View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Admiral_Needa
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 10479 Location: Tiburon, CA
Back to top |
Posted: 04/13/05 5:20 pm ::: Expect McCarville's Name Called Early |
Reply |
|
Here's a look at the top 10 prospects:
Janel McCarville, Minnesota, 6-2, C, Stevens Point, Wis.
The safest pick in this year's class, McCarville will give up a couple of inches to some WNBA centers, but she's not going to be pushed around in the post. A tremendous passer out of the low and high posts, she continues to improve as a low-post scorer and has the range to hit consistently from anywhere inside the arc. Others might have more athletic upside, but she has the all-around skills to be a regular all-star. Early attitude questions at Minnesota are a thing of the past; she's a fiery leader with the same engagingly frank personality as Diana Taurasi.
Sandora Irvin, TCU, 6-3, F, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.All you hear about are the blocks, and they're certainly impressive – Irvin was three-time Conference USA defensive player of the year for a reason. But she's far more than a one-dimensional shot blocker. She has terrific range (24 3-pointers on 38.1 percent shooting as a senior) but steps away from her post responsibilities only when necessary. She's not a floater who tries to play like a guard.
Tan White, Mississippi State, 5-7, G, Tupelo, Miss.
White's upside is she's a women's version of Allen Iverson (on the court). And it speaks to the allure of that upside that teams at the top of the first round are apparently willing to overlook her diminutive size. Then again, she certainly played bigger than 5-foot-7 in averaging seven rebounds per game during her career at Mississippi State, while never averaging less than 18 points per game in a season. Not a point guard (more turnovers than assists this season), but could move over to spell a point guard for a few minutes each game.
Kendra Wecker, Kansas State, 5-11, F, Marysville, Kan.
Might have to play more on the wing than she did in dominating the Big 12, but that could actually work to her advantage. Wecker has excellent range (39.8 percent from behind the arc for her career, including 42.2 percent the last two seasons) and the quickness to stay with WNBA wings. And given her post experience and near-freakish strength, she'll be able to exploit weaker defenders down low. With a couple more inches, she'd be the top pick. As it is, she's still a complete package.
Sancho Lyttle, Houston, 6-4, F/C, St. Vincent, British West Indies
The X-factor of the first round, Lyttle is far from a finished product after a late introduction to organized basketball and just two seasons at the University of Houston. But at 6-4 with good quickness and little awkwardness, she has more than enough polish to be off the board by the middle of the first round. And after averaging 17.6 ppg against the same Conference USA competition as Sandora Irvin, she's not getting by purely on measurables.
Dionnah Jackson, Oklahoma, 5-9, G, St. Louis, Mo.
Like White, slightly undersized for a league increasingly building around big backcourts (see: Diana Taurasi). Nowhere near the kind of pure scorer that White is, but Jackson is both slightly bigger and better prepared to handle point-guard responsibilities, at least in a reserve role initially. Averaged a career-best 5.8 assists per game as a senior at Oklahoma, while cutting her turnovers sharply. All you need to know about her toughness is that at 5-9, she averaged 8.5 rebounds per game last season.
Kara Braxton, Georgia, 6-6, C, Westview, Ore.
Reportedly had a good performance at the WNBA pre-draft camp last weekend, which should ease concerns among GMs after her time away from the game (she last played at Georgia during the 2003-04 season). The 2002 SEC Freshman of the Year never quite lived up to that initial showing in parts of two subsequent turbulent seasons playing for the Lady Bulldogs (due to suspensions, Braxton didn't play more than 21 games in either of her last two seasons in Athens, Ga.). But you can't ignore a 6-6 post with good hands and agility who put up 16 points and seven boards in her first taste of SEC competition. Would be a perfect fit in Connecticut's up-tempo attack, learning from fellow mom Taj McWilliams-Franklin, but Braxton might not last until the No. 8 pick.
Tanisha Wright, Penn State, 5-11, G, West Mifflin, Pa.
Probably the least talked about lock for the first round, just as she was the least talked about star in the Big Ten. Wright earned first-team all-conference honors by doing the little things in Kelly Mazzante's shadow as a junior and then repeated that honor as Penn State's focal point as a senior. The only knocks on Wright are that she lacks 3-point range and her field-goal percentage slipped dramatically when she took over for Mazzante as the primary offensive option. But even if her offense still needs polish, Wright is a perfect all-around threat for a playoff contender looking to add role players in the second half of the first round.
Jacqueline Batteast, Notre Dame, 6-2, F, South Bend, Ind.
Struggled at times to live up to the hype she generated for herself with an outstanding freshman season, but the totality of her résumé, not to mention her ideal size and quickness, are imposing. Batteast simply looks like a basketball player, with her deceptively long reach fueling both steals and blocks in a defensive game that could blossom under the right coach. The biggest question for Batteast, aside from her measurables, is what will her role be in the WNBA? She has 3-point range but shot better than 41 percent from the field in just one college season. And despite good height and leaping ability, she was not a dominant force on the boards as a senior.
Katie Feenstra, Liberty, 6-8, C, Grand Rapids, Mich.
