View previous topic :: View next topic |
Who will win this game? |
Liberty |
|
31% |
[ 7 ] |
Storm |
|
68% |
[ 15 ] |
|
Total Votes : 22 |
|
Author |
Message |
LibFan25
Joined: 01 Sep 2012 Posts: 894 Location: NY
Back to top |
Posted: 05/27/17 3:04 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
ClayK wrote: |
I'm unconvinced Canada is a quality perimeter shooter. She only took 82 threes in 34 games, and though her percentage was 35.4, my sense is most of those were wide-open.
This is not to say she can't improve, but until she shows she must be guarded beyond the arc, it will be hard for her to score in the WNBA. She's neither tall nor strongly built. |
Ok So who do you suggest we should draft? Cuz we all know PG has become a major need now, I love Boyd but she is injury prone now, need some insurance behind her for the future. Im all in with draftin Canada unless we become a disaster this year and become a lottery team which i highly doubt this team is still good enuff
|
|
ClayK
Joined: 11 Oct 2005 Posts: 11146
Back to top |
Posted: 05/27/17 3:19 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
LibFan25 wrote: |
ClayK wrote: |
I'm unconvinced Canada is a quality perimeter shooter. She only took 82 threes in 34 games, and though her percentage was 35.4, my sense is most of those were wide-open.
This is not to say she can't improve, but until she shows she must be guarded beyond the arc, it will be hard for her to score in the WNBA. She's neither tall nor strongly built. |
Ok So who do you suggest we should draft? Cuz we all know PG has become a major need now, I love Boyd but she is injury prone now, need some insurance behind her for the future. Im all in with draftin Canada unless we become a disaster this year and become a lottery team which i highly doubt this team is still good enuff |
That's a great question ... I don't know of a point guard who can shoot at the level required. Destiny Slocum, but she's not eligible yet. Same with Sabrina Ionescu, though there are legitimate questions about bot6h of them at the next level.
_________________ Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
|
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008 Posts: 32335
Back to top |
Posted: 05/27/17 3:29 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Whalen has never been much of a shooter but everyone thinks she is a good PG. DRob is even less of a shooter and she is generally considered to be a good PG. Boyd is not a shooter but some people think that's ok. Clarendon seems to be making a niche for herself and she is not a shooter. Yeah, it's nice to have a PG who can also shoot but they don't seem to grow on trees. There is Bird...and then there are the rest. It's maybe become more important to be a decent defender. [?] Or you can say there are three main qualifications:
1)seeing the floor and distributing
2)shooting
3)defending
Most successful PGs do 2 of the 3, but very, very few can do all three. I personally think that's where January shines. She's not the best at any of them but she's quite good at all of them.
_________________ For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
Michelle89
Joined: 17 Nov 2010 Posts: 16464 Location: Holland
Back to top |
Posted: 05/27/17 5:09 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
myrtle wrote: |
Whalen has never been much of a shooter but everyone thinks she is a good PG. DRob is even less of a shooter and she is generally considered to be a good PG. Boyd is not a shooter but some people think that's ok. Clarendon seems to be making a niche for herself and she is not a shooter. Yeah, it's nice to have a PG who can also shoot but they don't seem to grow on trees. There is Bird...and then there are the rest. It's maybe become more important to be a decent defender. [?] Or you can say there are three main qualifications:
1)seeing the floor and distributing
2)shooting
3)defending
Most successful PGs do 2 of the 3, but very, very few can do all three. I personally think that's where January shines. She's not the best at any of them but she's quite good at all of them. |
The most important thing is distributing the ball and that is also where January is weakest of the 3. She only averages 3,6 assists for her career. That is just too low IMO
_________________ "Sue Bird and Lauren Jackson were and are the dynamic duo. They're the one-two punch. They're all the clich�s possible to describe people that perfectly complement each other, who make each other better and also bring out the best in the team." �Karen Bryant
|
|
NYL_WNBA_FAN
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 14097
Back to top |
Posted: 05/27/17 6:11 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Both Whalen and Robinson are excellent (or Robinson was at least) midrange shooters. Boyd showed some willingness to do the midrange thing in the game she got hurt. Don't know if she could ever have been consistent with it, but with her speed that shot was always available if she wanted it.
