:20 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

patsweetpat wrote:
ArtBest23 wrote:
You of course are free to have a different view and to consider them the most orderly, planned, disciplined team in the nation if you wish."


Please cite specifically where I called them that. I can't seem to find it.


Did I say you did? I said you're free to view them that way if you choose. You certainly didn't seem to like my characterization.


myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32326



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 6:30 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

There are some teams that seem to play less organized and more of a flow offense (which in the extreme becomes 'street ball'). IMO UCLA is definitely more toward the flow end...which works reasonably well when you have at least two really good players who can make it work. At the other end of the spectrum is a Green Bay or Marist, whose success is thru extreme organization because they don't have the tip top athletes. Stanford is also toward the organized end of the spectrum. From my perspective as long as it works, it's not really a knock on a team. I do think that with the level of athletes involved both UCLA and Cal have under-achieved over a period of years, and some of that inevitably devolves onto the coach. Of course everyone has their own idea of under-achieving - my own is admittedly totally subjective. JMO



_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2305
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 7:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:
patsweetpat wrote:
ArtBest23 wrote:
You of course are free to have a different view and to consider them the most orderly, planned, disciplined team in the nation if you wish."


Please cite specifically where I called them that. I can't seem to find it.


Did I say you did? I said you're free to view them that way if you choose. You certainly didn't seem to like my characterization.


Fair enough. And apologies for an unnecessarily snippy and sarcastic response. Definitely a bad habit of mine. Lemme tone myself down about a half shade and posit that there's a big space between "frequently sloppy play" and "the most orderly, planned, disciplined team in the nation." In my opinion, UCLA resides somewhere within that space.


FrozenLVFan



Joined: 08 Jul 2014
Posts: 3510



Back to top
PostPosted: 11/07/17 9:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Tenn 121, Carson-Newman 76

Freshman look great, need some work on defense, but scored 76 of those points, and the team finally has some decent point guards. Westbrook and Davis are the real deal, Hayes is a speed demon, and KK played better than expected. Green is out with some minor injury so we didn't get to see her.


LibFan25



Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 893
Location: NY


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/10/17 7:32 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

FrozenLVFan wrote:
Tenn 121, Carson-Newman 76

Freshman look great, need some work on defense, but scored 76 of those points, and the team finally has some decent point guards. Westbrook and Davis are the real deal, Hayes is a speed demon, and KK played better than expected. Green is out with some minor injury so we didn't get to see her.



Watching the game, Westbrook is my favorite. great size Combo Guard can play the 1 and 2. Very smooth jumper, she's gonna be a star. That Hayes/Westbrook combo is gonna be dangerous for years to come, thanks to Hayes speed to created easy baskets.


WNBA 09



Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 12493
Location: Dallas , Texas


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/10/17 9:52 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

LibFan25 wrote:
FrozenLVFan wrote:
Tenn 121, Carson-Newman 76

Freshman look great, need some work on defense, but scored 76 of those points, and the team finally has some decent point guards. Westbrook and Davis are the real deal, Hayes is a speed demon, and KK played better than expected. Green is out with some minor injury so we didn't get to see her.



Watching the game, Westbrook is my favorite. great size Combo Guard can play the 1 and 2. Very smooth jumper, she's gonna be a star. That Hayes/Westbrook combo is gonna be dangerous for years to come, thanks to Hayes speed to created easy baskets.


Wheres the game available to watch ? I could not find on UTsports.com just the postgame .



_________________
3-Time WNBA Champion-3-Time National Champion-4-Time Olympic Champion....And Yes DT "We Got Confeti" lol
FollowtheCardinalRule



Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 5153
Location: Denver


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/10/17 9:58 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

WNBA 09 wrote:
LibFan25 wrote:
FrozenLVFan wrote:
Tenn 121, Carson-Newman 76

Freshman look great, need some work on defense, but scored 76 of those points, and the team finally has some decent point guards. Westbrook and Davis are the real deal, Hayes is a speed demon, and KK played better than expected. Green is out with some minor injury so we didn't get to see her.



Watching the game, Westbrook is my favorite. great size Combo Guard can play the 1 and 2. Very smooth jumper, she's gonna be a star. That Hayes/Westbrook combo is gonna be dangerous for years to come, thanks to Hayes speed to created easy baskets.


Wheres the game available to watch ? I could not find on UTsports.com just the postgame .


Replay is on ESPN3


LibFan25



Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 893
Location: NY


Back to top
PostPosted: 11/10/17 10:33 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

WNBA 09 wrote:
LibFan25 wrote:
FrozenLVFan wrote:
Tenn 121, Carson-Newman 76

Freshman look great, need some work on defense, but scored 76 of those points, and the team finally has some decent point guards. Westbrook and Davis are the real deal, Hayes is a speed demon, and KK played better than expected. Green is out with some minor injury so we didn't get to see her.



Watching the game, Westbrook is my favorite. great size Combo Guard can play the 1 and 2. Very smooth jumper, she's gonna be a star. That Hayes/Westbrook combo is gonna be dangerous for years to come, thanks to Hayes speed to created easy baskets.


Wheres the game available to watch ? I could not find on UTsports.com just the postgame .



Download WatchESPN app on your phone or any device you have and click women's basketball, then click replay SECN +


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin