Click_ here to Help Support the Junkie Boards

RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

2012 WNBA Mock Draft
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26, 27  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 10559
Location: Los Angeles


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 12:35 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
GEF34 wrote:
Shades wrote:
Santiago awaiting WNBA Draft

Quote:
Santiago participated in a predraft camp in Denver earlier this month at the Final Four. She says she played well against the other top draft prospects and showed the ability to play on the perimeter by hitting some three pointers and driving to the basket off the dribble. Santiago says she also pleased the scouts with her height. "I did hear that a lot of people were impressed with my size. Because I am listed at 6'1" so I think a lot of people thought, oh she's going to be 5'10". I'm actually about 6'2" said Santiago.


The article that was linked is from 2010. I'd like to read the article you go the quote from is you can find it again, I tried looking through the site and I couldn't find it.


Okay, I fixed it. http://www.ksby.com/news/santiago-awaiting-wnba-draft/


Thanks. I'm interested to see if she has gained enough interest to get drafted or picked up for training camp. I hope she is able to prove herself, I think she has what it takes to make a roster.



_________________
DeLisha Milton-Jones is my favorite player Smile

Win or Lose LA Sparks Fan for life!!!
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 5:11 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Tulsa Shock seeks talent upgrade through WNBA draft

Quote:
There are two schools of thought in regard to draft philosophy: 1, Take the best player available. 2, Try to fill a specific need.

"This year, for me, it's 'let's try to get best player, because we weren't very good,' " Kloppenburg said, adding that he wants to upgrade the talent level.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 5:11 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

DieBitches v2.0

<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/okf1gVyr9CU?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>


Last edited by Shades on 04/15/12 6:30 am; edited 1 time in total
Nerd2



Joined: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 6296



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 6:22 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

bballfan2005 wrote:
Big difference between having done something before (out of necessity) and doing something because you're proficient.

Stricklen is a 2/3.


I'll take Agler's word for it that she can play all four positions.


bballfan2005



Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 25318
Location: Somewhere here and there


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 8:06 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nerd2 wrote:
bballfan2005 wrote:
Big difference between having done something before (out of necessity) and doing something because you're proficient.

Stricklen is a 2/3.


I'll take Agler's word for it that she can play all four positions.


Then you also believe that Monica Wright is a young Katie Smith, because he's said that as well.

Like any WNBA coach, you take what he says with a grain of salt. Just because he's a WNBA coach doesn't mean he's somehow wired against being wrong. He's been wrong quite a few times WRT drafting and personnel decisions. This is the same man who traded away an Olympian less than six months ago.



_________________
Avatar: The King has his ring!

Mathies to LA 2013
scullyfu



Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 7496
Location: buffalo


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 10:28 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
scullyfu wrote:
question: now that the ncaa tourney has ended, can gm's speak directly with eligible players before they put them on their wish list?


Yes. Interviewing potential draftees is common practice.


thanks, pilight.

i'm curious about how this 'job interview' might go. i would suppose the main thing to be approached is the 'you're not going to start and how will you handle that?' conversation; maybe 'how do you feel about playing so far from home?' but what other subjects do you think may be approached?


#Occasionalwnbafan



Joined: 01 Mar 2012
Posts: 142



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 11:12 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Final first round 2012 wnba mock draft from an Occasional fans point of view…

1. Los Angeles – Nnemkadi Ogwumike
2. Seattle –Shekinna Stricklen
3. Minnesota – Shenise Johnson
4. Tulsa – Samantha Prahalis
5. San Antonio – Glory Johnson (thought I think Devereaux Peters 2time Big east DPOY can do a little more)
6. Phoenix – Tiffany Hayes
7. New York – Devereaux Peters
8. Washington – Riquna Williams
9. Connecticut – Damiris Dantas
10. Washington – Lynetta Kizer
11. Indiana – Kayla Standish
12. Minnesota – Sasha Goodlett

I Have Natalie Novosel falling to the dream at number 14, because I think Khadijah Rushdan will be the 13th pick by Los Angeles, shes a big guard that will Rebound and defend.
bballfan2005



Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 25318
Location: Somewhere here and there


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 11:15 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

#Occasionalwnbafan wrote:
I think Khadijah Rushdan will be the 13th pick by Los Angeles, shes a big guard that will Rebound and defend


and will also be available at LA's other second round picks. If Novosel is available at 13, she would be the pick.



_________________
Avatar: The King has his ring!

Mathies to LA 2013
RP



Joined: 17 Jul 2010
Posts: 504



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 11:23 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Best I can do...

Los Angeles--Nneka Ogwumike
Seattle--Shekinna Stricklen
Minnesota--Shenise Johnson
Tulsa Shock--Samantha Prahalis
San Antonio--Glory Johnson
Phoenix--Tiffany Hayes
New York--Devereaux Peters
Washington--Natalie Novosel
Connecticut--Julie Wojta
Washington--Lynetta Kizer
Indiana--Sasha Goodlett
Minnesota--Damiris Dantas


readyAIMfire53
2010 WNBA Prediction Winner


Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 3742
Location: Durham, NC


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 11:37 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

RP wrote:
Best I can do...

Los Angeles--Nneka Ogwumike
Seattle--Shekinna Stricklen
Minnesota--Shenise Johnson
Tulsa Shock--Samantha Prahalis
San Antonio--Glory Johnson
Phoenix--Tiffany Hayes
New York--Devereaux Peters
Washington--Natalie Novosel
Connecticut--Julie Wojta
Washington--Lynetta Kizer
Indiana--Sasha Goodlett
Minnesota--Damiris Dantas


bump



_________________
Follow your passion and your life will be true down to your core.

~rAf
dynasty0207



Joined: 16 Aug 2009
Posts: 2161



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 1:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Do you think Phoenix really will pass on Prahalis?


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 2:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

RP wrote:
Best I can do...

Los Angeles--Nneka Ogwumike
Seattle--Shekinna Stricklen
Minnesota--Shenise Johnson
Tulsa Shock--Samantha Prahalis
San Antonio--Glory Johnson
Phoenix--Tiffany Hayes
New York--Devereaux Peters
Washington--Natalie Novosel
Connecticut--Julie Wojta
Washington--Lynetta Kizer
Indiana--Sasha Goodlett
Minnesota--Damiris Dantas


The best you can do seems pretty good. Looks like a prize winner here.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 2:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nneka Ogwumike: Top 10 Fast Facts About 2012 WNBA Draft's Top Prospect

Quote:
For her career, she was a 58.3 percent shooter and hit 77 percent of her free throws. Those are excellent numbers that should translate well to the pro game as her jump shooting range continues to increase.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 2:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Johnson, Williams ready for WNBA Draft

Quote:
Johnson, who has been trying to contact Williams, is looking forward to "put some things behind us" when she sees her college teammate. But the feeling isn't mutual.

"We don't have much to say," said Williams, who wouldn't discuss the reason she received the suspension. She's currently preparing for the draft in her hometown of Pahokee. "I'm just staying positive about everything from here on out."



Quote:
When asked what she would say to a WNBA coach or general manager that asked her about the suspension, Williams replied, "Nothing." Instead, she will just point to her illustrious career at Miami, where she led the Atlantic Coast Conference in scoring as a junior with 21.7 points per game.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 2:36 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Stanford's Ogwumike expected No. 1 in WNBA Draft

Quote:
"Assuming that that happens and I end up in L.A., I think I'm looking forward to playing with a lot of experienced posts," said the 6-foot-2 Ogwumike, who averaged 22.5 points and 10.2 rebounds this season. "I can still elevate my game at this point, but I think it will be good to see what I can learn from people."
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 2:40 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Natalie Novosel Q&A

Quote:
What do you expect to be some of the biggest challenges or adjustments at the next level?
I think one of the biggest challenges is transitioning from the team concept at the collegiate level to the WNBA being a business—people are not necessarily going to wait for you to get something right, you must help yourself, so you must take your chances and make the best use of them when you have them!
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 2:43 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nneka Ogwumike Q&A

Quote:
What specific skills do you need to work on in order to succeed at this level?
Continue to shoot and being a perimeter threat.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 2:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Vicki Baugh Q&A

Quote:
Are there any current WNBA players that you model your game after?
Candace Parker and Nicky Anosike.

What WNBA players are you most looking forward to playing against or meeting?
Candace Parker and Nicky Anosike.
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 10077



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 3:02 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
Johnson, Williams ready for WNBA Draft

Quote:
Johnson, who has been trying to contact Williams, is looking forward to "put some things behind us" when she sees her college teammate. But the feeling isn't mutual.

"We don't have much to say," said Williams, who wouldn't discuss the reason she received the suspension. She's currently preparing for the draft in her hometown of Pahokee. "I'm just staying positive about everything from here on out."



Quote:
When asked what she would say to a WNBA coach or general manager that asked her about the suspension, Williams replied, "Nothing." Instead, she will just point to her illustrious career at Miami, where she led the Atlantic Coast Conference in scoring as a junior with 21.7 points per game.


well, this does give one pause... The fact that the team voted to leave her behind also says a lot about the incident. It will be interesting to see the interaction, or lack thereof, tomorrow. Kind of sad, really, to spend that much time working for a common goal and have it end so badly.


bballfan2005



Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 25318
Location: Somewhere here and there


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 3:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Illustrious career? So is she clueless in addition to being a team cancer? Shocked

She scored a bunch of points by taking a bunch of shots. She is the typical Miami chucker. Nothing "illustrious" about her career. She just happened to come along after the ACC lost a ton of very good to great players.

IOW, she's lucky that she was born in 1990 and not four or five years earlier.



_________________
Avatar: The King has his ring!

Mathies to LA 2013
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 1509



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 3:32 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
RP wrote:
Best I can do...

Los Angeles--Nneka Ogwumike
Seattle--Shekinna Stricklen
Minnesota--Shenise Johnson
Tulsa Shock--Samantha Prahalis
San Antonio--Glory Johnson
Phoenix--Tiffany Hayes
New York--Devereaux Peters
Washington--Natalie Novosel
Connecticut--Julie Wojta
Washington--Lynetta Kizer
Indiana--Sasha Goodlett
Minnesota--Damiris Dantas


The best you can do seems pretty good. Looks like a prize winner here.


I agree this is one of the best mock drafts I've seen. I'm going to do one more later and it won't make half as much sense as this one. Good job!


Str8_Butta



Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 6868



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 3:36 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I don't know why Hurt and Natalie Novosel keep being named as possible Liberty selections, I hope we don't pick neither one of them... (no offense)



_________________
WNBA fan since 1997
Admiral_Needa



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 7428
Location: Tiburon, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 3:53 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

RP wrote:
Best I can do...

Los Angeles--Nneka Ogwumike
Seattle--Shekinna Stricklen
Minnesota--Shenise Johnson
Tulsa Shock--Samantha Prahalis
San Antonio--Glory Johnson
Phoenix--Tiffany Hayes
New York--Devereaux Peters
Washington--Natalie Novosel
Connecticut--Julie Wojta
Washington--Lynetta Kizer
Indiana--Sasha Goodlett
Minnesota--Damiris Dantas



Stricklen's now movin' on up!

If I were MIN, I'd take Prahalis, not because they need her, but because she appears to be more valuable in a trade. WAS, NY, TUL, and their favorite trading partner PHO, all could be willing to make a trade for a PG. Can't say the same thing about a 2-3, who could be a great surprise, but she won't get the playing time in MIN to prove that and raise her trade stock.