January has the intangibles of toughness, leadership and clutch play. Also Catch did a lot of the distributing for their team. Might have lowered her assist numbers a bit though I wouldn't characterize her vision as anything exceptional. I'd take her on this team right away though.
_________________ The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
|
|
tfan
Joined: 31 May 2010 Posts: 9617
Back to top |
Posted: 05/27/17 6:53 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ejAcas7Qm2g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
|
cappa23MVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2010 Posts: 411
Back to top |
Posted: 05/27/17 8:06 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
root_thing wrote: |
cappa23MVP wrote: |
Yes, I most certainly do...and when she does that in a playoff game, a win and get in game...when it's one and done, get back at me. I will gladly give Piph her props, until then, I'll "color" her, clutchless |
I agree on the playoffs -- I've made that argument myself. However, I've seen Prince hit a number of big shots during the regular season. So, it's not fair to make a blanket statement that she never makes clutch shots. I'm objecting to the exaggeration.
I think Liberty fans are overreacting to this loss. Whitcomb had an unconscious game and that was clearly the difference. Instead of blaming the players, shouldn't people ask why Laimbeer made no adjustments to the defense? Yes, he changed defenders -- replacing Allen with Rodgers, and Rodgers with Zellous -- but the approach was the same. Even after Whitcomb hit four or five 3s, you still saw the Liberty defender playing off her and hedging toward the middle. That's the Liberty base defense -- protecting the middle and daring you to beat them from outside. It's at the discretion of the coach to make an adjustment. However, all I saw was one trap run at Whitcomb and I'm not even convinced it was intentional. Tina jumped out to help and it turned into a trap. Time and again we've seen opponents get hot from the outside and the Liberty choose not to adjust. It's been going on for five seasons now (really seven since Whisenant took the same approach). After awhile, you just have to accept that this is their philosophy and that the team is willing to live or die with their system. Since this is a good year to finish lower -- even if you want to make the playoffs -- I can live with the loss. Is there such a thing as a semi-tank?
Regarding Whitcomb, a few of us on this board kept saying that somebody should sign her. That's one for the basement! |
Ok, perhaps I need to make myself clear. When I say Piph is clutchless, I'm referring to her "BIG" game ability in a playoff situation. I thought I made that clear, one and done game, play in game...playoff game.
Piph, is a scorer, who doesn't score when it counts most in crunch time of Big playoff or play in games...must win games. Saying that isn't exaggeration..it's fact.
_________________ TINA CHARLES IS A MOTHERFUKIN BOSS.
|
|
mugsyt
Joined: 29 Jan 2010 Posts: 33
Back to top |
Posted: 05/27/17 9:29 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
32 free throw attempts for Seattle vs. 14 for NY.
|
|
caune
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 17919 Location: Valley of the Bun
Back to top |
Posted: 05/27/17 11:28 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Awwww. Juniors all grown up and living her dream! Thanks for sharing this Luuuc
_________________ Because there is only one Diana Taurasi.
@Phoenix Mercury
|
|
J-Spoon
Joined: 31 Jan 2009 Posts: 6796
Back to top |
Posted: 05/27/17 11:34 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
toad455 wrote: |
I do think Laimbeer waits until he can bring in those two replacement players. I have to think it'll be Lindsay Allen and a post player. If Lindsay Allen plays well, he can keep her for the rest of the season and dump either Burdick, Raincock or Hartley. I'd prefer he dump Hartley at this point. I love the hustle from Burdick & Raincock. |
OK Temp PG L. Allen, maybe C. Hopkins or someone else
so who is the temp big?
Baugh, Bulgak, Hamson, Gray, Gatling, Graves, Osahor, Pedersen, Greene?
|
|
root_thing
Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 7365 Location: Underground
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 1:14 am ::: |
Reply |
|
J-Spoon wrote: |
so who is the temp big?