Burst onto the national scene during Liberty's run to the Sweet 16 in this year's NCAA Tournament, but she actually posted better numbers as a junior for the Lady Flames, earning honorable mention AP All-American status in 2004. The positives are obvious – she might enter the WNBA with the best hands and shooting touch of any player 6-6 or taller. She was a dominant shot blocker in the Big South, but her NCAA performance suggests her best defensive trait against more athletic competition will be simply using her size to disrupt offensive rhythm. She's not a project in the same sense as past giants such as Lindsay Taylor, or even Margo Dydek, but might not have the conditioning to be an instant starter.
http://sports.espn.go.com/wnba/news/story?id=2036288
_________________ 2002 WNBA Virtual GM Overall Winner
2006 WNBA Triple Threat Overall Winner
2007 NBA ESPN Fast Break Overall Winner
Last edited by Admiral_Needa on 04/14/05 6:15 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
bluewolfvii
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 5007 Location: The Happening
Back to top |
Posted: 04/13/05 5:28 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Excellent writeup, Admiral. Some will question leaving Temeka Johnson out. Some put her in the Top 5. How close did she come to making your Top 10, and why did you leave her out?
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 66911 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 04/13/05 5:38 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Just a word from a little bird, Dionnah Jackson had a poor combine and her stock has dropped as a result.
_________________ I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
Keegan
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 6861 Location: The Cathedral of Snark
Back to top |
Posted: 04/13/05 6:11 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
pilight wrote: |
Just a word from a little bird, Dionnah Jackson had a poor combine and her stock has dropped as a result. |
Maybe she'll drop all the way to Seattle... so Anne can have the chance to pass her up. |
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 04/13/05 7:02 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Quote: |
Kendra Wecker, Kansas State, 5-11, F, Marysville, Kan.
Might have to play more on the wing than she did in dominating the Big 12, but that could actually work to her advantage. Wecker has excellent range (39.8 percent from behind the arc for her career, including 42.2 percent the last two seasons) and the quickness to stay with WNBA wings. And given her post experience and near-freakish strength, she'll be able to exploit weaker defenders down low. With a couple more inches, she'd be the top pick. As it is, she's still a complete package |
Uh, Admiral, was this your write-up? Or was this copied from somewhere else?
|
|
sportsfan48
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 1228
Back to top |
|
BBallFanCT729
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 2666 Location: UConn Territory
Back to top |
|
sportsfan48
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 1228
Back to top |
|
BBallFanCT729
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 2666 Location: UConn Territory
Back to top |
|
Admiral_Needa
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 10479 Location: Tiburon, CA
Back to top |
|
mb
Joined: 07 Dec 2004 Posts: 144
Back to top |
Posted: 04/14/05 7:04 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Admiral,
Take the "no comment" route if you wish, and feel free to lump me in with the other Mercury fans you often mischaracterize if you wish, yet please answer the simple question:
Is this your analysis, someone elses, or a combination of both?
Either way, it contained good info. If original work, well done. If sharing another's comments, thanks. If adding comments based on those of another, that is okay as well.
Obvisiously, while abhorring(?) your innuendo laced, childish headlines; I can appreciate when you share comments on players (or future players) of the WNBA, whether they are your comments or those of another you are kind enough to share.
Perhaps I am guilty of joining those who harshly try to reign you and VeProf in, yet you both have brought it on yourselves. We are not saying you shouldn't share your comments, or link comments or articles by others. Simply don't offer opinion as fact, and drop the silly innuendo (thanks for having eased up on the headlines, lately...perhaps the mocking worked).
Draft day should be exciting, as should the upcoming season.
Long live the WNBA!
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 66911 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 18815
Back to top |
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 04/14/05 3:06 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Another question of mine Admiral avoided...I would love to see how he claims I was attacking him.
He didn't cite the source. Was he trying to pass the analysis off as his own?
|
|
Slovydal
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 12205 Location: Indianapolis, IN
Back to top |
Posted: 04/14/05 3:24 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Graham Hays is a regular contributor to ESPN.com's women's basketball coverage. He can be reached at graham.hays@espn3.com.
|
|
dtsnms
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 18815
Back to top |
Posted: 04/14/05 3:27 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Slovydal wrote: |
Graham Hays is a regular contributor to ESPN.com's women's basketball coverage. He can be reached at graham.hays@espn3.com. |
Admiral why don't you let him know how much you like his thoughts and writing style?
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
|
Keegan
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 6861 Location: The Cathedral of Snark
Back to top |
Posted: 04/14/05 6:12 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I should have known... dodos don't suddenly start flying. |
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 04/14/05 8:05 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Well, it certainly could have been an honest mistake. But consdering how Admiral saves messages and always reads other people's messages claiming to check for accuracy, it is surprising he would not cite the Graham Hays piece and try to pass off analysis as his own...and not correcting people who initially assumed it was his.
After Keegan's post, Admiral edited it to add the link...
|
|
Sass
Joined: 22 Mar 2005 Posts: 5576 Location: where it's sunny and warm
Back to top |
Posted: 04/14/05 10:27 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
This thread is so much more informative than its title implies.
_________________ _________________
More high school team allegiances than can be believed
_________________
He's the greatest of the greater
get it straight - he's great
- Run-DMC
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 18371 Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
Posted: 04/15/05 7:31 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Sass wrote: |
This thread is so much more informative than its title implies. |
Yes, it is. The blurbs about players are quite interesting. Good job by Graham Hays.
|
|
|
|