_________________
2002 WNBA Virtual GM Overall Winner
2006 WNBA Triple Threat Overall Winner
2007 NBA ESPN Fast Break Overall Winner
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 1509



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 4:29 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

last attempt at a mock draft, this draft might not be exciting player-wise but its been the toughest to mock in years. And yes I'm aware some of my choices might be whack. Second round just for fun since its pretty much just guess work. Reading all the articles and what coach/GMs have said has left me more confused.

LA-Ogwumike
Seattle-S. Johnson
Minn.- G. Johnson
Tulsa- S. Stricklen
SA- D. Peters
PX- S. Prahalis
NY- L. Barrett
Was.- T. Hayes
Conn.- S. Goodlett
Was.- C. Hurt
Ind.- L. Kizer
Minn.- J. Wojta

2nd round

LA- N. Novosel
Atl.- R. Williams
LA- K. Rushdan
LA- K. Hampton
Tulsa- T. White
Minn.- D. Dantas
Minn.- K. Standish
Minn.- B. Rayburn
Conn.- C. Shegog
Seattle- S. Carter
Chi.- T. James
PX- C. Ricketts


MNfan22



Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 2393



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 4:47 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Admiral_Needa wrote:

Stricklen's now movin' on up!

If I were MIN, I'd take Prahalis, not because they need her, but because she appears to be more valuable in a trade. WAS, NY, TUL, and their favorite trading partner PHO, all could be willing to make a trade for a PG. Can't say the same thing about a 2-3, who could be a great surprise, but she won't get the playing time in MIN to prove that and raise her trade stock.

Trade value is subjective (like about everything else about this draft).Laughing Besides what exactly do WAS, NY,TUL or PHO have to offer Minnesota? Can't see any of them giving up their '13 first round pick for Prahalis. So where's the value? Why waste time if people have nothing of value to offer.
Whoever wants Sammy, can just draft her.
At this point why should the Lynx worry about upping the 'trade stock' of a player they have plans for Idea



_________________
Minnesota Lynx - 15 yrs - est. 1999- 2011 WNBA Champs!
Admiral_Needa



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 7428
Location: Tiburon, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 4:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
Second round just for fun since its pretty much just guess work. Reading all the articles and what coach/GMs have said has left me more confused.



Well if I was a GM being interviewed for an article, I would definitely try to make statements that would confuse other GMs.. The fact that the fans would get confused as well would just be collateral damage Razz




_________________
2002 WNBA Virtual GM Overall Winner
2006 WNBA Triple Threat Overall Winner
2007 NBA ESPN Fast Break Overall Winner
Admiral_Needa



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 7428
Location: Tiburon, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 5:17 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

MNfan22 wrote:
Admiral_Needa wrote:

Stricklen's now movin' on up!

If I were MIN, I'd take Prahalis, not because they need her, but because she appears to be more valuable in a trade. WAS, NY, TUL, and their favorite trading partner PHO, all could be willing to make a trade for a PG. Can't say the same thing about a 2-3, who could be a great surprise, but she won't get the playing time in MIN to prove that and raise her trade stock.

Trade value is subjective (like about everything else about this draft).Laughing Besides what exactly do WAS, NY,TUL or PHO have to offer Minnesota? Can't see any of them giving up their '13 first round pick for Prahalis. So where's the value? Why waste time if people have nothing of value to offer.
Whoever wants Sammy, can just draft her.
At this point why should the Lynx worry about upping the 'trade stock' of a player they have plans for Idea




Well, one of the points I was making was that MIN doesn't really have the ability to raise the trade stock of any of their draft picks because their team is so overloaded.

Therefore, the trade value that their pick has coming in is where the trade value will remain. So if Prahalis' is already considered the best PG in the draft, and good PGs are rare, and several teams are in need of an upgrade at PG, then I would say Prahalis has more trade value than the other 2-3s. Idea

The other point I was making was that MIN doesn't really need anything. They're good to go for another Championship, as I'm picking them to repeat. (They probably could use a backup post for some 'Taj Insurance', but burn a #3 pick for that?) Therefore, it makes sense to try to defer their draft picks to later years.