Baugh, Bulgak, Hamson, Gray, Gatling, Graves, Osahor, Pedersen, Greene? |
So you weren't impressed with Kai James?
Given how much trouble players seem to be having with the (new?) Liberty offense, whoever comes in may never get off the bench. Out of the bunch you named, I think Baugh is best prepared to step in cold. Avery Warley-Talbert is also out there if you want to go for Round 3. Otherwise, if they just want to look at somebody as a possible project, then maybe Hamson. I know management liked Swords, so maybe they'd want to assess whether Hamson can become that kind of player. If nothing else, she can give you some needed rim protection. Right now, the team is below average with 13 blocks in 4 games, and most of those blocks are from the perimeter: Rodgers 5, Stokes 4, Allen 3, Tina 1, Vaughn 0, Zahui B 0, NRE 0.
_________________ You can always do something else.
|
|
NYL_WNBA_FAN
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 14097
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 9:15 am ::: |
Reply |
|
So I'm guessing from what has been said that we lose Piph and Kia after the LA game. LA is a differently constructed team this year and they've lost 2 straight on the road. So perhaps we can steal a win over them. After that it is 5 of 7 at home. Two against Dallas, who appears to be cooling off, and 2 against CT who has not won a game.
Mind you, I am taking NO team for granted. Out of the next 8, I'd say if we can win 4-5 of them, I think in general we can probably be ok later on. By then Kiah will probably be in shape and Zahui will have gotten some significant minutes with the absence of Vaughn, which may push her game along.
I wouldn't be surprised if they bring in 2 PGs with the two open spots, being that both Burdick and Nayo can play some 4 spot and the PG situation is such a need. Plus none of those available posts are going to make much of an impact.
_________________ The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
|
|
zune69
Joined: 27 May 2010 Posts: 8183
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 10:39 am ::: |
Reply |
|
NYL_WNBA_FAN wrote: |
Mind you, I am taking NO team for granted. Out of the next 8, I'd say if we can win 4-5 of them, I think in general we can probably be ok later on. By then Kiah will probably be in shape and Zahui will have gotten some significant minutes with the absence of Vaughn, which may push her game along.
|
I disagree with the bolded.If Zahui doesn't produce,her minutes will continue to decline.Laimbeer will just play Charles/Stokes 66-70 minutes,and give Burdick,NRE,and Allen the leftovers.This is it for Zahui.If she doesn't step up during the absence of Vaughn,this will be Zahui's last season playing for the Liberty.
Last edited by zune69 on 05/28/17 11:06 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
toad455
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 22474 Location: NJ
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 10:50 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Completely agree about Zahui B. This is her last shot. Has a huge opportunity to play some significant minutes when Vaughn leaves. Otherwise I can see Laimbeer dumping her once Vaughn returns.
_________________ LET'S GO LIBERTY!!!!!!
Twitter: @TBRBWAY
|
|
myrtle
Joined: 02 May 2008 Posts: 32335
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 11:35 am ::: |
Reply |
|
If Kai James 'got it' at all, then I think she's back. That was the whole point of spending so much time with her in preseason [I'm guessing] and Tina seemed to really take her under wing.
_________________ For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
|
|
root_thing
Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 7365 Location: Underground
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 12:25 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I don't see Charles and Stokes logging 66-70 mpg. Laimbeer has said he wants to reduce the minutes for Tina. He even apologized after the last game for using her so much. Bill also doesn't want to put her back at center. As for Stokes, she usually gets into foul trouble at this level and can't play that many minutes. I also think she's tired. It amuses me that Laimbeer makes one off the cuff remark about Stokes being out of shape and now it's treated as gospel. You're talking about a player who was a career backup at UConn and has played 24-25 mpg for NY. All of a sudden she's playing 36.3 mpg in Turkey. There was no break between Turkey and her arrival in NY. Are those factors more likely to produce an out of shape player or someone who is tired? Does Kiah look out of shape? Camille Little looks 50% bigger and I haven't seen any comments about her being out of shape. Anyway, Zahui absolutely has to play. Burdick and NRE are undersized at PF much less at C. And once again, I have to point out that Allen has never played PF as far as I know. Bec actually has some emergency PG experience if they get truly desperate. More likely, you'll see her play some SG if Hartley totally bombs as lead guard and Bill ends up using Sugar or Zellous at the point. I think it's meaningful that Allen finished the Minnesota game at SG.
