RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

SMU - UCLA

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » Men's Sports
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66896
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/19/15 4:57 pm    ::: SMU - UCLA Reply Reply with quote

Ends on the worst goaltending call you're ever likely to see



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 8407
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/19/15 6:05 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Looked like a correct call to me. Following the shot's arc looks like it would have hit the rim. To stop it before it does is goaltending.



_________________
↑↑↓↓←→←→BA
Luuuc
#NATC


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 21926



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/21/15 6:52 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Quote:
Goaltending shall have occurred when a defensive player touches
the ball during a field-goal try and each of the following conditions is met:
a. The ball is in its downward flight; and
b. The entire ball is above the level of the ring and has the possibility,
while in flight, of entering the basket and is not touching the
cylinder.

I would say that it's questionable whether the entire ball was above the ring, but more to the point, it had zero possibility of entering the basket.



_________________
Thanks for calling. I wait all night for calls like these.
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 8407
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/21/15 9:25 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Luuuc wrote:
Quote:
Goaltending shall have occurred when a defensive player touches
the ball during a field-goal try and each of the following conditions is met:
a. The ball is in its downward flight; and
b. The entire ball is above the level of the ring and has the possibility,
while in flight, of entering the basket and is not touching the
cylinder.

I would say that it's questionable whether the entire ball was above the ring, but more to the point, it had zero possibility of entering the basket.

Freeze frames show it clearly above rim.

Since it is impossible for the refs to read spin, that it would have hit rim gives it at least .0001% chance of bouncing up and going in. And by rule that .0001% is all that is needed. Even if it would have required the luckiest bounce ever.



_________________
↑↑↓↓←→←→BA
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66896
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/21/15 9:31 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

justintyme wrote:
Luuuc wrote:
Quote:
Goaltending shall have occurred when a defensive player touches
the ball during a field-goal try and each of the following conditions is met:
a. The ball is in its downward flight; and
b. The entire ball is above the level of the ring and has the possibility,
while in flight, of entering the basket and is not touching the
cylinder.

I would say that it's questionable whether the entire ball was above the ring, but more to the point, it had zero possibility of entering the basket.

Freeze frames show it clearly above rim.

Since it is impossible for the refs to read spin, that it would have hit rim gives it at least .0001% chance of bouncing up and going in. And by rule that .0001% is all that is needed. Even if it would have required the luckiest bounce ever.


There's certainly no way the ref at mid-court, who called it, can make that determination. The refs who were closer and had better angles did not blow their whistles.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
Luuuc
#NATC


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 21926



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/21/15 9:36 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

justintyme wrote:
Luuuc wrote:
Quote:
Goaltending shall have occurred when a defensive player touches
the ball during a field-goal try and each of the following conditions is met:
a. The ball is in its downward flight; and
b. The entire ball is above the level of the ring and has the possibility,
while in flight, of entering the basket and is not touching the
cylinder.

I would say that it's questionable whether the entire ball was above the ring, but more to the point, it had zero possibility of entering the basket.

Freeze frames show it clearly above rim.

Since it is impossible for the refs to read spin, that it would have hit rim gives it at least .0001% chance of bouncing up and going in. And by rule that .0001% is all that is needed. Even if it would have required the luckiest bounce ever.

I agree that a .0001% chance of bouncing up and going in should be enough to qualify, but I strongly disagree that glancing the outside edge of the rim - which is the most that ball was going to do - gives the it anything above 0% chance of going in, regardless of spin, atmospheric conditions, prayer, time-space wormholes, ...
It's one of those instances where it would be nice if common sense could just prevail.



_________________
Thanks for calling. I wait all night for calls like these.
justintyme



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 8407
Location: Northfield, MN


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/21/15 10:04 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
justintyme wrote:
Luuuc wrote:
Quote:
Goaltending shall have occurred when a defensive player touches
the ball during a field-goal try and each of the following conditions is met:
a. The ball is in its downward flight; and
b. The entire ball is above the level of the ring and has the possibility,
while in flight, of entering the basket and is not touching the
cylinder.

I would say that it's questionable whether the entire ball was above the ring, but more to the point, it had zero possibility of entering the basket.

Freeze frames show it clearly above rim.

Since it is impossible for the refs to read spin, that it would have hit rim gives it at least .0001% chance of bouncing up and going in. And by rule that .0001% is all that is needed. Even if it would have required the luckiest bounce ever.


There's certainly no way the ref at mid-court, who called it, can make that determination. The refs who were closer and had better angles did not blow their whistles.

This point I do agree with. Judgement calls should be made by the person in the best position.



_________________
↑↑↓↓←→←→BA
Youth Coach



Joined: 23 Mar 2008
Posts: 4756



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/21/15 4:51 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

And the UCLA run continues as they advanced to the Sweet 16 today.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » Men's Sports All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin