| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66920
Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
 Posted: 02/12/06 3:50 pm ::: Temple vs Richmond |
Reply  |
|
| Spiders pull the upset 56-54!
_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
bballfan2005
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 25315
Location: Somewhere here and there
Back to top |
|
scullyfu
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 8861
Location: Niagara Falls
Back to top |
| Posted: 02/12/06 7:12 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| caught a quick glimpse at a stat that showed (i think) dawn getting no points from her bench, while richmond's bench contributed 26!
_________________
i'll always bleed Storm green.
|
|
bballjunkee212
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 1906
Back to top |
| Posted: 02/13/06 8:21 am ::: |
Reply |
|
Okay, I didn't see the game, but I looked at the box score. Who, if anybody, was guarding Mirna Mazic? And why did Stephanie Hicks and Shenita Landry get 29 minutes of PT when they weren't producing?
And who was guarding my girl Candace Dupree? If she had gotten her average, Temple would have won. Of course, same could be said of Bowens and Maddox. Richmond caught 'em napping, I guess.
_________________
~Bill
|
|
HomerCecil
Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 1209
Back to top |
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66920
Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
| Posted: 02/13/06 9:05 am ::: |
Reply |
|
| Dawn Staley is well loved, if somewhat overrated as a coach.
_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
HomerCecil
Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 1209
Back to top |
| Posted: 02/13/06 9:47 am ::: |
Reply |
|
| And Candice Dupree is a very nice college player, but at 6-2 I don't see how people on the WNBA board are saying she'll do much as a pro. There aren't any 6-2 centers playing in the W.
|
|
PUmatty
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 16359
Location: Chicago
Back to top |
| Posted: 02/13/06 9:50 am ::: |
Reply |
|
| HomerCecil wrote: |
| And Candice Dupree is a very nice college player, but at 6-2 I don't see how people on the WNBA board are saying she'll do much as a pro. There aren't any 6-2 centers playing in the W. |
Nat Williams was a starting center last year, and did very nicely at 6'2. Of course Dupree is no Nat Williams.
|
|
CamrnCrz1974
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18371
Location: Phoenix
Back to top |
| Posted: 02/13/06 9:51 am ::: |
Reply |
|
| PUmatty wrote: |
| HomerCecil wrote: |
| And Candice Dupree is a very nice college player, but at 6-2 I don't see how people on the WNBA board are saying she'll do much as a pro. There aren't any 6-2 centers playing in the W. |
Nat Williams was a starting center last year, and did very nicely at 6'2. Of course Dupree is no Nat Williams. |
Nat's volleyball background and 200+ pound frame helped.
|
|
PUmatty
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 16359
Location: Chicago
Back to top |
| Posted: 02/13/06 9:53 am ::: |
Reply |
|
| CamrnCrz1974 wrote: |
| PUmatty wrote: |
| HomerCecil wrote: |
| And Candice Dupree is a very nice college player, but at 6-2 I don't see how people on the WNBA board are saying she'll do much as a pro. There aren't any 6-2 centers playing in the W. |
Nat Williams was a starting center last year, and did very nicely at 6'2. Of course Dupree is no Nat Williams. |
Nat's volleyball background and 200+ pound frame helped. |
Like I said, Dupree is no Nat Williams, who is one of my all-time faves.
|
|
|
|
and, uh, Stony Brook..