_________________ You can always do something else.
|
|
Bob Lamm
Joined: 11 Apr 2010 Posts: 5065 Location: New York City
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 12:50 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
No way will Charles and Stokes play 66-70 minutes together, game after game.
And as for "dumping" Zahui B, wow, people here are in such a rush to dump this player or that one. Zahui B didn't play all that much as a rookie. She came to a new team last season and did decently. She's very young. She's off to a disappointing start, no question. Suppose she plays more minutes in June and doesn't do well. Give up on her already? In favor of Kai James, Avery Warley-Talbert, or 10 other post players who've been mentioned? I think that would be crazy.
_________________ Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
Last edited by Bob Lamm on 05/28/17 12:55 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
NYL_WNBA_FAN
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 14097
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 12:54 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Kiah looks awful to me. Laimbeer said it twice. After the Columbia game he said that they would see what type of shape she was in, as if he already knew. And he said it again after game 1. I think you're seeing it as profoundly on the offensive end as the defensive end. She averaged 7 ppg on 64% shooting last year in 25 mpg. This year she is at 3.3 ppg on 31.3 % at 20 mpg. Her elevation is lousy. She is terribly off-balance even on layups and short turnarounds she would normally make with ease. At least being a high % scorer on layups made her a threat in certain offensive sets. Now she's not. And her help defense isn't there. I don't think it's fatigue. Fatigue wouldn't affect the height of her jump and wouldn't affect her balance to the extent that it has when she catches the ball in the paint and has little coordination. I think it's clear that she's not in condition to play. And if anything, I think we had an expectation that she would break out, not completely regress. She should be a 28-30 mpg player now.
Our team defense, once a staple, is also at the league average in points per possession, another indicator that our formerly best defensive player isn't having the impact she used to. Our rebound percentage is up to 3rd in the league but I think that also needs to be better. In spite of Kiah's rebounds on Friday, she could have and should have had 3 or 4 more that went through her hands. To me, balance and coordination are issues there too.
_________________ The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
Last edited by NYL_WNBA_FAN on 05/28/17 12:59 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Bob Lamm
Joined: 11 Apr 2010 Posts: 5065 Location: New York City
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 12:58 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
NYL_WNBA_FAN wrote: |
Kiah looks awful to me. Laimbeer said it twice. After the Columbia he said that they would see what type of shape she was in, as if he already knew. And he said it again after game 1. I think you're seeing it as profoundly on the offensive end as the defensive end. She averaged 7 ppg on 64% shooting last year in 25 mpg. This year she is at 3.3 ppg on 31.3 % at 20 mpg. Her elevation is lousy. She is terribly off-balance even on layups and short turnarounds she would normally make with ease. At least being a high % scorer on layups made her a threat in certain offensive sets. Now she's not. And her help defense isn't there. I don't think it's fatigue. Fatigue wouldn't affect the height of her jump and wouldn't affect her balance to the extent that it has when she catches the ball in the paint and has little coordination. I think it's clear that she's not in condition to play. And if anything, I think we had an expectation that she would break out, not completely regress. |
I disagree with all of this. Fatigue can affect anything. She's off to a bad start. No one can dispute that. But it's only four games. I'm not writing her off yet.
_________________ Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
|
|
NYL_WNBA_FAN
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 14097
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 1:01 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I'm not writing her off either though I don't anticipate a quick turnaround. But why is it in dispute that she's out of shape when the coach himself has said it twice? It's not like I'm speculating. If I was, then I could understand.
Maybe fatigue is ALSO a factor, but her balance, coordination, timing and jumping also have to be affected by other factors. Fatigue alone wouldn't cause such extreme adjustments in performance and ability.
And since it's been documented, I think it's pretty fair to question and be upset and disappointed. She has the tools to be a force, yet I'm not sure we've really seen the desire to improve her game. If you remember, after her first overseas season Laimbeer remarked that she had done nearly nothing to work on her offensive game in South Korea, though some of that may have been coaching and not her fault. Still, repeated documented instances by the coach of a lack of readiness to be at her best are a disappointment and well within our right to question.
And if we were going to take a step forward without Wright, Swords and Cash providing intangibles and physicality, I think we'd agree Kiah was the number one player we needed to step up.
_________________ The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
|
|
NYL_WNBA_FAN
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 14097
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 1:09 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I agree with not giving up on Zahui though. And yes, she has to play. Perhaps she is not healthy.
_________________ The poster formerly known as LibWNBAFan.
|
|
zune69
Joined: 27 May 2010 Posts: 8183
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 1:43 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Just because Laimbeer said he wants to reduce Charles' minutes,doesn't mean it's going to happen.Tina has a career minute avg of 32.5,and averaged a career high of 33.7 last season.Back to Zahui b.....Vaughn is leaving in a matter of days.Zahui b. played "0" minutes against seattle.Not much of a vote of confidence by coach Laimbeer.I've been a big Zahui b supporter,but at some point she needs to woman up,and give the liberty 15-22 quality minutes per game.Liberty fans had high hopes for Zahui in 2017.But yet,after 4 games...1.3p/1r/40%/1 dnp in 5 mpg....Again,Laimbeer will not play Zahui b if she's not giving him quality minutes.And they don't call him trader bill for nothing.
|
|
J-Spoon
Joined: 31 Jan 2009 Posts: 6796
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 5:17 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I'm sort of in the middle on the Zahui B discussion. Zahui B will get more minutes when Vaughn is gone, she is likely to get in the 15-20 minute range. This might be good for her, more minutes is more opportunity to get in the flow, less back up options means being allowed to play through some mistakes as opposed to being yanked. This is definitely her chance to step up and shine, she will have to for NY to be successful. But I agree that if she doesn't rise to the challenge, we'll see some undersized line ups, and when Vaughn returns Zahui B might find herself glued to the bench for the rest of the season. If she does step up she gives us a very different look than Stokes or Vaughn so it is only going to make NY a better team, fingers crossed.
I also hope we get to see more Raincock-Ekunwe and Burdick. Slide zellous and maybe even R. Allen to the SG spot and let the scrappy players get some minutes at the 3 and 4 when we can afford to go small.
|
|
Bob Lamm
Joined: 11 Apr 2010 Posts: 5065 Location: New York City
Back to top |
Posted: 05/28/17 5:23 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
NYL_WNBA_FAN wrote: |
I'm not writing her off either though I don't anticipate a quick turnaround. But why is it in dispute that she's out of shape when the coach himself has said it twice? It's not like I'm speculating. If I was, then I could understand.
Maybe fatigue is ALSO a factor, but her balance, coordination, timing and jumping also have to be affected by other factors. Fatigue alone wouldn't cause such extreme adjustments in performance and ability.
And since it's been documented, I think it's pretty fair to question and be upset and disappointed. She has the tools to be a force, yet I'm not sure we've really seen the desire to improve her game. If you remember, after her first overseas season Laimbeer remarked that she had done nearly nothing to work on her offensive game in South Korea, though some of that may have been coaching and not her fault. Still, repeated documented instances by the coach of a lack of readiness to be at her best are a disappointment and well within our right to question.
And if we were going to take a step forward without Wright, Swords and Cash providing intangibles and physicality, I think we'd agree Kiah was the number one player we needed to step up. |
I wasn't in any way challenging your right to question on this issue or any other. I simply disagreed with your views.
I posted just yesterday or the day before that I believe Stokes is the crucial player who MUST raise her game to support our Big Three. I completely agree with you about that. Given the current roster, it's hard to see a successful season without Stokes making a major contribution.
_________________ Remember Roe v. Wade. Work for and support legal abortion all over the world and full reproductive rights for everyone.
|
|
tfan
Joined: 31 May 2010 Posts: 9617
Back to top |
|
|
|