Basically, I say do the same thing with their draft picks as they did with Hornbuckle and Houston. They won't get equal value in return, but it's better than losing them for nothing in free agency or in an expansion draft. Idea



_________________
2002 WNBA Virtual GM Overall Winner
2006 WNBA Triple Threat Overall Winner
2007 NBA ESPN Fast Break Overall Winner
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 6:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

WNBA draft: Mystics have 8th and 10th picks

Quote:
After acquiring several interior players and more experienced bench options this offseason to complement forward Crystal Langhorne, Washington native Monique Currie and guard Matee Ajavon, Lacey would like to add a three-point shooter if possible.

“If we can fill a need, we will,” she said. “If we can’t, we’ll take the best player available.”
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 7:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

For Sun, Like Most WNBA Teams, Drafted Players Far From A Sure Thing

Quote:
"The problem is there is no room in the league to develop players. As far as I'm concerned, there is no point in even having a third round in the draft, unless we go back to a 12- or 13-man roster."
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 40589
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 7:18 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

The more I look at this draft the worse it gets. There aren't even decent sleepers. I kinda like Shey Peddy (Temple) and Antonia Bennett (Florida A&M), but even they seem meh.



_________________
Waking up in Canada has never been easy
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 10077



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 7:32 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
WNBA draft: Mystics have 8th and 10th picks

Quote:
After acquiring several interior players and more experienced bench options this offseason to complement forward Crystal Langhorne, Washington native Monique Currie and guard Matee Ajavon, Lacey would like to add a three-point shooter if possible.

“If we can fill a need, we will,” she said. “If we can’t, we’ll take the best player available.”


Sounds like BayBay may find a home. Or if they want a 3 pt shooting post - Christina Flores.


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 9:01 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
The more I look at this draft the worse it gets. There aren't even decent sleepers.


I think Lin Dunn called Shenise Johnson a sleeper. She probably has a different definition of sleeper than most people.
MNfan22



Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 2393



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 10:39 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Admiral_Needa wrote:
Well, one of the points I was making was that MIN doesn't really have the ability to raise the trade stock of any of their draft picks because their team is so overloaded.

And my point was, we have no reason to be worried about trade stock. We’re overloaded w/talent and in position to add more. If you want someone I have or can draft, step up before 1pm ct tomorrow & make an offer. If you no one does, we move on to stockpiling more talent. Very Happy

Admiral_Needa wrote:
Therefore, the trade value that their pick has coming in is where the trade value will remain. So if Prahalis' is already considered the best PG in the draft, and good PGs are rare, and several teams are in need of an upgrade at PG, then I would say Prahalis has more trade value than the other 2-3s. Idea

You might think she does. I don’t and it would appear most teams don’t either. But we’ll see on draft day. Prahalis only has more value then other 2-3s relative to what someone wants to offer.

Admiral_Needa wrote:
The other point I was making was that MIN doesn't really need anything. They're good to go for another Championship, as I'm picking them to repeat. (They probably could use a backup post for some 'Taj Insurance', but burn a #3 pick for that?) Therefore, it makes sense to try to defer their draft picks to later years.

It could make sense. But only if we have willing partners. If not, we move on & continue to stockpile.

Admiral_Needa wrote:
Basically, I say do the same thing with their draft picks as they did with Hornbuckle and Houston. They won't get equal value in return, but it's better than losing them for nothing in free agency or in an expansion draft. Idea

Likely not w/the #3 pick but with the rest of our picks, sure if you can find other teams willing.
You’re talking about two 4 yr vets who were don’t carry all that much value nor were in high demand. Houston was a swap of 2012 2nd rnd picks & Hornbuckle got us the Merc 2013 2nd rnd pick. If I'm going to have to "settle" for "something", then w/the #3 pick, I'll take a player that is most valuable to me now. Value of the #3 in 2012 has > value then offer of some 2nd rounder in ’13 or ’14.
As for free agency, most of our roster is still on rookie contracts or RFA in status. Our Big 3 UN-RFAs will likely be together for at least 3 more yrs or as long as they want to be here. As for potential expansion, can’t do anything about that.

Anyway Happy Draft Day everyone Exclamation



_________________
Minnesota Lynx - 15 yrs - est. 1999- 2011 WNBA Champs!
mb1



Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 3532
Location: Scottsdale,AZ,USA


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 10:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Some 2012 WNBA Mock Drfat Links:

http://www.wnba.com/draft/2012/wnba_mock_draft.html

http://www.slamonline.com/online/other-ballers/womens/2012/04/slam-wnba-mock-draft/

http://www.swishappeal.com/2012/4/13/2947019/2012-wnba-mock-draft-2

http://www.wnba.com/lynx/draft_central_2012.html

http://wnbamockdraft.blogspot.com/

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1142546-2012-wnba-mock-draft-nnemkadi-ogwumike-and-early-picks-sure-to-become-stars

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1142546-2012-wnba-mock-draft-nnemkadi-ogwumike-and-early-picks-sure-to-become-stars

http://www.collegesportsmadness.com/article/3803

http://www.collegesportsmadness.com/article/3794

http://www.wnba.com/fever/news/2012_mock_draft_dunn.html



http://www.draftsite.com/wnba/mock-draft/2012/



_________________
I've got a crush on Rebby!

LONG LIVE THE WNBA!
Nerd2



Joined: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 6296



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/12 10:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

bballfan2005 wrote:
Nerd2 wrote:
bballfan2005 wrote:
Big difference between having done something before (out of necessity) and doing something because you're proficient.

Stricklen is a 2/3.


I'll take Agler's word for it that she can play all four positions.


Then you also believe that Monica Wright is a young Katie Smith, because he's said that as well.

Like any WNBA coach, you take what he says with a grain of salt. Just because he's a WNBA coach doesn't mean he's somehow wired against being wrong. He's been wrong quite a few times WRT drafting and personnel decisions. This is the same man who traded away an Olympian less than six months ago.


He's said she's a natural 3, you say she's a natural 3. The difference is that he believes that if called upon she is capable of logging time in different positions - which she is because she already has.


ucdt3



Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 4226



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 12:20 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

2012 WNBA Mock Draft (Final)
1. Ogwumike
2. Stricklen
3. G. Johnson
4. S. Johnson

The Rest
http://wnbamockdraft.blogspot.com/2012/04/2012-wnba-mock-draft-final.html
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 5:02 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ucdt3 wrote:
2012 WNBA Mock Draft (Final)
1. Ogwumike
2. Stricklen
3. G. Johnson
4. S. Johnson

The Rest
http://wnbamockdraft.blogspot.com/2012/04/2012-wnba-mock-draft-final.html


G Johnson over S Johnson? That would be like dropping the ball.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 5:02 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ucdt3 wrote:
2012 WNBA Mock Draft (Final)
1. Ogwumike
2. Stricklen
3. G. Johnson
4. S. Johnson

The Rest
http://wnbamockdraft.blogspot.com/2012/04/2012-wnba-mock-draft-final.html


G Johnson over S Johnson? That would be like dropping the ball.
Red Wing



Joined: 06 Oct 2011
Posts: 76
Location: Minnesota


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 6:46 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Trades really mess up even a good mock. Anyone have a feel for any trades that might happen today?


Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 7:13 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Red Wing wrote:
Trades really mess up even a good mock. Anyone have a feel for any trades that might happen today?


If the Lynx are keeping the player at the #3 pick, I believe they'll attempt to trade the #12 pick in the same way they traded the #13 pick last year.

Last year the Lynx drafted Jessica Breland and traded her to the Liberty for Angel Robinson and a 2012 pick. I'm gonna take a guess that this year's Angel Robinson will be Kiara Buford.
JohnyK



Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 3361
Location: EU


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 7:22 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

If anyone wants Nika Baric they would have to go through Chicago Sky, ugh, no, wait, Pokey Chatman, umm, oh right, Sparta&K is be the correct synonym.

http://www.fiba.com/pages/eng/fc/news/lateNews/p/newsid/51197/arti.html

Quote:
during the duration of my multi-year commitment with Sparta&K, I have agreed that I can’t play for any WNBA team without their permission.



_________________
http://lovewomensbasketball.com/ - International women's basketball coverage
bballfan2005



Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 25318
Location: Somewhere here and there


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 7:26 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

She's got potential, but they can keep her. 2012 is a crap year for PGs, but 2013 and 2014 should be good.



_________________
Avatar: The King has his ring!

Mathies to LA 2013
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 8:36 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

WNBA: Shock expects to get a good player with fourth pick

Quote:
Kloppenburg put together a mock draft in an attempt to divine who will be available at No. 4. But, he said, "it changes when you get into the draft. Somebody does something funny and it changes everything."



Quote:
"The player there could help us and play a lot," he said.


Go Sammy!


Quote:
"Who it's going to be, I don't know. There are a group of about five or six that we really like in that group."


It should be 2-3. Confused


Quote:
Asked about needs, Kloppenburg said, "We felt like we weren't just a real good outside shooting team, so that's an area we are really looking to try to improve is our 3-point shooting and just shooting in general, our field goal percentage."

The Shock ranked last in the league in field goal percentage (.396) and next-to-last in 3-point percentage (.284) last season. Kloppenburg said he wants to look at players who can shoot the ball better, and he wants to implement a system that will put players in position to get good shots.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 8:57 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

John Klein: This draft won't be a game-changer for Shock

Quote:
"Next year could really be something," said Tulsa coach Gary Kloppenburg.

"I don't think you are going to see people giving up picks for next year to get picks in this draft," Kloppenburg said.


Quote:
"I think the advantage is that she (Cambage) will come here in good shape because she'll come to us straight from the Olympics," Kloppenburg said. "She'll come here ready to go."


Quote:
"I think after those first two picks get taken, and the dominoes start to fall, we'll know more," Kloppenburg said. "I really believe there are some very good players out there all the way down to the second round.

"I think this draft is pretty deep."
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 9:16 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

2012 WNBA Draft Prospect: The Curious Case Of Riquna Williams

Quote:
Regardless of the situation that got Williams suspended for the tournament, her behavior in handling the aftermath of the situation makes me think she might not be the best teammate, the most coachable player or the greatest locker room presence wherever she lands next. She has completely cut off her association with Miami other than attending online classes from home? She won't talk to her coach? Or her teammates? Or tell us what really happened to cause this huge rift in the first place?
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 40589
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 9:35 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I was not that high on Riquna Williams before the suspension. I prefer shooting guards who are good at shooting. Copping an attitude should push her out of the first round.



_________________
Waking up in Canada has never been easy
bballfan2005



Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 25318
Location: Somewhere here and there


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 9:38 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
I was not that high on Riquna Williams before the suspension. I prefer shooting guards who are good at shooting. Copping an attitude should push her out of the first round.


That means she'll be a Spark. -_-

Would rather have Hayes or Novosel.



_________________
Avatar: The King has his ring!

Mathies to LA 2013
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 19901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 9:39 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8MeS9YNrmEk?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="480" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>

<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7DVmS0IgMo4?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="480" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>

<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LGx4WdNLUiI?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="480" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>
Randy



Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 766



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 9:42 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

What is sort of amazing about the Riquna Williams story is that in this age of nothing being a secret - the actual event has been kept of secret. May be the first time this has happened since the invention of the internet. Laughing


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 40589
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/12 9:44 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

bballfan2005 wrote:
pilight wrote:
I was not that high on Riquna Williams before the suspension. I prefer shooting guards who are good at shooting. Copping an attitude should push her out of the first round.


That means she'll be a Spark. -_-

Would rather have Hayes or Novosel.


Hayes has always been the better prospect. The suspension pushes Novosel ahead of her, IMO.



_________________
Waking up in Canada has never been easy
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26, 27  Next
Page 25 of 27

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin